Comments on Fabian Freyenhagen, Adorno's Practical Philosophy

In this paper, I offer some critical comments on Fabian Freyenhagen's book, Adorno's Practical Philosophy. Although I am largely in agreement with many of his arguments about the value of Adorno's negativism for contemporary critical theory, I raise a few critical questions that are g...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of philosophy 2017-09, Vol.25 (3), p.840-845
1. Verfasser: Allen, Amy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 845
container_issue 3
container_start_page 840
container_title European journal of philosophy
container_volume 25
creator Allen, Amy
description In this paper, I offer some critical comments on Fabian Freyenhagen's book, Adorno's Practical Philosophy. Although I am largely in agreement with many of his arguments about the value of Adorno's negativism for contemporary critical theory, I raise a few critical questions that are grouped around the following three headings: immanent critique, objectivism, and skepticism. My primary aim in pursuing these questions is not to haggle over fine points of Adorno interpretation but rather to consider how these three issues bear systematically on the vision for critical theory that Freyenhagen has put forward.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ejop.12297
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1941245016</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1941245016</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3017-5a35d4be61c6617622419fc6d0125f133366550ad9559ac56c535e33ffaf3ef23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EEqWw8AsiMSAhUvz8YiceGKqq5UOV2gFmy3VsmiqNg90K5d8TCDN3uct570qHkGugE-jzYHe-nQBjMj8hI8hEkVLMi1MyolKItMAcz8lFjDtKKUpRjMjjzO_3tjnExDfJQm8q3VewnW22-sM298m09KHxtzFZB20OldF1st5WtY--3XaX5MzpOtqrvx6T98X8bfacLldPL7PpMjVIIU-5Rl5mGyvACAG5YCwD6YwoKTDuABGF4JzqUnIuteHCcOQW0Tnt0DqGY3Iz_G2D_zzaeFA7fwxNP6lAZsAyTkH01N1AmeBjDNapNlR7HToFVP3oUT961K-eHoYB_qpq2_1Dqvnraj3cfAPiHmXa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1941245016</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comments on Fabian Freyenhagen, Adorno's Practical Philosophy</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Allen, Amy</creator><creatorcontrib>Allen, Amy</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, I offer some critical comments on Fabian Freyenhagen's book, Adorno's Practical Philosophy. Although I am largely in agreement with many of his arguments about the value of Adorno's negativism for contemporary critical theory, I raise a few critical questions that are grouped around the following three headings: immanent critique, objectivism, and skepticism. My primary aim in pursuing these questions is not to haggle over fine points of Adorno interpretation but rather to consider how these three issues bear systematically on the vision for critical theory that Freyenhagen has put forward.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0966-8373</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-0378</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ejop.12297</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adorno, Theodor Wiesengrund (1903-1969) ; Critical theory ; Freyenhagen, Fabian ; Objectivity ; Philosophy ; Skepticism</subject><ispartof>European journal of philosophy, 2017-09, Vol.25 (3), p.840-845</ispartof><rights>2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3017-5a35d4be61c6617622419fc6d0125f133366550ad9559ac56c535e33ffaf3ef23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3017-5a35d4be61c6617622419fc6d0125f133366550ad9559ac56c535e33ffaf3ef23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fejop.12297$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fejop.12297$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,33751,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allen, Amy</creatorcontrib><title>Comments on Fabian Freyenhagen, Adorno's Practical Philosophy</title><title>European journal of philosophy</title><description>In this paper, I offer some critical comments on Fabian Freyenhagen's book, Adorno's Practical Philosophy. Although I am largely in agreement with many of his arguments about the value of Adorno's negativism for contemporary critical theory, I raise a few critical questions that are grouped around the following three headings: immanent critique, objectivism, and skepticism. My primary aim in pursuing these questions is not to haggle over fine points of Adorno interpretation but rather to consider how these three issues bear systematically on the vision for critical theory that Freyenhagen has put forward.</description><subject>Adorno, Theodor Wiesengrund (1903-1969)</subject><subject>Critical theory</subject><subject>Freyenhagen, Fabian</subject><subject>Objectivity</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Skepticism</subject><issn>0966-8373</issn><issn>1468-0378</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EEqWw8AsiMSAhUvz8YiceGKqq5UOV2gFmy3VsmiqNg90K5d8TCDN3uct570qHkGugE-jzYHe-nQBjMj8hI8hEkVLMi1MyolKItMAcz8lFjDtKKUpRjMjjzO_3tjnExDfJQm8q3VewnW22-sM298m09KHxtzFZB20OldF1st5WtY--3XaX5MzpOtqrvx6T98X8bfacLldPL7PpMjVIIU-5Rl5mGyvACAG5YCwD6YwoKTDuABGF4JzqUnIuteHCcOQW0Tnt0DqGY3Iz_G2D_zzaeFA7fwxNP6lAZsAyTkH01N1AmeBjDNapNlR7HToFVP3oUT961K-eHoYB_qpq2_1Dqvnraj3cfAPiHmXa</recordid><startdate>201709</startdate><enddate>201709</enddate><creator>Allen, Amy</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201709</creationdate><title>Comments on Fabian Freyenhagen, Adorno's Practical Philosophy</title><author>Allen, Amy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3017-5a35d4be61c6617622419fc6d0125f133366550ad9559ac56c535e33ffaf3ef23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adorno, Theodor Wiesengrund (1903-1969)</topic><topic>Critical theory</topic><topic>Freyenhagen, Fabian</topic><topic>Objectivity</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Skepticism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allen, Amy</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>European journal of philosophy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allen, Amy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comments on Fabian Freyenhagen, Adorno's Practical Philosophy</atitle><jtitle>European journal of philosophy</jtitle><date>2017-09</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>840</spage><epage>845</epage><pages>840-845</pages><issn>0966-8373</issn><eissn>1468-0378</eissn><abstract>In this paper, I offer some critical comments on Fabian Freyenhagen's book, Adorno's Practical Philosophy. Although I am largely in agreement with many of his arguments about the value of Adorno's negativism for contemporary critical theory, I raise a few critical questions that are grouped around the following three headings: immanent critique, objectivism, and skepticism. My primary aim in pursuing these questions is not to haggle over fine points of Adorno interpretation but rather to consider how these three issues bear systematically on the vision for critical theory that Freyenhagen has put forward.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ejop.12297</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0966-8373
ispartof European journal of philosophy, 2017-09, Vol.25 (3), p.840-845
issn 0966-8373
1468-0378
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1941245016
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Adorno, Theodor Wiesengrund (1903-1969)
Critical theory
Freyenhagen, Fabian
Objectivity
Philosophy
Skepticism
title Comments on Fabian Freyenhagen, Adorno's Practical Philosophy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T01%3A49%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comments%20on%20Fabian%20Freyenhagen,%20Adorno's%20Practical%20Philosophy&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20philosophy&rft.au=Allen,%20Amy&rft.date=2017-09&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=840&rft.epage=845&rft.pages=840-845&rft.issn=0966-8373&rft.eissn=1468-0378&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ejop.12297&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1941245016%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1941245016&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true