Toward Validation of Partner Goal Achievement as a Measure of Joint Venture Performance
The increased use of joint ventures in highly competitive environments has spurred a dramatic increase in academic research activity on this synergistic strategy. However, in the absence of a theory of joint venture performance, researchers have used a variety of performance indicators without addre...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of managerial issues 1998-10, Vol.10 (3), p.355-372 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 372 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 355 |
| container_title | Journal of managerial issues |
| container_volume | 10 |
| creator | Hatfield, Louise Pearce, John A. Sleeth, Randall G. Pitts, Michael W. |
| description | The increased use of joint ventures in highly competitive environments has spurred a dramatic increase in academic research activity on this synergistic strategy. However, in the absence of a theory of joint venture performance, researchers have used a variety of performance indicators without addressing how these surrogate measures relate to each other. This field study tests the relationships among the three most popular joint venture performance measures — managerial assessment, joint venture duration, and joint venture survival. A derived model is provided which suggests that partner satisfaction with the joint venture experience is principally determined by partner goal achievement. The implication for business practice is that measures of joint venture performance that emphasize duration and prioritize survival over managerial assessment can be abandoned in favor of attention to partner goal achievement. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_194164561</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40604204</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40604204</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j491-acca7e368b73d78fbf0aeeca7e6071196f533c4b849b77e36d220df2b2c2b16a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjV1LwzAYhYMoWKc_QQjeF_LVpL0cQ6cycRdlXpa36RtsaZuZdIr_3pZ5deA5D-dckERIkadGGXZJEs5UlkpdZNfkJsaOMcaFYgn5KP0PhIYeoG8bmFo_Uu_oHsI0YqBbDz1d288Wv3HAcaIQKdA3hHgKuIivvp3pYa4WsMfgfBhgtHhLrhz0Ee_-c0XKp8dy85zu3rcvm_Uu7VTBU7AWDEqd10Y2Jne1Y4C4MM0M54V2mZRW1bkqarOIjRCscaIWVtRcg1yRh_PsMfivE8ap6vwpjPNjxQvFtco0n6X7s9TFyYfqGNoBwm-lmGZKMCX_AD4CV5U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194164561</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toward Validation of Partner Goal Achievement as a Measure of Joint Venture Performance</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Hatfield, Louise ; Pearce, John A. ; Sleeth, Randall G. ; Pitts, Michael W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hatfield, Louise ; Pearce, John A. ; Sleeth, Randall G. ; Pitts, Michael W.</creatorcontrib><description>The increased use of joint ventures in highly competitive environments has spurred a dramatic increase in academic research activity on this synergistic strategy. However, in the absence of a theory of joint venture performance, researchers have used a variety of performance indicators without addressing how these surrogate measures relate to each other. This field study tests the relationships among the three most popular joint venture performance measures — managerial assessment, joint venture duration, and joint venture survival. A derived model is provided which suggests that partner satisfaction with the joint venture experience is principally determined by partner goal achievement. The implication for business practice is that measures of joint venture performance that emphasize duration and prioritize survival over managerial assessment can be abandoned in favor of attention to partner goal achievement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-3695</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2328-7470</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMAIE9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Pittsburg: Pittsburg State University</publisher><subject>Alliances ; Business structures ; Capital management ; Competition ; Consolidated financial statements ; Corporate objectives ; Corporate strategies ; Failure ; Hypotheses ; International economic cooperation ; Joint ventures ; Likert scale ; Objectives ; Performance metrics ; Regression analysis ; Researchers ; Start up firms ; Startups ; Statistical analysis ; Studies ; Subsidiary companies ; Success</subject><ispartof>Journal of managerial issues, 1998-10, Vol.10 (3), p.355-372</ispartof><rights>1998 Pittsburg State University</rights><rights>Copyright Pittsburg State University, Department of Economics Fall 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40604204$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40604204$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hatfield, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearce, John A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sleeth, Randall G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitts, Michael W.</creatorcontrib><title>Toward Validation of Partner Goal Achievement as a Measure of Joint Venture Performance</title><title>Journal of managerial issues</title><description>The increased use of joint ventures in highly competitive environments has spurred a dramatic increase in academic research activity on this synergistic strategy. However, in the absence of a theory of joint venture performance, researchers have used a variety of performance indicators without addressing how these surrogate measures relate to each other. This field study tests the relationships among the three most popular joint venture performance measures — managerial assessment, joint venture duration, and joint venture survival. A derived model is provided which suggests that partner satisfaction with the joint venture experience is principally determined by partner goal achievement. The implication for business practice is that measures of joint venture performance that emphasize duration and prioritize survival over managerial assessment can be abandoned in favor of attention to partner goal achievement.</description><subject>Alliances</subject><subject>Business structures</subject><subject>Capital management</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Consolidated financial statements</subject><subject>Corporate objectives</subject><subject>Corporate strategies</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>International economic cooperation</subject><subject>Joint ventures</subject><subject>Likert scale</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Performance metrics</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Start up firms</subject><subject>Startups</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Subsidiary companies</subject><subject>Success</subject><issn>1045-3695</issn><issn>2328-7470</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNotjV1LwzAYhYMoWKc_QQjeF_LVpL0cQ6cycRdlXpa36RtsaZuZdIr_3pZ5deA5D-dckERIkadGGXZJEs5UlkpdZNfkJsaOMcaFYgn5KP0PhIYeoG8bmFo_Uu_oHsI0YqBbDz1d288Wv3HAcaIQKdA3hHgKuIivvp3pYa4WsMfgfBhgtHhLrhz0Ee_-c0XKp8dy85zu3rcvm_Uu7VTBU7AWDEqd10Y2Jne1Y4C4MM0M54V2mZRW1bkqarOIjRCscaIWVtRcg1yRh_PsMfivE8ap6vwpjPNjxQvFtco0n6X7s9TFyYfqGNoBwm-lmGZKMCX_AD4CV5U</recordid><startdate>19981001</startdate><enddate>19981001</enddate><creator>Hatfield, Louise</creator><creator>Pearce, John A.</creator><creator>Sleeth, Randall G.</creator><creator>Pitts, Michael W.</creator><general>Pittsburg State University</general><general>Pittsburg State University, Department of Economics</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A3</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19981001</creationdate><title>Toward Validation of Partner Goal Achievement as a Measure of Joint Venture Performance</title><author>Hatfield, Louise ; Pearce, John A. ; Sleeth, Randall G. ; Pitts, Michael W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j491-acca7e368b73d78fbf0aeeca7e6071196f533c4b849b77e36d220df2b2c2b16a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Alliances</topic><topic>Business structures</topic><topic>Capital management</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Consolidated financial statements</topic><topic>Corporate objectives</topic><topic>Corporate strategies</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>International economic cooperation</topic><topic>Joint ventures</topic><topic>Likert scale</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Performance metrics</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Start up firms</topic><topic>Startups</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Subsidiary companies</topic><topic>Success</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hatfield, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearce, John A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sleeth, Randall G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitts, Michael W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of managerial issues</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hatfield, Louise</au><au>Pearce, John A.</au><au>Sleeth, Randall G.</au><au>Pitts, Michael W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toward Validation of Partner Goal Achievement as a Measure of Joint Venture Performance</atitle><jtitle>Journal of managerial issues</jtitle><date>1998-10-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>355</spage><epage>372</epage><pages>355-372</pages><issn>1045-3695</issn><eissn>2328-7470</eissn><coden>JMAIE9</coden><abstract>The increased use of joint ventures in highly competitive environments has spurred a dramatic increase in academic research activity on this synergistic strategy. However, in the absence of a theory of joint venture performance, researchers have used a variety of performance indicators without addressing how these surrogate measures relate to each other. This field study tests the relationships among the three most popular joint venture performance measures — managerial assessment, joint venture duration, and joint venture survival. A derived model is provided which suggests that partner satisfaction with the joint venture experience is principally determined by partner goal achievement. The implication for business practice is that measures of joint venture performance that emphasize duration and prioritize survival over managerial assessment can be abandoned in favor of attention to partner goal achievement.</abstract><cop>Pittsburg</cop><pub>Pittsburg State University</pub><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1045-3695 |
| ispartof | Journal of managerial issues, 1998-10, Vol.10 (3), p.355-372 |
| issn | 1045-3695 2328-7470 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_194164561 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | Alliances Business structures Capital management Competition Consolidated financial statements Corporate objectives Corporate strategies Failure Hypotheses International economic cooperation Joint ventures Likert scale Objectives Performance metrics Regression analysis Researchers Start up firms Startups Statistical analysis Studies Subsidiary companies Success |
| title | Toward Validation of Partner Goal Achievement as a Measure of Joint Venture Performance |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T01%3A41%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toward%20Validation%20of%20Partner%20Goal%20Achievement%20as%20a%20Measure%20of%20Joint%20Venture%20Performance&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20managerial%20issues&rft.au=Hatfield,%20Louise&rft.date=1998-10-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=355&rft.epage=372&rft.pages=355-372&rft.issn=1045-3695&rft.eissn=2328-7470&rft.coden=JMAIE9&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40604204%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194164561&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40604204&rfr_iscdi=true |