Nursing Students' Self-Assessments and Opinions About Using Nursing Diagnosis in Clinical Practice

PURPOSE To determine student opinions about using nursing diagnosis in their future clinical practice. METHODS The course described in this study was an 11‐credit hours course for third‐year students, which included theory and clinical practice 22 hours/week. Theoretical content covered fundamental...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The international journal of nursing terminologies and classifications 2003-10, Vol.14 (s4), p.34-34
Hauptverfasser: Erdemir, Firdevs, Altun, Emine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 34
container_issue s4
container_start_page 34
container_title The international journal of nursing terminologies and classifications
container_volume 14
creator Erdemir, Firdevs
Altun, Emine
description PURPOSE To determine student opinions about using nursing diagnosis in their future clinical practice. METHODS The course described in this study was an 11‐credit hours course for third‐year students, which included theory and clinical practice 22 hours/week. Theoretical content covered fundamental concepts such as crisis, child and family development, current developments in nursing process and nursing diagnosis, descriptions of the disease process and its effects on child and family, NANDA diagnoses, functional health patterns, and collaborative problems possibly associated with the disease/situations. Simulated case studies were discussed by student groups. Practice areas were pediatric‐neonatal care units and pediatric outpatient clinics. Students care for hospitalized children, infants, and their families under the instructors' supervision. Students are assigned to patients and expected to identify relevant nursing diagnoses, design care plans, and discuss the care plans with instructors during the daily conferences. The sample was 57 students who had attended the course in full. To evaluate students' opinions about using nursing diagnoses in clinical practice and perceived confidence in formulating/identifying nursing diagnoses, a two‐part self‐assessment tool was developed. Part 1 (5 items) was for self‐assessment of the knowledge and skills related to identifying and formulating nursing diagnosis; part 2 had 5 items related to opinions about using nursing diagnoses in nursing practice in general. Items were reviewed by four nursing experts. Test‐retest reliability of items was evaluated. The criterion used to decide whether to retain an item was at least 50% agreement in response over time. After the final examination of the course, the purpose of the study was explained to students and all students were asked to participate. Self‐assessment instruments were distributed to all students. Completed forms were left in a box for collection by a research assistant. Data analysis involved calculating percentages. FINDINGS All 57 students completed and turned in the self‐assessment instruments. The majority of the students (85%) agreed/strongly agreed that they had a good understanding of nursing diagnosis and diagnostic reasoning, 64% did not have much difficulty with the expression of patient care needs as nursing diagnoses, and 87% said the course gave them a proper preparation on nursing diagnosis and diagnostic reasoning at a basic level. Most of the
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1744-618X.2003.032_4.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_194431170</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>527019881</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2264-36fe83e4b1e05de7fd070642edb8ed4dbe8c1b0ba6b1f3092b21815e770d1ff23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1PgzAUhonRxM__0HjjFdhDC8U7l81NjUETZ_TuhMLBdDKYLcTt3wubem1vetK-z9vkqecx4AH063IRgJLSjyF5C0LORcBFiDJY73lHfxf7_RxJ8COQ6tA7dm7BOSRCRUeeTjvrTP3OntuuoLp1F-yZqtIfOUfOLYcTltUFe1yZ2jS1YyPddC172TK_7MRk73XjjGOmZuOqT-ZZxZ5slrcmp1PvoMwqR2c_-4n3Mr2Zj2_9h8fZ3Xj04OdhGEtfxCUlgqQG4lFBqiy44rEMqdAJFbLQlOSguc5iDaXgV6EOIYGIlOIFlGUoTrzzXe_KNp8duRYXTWfr_kmEKykFgOJ9KNmFcts4Z6nElTXLzG4QOA5CcYGDNxy84SAUt0Jx3aPXO_TLVLT5N4d39-l8O8q-wt9VGNfS-q8isx8Yq_4_8DWdYTq_n8ynaYpCfAPFIY41</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194431170</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nursing Students' Self-Assessments and Opinions About Using Nursing Diagnosis in Clinical Practice</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><creator>Erdemir, Firdevs ; Altun, Emine</creator><creatorcontrib>Erdemir, Firdevs ; Altun, Emine</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSE To determine student opinions about using nursing diagnosis in their future clinical practice. METHODS The course described in this study was an 11‐credit hours course for third‐year students, which included theory and clinical practice 22 hours/week. Theoretical content covered fundamental concepts such as crisis, child and family development, current developments in nursing process and nursing diagnosis, descriptions of the disease process and its effects on child and family, NANDA diagnoses, functional health patterns, and collaborative problems possibly associated with the disease/situations. Simulated case studies were discussed by student groups. Practice areas were pediatric‐neonatal care units and pediatric outpatient clinics. Students care for hospitalized children, infants, and their families under the instructors' supervision. Students are assigned to patients and expected to identify relevant nursing diagnoses, design care plans, and discuss the care plans with instructors during the daily conferences. The sample was 57 students who had attended the course in full. To evaluate students' opinions about using nursing diagnoses in clinical practice and perceived confidence in formulating/identifying nursing diagnoses, a two‐part self‐assessment tool was developed. Part 1 (5 items) was for self‐assessment of the knowledge and skills related to identifying and formulating nursing diagnosis; part 2 had 5 items related to opinions about using nursing diagnoses in nursing practice in general. Items were reviewed by four nursing experts. Test‐retest reliability of items was evaluated. The criterion used to decide whether to retain an item was at least 50% agreement in response over time. After the final examination of the course, the purpose of the study was explained to students and all students were asked to participate. Self‐assessment instruments were distributed to all students. Completed forms were left in a box for collection by a research assistant. Data analysis involved calculating percentages. FINDINGS All 57 students completed and turned in the self‐assessment instruments. The majority of the students (85%) agreed/strongly agreed that they had a good understanding of nursing diagnosis and diagnostic reasoning, 64% did not have much difficulty with the expression of patient care needs as nursing diagnoses, and 87% said the course gave them a proper preparation on nursing diagnosis and diagnostic reasoning at a basic level. Most of the students had a positive tendency toward using nursing diagnosis in their future practice; 80% agreed/strongly agreed that, after graduation, if they were asked to teach clinical nurses the formulation of nursing diagnosis they would accept this responsibility with pleasure; if nursing administration asked them to use nursing diagnoses, 78% of students would. If a course was offered in utilization of nursing diagnosis, 75% of students indicated they would attend such a course. CONCLUSIONS This study provided insight into the effects of knowledge on tendency of the students toward utilization of nursing diagnoses. Findings also indicated there might be a very effective potential if the undergraduate programs were revised by considering the utilization of nursing classification systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1541-5147</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2047-3087</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-618X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2047-3095</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-618X.2003.032_4.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Inc</publisher><subject>Medical diagnosis ; Nursing ; Self evaluation ; Students</subject><ispartof>The international journal of nursing terminologies and classifications, 2003-10, Vol.14 (s4), p.34-34</ispartof><rights>Copyright Nursecom, Inc. Oct-Dec 2003</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2264-36fe83e4b1e05de7fd070642edb8ed4dbe8c1b0ba6b1f3092b21815e770d1ff23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1744-618X.2003.032_4.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1744-618X.2003.032_4.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,12844,27922,27923,30997,45572,45573</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Erdemir, Firdevs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altun, Emine</creatorcontrib><title>Nursing Students' Self-Assessments and Opinions About Using Nursing Diagnosis in Clinical Practice</title><title>The international journal of nursing terminologies and classifications</title><description>PURPOSE To determine student opinions about using nursing diagnosis in their future clinical practice. METHODS The course described in this study was an 11‐credit hours course for third‐year students, which included theory and clinical practice 22 hours/week. Theoretical content covered fundamental concepts such as crisis, child and family development, current developments in nursing process and nursing diagnosis, descriptions of the disease process and its effects on child and family, NANDA diagnoses, functional health patterns, and collaborative problems possibly associated with the disease/situations. Simulated case studies were discussed by student groups. Practice areas were pediatric‐neonatal care units and pediatric outpatient clinics. Students care for hospitalized children, infants, and their families under the instructors' supervision. Students are assigned to patients and expected to identify relevant nursing diagnoses, design care plans, and discuss the care plans with instructors during the daily conferences. The sample was 57 students who had attended the course in full. To evaluate students' opinions about using nursing diagnoses in clinical practice and perceived confidence in formulating/identifying nursing diagnoses, a two‐part self‐assessment tool was developed. Part 1 (5 items) was for self‐assessment of the knowledge and skills related to identifying and formulating nursing diagnosis; part 2 had 5 items related to opinions about using nursing diagnoses in nursing practice in general. Items were reviewed by four nursing experts. Test‐retest reliability of items was evaluated. The criterion used to decide whether to retain an item was at least 50% agreement in response over time. After the final examination of the course, the purpose of the study was explained to students and all students were asked to participate. Self‐assessment instruments were distributed to all students. Completed forms were left in a box for collection by a research assistant. Data analysis involved calculating percentages. FINDINGS All 57 students completed and turned in the self‐assessment instruments. The majority of the students (85%) agreed/strongly agreed that they had a good understanding of nursing diagnosis and diagnostic reasoning, 64% did not have much difficulty with the expression of patient care needs as nursing diagnoses, and 87% said the course gave them a proper preparation on nursing diagnosis and diagnostic reasoning at a basic level. Most of the students had a positive tendency toward using nursing diagnosis in their future practice; 80% agreed/strongly agreed that, after graduation, if they were asked to teach clinical nurses the formulation of nursing diagnosis they would accept this responsibility with pleasure; if nursing administration asked them to use nursing diagnoses, 78% of students would. If a course was offered in utilization of nursing diagnosis, 75% of students indicated they would attend such a course. CONCLUSIONS This study provided insight into the effects of knowledge on tendency of the students toward utilization of nursing diagnoses. Findings also indicated there might be a very effective potential if the undergraduate programs were revised by considering the utilization of nursing classification systems.</description><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Self evaluation</subject><subject>Students</subject><issn>1541-5147</issn><issn>2047-3087</issn><issn>1744-618X</issn><issn>2047-3095</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1PgzAUhonRxM__0HjjFdhDC8U7l81NjUETZ_TuhMLBdDKYLcTt3wubem1vetK-z9vkqecx4AH063IRgJLSjyF5C0LORcBFiDJY73lHfxf7_RxJ8COQ6tA7dm7BOSRCRUeeTjvrTP3OntuuoLp1F-yZqtIfOUfOLYcTltUFe1yZ2jS1YyPddC172TK_7MRk73XjjGOmZuOqT-ZZxZ5slrcmp1PvoMwqR2c_-4n3Mr2Zj2_9h8fZ3Xj04OdhGEtfxCUlgqQG4lFBqiy44rEMqdAJFbLQlOSguc5iDaXgV6EOIYGIlOIFlGUoTrzzXe_KNp8duRYXTWfr_kmEKykFgOJ9KNmFcts4Z6nElTXLzG4QOA5CcYGDNxy84SAUt0Jx3aPXO_TLVLT5N4d39-l8O8q-wt9VGNfS-q8isx8Yq_4_8DWdYTq_n8ynaYpCfAPFIY41</recordid><startdate>200310</startdate><enddate>200310</enddate><creator>Erdemir, Firdevs</creator><creator>Altun, Emine</creator><general>Blackwell Science Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200310</creationdate><title>Nursing Students' Self-Assessments and Opinions About Using Nursing Diagnosis in Clinical Practice</title><author>Erdemir, Firdevs ; Altun, Emine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2264-36fe83e4b1e05de7fd070642edb8ed4dbe8c1b0ba6b1f3092b21815e770d1ff23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Self evaluation</topic><topic>Students</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Erdemir, Firdevs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altun, Emine</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The international journal of nursing terminologies and classifications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Erdemir, Firdevs</au><au>Altun, Emine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nursing Students' Self-Assessments and Opinions About Using Nursing Diagnosis in Clinical Practice</atitle><jtitle>The international journal of nursing terminologies and classifications</jtitle><date>2003-10</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>s4</issue><spage>34</spage><epage>34</epage><pages>34-34</pages><issn>1541-5147</issn><issn>2047-3087</issn><eissn>1744-618X</eissn><eissn>2047-3095</eissn><abstract>PURPOSE To determine student opinions about using nursing diagnosis in their future clinical practice. METHODS The course described in this study was an 11‐credit hours course for third‐year students, which included theory and clinical practice 22 hours/week. Theoretical content covered fundamental concepts such as crisis, child and family development, current developments in nursing process and nursing diagnosis, descriptions of the disease process and its effects on child and family, NANDA diagnoses, functional health patterns, and collaborative problems possibly associated with the disease/situations. Simulated case studies were discussed by student groups. Practice areas were pediatric‐neonatal care units and pediatric outpatient clinics. Students care for hospitalized children, infants, and their families under the instructors' supervision. Students are assigned to patients and expected to identify relevant nursing diagnoses, design care plans, and discuss the care plans with instructors during the daily conferences. The sample was 57 students who had attended the course in full. To evaluate students' opinions about using nursing diagnoses in clinical practice and perceived confidence in formulating/identifying nursing diagnoses, a two‐part self‐assessment tool was developed. Part 1 (5 items) was for self‐assessment of the knowledge and skills related to identifying and formulating nursing diagnosis; part 2 had 5 items related to opinions about using nursing diagnoses in nursing practice in general. Items were reviewed by four nursing experts. Test‐retest reliability of items was evaluated. The criterion used to decide whether to retain an item was at least 50% agreement in response over time. After the final examination of the course, the purpose of the study was explained to students and all students were asked to participate. Self‐assessment instruments were distributed to all students. Completed forms were left in a box for collection by a research assistant. Data analysis involved calculating percentages. FINDINGS All 57 students completed and turned in the self‐assessment instruments. The majority of the students (85%) agreed/strongly agreed that they had a good understanding of nursing diagnosis and diagnostic reasoning, 64% did not have much difficulty with the expression of patient care needs as nursing diagnoses, and 87% said the course gave them a proper preparation on nursing diagnosis and diagnostic reasoning at a basic level. Most of the students had a positive tendency toward using nursing diagnosis in their future practice; 80% agreed/strongly agreed that, after graduation, if they were asked to teach clinical nurses the formulation of nursing diagnosis they would accept this responsibility with pleasure; if nursing administration asked them to use nursing diagnoses, 78% of students would. If a course was offered in utilization of nursing diagnosis, 75% of students indicated they would attend such a course. CONCLUSIONS This study provided insight into the effects of knowledge on tendency of the students toward utilization of nursing diagnoses. Findings also indicated there might be a very effective potential if the undergraduate programs were revised by considering the utilization of nursing classification systems.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1744-618X.2003.032_4.x</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1541-5147
ispartof The international journal of nursing terminologies and classifications, 2003-10, Vol.14 (s4), p.34-34
issn 1541-5147
2047-3087
1744-618X
2047-3095
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_194431170
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library Journals
subjects Medical diagnosis
Nursing
Self evaluation
Students
title Nursing Students' Self-Assessments and Opinions About Using Nursing Diagnosis in Clinical Practice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T16%3A56%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nursing%20Students'%20Self-Assessments%20and%20Opinions%20About%20Using%20Nursing%20Diagnosis%20in%20Clinical%20Practice&rft.jtitle=The%20international%20journal%20of%20nursing%20terminologies%20and%20classifications&rft.au=Erdemir,%20Firdevs&rft.date=2003-10&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=s4&rft.spage=34&rft.epage=34&rft.pages=34-34&rft.issn=1541-5147&rft.eissn=1744-618X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1744-618X.2003.032_4.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E527019881%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194431170&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true