A review of methods for monitoring streamflow for sustainable water resource management

Monitoring of streamflow may help to determine the optimum levels of its use for sustainable water management in the face of climate change. We reviewed available methods for monitoring streamflow on the basis of six criteria viz. their applicability across different terrains and size of the streams...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied water science 2017-10, Vol.7 (6), p.2617-2628
Hauptverfasser: Dobriyal, Pariva, Badola, Ruchi, Tuboi, Chongpi, Hussain, Syed Ainul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2628
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2617
container_title Applied water science
container_volume 7
creator Dobriyal, Pariva
Badola, Ruchi
Tuboi, Chongpi
Hussain, Syed Ainul
description Monitoring of streamflow may help to determine the optimum levels of its use for sustainable water management in the face of climate change. We reviewed available methods for monitoring streamflow on the basis of six criteria viz. their applicability across different terrains and size of the streams, operational ease, time effectiveness, accuracy, environmental impact that they may cause and cost involve in it. On the basis of the strengths and weaknesses of each of the methods reviewed, we conclude that the timed volume method is apt for hilly terrain having smaller streams due to its operational ease and accuracy of results. Although comparatively expensive, the weir and flume methods are suitable for long term studies of small hill streams, since once the structure is put in place, it yields accurate results. In flat terrain, the float method is best suited for smaller streams for its operational ease and cost effectiveness, whereas, for larger streams, the particle image velocimetry may be used for its accuracy. Our review suggests that the selection of a method for monitoring streamflow may be based on volume of the stream, accuracy of the method, accessibility of the terrain and financial and physical resources available.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13201-016-0488-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1941259059</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1941259059</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-c592569051a4e0d58a7f345b347ea03ffee059e2e0a2e71dccd721d2fd2167863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWLQfwFvAczSTTXY3x1L8BwUviseQ7k7qlu6mJqml397UFfHiXGZg5r15_Ai5An4DnFe3EQrBgXEoGZd1zQ4nZCJAc6akVqe_c12dk2mMa55LgdKinpC3GQ342eGeekd7TO--jdT5QHs_dMmHbljRmALa3m38_nsTdzHZbrDLDdK9TRiyQ_S70CDt7WBX2OOQLsmZs5uI059-QV7v717mj2zx_PA0ny1YI4VKrMkpVKlzHCuRt6q2lSukWhayQssL5xC50iiQW4EVtE3TVgJa4VoBZVWXxQW5Hn23wX_sMCazzlGG_NKAliBU9tb5CsarJvgYAzqzDV1vw8EAN0eEZkRoMkJzRGgOWSNGTdweKWD44_yv6AvCs3UX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1941259059</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A review of methods for monitoring streamflow for sustainable water resource management</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Dobriyal, Pariva ; Badola, Ruchi ; Tuboi, Chongpi ; Hussain, Syed Ainul</creator><creatorcontrib>Dobriyal, Pariva ; Badola, Ruchi ; Tuboi, Chongpi ; Hussain, Syed Ainul</creatorcontrib><description>Monitoring of streamflow may help to determine the optimum levels of its use for sustainable water management in the face of climate change. We reviewed available methods for monitoring streamflow on the basis of six criteria viz. their applicability across different terrains and size of the streams, operational ease, time effectiveness, accuracy, environmental impact that they may cause and cost involve in it. On the basis of the strengths and weaknesses of each of the methods reviewed, we conclude that the timed volume method is apt for hilly terrain having smaller streams due to its operational ease and accuracy of results. Although comparatively expensive, the weir and flume methods are suitable for long term studies of small hill streams, since once the structure is put in place, it yields accurate results. In flat terrain, the float method is best suited for smaller streams for its operational ease and cost effectiveness, whereas, for larger streams, the particle image velocimetry may be used for its accuracy. Our review suggests that the selection of a method for monitoring streamflow may be based on volume of the stream, accuracy of the method, accessibility of the terrain and financial and physical resources available.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2190-5487</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2190-5495</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13201-016-0488-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Aquatic Pollution ; Climate change ; Comparative Law ; Cost effectiveness ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Environmental impact ; Environmental monitoring ; Flumes ; Hydrogeology ; Industrial and Production Engineering ; International &amp; Foreign Law ; Methods ; Monitoring methods ; Nanotechnology ; Particle image velocimetry ; Private International Law ; Resource management ; Review Article ; Reviews ; Rivers ; Stream discharge ; Stream flow ; Streams ; Sustainability ; Sustainability management ; Terrain ; Velocity measurement ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Industry/Water Technologies ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control ; Water resources ; Water resources management ; Weirs</subject><ispartof>Applied water science, 2017-10, Vol.7 (6), p.2617-2628</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><rights>Applied Water Science is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-c592569051a4e0d58a7f345b347ea03ffee059e2e0a2e71dccd721d2fd2167863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-c592569051a4e0d58a7f345b347ea03ffee059e2e0a2e71dccd721d2fd2167863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13201-016-0488-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13201-016-0488-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27922,27923,41118,41486,42187,42555,51317,51574</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dobriyal, Pariva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badola, Ruchi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuboi, Chongpi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Syed Ainul</creatorcontrib><title>A review of methods for monitoring streamflow for sustainable water resource management</title><title>Applied water science</title><addtitle>Appl Water Sci</addtitle><description>Monitoring of streamflow may help to determine the optimum levels of its use for sustainable water management in the face of climate change. We reviewed available methods for monitoring streamflow on the basis of six criteria viz. their applicability across different terrains and size of the streams, operational ease, time effectiveness, accuracy, environmental impact that they may cause and cost involve in it. On the basis of the strengths and weaknesses of each of the methods reviewed, we conclude that the timed volume method is apt for hilly terrain having smaller streams due to its operational ease and accuracy of results. Although comparatively expensive, the weir and flume methods are suitable for long term studies of small hill streams, since once the structure is put in place, it yields accurate results. In flat terrain, the float method is best suited for smaller streams for its operational ease and cost effectiveness, whereas, for larger streams, the particle image velocimetry may be used for its accuracy. Our review suggests that the selection of a method for monitoring streamflow may be based on volume of the stream, accuracy of the method, accessibility of the terrain and financial and physical resources available.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Comparative Law</subject><subject>Cost effectiveness</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Flumes</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Industrial and Production Engineering</subject><subject>International &amp; Foreign Law</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Monitoring methods</subject><subject>Nanotechnology</subject><subject>Particle image velocimetry</subject><subject>Private International Law</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Stream discharge</subject><subject>Stream flow</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainability management</subject><subject>Terrain</subject><subject>Velocity measurement</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Industry/Water Technologies</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Water resources management</subject><subject>Weirs</subject><issn>2190-5487</issn><issn>2190-5495</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWLQfwFvAczSTTXY3x1L8BwUviseQ7k7qlu6mJqml397UFfHiXGZg5r15_Ai5An4DnFe3EQrBgXEoGZd1zQ4nZCJAc6akVqe_c12dk2mMa55LgdKinpC3GQ342eGeekd7TO--jdT5QHs_dMmHbljRmALa3m38_nsTdzHZbrDLDdK9TRiyQ_S70CDt7WBX2OOQLsmZs5uI059-QV7v717mj2zx_PA0ny1YI4VKrMkpVKlzHCuRt6q2lSukWhayQssL5xC50iiQW4EVtE3TVgJa4VoBZVWXxQW5Hn23wX_sMCazzlGG_NKAliBU9tb5CsarJvgYAzqzDV1vw8EAN0eEZkRoMkJzRGgOWSNGTdweKWD44_yv6AvCs3UX</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Dobriyal, Pariva</creator><creator>Badola, Ruchi</creator><creator>Tuboi, Chongpi</creator><creator>Hussain, Syed Ainul</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>A review of methods for monitoring streamflow for sustainable water resource management</title><author>Dobriyal, Pariva ; Badola, Ruchi ; Tuboi, Chongpi ; Hussain, Syed Ainul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-c592569051a4e0d58a7f345b347ea03ffee059e2e0a2e71dccd721d2fd2167863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Comparative Law</topic><topic>Cost effectiveness</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Flumes</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Industrial and Production Engineering</topic><topic>International &amp; Foreign Law</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Monitoring methods</topic><topic>Nanotechnology</topic><topic>Particle image velocimetry</topic><topic>Private International Law</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Stream discharge</topic><topic>Stream flow</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainability management</topic><topic>Terrain</topic><topic>Velocity measurement</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Industry/Water Technologies</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Water resources management</topic><topic>Weirs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dobriyal, Pariva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badola, Ruchi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuboi, Chongpi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Syed Ainul</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Applied water science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dobriyal, Pariva</au><au>Badola, Ruchi</au><au>Tuboi, Chongpi</au><au>Hussain, Syed Ainul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A review of methods for monitoring streamflow for sustainable water resource management</atitle><jtitle>Applied water science</jtitle><stitle>Appl Water Sci</stitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2617</spage><epage>2628</epage><pages>2617-2628</pages><issn>2190-5487</issn><eissn>2190-5495</eissn><abstract>Monitoring of streamflow may help to determine the optimum levels of its use for sustainable water management in the face of climate change. We reviewed available methods for monitoring streamflow on the basis of six criteria viz. their applicability across different terrains and size of the streams, operational ease, time effectiveness, accuracy, environmental impact that they may cause and cost involve in it. On the basis of the strengths and weaknesses of each of the methods reviewed, we conclude that the timed volume method is apt for hilly terrain having smaller streams due to its operational ease and accuracy of results. Although comparatively expensive, the weir and flume methods are suitable for long term studies of small hill streams, since once the structure is put in place, it yields accurate results. In flat terrain, the float method is best suited for smaller streams for its operational ease and cost effectiveness, whereas, for larger streams, the particle image velocimetry may be used for its accuracy. Our review suggests that the selection of a method for monitoring streamflow may be based on volume of the stream, accuracy of the method, accessibility of the terrain and financial and physical resources available.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s13201-016-0488-y</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2190-5487
ispartof Applied water science, 2017-10, Vol.7 (6), p.2617-2628
issn 2190-5487
2190-5495
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1941259059
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Accuracy
Aquatic Pollution
Climate change
Comparative Law
Cost effectiveness
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Environmental impact
Environmental monitoring
Flumes
Hydrogeology
Industrial and Production Engineering
International & Foreign Law
Methods
Monitoring methods
Nanotechnology
Particle image velocimetry
Private International Law
Resource management
Review Article
Reviews
Rivers
Stream discharge
Stream flow
Streams
Sustainability
Sustainability management
Terrain
Velocity measurement
Waste Water Technology
Water Industry/Water Technologies
Water Management
Water Pollution Control
Water resources
Water resources management
Weirs
title A review of methods for monitoring streamflow for sustainable water resource management
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T03%3A31%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20review%20of%20methods%20for%20monitoring%20streamflow%20for%20sustainable%20water%20resource%20management&rft.jtitle=Applied%20water%20science&rft.au=Dobriyal,%20Pariva&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2617&rft.epage=2628&rft.pages=2617-2628&rft.issn=2190-5487&rft.eissn=2190-5495&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13201-016-0488-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1941259059%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1941259059&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true