A cost analysis of bioenergy-generated ash disposal options in Canada
The burning of wood for bioenergy produces significant amounts of ash residue that requires disposal. We constructed a cost model to evaluate the unit costs of three ash disposal methods in the Canadian context: landfills owned and operated by the bioenergy facility, municipal landfills, and forest...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of forest research 2017-09, Vol.47 (9), p.1222-1231 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1231 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1222 |
container_title | Canadian journal of forest research |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Hope, Emily S McKenney, Daniel W Allen, Darren J Pedlar, John H |
description | The burning of wood for bioenergy produces significant amounts of ash residue that requires disposal. We constructed a cost model to evaluate the unit costs of three ash disposal methods in the Canadian context: landfills owned and operated by the bioenergy facility, municipal landfills, and forest site application. The model accounts for costs related to the pretreatment, transportation, and disposal of ash at a landfill or forest site. Model parameter values were assigned appropriate distributions (based on published literature and industry surveys), and Monte Carlo simulations were employed to produce a range of model outputs for each disposal option. Results indicate that existing landfills (if available for ash disposal) are likely the most cost-effective option (median value of $77 per tonne), although applying ash to a forest site is only ∼15%–20% more costly (median value of $92 per tonne). Indeed, the unit cost estimates across disposal options have considerable overlap. This suggests that close examination of firm-specific circumstances is highly warranted when choosing a disposal approach, even in the absence of accounting for potential environmental benefits associated with forest site disposal of ash. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1139/cjfr-2016-0524 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1942671044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A503943026</galeid><sourcerecordid>A503943026</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-71c279561f3718d28e9af901ac083b8031c2e2dea39250ad913dac0b966928543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkkFrGzEQRkVJIW7aa86iPfWgZCTtaldHY5I2EBJI0rOQtVpHZr3aaNYQ__tocQ4xGErQYUDz3jADHyHnHC44l_rSrdvEBHDFoBTFFzLjAmqmQFYnZAZQlKwEVZ2Sb4hrAJBKwoxczamLOFLb226HAWls6TJE3_u02rHVVO3oG2rxmTYBh4i2o3EYQ-yRhp4ustjY7-Rrazv0P97rGfl3ffW0-Mtu7__cLOa3zJWFHlnFnah0qXgrK143ovbathq4dVDLZQ0y971ovJValGAbzWWTe0utlBZ1Wcgz8ms_d0jxZetxNOu4TXl1NFwXQlUcig_UynbehL6NY7JuE9CZeQlSFxKEyhQ7Qu0v7mLv25C_D_ifR3g3hBfzEbo4AuXX-E1wR6f-PhAyM_rXcWW3iObm8eET7N0h-76ISxEx-dYMKWxs2hkOZoqLmeJipriYKS5Z4HuhTy559Da55_85b5tIvKw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1942671044</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A cost analysis of bioenergy-generated ash disposal options in Canada</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hope, Emily S ; McKenney, Daniel W ; Allen, Darren J ; Pedlar, John H</creator><creatorcontrib>Hope, Emily S ; McKenney, Daniel W ; Allen, Darren J ; Pedlar, John H</creatorcontrib><description>The burning of wood for bioenergy produces significant amounts of ash residue that requires disposal. We constructed a cost model to evaluate the unit costs of three ash disposal methods in the Canadian context: landfills owned and operated by the bioenergy facility, municipal landfills, and forest site application. The model accounts for costs related to the pretreatment, transportation, and disposal of ash at a landfill or forest site. Model parameter values were assigned appropriate distributions (based on published literature and industry surveys), and Monte Carlo simulations were employed to produce a range of model outputs for each disposal option. Results indicate that existing landfills (if available for ash disposal) are likely the most cost-effective option (median value of $77 per tonne), although applying ash to a forest site is only ∼15%–20% more costly (median value of $92 per tonne). Indeed, the unit cost estimates across disposal options have considerable overlap. This suggests that close examination of firm-specific circumstances is highly warranted when choosing a disposal approach, even in the absence of accounting for potential environmental benefits associated with forest site disposal of ash.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-5067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1208-6037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2016-0524</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa: NRC Research Press</publisher><subject>Alternative energy ; Ash ; Ashes ; Biomass ; Burning ; Canada ; comparaison des coûts ; Computer simulation ; Construction costs ; Cost analysis ; cost comparison ; Cost estimates ; Electric power generation ; Environmental aspects ; forest application ; Forest dynamics ; Forests ; Landfill ; landfill disposal ; Landfills ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Municipal landfills ; Observations ; Pretreatment ; Renewable energy ; site d’enfouissement ; Studies ; Waste disposal ; Waste disposal sites ; Wood ; wood ash disposal ; élimination de la cendre de bois ; épandage en forêt</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of forest research, 2017-09, Vol.47 (9), p.1222-1231</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 NRC Research Press</rights><rights>Copyright Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press Sep 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-71c279561f3718d28e9af901ac083b8031c2e2dea39250ad913dac0b966928543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-71c279561f3718d28e9af901ac083b8031c2e2dea39250ad913dac0b966928543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hope, Emily S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKenney, Daniel W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Darren J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedlar, John H</creatorcontrib><title>A cost analysis of bioenergy-generated ash disposal options in Canada</title><title>Canadian journal of forest research</title><description>The burning of wood for bioenergy produces significant amounts of ash residue that requires disposal. We constructed a cost model to evaluate the unit costs of three ash disposal methods in the Canadian context: landfills owned and operated by the bioenergy facility, municipal landfills, and forest site application. The model accounts for costs related to the pretreatment, transportation, and disposal of ash at a landfill or forest site. Model parameter values were assigned appropriate distributions (based on published literature and industry surveys), and Monte Carlo simulations were employed to produce a range of model outputs for each disposal option. Results indicate that existing landfills (if available for ash disposal) are likely the most cost-effective option (median value of $77 per tonne), although applying ash to a forest site is only ∼15%–20% more costly (median value of $92 per tonne). Indeed, the unit cost estimates across disposal options have considerable overlap. This suggests that close examination of firm-specific circumstances is highly warranted when choosing a disposal approach, even in the absence of accounting for potential environmental benefits associated with forest site disposal of ash.</description><subject>Alternative energy</subject><subject>Ash</subject><subject>Ashes</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Burning</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>comparaison des coûts</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Construction costs</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>cost comparison</subject><subject>Cost estimates</subject><subject>Electric power generation</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>forest application</subject><subject>Forest dynamics</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Landfill</subject><subject>landfill disposal</subject><subject>Landfills</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Municipal landfills</subject><subject>Observations</subject><subject>Pretreatment</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><subject>site d’enfouissement</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Waste disposal</subject><subject>Waste disposal sites</subject><subject>Wood</subject><subject>wood ash disposal</subject><subject>élimination de la cendre de bois</subject><subject>épandage en forêt</subject><issn>0045-5067</issn><issn>1208-6037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkkFrGzEQRkVJIW7aa86iPfWgZCTtaldHY5I2EBJI0rOQtVpHZr3aaNYQ__tocQ4xGErQYUDz3jADHyHnHC44l_rSrdvEBHDFoBTFFzLjAmqmQFYnZAZQlKwEVZ2Sb4hrAJBKwoxczamLOFLb226HAWls6TJE3_u02rHVVO3oG2rxmTYBh4i2o3EYQ-yRhp4ustjY7-Rrazv0P97rGfl3ffW0-Mtu7__cLOa3zJWFHlnFnah0qXgrK143ovbathq4dVDLZQ0y971ovJValGAbzWWTe0utlBZ1Wcgz8ms_d0jxZetxNOu4TXl1NFwXQlUcig_UynbehL6NY7JuE9CZeQlSFxKEyhQ7Qu0v7mLv25C_D_ifR3g3hBfzEbo4AuXX-E1wR6f-PhAyM_rXcWW3iObm8eET7N0h-76ISxEx-dYMKWxs2hkOZoqLmeJipriYKS5Z4HuhTy559Da55_85b5tIvKw</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Hope, Emily S</creator><creator>McKenney, Daniel W</creator><creator>Allen, Darren J</creator><creator>Pedlar, John H</creator><general>NRC Research Press</general><general>Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>A cost analysis of bioenergy-generated ash disposal options in Canada</title><author>Hope, Emily S ; McKenney, Daniel W ; Allen, Darren J ; Pedlar, John H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-71c279561f3718d28e9af901ac083b8031c2e2dea39250ad913dac0b966928543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Alternative energy</topic><topic>Ash</topic><topic>Ashes</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Burning</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>comparaison des coûts</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Construction costs</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>cost comparison</topic><topic>Cost estimates</topic><topic>Electric power generation</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>forest application</topic><topic>Forest dynamics</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Landfill</topic><topic>landfill disposal</topic><topic>Landfills</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Municipal landfills</topic><topic>Observations</topic><topic>Pretreatment</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><topic>site d’enfouissement</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Waste disposal</topic><topic>Waste disposal sites</topic><topic>Wood</topic><topic>wood ash disposal</topic><topic>élimination de la cendre de bois</topic><topic>épandage en forêt</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hope, Emily S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKenney, Daniel W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Darren J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedlar, John H</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of forest research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hope, Emily S</au><au>McKenney, Daniel W</au><au>Allen, Darren J</au><au>Pedlar, John H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A cost analysis of bioenergy-generated ash disposal options in Canada</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of forest research</jtitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1222</spage><epage>1231</epage><pages>1222-1231</pages><issn>0045-5067</issn><eissn>1208-6037</eissn><abstract>The burning of wood for bioenergy produces significant amounts of ash residue that requires disposal. We constructed a cost model to evaluate the unit costs of three ash disposal methods in the Canadian context: landfills owned and operated by the bioenergy facility, municipal landfills, and forest site application. The model accounts for costs related to the pretreatment, transportation, and disposal of ash at a landfill or forest site. Model parameter values were assigned appropriate distributions (based on published literature and industry surveys), and Monte Carlo simulations were employed to produce a range of model outputs for each disposal option. Results indicate that existing landfills (if available for ash disposal) are likely the most cost-effective option (median value of $77 per tonne), although applying ash to a forest site is only ∼15%–20% more costly (median value of $92 per tonne). Indeed, the unit cost estimates across disposal options have considerable overlap. This suggests that close examination of firm-specific circumstances is highly warranted when choosing a disposal approach, even in the absence of accounting for potential environmental benefits associated with forest site disposal of ash.</abstract><cop>Ottawa</cop><pub>NRC Research Press</pub><doi>10.1139/cjfr-2016-0524</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0045-5067 |
ispartof | Canadian journal of forest research, 2017-09, Vol.47 (9), p.1222-1231 |
issn | 0045-5067 1208-6037 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1942671044 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Alternative energy Ash Ashes Biomass Burning Canada comparaison des coûts Computer simulation Construction costs Cost analysis cost comparison Cost estimates Electric power generation Environmental aspects forest application Forest dynamics Forests Landfill landfill disposal Landfills Monte Carlo simulation Municipal landfills Observations Pretreatment Renewable energy site d’enfouissement Studies Waste disposal Waste disposal sites Wood wood ash disposal élimination de la cendre de bois épandage en forêt |
title | A cost analysis of bioenergy-generated ash disposal options in Canada |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T03%3A24%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20cost%20analysis%20of%20bioenergy-generated%20ash%20disposal%20options%20in%20Canada&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20forest%20research&rft.au=Hope,%20Emily%20S&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1222&rft.epage=1231&rft.pages=1222-1231&rft.issn=0045-5067&rft.eissn=1208-6037&rft_id=info:doi/10.1139/cjfr-2016-0524&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA503943026%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1942671044&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A503943026&rfr_iscdi=true |