A review of methods for monitoring streamflow for sustainable water resource management
Monitoring of streamflow may help to determine the optimum levels of its use for sustainable water management in the face of climate change. We reviewed available methods for monitoring streamflow on the basis of six criteria viz. their applicability across different terrains and size of the streams...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Applied water science 2017-10, Vol.7 (6), p.2617-2628 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2628 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2617 |
container_title | Applied water science |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Dobriyal, Pariva Badola, Ruchi Tuboi, Chongpi Hussain, Syed Ainul |
description | Monitoring of streamflow may help to determine the optimum levels of its use for sustainable water management in the face of climate change. We reviewed available methods for monitoring streamflow on the basis of six criteria viz. their applicability across different terrains and size of the streams, operational ease, time effectiveness, accuracy, environmental impact that they may cause and cost involve in it. On the basis of the strengths and weaknesses of each of the methods reviewed, we conclude that the timed volume method is apt for hilly terrain having smaller streams due to its operational ease and accuracy of results. Although comparatively expensive, the weir and flume methods are suitable for long term studies of small hill streams, since once the structure is put in place, it yields accurate results. In flat terrain, the float method is best suited for smaller streams for its operational ease and cost effectiveness, whereas, for larger streams, the particle image velocimetry may be used for its accuracy. Our review suggests that the selection of a method for monitoring streamflow may be based on volume of the stream, accuracy of the method, accessibility of the terrain and financial and physical resources available. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13201-016-0488-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1941259059</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1941259059</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-c592569051a4e0d58a7f345b347ea03ffee059e2e0a2e71dccd721d2fd2167863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWLQfwFvAczSTTXY3x1L8BwUviseQ7k7qlu6mJqml397UFfHiXGZg5r15_Ai5An4DnFe3EQrBgXEoGZd1zQ4nZCJAc6akVqe_c12dk2mMa55LgdKinpC3GQ342eGeekd7TO--jdT5QHs_dMmHbljRmALa3m38_nsTdzHZbrDLDdK9TRiyQ_S70CDt7WBX2OOQLsmZs5uI059-QV7v717mj2zx_PA0ny1YI4VKrMkpVKlzHCuRt6q2lSukWhayQssL5xC50iiQW4EVtE3TVgJa4VoBZVWXxQW5Hn23wX_sMCazzlGG_NKAliBU9tb5CsarJvgYAzqzDV1vw8EAN0eEZkRoMkJzRGgOWSNGTdweKWD44_yv6AvCs3UX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1941259059</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A review of methods for monitoring streamflow for sustainable water resource management</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Dobriyal, Pariva ; Badola, Ruchi ; Tuboi, Chongpi ; Hussain, Syed Ainul</creator><creatorcontrib>Dobriyal, Pariva ; Badola, Ruchi ; Tuboi, Chongpi ; Hussain, Syed Ainul</creatorcontrib><description>Monitoring of streamflow may help to determine the optimum levels of its use for sustainable water management in the face of climate change. We reviewed available methods for monitoring streamflow on the basis of six criteria viz. their applicability across different terrains and size of the streams, operational ease, time effectiveness, accuracy, environmental impact that they may cause and cost involve in it. On the basis of the strengths and weaknesses of each of the methods reviewed, we conclude that the timed volume method is apt for hilly terrain having smaller streams due to its operational ease and accuracy of results. Although comparatively expensive, the weir and flume methods are suitable for long term studies of small hill streams, since once the structure is put in place, it yields accurate results. In flat terrain, the float method is best suited for smaller streams for its operational ease and cost effectiveness, whereas, for larger streams, the particle image velocimetry may be used for its accuracy. Our review suggests that the selection of a method for monitoring streamflow may be based on volume of the stream, accuracy of the method, accessibility of the terrain and financial and physical resources available.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2190-5487</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2190-5495</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13201-016-0488-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Aquatic Pollution ; Climate change ; Comparative Law ; Cost effectiveness ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Environmental impact ; Environmental monitoring ; Flumes ; Hydrogeology ; Industrial and Production Engineering ; International & Foreign Law ; Methods ; Monitoring methods ; Nanotechnology ; Particle image velocimetry ; Private International Law ; Resource management ; Review Article ; Reviews ; Rivers ; Stream discharge ; Stream flow ; Streams ; Sustainability ; Sustainability management ; Terrain ; Velocity measurement ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Industry/Water Technologies ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control ; Water resources ; Water resources management ; Weirs</subject><ispartof>Applied water science, 2017-10, Vol.7 (6), p.2617-2628</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><rights>Applied Water Science is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-c592569051a4e0d58a7f345b347ea03ffee059e2e0a2e71dccd721d2fd2167863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-c592569051a4e0d58a7f345b347ea03ffee059e2e0a2e71dccd721d2fd2167863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13201-016-0488-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13201-016-0488-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27922,27923,41118,41486,42187,42555,51317,51574</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dobriyal, Pariva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badola, Ruchi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuboi, Chongpi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Syed Ainul</creatorcontrib><title>A review of methods for monitoring streamflow for sustainable water resource management</title><title>Applied water science</title><addtitle>Appl Water Sci</addtitle><description>Monitoring of streamflow may help to determine the optimum levels of its use for sustainable water management in the face of climate change. We reviewed available methods for monitoring streamflow on the basis of six criteria viz. their applicability across different terrains and size of the streams, operational ease, time effectiveness, accuracy, environmental impact that they may cause and cost involve in it. On the basis of the strengths and weaknesses of each of the methods reviewed, we conclude that the timed volume method is apt for hilly terrain having smaller streams due to its operational ease and accuracy of results. Although comparatively expensive, the weir and flume methods are suitable for long term studies of small hill streams, since once the structure is put in place, it yields accurate results. In flat terrain, the float method is best suited for smaller streams for its operational ease and cost effectiveness, whereas, for larger streams, the particle image velocimetry may be used for its accuracy. Our review suggests that the selection of a method for monitoring streamflow may be based on volume of the stream, accuracy of the method, accessibility of the terrain and financial and physical resources available.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Comparative Law</subject><subject>Cost effectiveness</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Flumes</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Industrial and Production Engineering</subject><subject>International & Foreign Law</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Monitoring methods</subject><subject>Nanotechnology</subject><subject>Particle image velocimetry</subject><subject>Private International Law</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Stream discharge</subject><subject>Stream flow</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainability management</subject><subject>Terrain</subject><subject>Velocity measurement</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Industry/Water Technologies</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Water resources management</subject><subject>Weirs</subject><issn>2190-5487</issn><issn>2190-5495</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWLQfwFvAczSTTXY3x1L8BwUviseQ7k7qlu6mJqml397UFfHiXGZg5r15_Ai5An4DnFe3EQrBgXEoGZd1zQ4nZCJAc6akVqe_c12dk2mMa55LgdKinpC3GQ342eGeekd7TO--jdT5QHs_dMmHbljRmALa3m38_nsTdzHZbrDLDdK9TRiyQ_S70CDt7WBX2OOQLsmZs5uI059-QV7v717mj2zx_PA0ny1YI4VKrMkpVKlzHCuRt6q2lSukWhayQssL5xC50iiQW4EVtE3TVgJa4VoBZVWXxQW5Hn23wX_sMCazzlGG_NKAliBU9tb5CsarJvgYAzqzDV1vw8EAN0eEZkRoMkJzRGgOWSNGTdweKWD44_yv6AvCs3UX</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Dobriyal, Pariva</creator><creator>Badola, Ruchi</creator><creator>Tuboi, Chongpi</creator><creator>Hussain, Syed Ainul</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>A review of methods for monitoring streamflow for sustainable water resource management</title><author>Dobriyal, Pariva ; Badola, Ruchi ; Tuboi, Chongpi ; Hussain, Syed Ainul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-c592569051a4e0d58a7f345b347ea03ffee059e2e0a2e71dccd721d2fd2167863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Comparative Law</topic><topic>Cost effectiveness</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Flumes</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Industrial and Production Engineering</topic><topic>International & Foreign Law</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Monitoring methods</topic><topic>Nanotechnology</topic><topic>Particle image velocimetry</topic><topic>Private International Law</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Stream discharge</topic><topic>Stream flow</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainability management</topic><topic>Terrain</topic><topic>Velocity measurement</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Industry/Water Technologies</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Water resources management</topic><topic>Weirs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dobriyal, Pariva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badola, Ruchi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuboi, Chongpi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Syed Ainul</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Applied water science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dobriyal, Pariva</au><au>Badola, Ruchi</au><au>Tuboi, Chongpi</au><au>Hussain, Syed Ainul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A review of methods for monitoring streamflow for sustainable water resource management</atitle><jtitle>Applied water science</jtitle><stitle>Appl Water Sci</stitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2617</spage><epage>2628</epage><pages>2617-2628</pages><issn>2190-5487</issn><eissn>2190-5495</eissn><abstract>Monitoring of streamflow may help to determine the optimum levels of its use for sustainable water management in the face of climate change. We reviewed available methods for monitoring streamflow on the basis of six criteria viz. their applicability across different terrains and size of the streams, operational ease, time effectiveness, accuracy, environmental impact that they may cause and cost involve in it. On the basis of the strengths and weaknesses of each of the methods reviewed, we conclude that the timed volume method is apt for hilly terrain having smaller streams due to its operational ease and accuracy of results. Although comparatively expensive, the weir and flume methods are suitable for long term studies of small hill streams, since once the structure is put in place, it yields accurate results. In flat terrain, the float method is best suited for smaller streams for its operational ease and cost effectiveness, whereas, for larger streams, the particle image velocimetry may be used for its accuracy. Our review suggests that the selection of a method for monitoring streamflow may be based on volume of the stream, accuracy of the method, accessibility of the terrain and financial and physical resources available.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s13201-016-0488-y</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2190-5487 |
ispartof | Applied water science, 2017-10, Vol.7 (6), p.2617-2628 |
issn | 2190-5487 2190-5495 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1941259059 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Accuracy Aquatic Pollution Climate change Comparative Law Cost effectiveness Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Environmental impact Environmental monitoring Flumes Hydrogeology Industrial and Production Engineering International & Foreign Law Methods Monitoring methods Nanotechnology Particle image velocimetry Private International Law Resource management Review Article Reviews Rivers Stream discharge Stream flow Streams Sustainability Sustainability management Terrain Velocity measurement Waste Water Technology Water Industry/Water Technologies Water Management Water Pollution Control Water resources Water resources management Weirs |
title | A review of methods for monitoring streamflow for sustainable water resource management |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T03%3A31%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20review%20of%20methods%20for%20monitoring%20streamflow%20for%20sustainable%20water%20resource%20management&rft.jtitle=Applied%20water%20science&rft.au=Dobriyal,%20Pariva&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2617&rft.epage=2628&rft.pages=2617-2628&rft.issn=2190-5487&rft.eissn=2190-5495&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13201-016-0488-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1941259059%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1941259059&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |