Simulation of Mercury's magnetosheath with a combined hybrid‐paraboloid model

In this paper we introduce a novel approach for modeling planetary magnetospheres that involves a combination of the hybrid model and the paraboloid magnetosphere model (PMM); we further refer to it as the combined hybrid model. While both of these individual models have been successfully applied in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Space physics 2017-08, Vol.122 (8), p.8310-8326
Hauptverfasser: Parunakian, David, Dyadechkin, Sergey, Alexeev, Igor, Belenkaya, Elena, Khodachenko, Maxim, Kallio, Esa, Alho, Markku
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 8326
container_issue 8
container_start_page 8310
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Space physics
container_volume 122
creator Parunakian, David
Dyadechkin, Sergey
Alexeev, Igor
Belenkaya, Elena
Khodachenko, Maxim
Kallio, Esa
Alho, Markku
description In this paper we introduce a novel approach for modeling planetary magnetospheres that involves a combination of the hybrid model and the paraboloid magnetosphere model (PMM); we further refer to it as the combined hybrid model. While both of these individual models have been successfully applied in the past, their combination enables us both to overcome the traditional difficulties of hybrid models to develop a self‐consistent magnetic field and to compensate the lack of plasma simulation in the PMM. We then use this combined model to simulate Mercury's magnetosphere and investigate the geometry and configuration of Mercury's magnetosheath controlled by various conditions in the interplanetary medium. The developed approach provides a unique comprehensive view of Mercury's magnetospheric environment for the first time. Using this setup, we compare the locations of the bow shock and the magnetopause as determined by simulations with the locations predicted by stand‐alone PMM runs and also verify the magnetic and dynamic pressure balance at the magnetopause. We also compare the results produced by these simulations with observational data obtained by the magnetometer on board the MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging (MESSENGER) spacecraft along a dusk‐dawn orbit and discuss the signatures of the magnetospheric features that appear in these simulations. Overall, our analysis suggests that combining the semiempirical PMM with a self‐consistent global kinetic model creates new modeling possibilities which individual models cannot provide on their own. Key Points A new magnetosphere model has been developed which combines hybrid and analytical approaches Preliminary tests suggest that this approach successfully captures observed magnetospheric features The magnetopause is closer to Mercury for southward IMF, while the bow shock position is stable
doi_str_mv 10.1002/2017JA024105
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1942298713</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1942298713</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3454-eede82dc6e3a0929517ad9c1e20e4db8b98da51e90fd47ddf072ee445ab407253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AUhQdRsGh3PkDAhRuj89tklqVotVQK_qyHSebGTkkydSahZOcj-Iw-iSNVcOVdnHu4fJwLB6Ezgq8IxvSaYpItpphygsUBGlEykankmB7-epbjYzQOYYPj5PFExAitnmzT17qzrk1clTyAL3s_XISk0a8tdC6sQXfrZGej6KR0TWFbMMl6KLw1n-8fW-114WpnTdI4A_UpOqp0HWD8s0_Qy-3N8-wuXa7m97PpMi0ZFzwFMJBTU06AaSypFCTTRpYEKAZuiryQudGCgMSV4ZkxFc4oAOdCFzxawU7Q-T53691bD6FTG9f7Nr5URHJKZZ4RFqnLPVV6F4KHSm29bbQfFMHquzX1t7WIsz2-szUM_7JqMX-cCjYRnH0Ba9xuxA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1942298713</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Simulation of Mercury's magnetosheath with a combined hybrid‐paraboloid model</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Parunakian, David ; Dyadechkin, Sergey ; Alexeev, Igor ; Belenkaya, Elena ; Khodachenko, Maxim ; Kallio, Esa ; Alho, Markku</creator><creatorcontrib>Parunakian, David ; Dyadechkin, Sergey ; Alexeev, Igor ; Belenkaya, Elena ; Khodachenko, Maxim ; Kallio, Esa ; Alho, Markku</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper we introduce a novel approach for modeling planetary magnetospheres that involves a combination of the hybrid model and the paraboloid magnetosphere model (PMM); we further refer to it as the combined hybrid model. While both of these individual models have been successfully applied in the past, their combination enables us both to overcome the traditional difficulties of hybrid models to develop a self‐consistent magnetic field and to compensate the lack of plasma simulation in the PMM. We then use this combined model to simulate Mercury's magnetosphere and investigate the geometry and configuration of Mercury's magnetosheath controlled by various conditions in the interplanetary medium. The developed approach provides a unique comprehensive view of Mercury's magnetospheric environment for the first time. Using this setup, we compare the locations of the bow shock and the magnetopause as determined by simulations with the locations predicted by stand‐alone PMM runs and also verify the magnetic and dynamic pressure balance at the magnetopause. We also compare the results produced by these simulations with observational data obtained by the magnetometer on board the MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging (MESSENGER) spacecraft along a dusk‐dawn orbit and discuss the signatures of the magnetospheric features that appear in these simulations. Overall, our analysis suggests that combining the semiempirical PMM with a self‐consistent global kinetic model creates new modeling possibilities which individual models cannot provide on their own. Key Points A new magnetosphere model has been developed which combines hybrid and analytical approaches Preliminary tests suggest that this approach successfully captures observed magnetospheric features The magnetopause is closer to Mercury for southward IMF, while the bow shock position is stable</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2017JA024105</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aerospace environments ; Computer simulation ; Dynamic pressure ; Geochemistry ; Hermean magnetosphere ; hybrid model ; Interplanetary medium ; Magnetic fields ; Magnetopause ; Magnetosheath ; Magnetosphere ; Magnetospheres ; Mercury ; Mercury (planet) ; Mercury magnetosphere ; Mercury surface ; MESSENGER ; MESSENGER Mission ; MESSENGER Spacecraft ; Modelling ; Planetary magnetospheres ; semiempirical model ; Spacecraft</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2017-08, Vol.122 (8), p.8310-8326</ispartof><rights>2017. The Authors.</rights><rights>2017. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3454-eede82dc6e3a0929517ad9c1e20e4db8b98da51e90fd47ddf072ee445ab407253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3454-eede82dc6e3a0929517ad9c1e20e4db8b98da51e90fd47ddf072ee445ab407253</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9791-804X ; 0000-0002-5468-4060 ; 0000-0003-2057-5365</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2017JA024105$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2017JA024105$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parunakian, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyadechkin, Sergey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexeev, Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belenkaya, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khodachenko, Maxim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallio, Esa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alho, Markku</creatorcontrib><title>Simulation of Mercury's magnetosheath with a combined hybrid‐paraboloid model</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</title><description>In this paper we introduce a novel approach for modeling planetary magnetospheres that involves a combination of the hybrid model and the paraboloid magnetosphere model (PMM); we further refer to it as the combined hybrid model. While both of these individual models have been successfully applied in the past, their combination enables us both to overcome the traditional difficulties of hybrid models to develop a self‐consistent magnetic field and to compensate the lack of plasma simulation in the PMM. We then use this combined model to simulate Mercury's magnetosphere and investigate the geometry and configuration of Mercury's magnetosheath controlled by various conditions in the interplanetary medium. The developed approach provides a unique comprehensive view of Mercury's magnetospheric environment for the first time. Using this setup, we compare the locations of the bow shock and the magnetopause as determined by simulations with the locations predicted by stand‐alone PMM runs and also verify the magnetic and dynamic pressure balance at the magnetopause. We also compare the results produced by these simulations with observational data obtained by the magnetometer on board the MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging (MESSENGER) spacecraft along a dusk‐dawn orbit and discuss the signatures of the magnetospheric features that appear in these simulations. Overall, our analysis suggests that combining the semiempirical PMM with a self‐consistent global kinetic model creates new modeling possibilities which individual models cannot provide on their own. Key Points A new magnetosphere model has been developed which combines hybrid and analytical approaches Preliminary tests suggest that this approach successfully captures observed magnetospheric features The magnetopause is closer to Mercury for southward IMF, while the bow shock position is stable</description><subject>Aerospace environments</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Dynamic pressure</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Hermean magnetosphere</subject><subject>hybrid model</subject><subject>Interplanetary medium</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Magnetopause</subject><subject>Magnetosheath</subject><subject>Magnetosphere</subject><subject>Magnetospheres</subject><subject>Mercury</subject><subject>Mercury (planet)</subject><subject>Mercury magnetosphere</subject><subject>Mercury surface</subject><subject>MESSENGER</subject><subject>MESSENGER Mission</subject><subject>MESSENGER Spacecraft</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Planetary magnetospheres</subject><subject>semiempirical model</subject><subject>Spacecraft</subject><issn>2169-9380</issn><issn>2169-9402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AUhQdRsGh3PkDAhRuj89tklqVotVQK_qyHSebGTkkydSahZOcj-Iw-iSNVcOVdnHu4fJwLB6Ezgq8IxvSaYpItpphygsUBGlEykankmB7-epbjYzQOYYPj5PFExAitnmzT17qzrk1clTyAL3s_XISk0a8tdC6sQXfrZGej6KR0TWFbMMl6KLw1n-8fW-114WpnTdI4A_UpOqp0HWD8s0_Qy-3N8-wuXa7m97PpMi0ZFzwFMJBTU06AaSypFCTTRpYEKAZuiryQudGCgMSV4ZkxFc4oAOdCFzxawU7Q-T53691bD6FTG9f7Nr5URHJKZZ4RFqnLPVV6F4KHSm29bbQfFMHquzX1t7WIsz2-szUM_7JqMX-cCjYRnH0Ba9xuxA</recordid><startdate>201708</startdate><enddate>201708</enddate><creator>Parunakian, David</creator><creator>Dyadechkin, Sergey</creator><creator>Alexeev, Igor</creator><creator>Belenkaya, Elena</creator><creator>Khodachenko, Maxim</creator><creator>Kallio, Esa</creator><creator>Alho, Markku</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9791-804X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5468-4060</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2057-5365</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201708</creationdate><title>Simulation of Mercury's magnetosheath with a combined hybrid‐paraboloid model</title><author>Parunakian, David ; Dyadechkin, Sergey ; Alexeev, Igor ; Belenkaya, Elena ; Khodachenko, Maxim ; Kallio, Esa ; Alho, Markku</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3454-eede82dc6e3a0929517ad9c1e20e4db8b98da51e90fd47ddf072ee445ab407253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aerospace environments</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Dynamic pressure</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Hermean magnetosphere</topic><topic>hybrid model</topic><topic>Interplanetary medium</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Magnetopause</topic><topic>Magnetosheath</topic><topic>Magnetosphere</topic><topic>Magnetospheres</topic><topic>Mercury</topic><topic>Mercury (planet)</topic><topic>Mercury magnetosphere</topic><topic>Mercury surface</topic><topic>MESSENGER</topic><topic>MESSENGER Mission</topic><topic>MESSENGER Spacecraft</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Planetary magnetospheres</topic><topic>semiempirical model</topic><topic>Spacecraft</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parunakian, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyadechkin, Sergey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexeev, Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belenkaya, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khodachenko, Maxim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallio, Esa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alho, Markku</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parunakian, David</au><au>Dyadechkin, Sergey</au><au>Alexeev, Igor</au><au>Belenkaya, Elena</au><au>Khodachenko, Maxim</au><au>Kallio, Esa</au><au>Alho, Markku</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Simulation of Mercury's magnetosheath with a combined hybrid‐paraboloid model</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle><date>2017-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>122</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>8310</spage><epage>8326</epage><pages>8310-8326</pages><issn>2169-9380</issn><eissn>2169-9402</eissn><abstract>In this paper we introduce a novel approach for modeling planetary magnetospheres that involves a combination of the hybrid model and the paraboloid magnetosphere model (PMM); we further refer to it as the combined hybrid model. While both of these individual models have been successfully applied in the past, their combination enables us both to overcome the traditional difficulties of hybrid models to develop a self‐consistent magnetic field and to compensate the lack of plasma simulation in the PMM. We then use this combined model to simulate Mercury's magnetosphere and investigate the geometry and configuration of Mercury's magnetosheath controlled by various conditions in the interplanetary medium. The developed approach provides a unique comprehensive view of Mercury's magnetospheric environment for the first time. Using this setup, we compare the locations of the bow shock and the magnetopause as determined by simulations with the locations predicted by stand‐alone PMM runs and also verify the magnetic and dynamic pressure balance at the magnetopause. We also compare the results produced by these simulations with observational data obtained by the magnetometer on board the MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging (MESSENGER) spacecraft along a dusk‐dawn orbit and discuss the signatures of the magnetospheric features that appear in these simulations. Overall, our analysis suggests that combining the semiempirical PMM with a self‐consistent global kinetic model creates new modeling possibilities which individual models cannot provide on their own. Key Points A new magnetosphere model has been developed which combines hybrid and analytical approaches Preliminary tests suggest that this approach successfully captures observed magnetospheric features The magnetopause is closer to Mercury for southward IMF, while the bow shock position is stable</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2017JA024105</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9791-804X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5468-4060</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2057-5365</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9380
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2017-08, Vol.122 (8), p.8310-8326
issn 2169-9380
2169-9402
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1942298713
source Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Aerospace environments
Computer simulation
Dynamic pressure
Geochemistry
Hermean magnetosphere
hybrid model
Interplanetary medium
Magnetic fields
Magnetopause
Magnetosheath
Magnetosphere
Magnetospheres
Mercury
Mercury (planet)
Mercury magnetosphere
Mercury surface
MESSENGER
MESSENGER Mission
MESSENGER Spacecraft
Modelling
Planetary magnetospheres
semiempirical model
Spacecraft
title Simulation of Mercury's magnetosheath with a combined hybrid‐paraboloid model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T17%3A40%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Simulation%20of%20Mercury's%20magnetosheath%20with%20a%20combined%20hybrid%E2%80%90paraboloid%20model&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Space%20physics&rft.au=Parunakian,%20David&rft.date=2017-08&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=8310&rft.epage=8326&rft.pages=8310-8326&rft.issn=2169-9380&rft.eissn=2169-9402&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2017JA024105&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1942298713%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1942298713&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true