Simulation of Mercury's magnetosheath with a combined hybrid‐paraboloid model
In this paper we introduce a novel approach for modeling planetary magnetospheres that involves a combination of the hybrid model and the paraboloid magnetosphere model (PMM); we further refer to it as the combined hybrid model. While both of these individual models have been successfully applied in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Space physics 2017-08, Vol.122 (8), p.8310-8326 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 8326 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 8310 |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Space physics |
container_volume | 122 |
creator | Parunakian, David Dyadechkin, Sergey Alexeev, Igor Belenkaya, Elena Khodachenko, Maxim Kallio, Esa Alho, Markku |
description | In this paper we introduce a novel approach for modeling planetary magnetospheres that involves a combination of the hybrid model and the paraboloid magnetosphere model (PMM); we further refer to it as the combined hybrid model. While both of these individual models have been successfully applied in the past, their combination enables us both to overcome the traditional difficulties of hybrid models to develop a self‐consistent magnetic field and to compensate the lack of plasma simulation in the PMM. We then use this combined model to simulate Mercury's magnetosphere and investigate the geometry and configuration of Mercury's magnetosheath controlled by various conditions in the interplanetary medium. The developed approach provides a unique comprehensive view of Mercury's magnetospheric environment for the first time. Using this setup, we compare the locations of the bow shock and the magnetopause as determined by simulations with the locations predicted by stand‐alone PMM runs and also verify the magnetic and dynamic pressure balance at the magnetopause. We also compare the results produced by these simulations with observational data obtained by the magnetometer on board the MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging (MESSENGER) spacecraft along a dusk‐dawn orbit and discuss the signatures of the magnetospheric features that appear in these simulations. Overall, our analysis suggests that combining the semiempirical PMM with a self‐consistent global kinetic model creates new modeling possibilities which individual models cannot provide on their own.
Key Points
A new magnetosphere model has been developed which combines hybrid and analytical approaches
Preliminary tests suggest that this approach successfully captures observed magnetospheric features
The magnetopause is closer to Mercury for southward IMF, while the bow shock position is stable |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/2017JA024105 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1942298713</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1942298713</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3454-eede82dc6e3a0929517ad9c1e20e4db8b98da51e90fd47ddf072ee445ab407253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AUhQdRsGh3PkDAhRuj89tklqVotVQK_qyHSebGTkkydSahZOcj-Iw-iSNVcOVdnHu4fJwLB6Ezgq8IxvSaYpItpphygsUBGlEykankmB7-epbjYzQOYYPj5PFExAitnmzT17qzrk1clTyAL3s_XISk0a8tdC6sQXfrZGej6KR0TWFbMMl6KLw1n-8fW-114WpnTdI4A_UpOqp0HWD8s0_Qy-3N8-wuXa7m97PpMi0ZFzwFMJBTU06AaSypFCTTRpYEKAZuiryQudGCgMSV4ZkxFc4oAOdCFzxawU7Q-T53691bD6FTG9f7Nr5URHJKZZ4RFqnLPVV6F4KHSm29bbQfFMHquzX1t7WIsz2-szUM_7JqMX-cCjYRnH0Ba9xuxA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1942298713</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Simulation of Mercury's magnetosheath with a combined hybrid‐paraboloid model</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Parunakian, David ; Dyadechkin, Sergey ; Alexeev, Igor ; Belenkaya, Elena ; Khodachenko, Maxim ; Kallio, Esa ; Alho, Markku</creator><creatorcontrib>Parunakian, David ; Dyadechkin, Sergey ; Alexeev, Igor ; Belenkaya, Elena ; Khodachenko, Maxim ; Kallio, Esa ; Alho, Markku</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper we introduce a novel approach for modeling planetary magnetospheres that involves a combination of the hybrid model and the paraboloid magnetosphere model (PMM); we further refer to it as the combined hybrid model. While both of these individual models have been successfully applied in the past, their combination enables us both to overcome the traditional difficulties of hybrid models to develop a self‐consistent magnetic field and to compensate the lack of plasma simulation in the PMM. We then use this combined model to simulate Mercury's magnetosphere and investigate the geometry and configuration of Mercury's magnetosheath controlled by various conditions in the interplanetary medium. The developed approach provides a unique comprehensive view of Mercury's magnetospheric environment for the first time. Using this setup, we compare the locations of the bow shock and the magnetopause as determined by simulations with the locations predicted by stand‐alone PMM runs and also verify the magnetic and dynamic pressure balance at the magnetopause. We also compare the results produced by these simulations with observational data obtained by the magnetometer on board the MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging (MESSENGER) spacecraft along a dusk‐dawn orbit and discuss the signatures of the magnetospheric features that appear in these simulations. Overall, our analysis suggests that combining the semiempirical PMM with a self‐consistent global kinetic model creates new modeling possibilities which individual models cannot provide on their own.
Key Points
A new magnetosphere model has been developed which combines hybrid and analytical approaches
Preliminary tests suggest that this approach successfully captures observed magnetospheric features
The magnetopause is closer to Mercury for southward IMF, while the bow shock position is stable</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2017JA024105</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aerospace environments ; Computer simulation ; Dynamic pressure ; Geochemistry ; Hermean magnetosphere ; hybrid model ; Interplanetary medium ; Magnetic fields ; Magnetopause ; Magnetosheath ; Magnetosphere ; Magnetospheres ; Mercury ; Mercury (planet) ; Mercury magnetosphere ; Mercury surface ; MESSENGER ; MESSENGER Mission ; MESSENGER Spacecraft ; Modelling ; Planetary magnetospheres ; semiempirical model ; Spacecraft</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2017-08, Vol.122 (8), p.8310-8326</ispartof><rights>2017. The Authors.</rights><rights>2017. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3454-eede82dc6e3a0929517ad9c1e20e4db8b98da51e90fd47ddf072ee445ab407253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3454-eede82dc6e3a0929517ad9c1e20e4db8b98da51e90fd47ddf072ee445ab407253</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9791-804X ; 0000-0002-5468-4060 ; 0000-0003-2057-5365</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2017JA024105$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2017JA024105$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parunakian, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyadechkin, Sergey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexeev, Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belenkaya, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khodachenko, Maxim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallio, Esa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alho, Markku</creatorcontrib><title>Simulation of Mercury's magnetosheath with a combined hybrid‐paraboloid model</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</title><description>In this paper we introduce a novel approach for modeling planetary magnetospheres that involves a combination of the hybrid model and the paraboloid magnetosphere model (PMM); we further refer to it as the combined hybrid model. While both of these individual models have been successfully applied in the past, their combination enables us both to overcome the traditional difficulties of hybrid models to develop a self‐consistent magnetic field and to compensate the lack of plasma simulation in the PMM. We then use this combined model to simulate Mercury's magnetosphere and investigate the geometry and configuration of Mercury's magnetosheath controlled by various conditions in the interplanetary medium. The developed approach provides a unique comprehensive view of Mercury's magnetospheric environment for the first time. Using this setup, we compare the locations of the bow shock and the magnetopause as determined by simulations with the locations predicted by stand‐alone PMM runs and also verify the magnetic and dynamic pressure balance at the magnetopause. We also compare the results produced by these simulations with observational data obtained by the magnetometer on board the MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging (MESSENGER) spacecraft along a dusk‐dawn orbit and discuss the signatures of the magnetospheric features that appear in these simulations. Overall, our analysis suggests that combining the semiempirical PMM with a self‐consistent global kinetic model creates new modeling possibilities which individual models cannot provide on their own.
Key Points
A new magnetosphere model has been developed which combines hybrid and analytical approaches
Preliminary tests suggest that this approach successfully captures observed magnetospheric features
The magnetopause is closer to Mercury for southward IMF, while the bow shock position is stable</description><subject>Aerospace environments</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Dynamic pressure</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Hermean magnetosphere</subject><subject>hybrid model</subject><subject>Interplanetary medium</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Magnetopause</subject><subject>Magnetosheath</subject><subject>Magnetosphere</subject><subject>Magnetospheres</subject><subject>Mercury</subject><subject>Mercury (planet)</subject><subject>Mercury magnetosphere</subject><subject>Mercury surface</subject><subject>MESSENGER</subject><subject>MESSENGER Mission</subject><subject>MESSENGER Spacecraft</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Planetary magnetospheres</subject><subject>semiempirical model</subject><subject>Spacecraft</subject><issn>2169-9380</issn><issn>2169-9402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AUhQdRsGh3PkDAhRuj89tklqVotVQK_qyHSebGTkkydSahZOcj-Iw-iSNVcOVdnHu4fJwLB6Ezgq8IxvSaYpItpphygsUBGlEykankmB7-epbjYzQOYYPj5PFExAitnmzT17qzrk1clTyAL3s_XISk0a8tdC6sQXfrZGej6KR0TWFbMMl6KLw1n-8fW-114WpnTdI4A_UpOqp0HWD8s0_Qy-3N8-wuXa7m97PpMi0ZFzwFMJBTU06AaSypFCTTRpYEKAZuiryQudGCgMSV4ZkxFc4oAOdCFzxawU7Q-T53691bD6FTG9f7Nr5URHJKZZ4RFqnLPVV6F4KHSm29bbQfFMHquzX1t7WIsz2-szUM_7JqMX-cCjYRnH0Ba9xuxA</recordid><startdate>201708</startdate><enddate>201708</enddate><creator>Parunakian, David</creator><creator>Dyadechkin, Sergey</creator><creator>Alexeev, Igor</creator><creator>Belenkaya, Elena</creator><creator>Khodachenko, Maxim</creator><creator>Kallio, Esa</creator><creator>Alho, Markku</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9791-804X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5468-4060</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2057-5365</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201708</creationdate><title>Simulation of Mercury's magnetosheath with a combined hybrid‐paraboloid model</title><author>Parunakian, David ; Dyadechkin, Sergey ; Alexeev, Igor ; Belenkaya, Elena ; Khodachenko, Maxim ; Kallio, Esa ; Alho, Markku</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3454-eede82dc6e3a0929517ad9c1e20e4db8b98da51e90fd47ddf072ee445ab407253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aerospace environments</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Dynamic pressure</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Hermean magnetosphere</topic><topic>hybrid model</topic><topic>Interplanetary medium</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Magnetopause</topic><topic>Magnetosheath</topic><topic>Magnetosphere</topic><topic>Magnetospheres</topic><topic>Mercury</topic><topic>Mercury (planet)</topic><topic>Mercury magnetosphere</topic><topic>Mercury surface</topic><topic>MESSENGER</topic><topic>MESSENGER Mission</topic><topic>MESSENGER Spacecraft</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Planetary magnetospheres</topic><topic>semiempirical model</topic><topic>Spacecraft</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parunakian, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyadechkin, Sergey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexeev, Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belenkaya, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khodachenko, Maxim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallio, Esa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alho, Markku</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parunakian, David</au><au>Dyadechkin, Sergey</au><au>Alexeev, Igor</au><au>Belenkaya, Elena</au><au>Khodachenko, Maxim</au><au>Kallio, Esa</au><au>Alho, Markku</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Simulation of Mercury's magnetosheath with a combined hybrid‐paraboloid model</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle><date>2017-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>122</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>8310</spage><epage>8326</epage><pages>8310-8326</pages><issn>2169-9380</issn><eissn>2169-9402</eissn><abstract>In this paper we introduce a novel approach for modeling planetary magnetospheres that involves a combination of the hybrid model and the paraboloid magnetosphere model (PMM); we further refer to it as the combined hybrid model. While both of these individual models have been successfully applied in the past, their combination enables us both to overcome the traditional difficulties of hybrid models to develop a self‐consistent magnetic field and to compensate the lack of plasma simulation in the PMM. We then use this combined model to simulate Mercury's magnetosphere and investigate the geometry and configuration of Mercury's magnetosheath controlled by various conditions in the interplanetary medium. The developed approach provides a unique comprehensive view of Mercury's magnetospheric environment for the first time. Using this setup, we compare the locations of the bow shock and the magnetopause as determined by simulations with the locations predicted by stand‐alone PMM runs and also verify the magnetic and dynamic pressure balance at the magnetopause. We also compare the results produced by these simulations with observational data obtained by the magnetometer on board the MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging (MESSENGER) spacecraft along a dusk‐dawn orbit and discuss the signatures of the magnetospheric features that appear in these simulations. Overall, our analysis suggests that combining the semiempirical PMM with a self‐consistent global kinetic model creates new modeling possibilities which individual models cannot provide on their own.
Key Points
A new magnetosphere model has been developed which combines hybrid and analytical approaches
Preliminary tests suggest that this approach successfully captures observed magnetospheric features
The magnetopause is closer to Mercury for southward IMF, while the bow shock position is stable</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2017JA024105</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9791-804X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5468-4060</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2057-5365</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-9380 |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2017-08, Vol.122 (8), p.8310-8326 |
issn | 2169-9380 2169-9402 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1942298713 |
source | Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Aerospace environments Computer simulation Dynamic pressure Geochemistry Hermean magnetosphere hybrid model Interplanetary medium Magnetic fields Magnetopause Magnetosheath Magnetosphere Magnetospheres Mercury Mercury (planet) Mercury magnetosphere Mercury surface MESSENGER MESSENGER Mission MESSENGER Spacecraft Modelling Planetary magnetospheres semiempirical model Spacecraft |
title | Simulation of Mercury's magnetosheath with a combined hybrid‐paraboloid model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T17%3A40%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Simulation%20of%20Mercury's%20magnetosheath%20with%20a%20combined%20hybrid%E2%80%90paraboloid%20model&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Space%20physics&rft.au=Parunakian,%20David&rft.date=2017-08&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=8310&rft.epage=8326&rft.pages=8310-8326&rft.issn=2169-9380&rft.eissn=2169-9402&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2017JA024105&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1942298713%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1942298713&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |