Chronic consequences of high-stakes testing? Lessons from the Chinese civil service exam
In their article on China's imperial examination system the authors - two educational psychologists - show the relevance of this history to current debates about university entrance and secondary school leaving exams. Based on painstaking archival research they present instructive details and r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Comparative education review 2006-02, Vol.50 (1), p.46-65 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 65 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 46 |
container_title | Comparative education review |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Suen, Hoi K Yu, Lan |
description | In their article on China's imperial examination system the authors - two educational psychologists - show the relevance of this history to current debates about university entrance and secondary school leaving exams. Based on painstaking archival research they present instructive details and reveal unintended consequences of testing over a very long period. The authors argue that memorizing model essays, focusing on test-taking skills, and cheating are likely to be pervasive consequences of any high-stakes testing regime. Exam-induced psychological and behavioural problems are likely to result from such a regime. As the system with the longest and best-preserved records, the Keju system exhibited these same problems throughout its history. The fact that these problems persisted in the Keju system, despite repeated attempts to remove them, suggests that threats to the consequential basis of validity are stubbornly chronic in nature. When measures are taken to remove them, they mutate to new forms. (DIPF/Orig./Ba.). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/498328 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_194459619</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ751491</ericid><jstor_id>10.1086/498328</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/498328</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-73c42ae25f11083c6a09e6ce5188aa178535f1fa33317471237cbcbd47bf1c2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1LAzEQhoMoWL9-gHgIgt5WM5uk2ZxEip8UvCh4W9J01k1td2tmLfrvjWxpT8PwPMy8vIydgLgCUQyvlS1kXuywAWilMyPgfZcNhACRqYT32QHRTKTd5mbA3kd1bJvguW8bwq9vbDwSbyteh486o859prVD6kLzccPHSJQ8XsV2wbsa-agODRJyH1ZhzgnjKnjk-OMWR2yvcnPC4_U8ZG_3d6-jx2z88vA0uh1nXiroMiO9yh3muoIUXvqhExaHHjUUhXNgCi0TqpyUEowykEvjJ34yVWZSgc-dPGTn_d1lbFN86spZ-x2b9LIEq5S2Q7BJuuwlH1uiiFW5jGHh4m8JovwvrexLS-LF-poj7-ZVdI0PtLWNVlYXKnlnvYcx-A2-ezYalIUtnlHXxg2XWuUg84RPezwNy20Uo5QVSv4BfbOFqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194459619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chronic consequences of high-stakes testing? Lessons from the Chinese civil service exam</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source (EBSCOhost)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Suen, Hoi K ; Yu, Lan</creator><creatorcontrib>Suen, Hoi K ; Yu, Lan</creatorcontrib><description>In their article on China's imperial examination system the authors - two educational psychologists - show the relevance of this history to current debates about university entrance and secondary school leaving exams. Based on painstaking archival research they present instructive details and reveal unintended consequences of testing over a very long period. The authors argue that memorizing model essays, focusing on test-taking skills, and cheating are likely to be pervasive consequences of any high-stakes testing regime. Exam-induced psychological and behavioural problems are likely to result from such a regime. As the system with the longest and best-preserved records, the Keju system exhibited these same problems throughout its history. The fact that these problems persisted in the Keju system, despite repeated attempts to remove them, suggests that threats to the consequential basis of validity are stubbornly chronic in nature. When measures are taken to remove them, they mutate to new forms. (DIPF/Orig./Ba.).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-4086</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-701X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/498328</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CEDRDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Achievement tests ; Asia ; Cheating ; China ; College entrance examinations ; Couplets ; Cultural history ; Education ; Educational Assessment ; Educational evaluation ; Educational Policy ; Educational psychology ; Educational Research ; Educational sciences ; Educational Testing ; Fertigkeit ; High Stakes Tests ; History instruction ; Memorization ; Poetry ; Policy, reform, legislation ; Prüfung ; Prüfungsangst ; Prüfungsarbeit ; Prüfungsausschuss ; Prüfungsordnung ; Prüfungsrecht ; Psychology ; Psychopathologie ; Psychopathology ; Qing Dynasty ; Rater Effects ; Research Design ; Selbstmord ; Social impact ; Test validity ; Testdurchführung ; Testing ; Testmethodik ; Testpsychologie ; Tradition ; Validity ; Vergleichende Erziehungswissenschaft ; Writing tests ; Öffentlicher Dienst</subject><ispartof>Comparative education review, 2006-02, Vol.50 (1), p.46-65</ispartof><rights>2006 by the Comparative and International Education Society. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Feb 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-73c42ae25f11083c6a09e6ce5188aa178535f1fa33317471237cbcbd47bf1c2a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-73c42ae25f11083c6a09e6ce5188aa178535f1fa33317471237cbcbd47bf1c2a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27843,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=744904$$DAccess content in the German Education Portal$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ751491$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17549584$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Suen, Hoi K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Lan</creatorcontrib><title>Chronic consequences of high-stakes testing? Lessons from the Chinese civil service exam</title><title>Comparative education review</title><description>In their article on China's imperial examination system the authors - two educational psychologists - show the relevance of this history to current debates about university entrance and secondary school leaving exams. Based on painstaking archival research they present instructive details and reveal unintended consequences of testing over a very long period. The authors argue that memorizing model essays, focusing on test-taking skills, and cheating are likely to be pervasive consequences of any high-stakes testing regime. Exam-induced psychological and behavioural problems are likely to result from such a regime. As the system with the longest and best-preserved records, the Keju system exhibited these same problems throughout its history. The fact that these problems persisted in the Keju system, despite repeated attempts to remove them, suggests that threats to the consequential basis of validity are stubbornly chronic in nature. When measures are taken to remove them, they mutate to new forms. (DIPF/Orig./Ba.).</description><subject>Achievement tests</subject><subject>Asia</subject><subject>Cheating</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>College entrance examinations</subject><subject>Couplets</subject><subject>Cultural history</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Assessment</subject><subject>Educational evaluation</subject><subject>Educational Policy</subject><subject>Educational psychology</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Educational sciences</subject><subject>Educational Testing</subject><subject>Fertigkeit</subject><subject>High Stakes Tests</subject><subject>History instruction</subject><subject>Memorization</subject><subject>Poetry</subject><subject>Policy, reform, legislation</subject><subject>Prüfung</subject><subject>Prüfungsangst</subject><subject>Prüfungsarbeit</subject><subject>Prüfungsausschuss</subject><subject>Prüfungsordnung</subject><subject>Prüfungsrecht</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychopathologie</subject><subject>Psychopathology</subject><subject>Qing Dynasty</subject><subject>Rater Effects</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Selbstmord</subject><subject>Social impact</subject><subject>Test validity</subject><subject>Testdurchführung</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Testmethodik</subject><subject>Testpsychologie</subject><subject>Tradition</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Vergleichende Erziehungswissenschaft</subject><subject>Writing tests</subject><subject>Öffentlicher Dienst</subject><issn>0010-4086</issn><issn>1545-701X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE1LAzEQhoMoWL9-gHgIgt5WM5uk2ZxEip8UvCh4W9J01k1td2tmLfrvjWxpT8PwPMy8vIydgLgCUQyvlS1kXuywAWilMyPgfZcNhACRqYT32QHRTKTd5mbA3kd1bJvguW8bwq9vbDwSbyteh486o859prVD6kLzccPHSJQ8XsV2wbsa-agODRJyH1ZhzgnjKnjk-OMWR2yvcnPC4_U8ZG_3d6-jx2z88vA0uh1nXiroMiO9yh3muoIUXvqhExaHHjUUhXNgCi0TqpyUEowykEvjJ34yVWZSgc-dPGTn_d1lbFN86spZ-x2b9LIEq5S2Q7BJuuwlH1uiiFW5jGHh4m8JovwvrexLS-LF-poj7-ZVdI0PtLWNVlYXKnlnvYcx-A2-ezYalIUtnlHXxg2XWuUg84RPezwNy20Uo5QVSv4BfbOFqg</recordid><startdate>20060201</startdate><enddate>20060201</enddate><creator>Suen, Hoi K</creator><creator>Yu, Lan</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>9S6</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060201</creationdate><title>Chronic consequences of high-stakes testing? Lessons from the Chinese civil service exam</title><author>Suen, Hoi K ; Yu, Lan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-73c42ae25f11083c6a09e6ce5188aa178535f1fa33317471237cbcbd47bf1c2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Achievement tests</topic><topic>Asia</topic><topic>Cheating</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>College entrance examinations</topic><topic>Couplets</topic><topic>Cultural history</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Assessment</topic><topic>Educational evaluation</topic><topic>Educational Policy</topic><topic>Educational psychology</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Educational sciences</topic><topic>Educational Testing</topic><topic>Fertigkeit</topic><topic>High Stakes Tests</topic><topic>History instruction</topic><topic>Memorization</topic><topic>Poetry</topic><topic>Policy, reform, legislation</topic><topic>Prüfung</topic><topic>Prüfungsangst</topic><topic>Prüfungsarbeit</topic><topic>Prüfungsausschuss</topic><topic>Prüfungsordnung</topic><topic>Prüfungsrecht</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychopathologie</topic><topic>Psychopathology</topic><topic>Qing Dynasty</topic><topic>Rater Effects</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Selbstmord</topic><topic>Social impact</topic><topic>Test validity</topic><topic>Testdurchführung</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Testmethodik</topic><topic>Testpsychologie</topic><topic>Tradition</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Vergleichende Erziehungswissenschaft</topic><topic>Writing tests</topic><topic>Öffentlicher Dienst</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suen, Hoi K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Lan</creatorcontrib><collection>FIS Bildung Literaturdatenbank</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Comparative education review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suen, Hoi K</au><au>Yu, Lan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ751491</ericid><atitle>Chronic consequences of high-stakes testing? Lessons from the Chinese civil service exam</atitle><jtitle>Comparative education review</jtitle><date>2006-02-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>46</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>46-65</pages><issn>0010-4086</issn><eissn>1545-701X</eissn><coden>CEDRDJ</coden><abstract>In their article on China's imperial examination system the authors - two educational psychologists - show the relevance of this history to current debates about university entrance and secondary school leaving exams. Based on painstaking archival research they present instructive details and reveal unintended consequences of testing over a very long period. The authors argue that memorizing model essays, focusing on test-taking skills, and cheating are likely to be pervasive consequences of any high-stakes testing regime. Exam-induced psychological and behavioural problems are likely to result from such a regime. As the system with the longest and best-preserved records, the Keju system exhibited these same problems throughout its history. The fact that these problems persisted in the Keju system, despite repeated attempts to remove them, suggests that threats to the consequential basis of validity are stubbornly chronic in nature. When measures are taken to remove them, they mutate to new forms. (DIPF/Orig./Ba.).</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/498328</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-4086 |
ispartof | Comparative education review, 2006-02, Vol.50 (1), p.46-65 |
issn | 0010-4086 1545-701X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_194459619 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source (EBSCOhost); PAIS Index |
subjects | Achievement tests Asia Cheating China College entrance examinations Couplets Cultural history Education Educational Assessment Educational evaluation Educational Policy Educational psychology Educational Research Educational sciences Educational Testing Fertigkeit High Stakes Tests History instruction Memorization Poetry Policy, reform, legislation Prüfung Prüfungsangst Prüfungsarbeit Prüfungsausschuss Prüfungsordnung Prüfungsrecht Psychology Psychopathologie Psychopathology Qing Dynasty Rater Effects Research Design Selbstmord Social impact Test validity Testdurchführung Testing Testmethodik Testpsychologie Tradition Validity Vergleichende Erziehungswissenschaft Writing tests Öffentlicher Dienst |
title | Chronic consequences of high-stakes testing? Lessons from the Chinese civil service exam |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T01%3A55%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chronic%20consequences%20of%20high-stakes%20testing?%20Lessons%20from%20the%20Chinese%20civil%20service%20exam&rft.jtitle=Comparative%20education%20review&rft.au=Suen,%20Hoi%20K&rft.date=2006-02-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=46&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=46-65&rft.issn=0010-4086&rft.eissn=1545-701X&rft.coden=CEDRDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/498328&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1086/498328%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194459619&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ751491&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/498328&rfr_iscdi=true |