A comparison on metallurgical behaviors of 316L stainless steel by selective laser melting and laser cladding deposition

Selective laser melting (SLM) and laser cladding deposition (LCD) are two typical kinds of laser additive manufacturing techniques that have been developed for many years independently. Although they are based on the same principle of laser cladding, there are little comparison on the fundamental st...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Materials science & engineering. A, Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing, 2017-02, Vol.685, p.265-273
Hauptverfasser: Ma, Mingming, Wang, Zemin, Zeng, Xiaoyan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 273
container_issue
container_start_page 265
container_title Materials science & engineering. A, Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing
container_volume 685
creator Ma, Mingming
Wang, Zemin
Zeng, Xiaoyan
description Selective laser melting (SLM) and laser cladding deposition (LCD) are two typical kinds of laser additive manufacturing techniques that have been developed for many years independently. Although they are based on the same principle of laser cladding, there are little comparison on the fundamental studies for metallurgical behavior (including melting and solidification behaviors) and the mechanical properties of these two techniques up to now. In this paper, the single-track formation and the deposition of block sample from 316L stainless steel powders have been carried out by both SLM and LCD techniques. A comparison on pool shape, cooling rate, columnar grain size and mechanical properties under different processing conditions by LCD and SLM respectively has been studied. It is found that, due to the increase of energy input and the decrease of depth-to-width ratio of melting pool (MP) from SLM to LCD, the primary cellular arm spacing (PCAS) of the sample increases from less than 1.0µm to more than 15.0µm, and thus the cooling rate of MP decreases from about 106K/s in SLM to about 102K/s in LCD. Furthermore, due to the decrease of cooling rate from SLM to LCD, the columnar grains of the as forming alloy are getting coarser. Especially, the relationship between gain size (λ) and the reciprocal of square root of cooling rate (Ṫ) in LCD significantly meets the classical linear function of λ=a+b/Ṫ (a and b are constants), while a new relationship of a cubic function is found in SLM, showing the different solidification characteristics between LCD and SLM. Lastly, the samples of 316L stainless steel by SLM have much stronger tensile strength but lower elongation than those by LCD, and the main reason is due to that the solidification behavior of the MPs by SLM can form much finer columnar grains than those by LCD.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.msea.2016.12.112
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1943617537</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S092150931631615X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1943617537</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-bbedc3c9e29532e4617c4d1ea7d955769ca9cad69267ca56b8c3e9d16a0c36fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPA86752M024KUUv6DgRc8hm8zWLOlmTbbF_ntT2rMwMMPwvu8MD0L3lJSUUPHYl9sEumR5LikrKWUXaEYXDS8qycUlmhHJaFETya_RTUo9IYRWpJ6h3yU2YTvq6FIYcK4tTNr7Xdw4oz1u4VvvXYgJhw5zKtY4TdoNHlLKE0BWHHACD2Zye8BeJ4g5wk9u2GA92PPGeG3tcWVhDMlNLgy36KrTPsHduc_R18vz5-qtWH-8vq-W68JwWU1F24I13EhgsuYMKkEbU1kKurGyrhshjc5lhWSiMboW7cJwkJYKTQwXneFz9HDKHWP42UGaVB92ccgnFZUVz3k1b7KKnVQmhpQidGqMbqvjQVGijoRVr46E1ZGwokxlwtn0dDJB_n_vIKpkHAwGrIsZiLLB_Wf_AwsIhqE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1943617537</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison on metallurgical behaviors of 316L stainless steel by selective laser melting and laser cladding deposition</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ma, Mingming ; Wang, Zemin ; Zeng, Xiaoyan</creator><creatorcontrib>Ma, Mingming ; Wang, Zemin ; Zeng, Xiaoyan</creatorcontrib><description>Selective laser melting (SLM) and laser cladding deposition (LCD) are two typical kinds of laser additive manufacturing techniques that have been developed for many years independently. Although they are based on the same principle of laser cladding, there are little comparison on the fundamental studies for metallurgical behavior (including melting and solidification behaviors) and the mechanical properties of these two techniques up to now. In this paper, the single-track formation and the deposition of block sample from 316L stainless steel powders have been carried out by both SLM and LCD techniques. A comparison on pool shape, cooling rate, columnar grain size and mechanical properties under different processing conditions by LCD and SLM respectively has been studied. It is found that, due to the increase of energy input and the decrease of depth-to-width ratio of melting pool (MP) from SLM to LCD, the primary cellular arm spacing (PCAS) of the sample increases from less than 1.0µm to more than 15.0µm, and thus the cooling rate of MP decreases from about 106K/s in SLM to about 102K/s in LCD. Furthermore, due to the decrease of cooling rate from SLM to LCD, the columnar grains of the as forming alloy are getting coarser. Especially, the relationship between gain size (λ) and the reciprocal of square root of cooling rate (Ṫ) in LCD significantly meets the classical linear function of λ=a+b/Ṫ (a and b are constants), while a new relationship of a cubic function is found in SLM, showing the different solidification characteristics between LCD and SLM. Lastly, the samples of 316L stainless steel by SLM have much stronger tensile strength but lower elongation than those by LCD, and the main reason is due to that the solidification behavior of the MPs by SLM can form much finer columnar grains than those by LCD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-5093</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4936</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.12.112</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lausanne: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>316L stainless steel ; Additive manufacturing ; Austenitic stainless steels ; Columnar grain ; Cooling rate ; Deposition ; Elongation ; Grains ; Laser beam cladding ; Laser beam melting ; Laser cladding deposition ; Laser sintering ; Mechanical properties ; Mechanical property ; Melting pool ; Metallurgical analysis ; Selective laser melting ; Solidification ; Stainless steel ; Tensile strength</subject><ispartof>Materials science &amp; engineering. A, Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing, 2017-02, Vol.685, p.265-273</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Feb 8, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-bbedc3c9e29532e4617c4d1ea7d955769ca9cad69267ca56b8c3e9d16a0c36fc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-bbedc3c9e29532e4617c4d1ea7d955769ca9cad69267ca56b8c3e9d16a0c36fc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092150931631615X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ma, Mingming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zemin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Xiaoyan</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison on metallurgical behaviors of 316L stainless steel by selective laser melting and laser cladding deposition</title><title>Materials science &amp; engineering. A, Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing</title><description>Selective laser melting (SLM) and laser cladding deposition (LCD) are two typical kinds of laser additive manufacturing techniques that have been developed for many years independently. Although they are based on the same principle of laser cladding, there are little comparison on the fundamental studies for metallurgical behavior (including melting and solidification behaviors) and the mechanical properties of these two techniques up to now. In this paper, the single-track formation and the deposition of block sample from 316L stainless steel powders have been carried out by both SLM and LCD techniques. A comparison on pool shape, cooling rate, columnar grain size and mechanical properties under different processing conditions by LCD and SLM respectively has been studied. It is found that, due to the increase of energy input and the decrease of depth-to-width ratio of melting pool (MP) from SLM to LCD, the primary cellular arm spacing (PCAS) of the sample increases from less than 1.0µm to more than 15.0µm, and thus the cooling rate of MP decreases from about 106K/s in SLM to about 102K/s in LCD. Furthermore, due to the decrease of cooling rate from SLM to LCD, the columnar grains of the as forming alloy are getting coarser. Especially, the relationship between gain size (λ) and the reciprocal of square root of cooling rate (Ṫ) in LCD significantly meets the classical linear function of λ=a+b/Ṫ (a and b are constants), while a new relationship of a cubic function is found in SLM, showing the different solidification characteristics between LCD and SLM. Lastly, the samples of 316L stainless steel by SLM have much stronger tensile strength but lower elongation than those by LCD, and the main reason is due to that the solidification behavior of the MPs by SLM can form much finer columnar grains than those by LCD.</description><subject>316L stainless steel</subject><subject>Additive manufacturing</subject><subject>Austenitic stainless steels</subject><subject>Columnar grain</subject><subject>Cooling rate</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>Elongation</subject><subject>Grains</subject><subject>Laser beam cladding</subject><subject>Laser beam melting</subject><subject>Laser cladding deposition</subject><subject>Laser sintering</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Mechanical property</subject><subject>Melting pool</subject><subject>Metallurgical analysis</subject><subject>Selective laser melting</subject><subject>Solidification</subject><subject>Stainless steel</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><issn>0921-5093</issn><issn>1873-4936</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFPA86752M024KUUv6DgRc8hm8zWLOlmTbbF_ntT2rMwMMPwvu8MD0L3lJSUUPHYl9sEumR5LikrKWUXaEYXDS8qycUlmhHJaFETya_RTUo9IYRWpJ6h3yU2YTvq6FIYcK4tTNr7Xdw4oz1u4VvvXYgJhw5zKtY4TdoNHlLKE0BWHHACD2Zye8BeJ4g5wk9u2GA92PPGeG3tcWVhDMlNLgy36KrTPsHduc_R18vz5-qtWH-8vq-W68JwWU1F24I13EhgsuYMKkEbU1kKurGyrhshjc5lhWSiMboW7cJwkJYKTQwXneFz9HDKHWP42UGaVB92ccgnFZUVz3k1b7KKnVQmhpQidGqMbqvjQVGijoRVr46E1ZGwokxlwtn0dDJB_n_vIKpkHAwGrIsZiLLB_Wf_AwsIhqE</recordid><startdate>20170208</startdate><enddate>20170208</enddate><creator>Ma, Mingming</creator><creator>Wang, Zemin</creator><creator>Zeng, Xiaoyan</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170208</creationdate><title>A comparison on metallurgical behaviors of 316L stainless steel by selective laser melting and laser cladding deposition</title><author>Ma, Mingming ; Wang, Zemin ; Zeng, Xiaoyan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-bbedc3c9e29532e4617c4d1ea7d955769ca9cad69267ca56b8c3e9d16a0c36fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>316L stainless steel</topic><topic>Additive manufacturing</topic><topic>Austenitic stainless steels</topic><topic>Columnar grain</topic><topic>Cooling rate</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>Elongation</topic><topic>Grains</topic><topic>Laser beam cladding</topic><topic>Laser beam melting</topic><topic>Laser cladding deposition</topic><topic>Laser sintering</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Mechanical property</topic><topic>Melting pool</topic><topic>Metallurgical analysis</topic><topic>Selective laser melting</topic><topic>Solidification</topic><topic>Stainless steel</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ma, Mingming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zemin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Xiaoyan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Materials science &amp; engineering. A, Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ma, Mingming</au><au>Wang, Zemin</au><au>Zeng, Xiaoyan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison on metallurgical behaviors of 316L stainless steel by selective laser melting and laser cladding deposition</atitle><jtitle>Materials science &amp; engineering. A, Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing</jtitle><date>2017-02-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>685</volume><spage>265</spage><epage>273</epage><pages>265-273</pages><issn>0921-5093</issn><eissn>1873-4936</eissn><abstract>Selective laser melting (SLM) and laser cladding deposition (LCD) are two typical kinds of laser additive manufacturing techniques that have been developed for many years independently. Although they are based on the same principle of laser cladding, there are little comparison on the fundamental studies for metallurgical behavior (including melting and solidification behaviors) and the mechanical properties of these two techniques up to now. In this paper, the single-track formation and the deposition of block sample from 316L stainless steel powders have been carried out by both SLM and LCD techniques. A comparison on pool shape, cooling rate, columnar grain size and mechanical properties under different processing conditions by LCD and SLM respectively has been studied. It is found that, due to the increase of energy input and the decrease of depth-to-width ratio of melting pool (MP) from SLM to LCD, the primary cellular arm spacing (PCAS) of the sample increases from less than 1.0µm to more than 15.0µm, and thus the cooling rate of MP decreases from about 106K/s in SLM to about 102K/s in LCD. Furthermore, due to the decrease of cooling rate from SLM to LCD, the columnar grains of the as forming alloy are getting coarser. Especially, the relationship between gain size (λ) and the reciprocal of square root of cooling rate (Ṫ) in LCD significantly meets the classical linear function of λ=a+b/Ṫ (a and b are constants), while a new relationship of a cubic function is found in SLM, showing the different solidification characteristics between LCD and SLM. Lastly, the samples of 316L stainless steel by SLM have much stronger tensile strength but lower elongation than those by LCD, and the main reason is due to that the solidification behavior of the MPs by SLM can form much finer columnar grains than those by LCD.</abstract><cop>Lausanne</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.msea.2016.12.112</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0921-5093
ispartof Materials science & engineering. A, Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing, 2017-02, Vol.685, p.265-273
issn 0921-5093
1873-4936
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1943617537
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects 316L stainless steel
Additive manufacturing
Austenitic stainless steels
Columnar grain
Cooling rate
Deposition
Elongation
Grains
Laser beam cladding
Laser beam melting
Laser cladding deposition
Laser sintering
Mechanical properties
Mechanical property
Melting pool
Metallurgical analysis
Selective laser melting
Solidification
Stainless steel
Tensile strength
title A comparison on metallurgical behaviors of 316L stainless steel by selective laser melting and laser cladding deposition
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T10%3A22%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20on%20metallurgical%20behaviors%20of%20316L%20stainless%20steel%20by%20selective%20laser%20melting%20and%20laser%20cladding%20deposition&rft.jtitle=Materials%20science%20&%20engineering.%20A,%20Structural%20materials%20:%20properties,%20microstructure%20and%20processing&rft.au=Ma,%20Mingming&rft.date=2017-02-08&rft.volume=685&rft.spage=265&rft.epage=273&rft.pages=265-273&rft.issn=0921-5093&rft.eissn=1873-4936&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.msea.2016.12.112&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1943617537%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1943617537&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S092150931631615X&rfr_iscdi=true