Occurrence of Cryptosporidium oocysts in US wastewaters
Wastewater samples collected from ten wastewater facilities across the US were analyzed to determine the occurrence of indigenous Cryptosporidium oocysts using methods based on modifications of USEPA Method 1622. Wastewater facilities participating in this study ranged in size from 0.6 to 193 mgd av...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of water and health 2006-12, Vol.4 (4), p.437-452 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 452 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 437 |
container_title | Journal of water and health |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | McCuin, Randi M Clancy, Jennifer L |
description | Wastewater samples collected from ten wastewater facilities across the US were analyzed to determine the occurrence of indigenous Cryptosporidium oocysts using methods based on modifications of USEPA Method 1622. Wastewater facilities participating in this study ranged in size from 0.6 to 193 mgd average daily flow. A total of 289 wastewater samples were analyzed over a 15-month period. ColorSeed is a commercial product containing gamma-irradiated Cryptosporidium oocysts that have been permanently stained with a Texas Red dye. ColorSeed was used as an internal control with each sample to assess method performance. In 500ml sample volumes, mean ColorSeed recoveries in raw influents and primary effluents were 26.1 17.7% and 33.0 +/- 17.9%, respectively. In 10 liter volumes of secondary effluent, mean ColorSeed recovery was 25.0 +/- 16.6%. Volumes analyzed for tertiary effluent samples ranged from 14.81 to 131.31 resulting in a mean ColorSeed recovery of 48.8 +/- 14.5%. Indigenous oocysts were detected in 30% of raw influents, 46% of primary effluents, 58% of secondary effluents and 19% of tertiary effluents analyzed. Indigenous oocyst concentrations ranged from |
doi_str_mv | 10.2166/wh.2006.0028 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1943083587</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1943083587</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3368-7046371f1ef96f1512d559067883eacc4963bfe5ab0e5abaf8df5e446c56e8ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM1LwzAYxoMobk5vnqXg1c58NG-Sowy_YLCD7hzSNGEddqlJS9l_b8sGXt7nPfx4HvghdE_wkhKA52G3pBjDEmMqL9CcKAW5kFRdjn8hRC4VxTN0k9J-JIByeo1mRBABkvA5Ehtr-xjdwbos-GwVj20XUhtiXdV9k4Vgj6lLWX3Itl_ZYFLnBtO5mG7RlTc_yd2dc4G2b6_fq498vXn_XL2sc8sYyFzgApggnjivwBNOaMW5wiCkZM5YWyhgpXfclHg6xsvKc1cUYDk46T1boMdTbxvDb-9Sp_ehj4dxUhNVMCwZl2Kknk6UjSGl6LxuY92YeNQE68mSHnZ6sqQnSyP-cC7ty8ZV__BZC_sDbs9h-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1943083587</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Occurrence of Cryptosporidium oocysts in US wastewaters</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>McCuin, Randi M ; Clancy, Jennifer L</creator><creatorcontrib>McCuin, Randi M ; Clancy, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><description>Wastewater samples collected from ten wastewater facilities across the US were analyzed to determine the occurrence of indigenous Cryptosporidium oocysts using methods based on modifications of USEPA Method 1622. Wastewater facilities participating in this study ranged in size from 0.6 to 193 mgd average daily flow. A total of 289 wastewater samples were analyzed over a 15-month period. ColorSeed is a commercial product containing gamma-irradiated Cryptosporidium oocysts that have been permanently stained with a Texas Red dye. ColorSeed was used as an internal control with each sample to assess method performance. In 500ml sample volumes, mean ColorSeed recoveries in raw influents and primary effluents were 26.1 17.7% and 33.0 +/- 17.9%, respectively. In 10 liter volumes of secondary effluent, mean ColorSeed recovery was 25.0 +/- 16.6%. Volumes analyzed for tertiary effluent samples ranged from 14.81 to 131.31 resulting in a mean ColorSeed recovery of 48.8 +/- 14.5%. Indigenous oocysts were detected in 30% of raw influents, 46% of primary effluents, 58% of secondary effluents and 19% of tertiary effluents analyzed. Indigenous oocyst concentrations ranged from <2 to 86 /liter across all wastewater matrices tested.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1477-8920</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-7829</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/wh.2006.0028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17176815</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IWA Publishing</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cryptosporidium ; Cryptosporidium - isolation & purification ; Dyes ; Effluents ; Environmental Monitoring ; Fluorescent Dyes ; Geography ; Influents ; Methods ; Microscopy, Fluorescence ; Nephelometry and Turbidimetry ; Oocysts ; Oocysts - parasitology ; Oocysts - ultrastructure ; Protozoa ; Quality Control ; Recovering ; Recovery ; Risk Assessment ; Sewage - analysis ; Sewage - parasitology ; Time Factors ; United States ; United States Environmental Protection Agency ; Wastewater ; Wastewater treatment plants ; Water filtration ; Water Microbiology ; Water Movements ; Water Supply ; Water treatment plants ; Xanthenes</subject><ispartof>Journal of water and health, 2006-12, Vol.4 (4), p.437-452</ispartof><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing Dec 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3368-7046371f1ef96f1512d559067883eacc4963bfe5ab0e5abaf8df5e446c56e8ff3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17176815$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCuin, Randi M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clancy, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><title>Occurrence of Cryptosporidium oocysts in US wastewaters</title><title>Journal of water and health</title><addtitle>J Water Health</addtitle><description>Wastewater samples collected from ten wastewater facilities across the US were analyzed to determine the occurrence of indigenous Cryptosporidium oocysts using methods based on modifications of USEPA Method 1622. Wastewater facilities participating in this study ranged in size from 0.6 to 193 mgd average daily flow. A total of 289 wastewater samples were analyzed over a 15-month period. ColorSeed is a commercial product containing gamma-irradiated Cryptosporidium oocysts that have been permanently stained with a Texas Red dye. ColorSeed was used as an internal control with each sample to assess method performance. In 500ml sample volumes, mean ColorSeed recoveries in raw influents and primary effluents were 26.1 17.7% and 33.0 +/- 17.9%, respectively. In 10 liter volumes of secondary effluent, mean ColorSeed recovery was 25.0 +/- 16.6%. Volumes analyzed for tertiary effluent samples ranged from 14.81 to 131.31 resulting in a mean ColorSeed recovery of 48.8 +/- 14.5%. Indigenous oocysts were detected in 30% of raw influents, 46% of primary effluents, 58% of secondary effluents and 19% of tertiary effluents analyzed. Indigenous oocyst concentrations ranged from <2 to 86 /liter across all wastewater matrices tested.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cryptosporidium</subject><subject>Cryptosporidium - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Dyes</subject><subject>Effluents</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Fluorescent Dyes</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Influents</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Microscopy, Fluorescence</subject><subject>Nephelometry and Turbidimetry</subject><subject>Oocysts</subject><subject>Oocysts - parasitology</subject><subject>Oocysts - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Protozoa</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Recovering</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Sewage - analysis</subject><subject>Sewage - parasitology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States Environmental Protection Agency</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment plants</subject><subject>Water filtration</subject><subject>Water Microbiology</subject><subject>Water Movements</subject><subject>Water Supply</subject><subject>Water treatment plants</subject><subject>Xanthenes</subject><issn>1477-8920</issn><issn>1996-7829</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkM1LwzAYxoMobk5vnqXg1c58NG-Sowy_YLCD7hzSNGEddqlJS9l_b8sGXt7nPfx4HvghdE_wkhKA52G3pBjDEmMqL9CcKAW5kFRdjn8hRC4VxTN0k9J-JIByeo1mRBABkvA5Ehtr-xjdwbos-GwVj20XUhtiXdV9k4Vgj6lLWX3Itl_ZYFLnBtO5mG7RlTc_yd2dc4G2b6_fq498vXn_XL2sc8sYyFzgApggnjivwBNOaMW5wiCkZM5YWyhgpXfclHg6xsvKc1cUYDk46T1boMdTbxvDb-9Sp_ehj4dxUhNVMCwZl2Kknk6UjSGl6LxuY92YeNQE68mSHnZ6sqQnSyP-cC7ty8ZV__BZC_sDbs9h-g</recordid><startdate>200612</startdate><enddate>200612</enddate><creator>McCuin, Randi M</creator><creator>Clancy, Jennifer L</creator><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200612</creationdate><title>Occurrence of Cryptosporidium oocysts in US wastewaters</title><author>McCuin, Randi M ; Clancy, Jennifer L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3368-7046371f1ef96f1512d559067883eacc4963bfe5ab0e5abaf8df5e446c56e8ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cryptosporidium</topic><topic>Cryptosporidium - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Dyes</topic><topic>Effluents</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Fluorescent Dyes</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Influents</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Microscopy, Fluorescence</topic><topic>Nephelometry and Turbidimetry</topic><topic>Oocysts</topic><topic>Oocysts - parasitology</topic><topic>Oocysts - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Protozoa</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Recovering</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Sewage - analysis</topic><topic>Sewage - parasitology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States Environmental Protection Agency</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment plants</topic><topic>Water filtration</topic><topic>Water Microbiology</topic><topic>Water Movements</topic><topic>Water Supply</topic><topic>Water treatment plants</topic><topic>Xanthenes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCuin, Randi M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clancy, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Journal of water and health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCuin, Randi M</au><au>Clancy, Jennifer L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Occurrence of Cryptosporidium oocysts in US wastewaters</atitle><jtitle>Journal of water and health</jtitle><addtitle>J Water Health</addtitle><date>2006-12</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>437</spage><epage>452</epage><pages>437-452</pages><issn>1477-8920</issn><eissn>1996-7829</eissn><abstract>Wastewater samples collected from ten wastewater facilities across the US were analyzed to determine the occurrence of indigenous Cryptosporidium oocysts using methods based on modifications of USEPA Method 1622. Wastewater facilities participating in this study ranged in size from 0.6 to 193 mgd average daily flow. A total of 289 wastewater samples were analyzed over a 15-month period. ColorSeed is a commercial product containing gamma-irradiated Cryptosporidium oocysts that have been permanently stained with a Texas Red dye. ColorSeed was used as an internal control with each sample to assess method performance. In 500ml sample volumes, mean ColorSeed recoveries in raw influents and primary effluents were 26.1 17.7% and 33.0 +/- 17.9%, respectively. In 10 liter volumes of secondary effluent, mean ColorSeed recovery was 25.0 +/- 16.6%. Volumes analyzed for tertiary effluent samples ranged from 14.81 to 131.31 resulting in a mean ColorSeed recovery of 48.8 +/- 14.5%. Indigenous oocysts were detected in 30% of raw influents, 46% of primary effluents, 58% of secondary effluents and 19% of tertiary effluents analyzed. Indigenous oocyst concentrations ranged from <2 to 86 /liter across all wastewater matrices tested.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IWA Publishing</pub><pmid>17176815</pmid><doi>10.2166/wh.2006.0028</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1477-8920 |
ispartof | Journal of water and health, 2006-12, Vol.4 (4), p.437-452 |
issn | 1477-8920 1996-7829 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1943083587 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Animals Cryptosporidium Cryptosporidium - isolation & purification Dyes Effluents Environmental Monitoring Fluorescent Dyes Geography Influents Methods Microscopy, Fluorescence Nephelometry and Turbidimetry Oocysts Oocysts - parasitology Oocysts - ultrastructure Protozoa Quality Control Recovering Recovery Risk Assessment Sewage - analysis Sewage - parasitology Time Factors United States United States Environmental Protection Agency Wastewater Wastewater treatment plants Water filtration Water Microbiology Water Movements Water Supply Water treatment plants Xanthenes |
title | Occurrence of Cryptosporidium oocysts in US wastewaters |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T18%3A47%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Occurrence%20of%20Cryptosporidium%20oocysts%20in%20US%20wastewaters&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20water%20and%20health&rft.au=McCuin,%20Randi%20M&rft.date=2006-12&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=437&rft.epage=452&rft.pages=437-452&rft.issn=1477-8920&rft.eissn=1996-7829&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/wh.2006.0028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1943083587%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1943083587&rft_id=info:pmid/17176815&rfr_iscdi=true |