The United States Oil Fund as a hedging instrument

This study examines the relation between spot and futures prices in the crude oil market since the inception of the commodity exchange-traded fund (ETF), the United States Oil Fund (USOF), in an attempt to identify the usefulness of the USOF as a hedging vehicle. We also investigate whether market q...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of asset management 2008-12, Vol.9 (5), p.333-346
Hauptverfasser: Murdock, Marina, Richie, Nivine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 346
container_issue 5
container_start_page 333
container_title Journal of asset management
container_volume 9
creator Murdock, Marina
Richie, Nivine
description This study examines the relation between spot and futures prices in the crude oil market since the inception of the commodity exchange-traded fund (ETF), the United States Oil Fund (USOF), in an attempt to identify the usefulness of the USOF as a hedging vehicle. We also investigate whether market quality in the underlying oil futures improved following the introduction of the USOF. The results show that investors who rely on the USOF returns to hedge their exposure to crude oil markets face basis risk because USOF prices deviate from crude oil futures, particularly during periods of contango. Although the USOF prices are more highly correlated with the nearby West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil futures contract than they are with WTI spot prices, the futures-USOF basis is significantly greater and more volatile than the futures-spot basis over our sample period. We find that during contango, the period before July 2007, the correlation of the USOF with oil futures is lower than the correlation of spot oil prices with futures, and the futures-USOF basis is more volatile than the futures-spot basis. Multivariate analysis suggests that the change in the futures-USOF basis is greater during periods of contango, indicating that the ‘roll’ return plays an important role in the effectiveness of oil ETFs as hedges for oil prices. Our tests of market quality show that effective bid–ask spreads improve and volatility drops for oil futures following the introduction of the USOF, suggesting that the added participation of investors via oil ETFs is associated with improved liquidity in the oil futures markets.
doi_str_mv 10.1057/jam.2008.32
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_194481432</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1613315161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-a759a3673402005da017577d0de0b5524f62371045b598fda28fbd9ab62e817f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0E1PAjEQBuDGaCKiJ3-AjVddnH7R7dEQUBMSDkLirenSLiyBgm334L-3sMZ48DRzePLO5EXolsCAgJBPG7MbUIBywOgZ6hEuVUGk-jg_7VCUVNJLdBXjBoASJaCH6Hzt8MI3yVn8nkxyEc-aLZ603mITscFrZ1eNX-HGxxTanfPpGl3UZhvdzc_so8VkPB-9FtPZy9voeVosGWGpMFIow4aSccgvCWuASCGlBeugEoLyekiZJMBFJVRZW0PLurLKVEPqSiJr1kf3Xe4h7D9bF5Pe7Nvg80lNFOcl4Yxm9NChZdjHGFytD6HZmfClCehjJzp3oo-d6JN-7HTMyq9c-BP5L7_ruDepDe43OpsjyeIbCzJrPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194481432</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The United States Oil Fund as a hedging instrument</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Murdock, Marina ; Richie, Nivine</creator><creatorcontrib>Murdock, Marina ; Richie, Nivine</creatorcontrib><description>This study examines the relation between spot and futures prices in the crude oil market since the inception of the commodity exchange-traded fund (ETF), the United States Oil Fund (USOF), in an attempt to identify the usefulness of the USOF as a hedging vehicle. We also investigate whether market quality in the underlying oil futures improved following the introduction of the USOF. The results show that investors who rely on the USOF returns to hedge their exposure to crude oil markets face basis risk because USOF prices deviate from crude oil futures, particularly during periods of contango. Although the USOF prices are more highly correlated with the nearby West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil futures contract than they are with WTI spot prices, the futures-USOF basis is significantly greater and more volatile than the futures-spot basis over our sample period. We find that during contango, the period before July 2007, the correlation of the USOF with oil futures is lower than the correlation of spot oil prices with futures, and the futures-USOF basis is more volatile than the futures-spot basis. Multivariate analysis suggests that the change in the futures-USOF basis is greater during periods of contango, indicating that the ‘roll’ return plays an important role in the effectiveness of oil ETFs as hedges for oil prices. Our tests of market quality show that effective bid–ask spreads improve and volatility drops for oil futures following the introduction of the USOF, suggesting that the added participation of investors via oil ETFs is associated with improved liquidity in the oil futures markets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-8272</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1479-179X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1057/jam.2008.32</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Palgrave Macmillan UK</publisher><subject>Commodities ; Consumption ; Crude oil ; Crude oil prices ; Economics and Finance ; Exchange traded funds ; Finance ; Financial Services ; Futures market ; Futures trading ; Hedging ; Institutional investments ; Investment advisors ; Investors ; Liquidity ; Multivariate analysis ; Risk Management ; Stock exchanges ; Studies ; Volatility</subject><ispartof>Journal of asset management, 2008-12, Vol.9 (5), p.333-346</ispartof><rights>Palgrave Macmillan 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-a759a3673402005da017577d0de0b5524f62371045b598fda28fbd9ab62e817f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-a759a3673402005da017577d0de0b5524f62371045b598fda28fbd9ab62e817f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/jam.2008.32$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1057/jam.2008.32$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murdock, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richie, Nivine</creatorcontrib><title>The United States Oil Fund as a hedging instrument</title><title>Journal of asset management</title><addtitle>J Asset Manag</addtitle><description>This study examines the relation between spot and futures prices in the crude oil market since the inception of the commodity exchange-traded fund (ETF), the United States Oil Fund (USOF), in an attempt to identify the usefulness of the USOF as a hedging vehicle. We also investigate whether market quality in the underlying oil futures improved following the introduction of the USOF. The results show that investors who rely on the USOF returns to hedge their exposure to crude oil markets face basis risk because USOF prices deviate from crude oil futures, particularly during periods of contango. Although the USOF prices are more highly correlated with the nearby West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil futures contract than they are with WTI spot prices, the futures-USOF basis is significantly greater and more volatile than the futures-spot basis over our sample period. We find that during contango, the period before July 2007, the correlation of the USOF with oil futures is lower than the correlation of spot oil prices with futures, and the futures-USOF basis is more volatile than the futures-spot basis. Multivariate analysis suggests that the change in the futures-USOF basis is greater during periods of contango, indicating that the ‘roll’ return plays an important role in the effectiveness of oil ETFs as hedges for oil prices. Our tests of market quality show that effective bid–ask spreads improve and volatility drops for oil futures following the introduction of the USOF, suggesting that the added participation of investors via oil ETFs is associated with improved liquidity in the oil futures markets.</description><subject>Commodities</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Crude oil</subject><subject>Crude oil prices</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Exchange traded funds</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Financial Services</subject><subject>Futures market</subject><subject>Futures trading</subject><subject>Hedging</subject><subject>Institutional investments</subject><subject>Investment advisors</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Liquidity</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Risk Management</subject><subject>Stock exchanges</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Volatility</subject><issn>1470-8272</issn><issn>1479-179X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0E1PAjEQBuDGaCKiJ3-AjVddnH7R7dEQUBMSDkLirenSLiyBgm334L-3sMZ48DRzePLO5EXolsCAgJBPG7MbUIBywOgZ6hEuVUGk-jg_7VCUVNJLdBXjBoASJaCH6Hzt8MI3yVn8nkxyEc-aLZ603mITscFrZ1eNX-HGxxTanfPpGl3UZhvdzc_so8VkPB-9FtPZy9voeVosGWGpMFIow4aSccgvCWuASCGlBeugEoLyekiZJMBFJVRZW0PLurLKVEPqSiJr1kf3Xe4h7D9bF5Pe7Nvg80lNFOcl4Yxm9NChZdjHGFytD6HZmfClCehjJzp3oo-d6JN-7HTMyq9c-BP5L7_ruDepDe43OpsjyeIbCzJrPg</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>Murdock, Marina</creator><creator>Richie, Nivine</creator><general>Palgrave Macmillan UK</general><general>Palgrave Macmillan</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>The United States Oil Fund as a hedging instrument</title><author>Murdock, Marina ; Richie, Nivine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-a759a3673402005da017577d0de0b5524f62371045b598fda28fbd9ab62e817f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Commodities</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Crude oil</topic><topic>Crude oil prices</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Exchange traded funds</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Financial Services</topic><topic>Futures market</topic><topic>Futures trading</topic><topic>Hedging</topic><topic>Institutional investments</topic><topic>Investment advisors</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Liquidity</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Risk Management</topic><topic>Stock exchanges</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Volatility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murdock, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richie, Nivine</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of asset management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murdock, Marina</au><au>Richie, Nivine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The United States Oil Fund as a hedging instrument</atitle><jtitle>Journal of asset management</jtitle><stitle>J Asset Manag</stitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>333</spage><epage>346</epage><pages>333-346</pages><issn>1470-8272</issn><eissn>1479-179X</eissn><abstract>This study examines the relation between spot and futures prices in the crude oil market since the inception of the commodity exchange-traded fund (ETF), the United States Oil Fund (USOF), in an attempt to identify the usefulness of the USOF as a hedging vehicle. We also investigate whether market quality in the underlying oil futures improved following the introduction of the USOF. The results show that investors who rely on the USOF returns to hedge their exposure to crude oil markets face basis risk because USOF prices deviate from crude oil futures, particularly during periods of contango. Although the USOF prices are more highly correlated with the nearby West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil futures contract than they are with WTI spot prices, the futures-USOF basis is significantly greater and more volatile than the futures-spot basis over our sample period. We find that during contango, the period before July 2007, the correlation of the USOF with oil futures is lower than the correlation of spot oil prices with futures, and the futures-USOF basis is more volatile than the futures-spot basis. Multivariate analysis suggests that the change in the futures-USOF basis is greater during periods of contango, indicating that the ‘roll’ return plays an important role in the effectiveness of oil ETFs as hedges for oil prices. Our tests of market quality show that effective bid–ask spreads improve and volatility drops for oil futures following the introduction of the USOF, suggesting that the added participation of investors via oil ETFs is associated with improved liquidity in the oil futures markets.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Palgrave Macmillan UK</pub><doi>10.1057/jam.2008.32</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1470-8272
ispartof Journal of asset management, 2008-12, Vol.9 (5), p.333-346
issn 1470-8272
1479-179X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_194481432
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Commodities
Consumption
Crude oil
Crude oil prices
Economics and Finance
Exchange traded funds
Finance
Financial Services
Futures market
Futures trading
Hedging
Institutional investments
Investment advisors
Investors
Liquidity
Multivariate analysis
Risk Management
Stock exchanges
Studies
Volatility
title The United States Oil Fund as a hedging instrument
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T21%3A03%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20United%20States%20Oil%20Fund%20as%20a%20hedging%20instrument&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20asset%20management&rft.au=Murdock,%20Marina&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=333&rft.epage=346&rft.pages=333-346&rft.issn=1470-8272&rft.eissn=1479-179X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1057/jam.2008.32&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1613315161%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194481432&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true