Chronic consequences of high-stakes testing? Lessons from the Chinese civil service exam

In their article on China's imperial examination system the authors - two educational psychologists - show the relevance of this history to current debates about university entrance and secondary school leaving exams. Based on painstaking archival research they present instructive details and r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Comparative education review 2006-02, Vol.50 (1), p.46-65
Hauptverfasser: Suen, Hoi K, Yu, Lan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 65
container_issue 1
container_start_page 46
container_title Comparative education review
container_volume 50
creator Suen, Hoi K
Yu, Lan
description In their article on China's imperial examination system the authors - two educational psychologists - show the relevance of this history to current debates about university entrance and secondary school leaving exams. Based on painstaking archival research they present instructive details and reveal unintended consequences of testing over a very long period. The authors argue that memorizing model essays, focusing on test-taking skills, and cheating are likely to be pervasive consequences of any high-stakes testing regime. Exam-induced psychological and behavioural problems are likely to result from such a regime. As the system with the longest and best-preserved records, the Keju system exhibited these same problems throughout its history. The fact that these problems persisted in the Keju system, despite repeated attempts to remove them, suggests that threats to the consequential basis of validity are stubbornly chronic in nature. When measures are taken to remove them, they mutate to new forms. (DIPF/Orig./Ba.).
doi_str_mv 10.1086/498328
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_194459619</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ751491</ericid><jstor_id>10.1086/498328</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/498328</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-73c42ae25f11083c6a09e6ce5188aa178535f1fa33317471237cbcbd47bf1c2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1LAzEQhoMoWL9-gHgIgt5WM5uk2ZxEip8UvCh4W9J01k1td2tmLfrvjWxpT8PwPMy8vIydgLgCUQyvlS1kXuywAWilMyPgfZcNhACRqYT32QHRTKTd5mbA3kd1bJvguW8bwq9vbDwSbyteh486o859prVD6kLzccPHSJQ8XsV2wbsa-agODRJyH1ZhzgnjKnjk-OMWR2yvcnPC4_U8ZG_3d6-jx2z88vA0uh1nXiroMiO9yh3muoIUXvqhExaHHjUUhXNgCi0TqpyUEowykEvjJ34yVWZSgc-dPGTn_d1lbFN86spZ-x2b9LIEq5S2Q7BJuuwlH1uiiFW5jGHh4m8JovwvrexLS-LF-poj7-ZVdI0PtLWNVlYXKnlnvYcx-A2-ezYalIUtnlHXxg2XWuUg84RPezwNy20Uo5QVSv4BfbOFqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194459619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chronic consequences of high-stakes testing? Lessons from the Chinese civil service exam</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source (EBSCOhost)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Suen, Hoi K ; Yu, Lan</creator><creatorcontrib>Suen, Hoi K ; Yu, Lan</creatorcontrib><description>In their article on China's imperial examination system the authors - two educational psychologists - show the relevance of this history to current debates about university entrance and secondary school leaving exams. Based on painstaking archival research they present instructive details and reveal unintended consequences of testing over a very long period. The authors argue that memorizing model essays, focusing on test-taking skills, and cheating are likely to be pervasive consequences of any high-stakes testing regime. Exam-induced psychological and behavioural problems are likely to result from such a regime. As the system with the longest and best-preserved records, the Keju system exhibited these same problems throughout its history. The fact that these problems persisted in the Keju system, despite repeated attempts to remove them, suggests that threats to the consequential basis of validity are stubbornly chronic in nature. When measures are taken to remove them, they mutate to new forms. (DIPF/Orig./Ba.).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-4086</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-701X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/498328</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CEDRDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Achievement tests ; Asia ; Cheating ; China ; College entrance examinations ; Couplets ; Cultural history ; Education ; Educational Assessment ; Educational evaluation ; Educational Policy ; Educational psychology ; Educational Research ; Educational sciences ; Educational Testing ; Fertigkeit ; High Stakes Tests ; History instruction ; Memorization ; Poetry ; Policy, reform, legislation ; Prüfung ; Prüfungsangst ; Prüfungsarbeit ; Prüfungsausschuss ; Prüfungsordnung ; Prüfungsrecht ; Psychology ; Psychopathologie ; Psychopathology ; Qing Dynasty ; Rater Effects ; Research Design ; Selbstmord ; Social impact ; Test validity ; Testdurchführung ; Testing ; Testmethodik ; Testpsychologie ; Tradition ; Validity ; Vergleichende Erziehungswissenschaft ; Writing tests ; Öffentlicher Dienst</subject><ispartof>Comparative education review, 2006-02, Vol.50 (1), p.46-65</ispartof><rights>2006 by the Comparative and International Education Society. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Feb 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-73c42ae25f11083c6a09e6ce5188aa178535f1fa33317471237cbcbd47bf1c2a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-73c42ae25f11083c6a09e6ce5188aa178535f1fa33317471237cbcbd47bf1c2a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27843,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=744904$$DAccess content in the German Education Portal$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ751491$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17549584$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Suen, Hoi K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Lan</creatorcontrib><title>Chronic consequences of high-stakes testing? Lessons from the Chinese civil service exam</title><title>Comparative education review</title><description>In their article on China's imperial examination system the authors - two educational psychologists - show the relevance of this history to current debates about university entrance and secondary school leaving exams. Based on painstaking archival research they present instructive details and reveal unintended consequences of testing over a very long period. The authors argue that memorizing model essays, focusing on test-taking skills, and cheating are likely to be pervasive consequences of any high-stakes testing regime. Exam-induced psychological and behavioural problems are likely to result from such a regime. As the system with the longest and best-preserved records, the Keju system exhibited these same problems throughout its history. The fact that these problems persisted in the Keju system, despite repeated attempts to remove them, suggests that threats to the consequential basis of validity are stubbornly chronic in nature. When measures are taken to remove them, they mutate to new forms. (DIPF/Orig./Ba.).</description><subject>Achievement tests</subject><subject>Asia</subject><subject>Cheating</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>College entrance examinations</subject><subject>Couplets</subject><subject>Cultural history</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Assessment</subject><subject>Educational evaluation</subject><subject>Educational Policy</subject><subject>Educational psychology</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Educational sciences</subject><subject>Educational Testing</subject><subject>Fertigkeit</subject><subject>High Stakes Tests</subject><subject>History instruction</subject><subject>Memorization</subject><subject>Poetry</subject><subject>Policy, reform, legislation</subject><subject>Prüfung</subject><subject>Prüfungsangst</subject><subject>Prüfungsarbeit</subject><subject>Prüfungsausschuss</subject><subject>Prüfungsordnung</subject><subject>Prüfungsrecht</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychopathologie</subject><subject>Psychopathology</subject><subject>Qing Dynasty</subject><subject>Rater Effects</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Selbstmord</subject><subject>Social impact</subject><subject>Test validity</subject><subject>Testdurchführung</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Testmethodik</subject><subject>Testpsychologie</subject><subject>Tradition</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Vergleichende Erziehungswissenschaft</subject><subject>Writing tests</subject><subject>Öffentlicher Dienst</subject><issn>0010-4086</issn><issn>1545-701X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE1LAzEQhoMoWL9-gHgIgt5WM5uk2ZxEip8UvCh4W9J01k1td2tmLfrvjWxpT8PwPMy8vIydgLgCUQyvlS1kXuywAWilMyPgfZcNhACRqYT32QHRTKTd5mbA3kd1bJvguW8bwq9vbDwSbyteh486o859prVD6kLzccPHSJQ8XsV2wbsa-agODRJyH1ZhzgnjKnjk-OMWR2yvcnPC4_U8ZG_3d6-jx2z88vA0uh1nXiroMiO9yh3muoIUXvqhExaHHjUUhXNgCi0TqpyUEowykEvjJ34yVWZSgc-dPGTn_d1lbFN86spZ-x2b9LIEq5S2Q7BJuuwlH1uiiFW5jGHh4m8JovwvrexLS-LF-poj7-ZVdI0PtLWNVlYXKnlnvYcx-A2-ezYalIUtnlHXxg2XWuUg84RPezwNy20Uo5QVSv4BfbOFqg</recordid><startdate>20060201</startdate><enddate>20060201</enddate><creator>Suen, Hoi K</creator><creator>Yu, Lan</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>9S6</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060201</creationdate><title>Chronic consequences of high-stakes testing? Lessons from the Chinese civil service exam</title><author>Suen, Hoi K ; Yu, Lan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-73c42ae25f11083c6a09e6ce5188aa178535f1fa33317471237cbcbd47bf1c2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Achievement tests</topic><topic>Asia</topic><topic>Cheating</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>College entrance examinations</topic><topic>Couplets</topic><topic>Cultural history</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Assessment</topic><topic>Educational evaluation</topic><topic>Educational Policy</topic><topic>Educational psychology</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Educational sciences</topic><topic>Educational Testing</topic><topic>Fertigkeit</topic><topic>High Stakes Tests</topic><topic>History instruction</topic><topic>Memorization</topic><topic>Poetry</topic><topic>Policy, reform, legislation</topic><topic>Prüfung</topic><topic>Prüfungsangst</topic><topic>Prüfungsarbeit</topic><topic>Prüfungsausschuss</topic><topic>Prüfungsordnung</topic><topic>Prüfungsrecht</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychopathologie</topic><topic>Psychopathology</topic><topic>Qing Dynasty</topic><topic>Rater Effects</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Selbstmord</topic><topic>Social impact</topic><topic>Test validity</topic><topic>Testdurchführung</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Testmethodik</topic><topic>Testpsychologie</topic><topic>Tradition</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Vergleichende Erziehungswissenschaft</topic><topic>Writing tests</topic><topic>Öffentlicher Dienst</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suen, Hoi K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Lan</creatorcontrib><collection>FIS Bildung Literaturdatenbank</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Comparative education review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suen, Hoi K</au><au>Yu, Lan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ751491</ericid><atitle>Chronic consequences of high-stakes testing? Lessons from the Chinese civil service exam</atitle><jtitle>Comparative education review</jtitle><date>2006-02-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>46</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>46-65</pages><issn>0010-4086</issn><eissn>1545-701X</eissn><coden>CEDRDJ</coden><abstract>In their article on China's imperial examination system the authors - two educational psychologists - show the relevance of this history to current debates about university entrance and secondary school leaving exams. Based on painstaking archival research they present instructive details and reveal unintended consequences of testing over a very long period. The authors argue that memorizing model essays, focusing on test-taking skills, and cheating are likely to be pervasive consequences of any high-stakes testing regime. Exam-induced psychological and behavioural problems are likely to result from such a regime. As the system with the longest and best-preserved records, the Keju system exhibited these same problems throughout its history. The fact that these problems persisted in the Keju system, despite repeated attempts to remove them, suggests that threats to the consequential basis of validity are stubbornly chronic in nature. When measures are taken to remove them, they mutate to new forms. (DIPF/Orig./Ba.).</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/498328</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-4086
ispartof Comparative education review, 2006-02, Vol.50 (1), p.46-65
issn 0010-4086
1545-701X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_194459619
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source (EBSCOhost); PAIS Index
subjects Achievement tests
Asia
Cheating
China
College entrance examinations
Couplets
Cultural history
Education
Educational Assessment
Educational evaluation
Educational Policy
Educational psychology
Educational Research
Educational sciences
Educational Testing
Fertigkeit
High Stakes Tests
History instruction
Memorization
Poetry
Policy, reform, legislation
Prüfung
Prüfungsangst
Prüfungsarbeit
Prüfungsausschuss
Prüfungsordnung
Prüfungsrecht
Psychology
Psychopathologie
Psychopathology
Qing Dynasty
Rater Effects
Research Design
Selbstmord
Social impact
Test validity
Testdurchführung
Testing
Testmethodik
Testpsychologie
Tradition
Validity
Vergleichende Erziehungswissenschaft
Writing tests
Öffentlicher Dienst
title Chronic consequences of high-stakes testing? Lessons from the Chinese civil service exam
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T01%3A55%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chronic%20consequences%20of%20high-stakes%20testing?%20Lessons%20from%20the%20Chinese%20civil%20service%20exam&rft.jtitle=Comparative%20education%20review&rft.au=Suen,%20Hoi%20K&rft.date=2006-02-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=46&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=46-65&rft.issn=0010-4086&rft.eissn=1545-701X&rft.coden=CEDRDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/498328&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1086/498328%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194459619&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ751491&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/498328&rfr_iscdi=true