OPTIONS FOR NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY PRACTITIONERS’ ADVICE FOR THE NEW ADMINISTRATION
[...]the volume is more than a theory-based academic report; it incorporates a healthy dose of the art of the practical. The following sixteen chapters break nicely into the two categories of functional (future conflict, defense policy, defense budget, national security reform, weapons of mass destr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Naval War College review 2017-09, Vol.70 (4), p.134-140 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 140 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 134 |
container_title | Naval War College review |
container_volume | 70 |
creator | Tangredi, Sam J. |
description | [...]the volume is more than a theory-based academic report; it incorporates a healthy dose of the art of the practical. The following sixteen chapters break nicely into the two categories of functional (future conflict, defense policy, defense budget, national security reform, weapons of mass destruction, terrorism, and cyber policy) and regional (AsiaPacific, NATO/Europe, Russia, Middle East, South Asia, Africa, Latin America, central Asia, and the high north / Arctic). Lamb sees the need for three steps in particular: (1) legislation that allows the president to empower "mission managers" to lead interagency missions, (2) a concerted effort by the president to create collaborative attitudes and behaviors among cabinet officials, and (3) adoption of a new model of an assistant to the president for national security affairs (known as the national security adviser [NSA]). [...]reading Natali's chapter makes one think the United States should just step away from the Israeli-Palestinian peace process until the actors are "committed to making necessary compromises"-another contrarian recommendation (and one with which former president Carter certainly would not concur). |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_JFNAL</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1944207892</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A513193750</galeid><jstor_id>26398071</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A513193750</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1552-f8ffe1e96ed4015b8308255cb6f0ccd9c71c633a7f135f8ebd8e6fb4df82c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptjc1Og0AUhSdGE2v1EUxIXGPmlxmWBKmdBKEBtHFFYJhpaFqo0C668zV8PZ9E2poYk-Yuzv35zrkXYIQpZzaHlF-CEYRY2IgKeg1u-n4JD7NLRmAezzIZR6k1iRMr8g69F1pp4L8mMnu3ZnEo_UESz8_k4Rgk6ffnl-U9vUk_OJqyaWBFwXxYvchIpllyDLkFV6ZY9fruV8cgnQSZP7XD-Fn6XmgvEGPYNsIYjbTr6IpCxEpBoMCMqdIxUKnKVRwph5CCG0SYEbqshHZMSSsjsEJkDB5OqZuu_djpfpsv213XDA9z5FKKIRcu_qMWxUrndWPabVeodd2r3GOIIJdwBgfKPkMtdKO7YtU22tTD-h__eIYfqtLrWp013J8My37bdvmmq9dFt8-xQ1wBOSI_LAl7-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1944207892</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>OPTIONS FOR NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY PRACTITIONERS’ ADVICE FOR THE NEW ADMINISTRATION</title><source>Jstor Journals Open Access</source><creator>Tangredi, Sam J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tangredi, Sam J.</creatorcontrib><description>[...]the volume is more than a theory-based academic report; it incorporates a healthy dose of the art of the practical. The following sixteen chapters break nicely into the two categories of functional (future conflict, defense policy, defense budget, national security reform, weapons of mass destruction, terrorism, and cyber policy) and regional (AsiaPacific, NATO/Europe, Russia, Middle East, South Asia, Africa, Latin America, central Asia, and the high north / Arctic). Lamb sees the need for three steps in particular: (1) legislation that allows the president to empower "mission managers" to lead interagency missions, (2) a concerted effort by the president to create collaborative attitudes and behaviors among cabinet officials, and (3) adoption of a new model of an assistant to the president for national security affairs (known as the national security adviser [NSA]). [...]reading Natali's chapter makes one think the United States should just step away from the Israeli-Palestinian peace process until the actors are "committed to making necessary compromises"-another contrarian recommendation (and one with which former president Carter certainly would not concur).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-1484</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2475-7047</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: NAVAL WAR COLLEGE PRESS</publisher><subject>Cabinet ; Cybersecurity ; Decision making ; Defense industry ; Foreign policy ; Military policy ; National security ; Nonfiction ; REVIEW ESSAYS ; Terrorism</subject><ispartof>Naval War College review, 2017-09, Vol.70 (4), p.134-140</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 U.S. Naval War College</rights><rights>Copyright Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Naval War College Autumn 2017</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26398071$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26398071$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,776,780,788,12825,25333,54502,54508</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26398071$$EView_record_in_JSTOR$$FView_record_in_$$GJSTOR</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tangredi, Sam J.</creatorcontrib><title>OPTIONS FOR NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY PRACTITIONERS’ ADVICE FOR THE NEW ADMINISTRATION</title><title>Naval War College review</title><description>[...]the volume is more than a theory-based academic report; it incorporates a healthy dose of the art of the practical. The following sixteen chapters break nicely into the two categories of functional (future conflict, defense policy, defense budget, national security reform, weapons of mass destruction, terrorism, and cyber policy) and regional (AsiaPacific, NATO/Europe, Russia, Middle East, South Asia, Africa, Latin America, central Asia, and the high north / Arctic). Lamb sees the need for three steps in particular: (1) legislation that allows the president to empower "mission managers" to lead interagency missions, (2) a concerted effort by the president to create collaborative attitudes and behaviors among cabinet officials, and (3) adoption of a new model of an assistant to the president for national security affairs (known as the national security adviser [NSA]). [...]reading Natali's chapter makes one think the United States should just step away from the Israeli-Palestinian peace process until the actors are "committed to making necessary compromises"-another contrarian recommendation (and one with which former president Carter certainly would not concur).</description><subject>Cabinet</subject><subject>Cybersecurity</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Defense industry</subject><subject>Foreign policy</subject><subject>Military policy</subject><subject>National security</subject><subject>Nonfiction</subject><subject>REVIEW ESSAYS</subject><subject>Terrorism</subject><issn>0028-1484</issn><issn>2475-7047</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptjc1Og0AUhSdGE2v1EUxIXGPmlxmWBKmdBKEBtHFFYJhpaFqo0C668zV8PZ9E2poYk-Yuzv35zrkXYIQpZzaHlF-CEYRY2IgKeg1u-n4JD7NLRmAezzIZR6k1iRMr8g69F1pp4L8mMnu3ZnEo_UESz8_k4Rgk6ffnl-U9vUk_OJqyaWBFwXxYvchIpllyDLkFV6ZY9fruV8cgnQSZP7XD-Fn6XmgvEGPYNsIYjbTr6IpCxEpBoMCMqdIxUKnKVRwph5CCG0SYEbqshHZMSSsjsEJkDB5OqZuu_djpfpsv213XDA9z5FKKIRcu_qMWxUrndWPabVeodd2r3GOIIJdwBgfKPkMtdKO7YtU22tTD-h__eIYfqtLrWp013J8My37bdvmmq9dFt8-xQ1wBOSI_LAl7-Q</recordid><startdate>20170922</startdate><enddate>20170922</enddate><creator>Tangredi, Sam J.</creator><general>NAVAL WAR COLLEGE PRESS</general><general>U.S. Naval War College</general><general>Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Naval War College</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170922</creationdate><title>OPTIONS FOR NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY PRACTITIONERS’ ADVICE FOR THE NEW ADMINISTRATION</title><author>Tangredi, Sam J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1552-f8ffe1e96ed4015b8308255cb6f0ccd9c71c633a7f135f8ebd8e6fb4df82c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Cabinet</topic><topic>Cybersecurity</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Defense industry</topic><topic>Foreign policy</topic><topic>Military policy</topic><topic>National security</topic><topic>Nonfiction</topic><topic>REVIEW ESSAYS</topic><topic>Terrorism</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tangredi, Sam J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Naval War College review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tangredi, Sam J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>OPTIONS FOR NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY PRACTITIONERS’ ADVICE FOR THE NEW ADMINISTRATION</atitle><jtitle>Naval War College review</jtitle><date>2017-09-22</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>134</spage><epage>140</epage><pages>134-140</pages><issn>0028-1484</issn><eissn>2475-7047</eissn><abstract>[...]the volume is more than a theory-based academic report; it incorporates a healthy dose of the art of the practical. The following sixteen chapters break nicely into the two categories of functional (future conflict, defense policy, defense budget, national security reform, weapons of mass destruction, terrorism, and cyber policy) and regional (AsiaPacific, NATO/Europe, Russia, Middle East, South Asia, Africa, Latin America, central Asia, and the high north / Arctic). Lamb sees the need for three steps in particular: (1) legislation that allows the president to empower "mission managers" to lead interagency missions, (2) a concerted effort by the president to create collaborative attitudes and behaviors among cabinet officials, and (3) adoption of a new model of an assistant to the president for national security affairs (known as the national security adviser [NSA]). [...]reading Natali's chapter makes one think the United States should just step away from the Israeli-Palestinian peace process until the actors are "committed to making necessary compromises"-another contrarian recommendation (and one with which former president Carter certainly would not concur).</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>NAVAL WAR COLLEGE PRESS</pub><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-1484 |
ispartof | Naval War College review, 2017-09, Vol.70 (4), p.134-140 |
issn | 0028-1484 2475-7047 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1944207892 |
source | Jstor Journals Open Access |
subjects | Cabinet Cybersecurity Decision making Defense industry Foreign policy Military policy National security Nonfiction REVIEW ESSAYS Terrorism |
title | OPTIONS FOR NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY PRACTITIONERS’ ADVICE FOR THE NEW ADMINISTRATION |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T11%3A45%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_JFNAL&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=OPTIONS%20FOR%20NATIONAL%20SECURITY%20POLICY%20PRACTITIONERS%E2%80%99%20ADVICE%20FOR%20THE%20NEW%20ADMINISTRATION&rft.jtitle=Naval%20War%20College%20review&rft.au=Tangredi,%20Sam%20J.&rft.date=2017-09-22&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=134&rft.epage=140&rft.pages=134-140&rft.issn=0028-1484&rft.eissn=2475-7047&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_JFNAL%3EA513193750%3C/gale_JFNAL%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1944207892&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A513193750&rft_jstor_id=26398071&rfr_iscdi=true |