Tenecteplase versus alteplase for management of acute ischaemic stroke (NOR-TEST): a phase 3, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint trial

Tenecteplase is a newer thrombolytic agent with some pharmacological advantages over alteplase. Previous phase 2 trials of tenecteplase in acute ischaemic stroke have shown promising results. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of tenecteplase versus alteplase in patients with acute stro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lancet neurology 2017-10, Vol.16 (10), p.781-788
Hauptverfasser: Logallo, Nicola, Novotny, Vojtech, Assmus, Jörg, Kvistad, Christopher E, Alteheld, Lars, Rønning, Ole Morten, Thommessen, Bente, Amthor, Karl-Friedrich, Ihle-Hansen, Hege, Kurz, Martin, Tobro, Håkon, Kaur, Kamaljit, Stankiewicz, Magdalena, Carlsson, Maria, Morsund, Åse, Idicula, Titto, Aamodt, Anne Hege, Lund, Christian, Næss, Halvor, Waje-Andreassen, Ulrike, Thomassen, Lars
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 788
container_issue 10
container_start_page 781
container_title Lancet neurology
container_volume 16
creator Logallo, Nicola
Novotny, Vojtech
Assmus, Jörg
Kvistad, Christopher E
Alteheld, Lars
Rønning, Ole Morten
Thommessen, Bente
Amthor, Karl-Friedrich
Ihle-Hansen, Hege
Kurz, Martin
Tobro, Håkon
Kaur, Kamaljit
Stankiewicz, Magdalena
Carlsson, Maria
Morsund, Åse
Idicula, Titto
Aamodt, Anne Hege
Lund, Christian
Næss, Halvor
Waje-Andreassen, Ulrike
Thomassen, Lars
description Tenecteplase is a newer thrombolytic agent with some pharmacological advantages over alteplase. Previous phase 2 trials of tenecteplase in acute ischaemic stroke have shown promising results. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of tenecteplase versus alteplase in patients with acute stroke who were eligible for intravenous thrombolysis. This phase 3, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint, superiority trial was done in 13 stroke units in Norway. We enrolled adults with suspected acute ischaemic stroke who were eligible for thrombolysis and admitted within 4·5 h of symptom onset or within 4·5 h of awakening with symptoms, or who were eligible for bridging therapy before thrombectomy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous tenecteplase 0·4 mg/kg (to a maximum of 40 mg) or alteplase 0·9 mg/kg (to a maximum of 90 mg), via a block randomisation schedule stratified by centre of inclusion. Patients were not informed of treatment allocation; treating physicians were aware of treatment allocation but those assessing the primary and secondary endpoints were not. The primary outcome was excellent functional outcome defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0–1 at 3 months. The primary analysis was an unadjusted and non-stratified intention-to-treat analysis with last observation carried forward for imputation of missing data. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01949948. Between Sept 1, 2012, and Sept 30, 2016, 1107 patients met the inclusion criteria and seven patients were excluded because informed consent was withdrawn or eligibility for thrombolytic treatment was reconsidered. 1100 patients were randomly assigned to the tenecteplase (n=549) or alteplase (n=551) groups. The median age of participants was 77 years (IQR 64–79) and the median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at baseline was 4 points (IQR 2–8). A final diagnosis other than ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack was found in 99 (18%) patients in the tenecteplase group and 91 (17%) patients in the alteplase group. The primary outcome was achieved by 354 (64%) patients in the tenecteplase group and 345 (63%) patients in the alteplase group (odds ratio 1·08, 95% CI 0·84–1·38; p=0·52). By 3 months, 29 (5%) patients had died in the tenecteplase group compared with 26 (5%) in the alteplase group. The frequency of serious adverse events was similar between groups (145 [26%] in the tenecteplase group vs 141 [26%] in the alte
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30253-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1940617612</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1474442217302533</els_id><sourcerecordid>1940617612</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-4953914f21bc1acc14b77eaefe09bdb0e23dd00daf85181db56c81ea05a267193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUdtKHTEUDaVSb_2ElkBfFM5odpK5-SIiVgVRqKfPIZPsqbEzyZjMCP6DH905nqOvfdqbzbqw1yLkG7AjYFAc34MsZSYl5wdQHgrGc5GJT2Rncy7yzx8759tkN6VHxjjICr6QbV6VFeOi2CGvS_RoRhw6nZA-Y0xTorp7P7Qh0l57_Qd79CMNLdVmGpG6ZB409s7QNMbwF-nB7d2vbHlxvzw8oZoODyuyWNCovQ29S2gXNAzos0432C1o0zlv0VL0dghuVh6j090-2Wp1l_DrZu6R3z8vludX2c3d5fX52U1mpMzHTNa5qEG2HBoD2hiQTVmixhZZ3diGIRfWMmZ1W-VQgW3ywlSAmuWaFyXUYo_8WOsOMTxNmEb1GKboZ0sFtWQFlAXwGZWvUSaGlCK2aoiu1_FFAVOrDtRbB2oVsIJSvXWgxMz7vlGfmh7tB-s99Blwugbg_OOzw6iScegNWhfnLpQN7j8W_wCaF5av</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1940617612</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tenecteplase versus alteplase for management of acute ischaemic stroke (NOR-TEST): a phase 3, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Logallo, Nicola ; Novotny, Vojtech ; Assmus, Jörg ; Kvistad, Christopher E ; Alteheld, Lars ; Rønning, Ole Morten ; Thommessen, Bente ; Amthor, Karl-Friedrich ; Ihle-Hansen, Hege ; Kurz, Martin ; Tobro, Håkon ; Kaur, Kamaljit ; Stankiewicz, Magdalena ; Carlsson, Maria ; Morsund, Åse ; Idicula, Titto ; Aamodt, Anne Hege ; Lund, Christian ; Næss, Halvor ; Waje-Andreassen, Ulrike ; Thomassen, Lars</creator><creatorcontrib>Logallo, Nicola ; Novotny, Vojtech ; Assmus, Jörg ; Kvistad, Christopher E ; Alteheld, Lars ; Rønning, Ole Morten ; Thommessen, Bente ; Amthor, Karl-Friedrich ; Ihle-Hansen, Hege ; Kurz, Martin ; Tobro, Håkon ; Kaur, Kamaljit ; Stankiewicz, Magdalena ; Carlsson, Maria ; Morsund, Åse ; Idicula, Titto ; Aamodt, Anne Hege ; Lund, Christian ; Næss, Halvor ; Waje-Andreassen, Ulrike ; Thomassen, Lars</creatorcontrib><description>Tenecteplase is a newer thrombolytic agent with some pharmacological advantages over alteplase. Previous phase 2 trials of tenecteplase in acute ischaemic stroke have shown promising results. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of tenecteplase versus alteplase in patients with acute stroke who were eligible for intravenous thrombolysis. This phase 3, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint, superiority trial was done in 13 stroke units in Norway. We enrolled adults with suspected acute ischaemic stroke who were eligible for thrombolysis and admitted within 4·5 h of symptom onset or within 4·5 h of awakening with symptoms, or who were eligible for bridging therapy before thrombectomy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous tenecteplase 0·4 mg/kg (to a maximum of 40 mg) or alteplase 0·9 mg/kg (to a maximum of 90 mg), via a block randomisation schedule stratified by centre of inclusion. Patients were not informed of treatment allocation; treating physicians were aware of treatment allocation but those assessing the primary and secondary endpoints were not. The primary outcome was excellent functional outcome defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0–1 at 3 months. The primary analysis was an unadjusted and non-stratified intention-to-treat analysis with last observation carried forward for imputation of missing data. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01949948. Between Sept 1, 2012, and Sept 30, 2016, 1107 patients met the inclusion criteria and seven patients were excluded because informed consent was withdrawn or eligibility for thrombolytic treatment was reconsidered. 1100 patients were randomly assigned to the tenecteplase (n=549) or alteplase (n=551) groups. The median age of participants was 77 years (IQR 64–79) and the median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at baseline was 4 points (IQR 2–8). A final diagnosis other than ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack was found in 99 (18%) patients in the tenecteplase group and 91 (17%) patients in the alteplase group. The primary outcome was achieved by 354 (64%) patients in the tenecteplase group and 345 (63%) patients in the alteplase group (odds ratio 1·08, 95% CI 0·84–1·38; p=0·52). By 3 months, 29 (5%) patients had died in the tenecteplase group compared with 26 (5%) in the alteplase group. The frequency of serious adverse events was similar between groups (145 [26%] in the tenecteplase group vs 141 [26%] in the alteplase group; p=0·74). Tenecteplase was not superior to alteplase and showed a similar safety profile. Most patients enrolled in this study had mild stroke. Further trials are needed to establish the safety and efficacy in patients with severe stroke and whether tenecteplase is non-inferior to alteplase. Research Council of Norway.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1474-4422</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-4465</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30253-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28780236</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Brain Ischemia - drug therapy ; Clinical outcomes ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Fibrinolytic Agents ; Heart attacks ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Norway ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Researchers ; Stroke ; Stroke - drug therapy ; Studies ; Tissue Plasminogen Activator - administration &amp; dosage ; Tissue Plasminogen Activator - adverse effects ; Tissue Plasminogen Activator - pharmacology</subject><ispartof>Lancet neurology, 2017-10, Vol.16 (10), p.781-788</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Oct 1, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-4953914f21bc1acc14b77eaefe09bdb0e23dd00daf85181db56c81ea05a267193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-4953914f21bc1acc14b77eaefe09bdb0e23dd00daf85181db56c81ea05a267193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1940617612?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000,64390,64394,72474</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28780236$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Logallo, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novotny, Vojtech</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assmus, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kvistad, Christopher E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alteheld, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rønning, Ole Morten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thommessen, Bente</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amthor, Karl-Friedrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ihle-Hansen, Hege</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurz, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tobro, Håkon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaur, Kamaljit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stankiewicz, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlsson, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morsund, Åse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Idicula, Titto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aamodt, Anne Hege</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lund, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Næss, Halvor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waje-Andreassen, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomassen, Lars</creatorcontrib><title>Tenecteplase versus alteplase for management of acute ischaemic stroke (NOR-TEST): a phase 3, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint trial</title><title>Lancet neurology</title><addtitle>Lancet Neurol</addtitle><description>Tenecteplase is a newer thrombolytic agent with some pharmacological advantages over alteplase. Previous phase 2 trials of tenecteplase in acute ischaemic stroke have shown promising results. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of tenecteplase versus alteplase in patients with acute stroke who were eligible for intravenous thrombolysis. This phase 3, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint, superiority trial was done in 13 stroke units in Norway. We enrolled adults with suspected acute ischaemic stroke who were eligible for thrombolysis and admitted within 4·5 h of symptom onset or within 4·5 h of awakening with symptoms, or who were eligible for bridging therapy before thrombectomy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous tenecteplase 0·4 mg/kg (to a maximum of 40 mg) or alteplase 0·9 mg/kg (to a maximum of 90 mg), via a block randomisation schedule stratified by centre of inclusion. Patients were not informed of treatment allocation; treating physicians were aware of treatment allocation but those assessing the primary and secondary endpoints were not. The primary outcome was excellent functional outcome defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0–1 at 3 months. The primary analysis was an unadjusted and non-stratified intention-to-treat analysis with last observation carried forward for imputation of missing data. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01949948. Between Sept 1, 2012, and Sept 30, 2016, 1107 patients met the inclusion criteria and seven patients were excluded because informed consent was withdrawn or eligibility for thrombolytic treatment was reconsidered. 1100 patients were randomly assigned to the tenecteplase (n=549) or alteplase (n=551) groups. The median age of participants was 77 years (IQR 64–79) and the median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at baseline was 4 points (IQR 2–8). A final diagnosis other than ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack was found in 99 (18%) patients in the tenecteplase group and 91 (17%) patients in the alteplase group. The primary outcome was achieved by 354 (64%) patients in the tenecteplase group and 345 (63%) patients in the alteplase group (odds ratio 1·08, 95% CI 0·84–1·38; p=0·52). By 3 months, 29 (5%) patients had died in the tenecteplase group compared with 26 (5%) in the alteplase group. The frequency of serious adverse events was similar between groups (145 [26%] in the tenecteplase group vs 141 [26%] in the alteplase group; p=0·74). Tenecteplase was not superior to alteplase and showed a similar safety profile. Most patients enrolled in this study had mild stroke. Further trials are needed to establish the safety and efficacy in patients with severe stroke and whether tenecteplase is non-inferior to alteplase. Research Council of Norway.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Brain Ischemia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fibrinolytic Agents</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Norway</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Stroke - drug therapy</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tissue Plasminogen Activator - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Tissue Plasminogen Activator - adverse effects</subject><subject>Tissue Plasminogen Activator - pharmacology</subject><issn>1474-4422</issn><issn>1474-4465</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUdtKHTEUDaVSb_2ElkBfFM5odpK5-SIiVgVRqKfPIZPsqbEzyZjMCP6DH905nqOvfdqbzbqw1yLkG7AjYFAc34MsZSYl5wdQHgrGc5GJT2Rncy7yzx8759tkN6VHxjjICr6QbV6VFeOi2CGvS_RoRhw6nZA-Y0xTorp7P7Qh0l57_Qd79CMNLdVmGpG6ZB409s7QNMbwF-nB7d2vbHlxvzw8oZoODyuyWNCovQ29S2gXNAzos0432C1o0zlv0VL0dghuVh6j090-2Wp1l_DrZu6R3z8vludX2c3d5fX52U1mpMzHTNa5qEG2HBoD2hiQTVmixhZZ3diGIRfWMmZ1W-VQgW3ywlSAmuWaFyXUYo_8WOsOMTxNmEb1GKboZ0sFtWQFlAXwGZWvUSaGlCK2aoiu1_FFAVOrDtRbB2oVsIJSvXWgxMz7vlGfmh7tB-s99Blwugbg_OOzw6iScegNWhfnLpQN7j8W_wCaF5av</recordid><startdate>201710</startdate><enddate>201710</enddate><creator>Logallo, Nicola</creator><creator>Novotny, Vojtech</creator><creator>Assmus, Jörg</creator><creator>Kvistad, Christopher E</creator><creator>Alteheld, Lars</creator><creator>Rønning, Ole Morten</creator><creator>Thommessen, Bente</creator><creator>Amthor, Karl-Friedrich</creator><creator>Ihle-Hansen, Hege</creator><creator>Kurz, Martin</creator><creator>Tobro, Håkon</creator><creator>Kaur, Kamaljit</creator><creator>Stankiewicz, Magdalena</creator><creator>Carlsson, Maria</creator><creator>Morsund, Åse</creator><creator>Idicula, Titto</creator><creator>Aamodt, Anne Hege</creator><creator>Lund, Christian</creator><creator>Næss, Halvor</creator><creator>Waje-Andreassen, Ulrike</creator><creator>Thomassen, Lars</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201710</creationdate><title>Tenecteplase versus alteplase for management of acute ischaemic stroke (NOR-TEST): a phase 3, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint trial</title><author>Logallo, Nicola ; Novotny, Vojtech ; Assmus, Jörg ; Kvistad, Christopher E ; Alteheld, Lars ; Rønning, Ole Morten ; Thommessen, Bente ; Amthor, Karl-Friedrich ; Ihle-Hansen, Hege ; Kurz, Martin ; Tobro, Håkon ; Kaur, Kamaljit ; Stankiewicz, Magdalena ; Carlsson, Maria ; Morsund, Åse ; Idicula, Titto ; Aamodt, Anne Hege ; Lund, Christian ; Næss, Halvor ; Waje-Andreassen, Ulrike ; Thomassen, Lars</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-4953914f21bc1acc14b77eaefe09bdb0e23dd00daf85181db56c81ea05a267193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Brain Ischemia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fibrinolytic Agents</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Norway</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Stroke - drug therapy</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tissue Plasminogen Activator - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Tissue Plasminogen Activator - adverse effects</topic><topic>Tissue Plasminogen Activator - pharmacology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Logallo, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novotny, Vojtech</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assmus, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kvistad, Christopher E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alteheld, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rønning, Ole Morten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thommessen, Bente</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amthor, Karl-Friedrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ihle-Hansen, Hege</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurz, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tobro, Håkon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaur, Kamaljit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stankiewicz, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlsson, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morsund, Åse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Idicula, Titto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aamodt, Anne Hege</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lund, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Næss, Halvor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waje-Andreassen, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomassen, Lars</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Lancet neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Logallo, Nicola</au><au>Novotny, Vojtech</au><au>Assmus, Jörg</au><au>Kvistad, Christopher E</au><au>Alteheld, Lars</au><au>Rønning, Ole Morten</au><au>Thommessen, Bente</au><au>Amthor, Karl-Friedrich</au><au>Ihle-Hansen, Hege</au><au>Kurz, Martin</au><au>Tobro, Håkon</au><au>Kaur, Kamaljit</au><au>Stankiewicz, Magdalena</au><au>Carlsson, Maria</au><au>Morsund, Åse</au><au>Idicula, Titto</au><au>Aamodt, Anne Hege</au><au>Lund, Christian</au><au>Næss, Halvor</au><au>Waje-Andreassen, Ulrike</au><au>Thomassen, Lars</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tenecteplase versus alteplase for management of acute ischaemic stroke (NOR-TEST): a phase 3, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint trial</atitle><jtitle>Lancet neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet Neurol</addtitle><date>2017-10</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>781</spage><epage>788</epage><pages>781-788</pages><issn>1474-4422</issn><eissn>1474-4465</eissn><abstract>Tenecteplase is a newer thrombolytic agent with some pharmacological advantages over alteplase. Previous phase 2 trials of tenecteplase in acute ischaemic stroke have shown promising results. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of tenecteplase versus alteplase in patients with acute stroke who were eligible for intravenous thrombolysis. This phase 3, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint, superiority trial was done in 13 stroke units in Norway. We enrolled adults with suspected acute ischaemic stroke who were eligible for thrombolysis and admitted within 4·5 h of symptom onset or within 4·5 h of awakening with symptoms, or who were eligible for bridging therapy before thrombectomy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous tenecteplase 0·4 mg/kg (to a maximum of 40 mg) or alteplase 0·9 mg/kg (to a maximum of 90 mg), via a block randomisation schedule stratified by centre of inclusion. Patients were not informed of treatment allocation; treating physicians were aware of treatment allocation but those assessing the primary and secondary endpoints were not. The primary outcome was excellent functional outcome defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0–1 at 3 months. The primary analysis was an unadjusted and non-stratified intention-to-treat analysis with last observation carried forward for imputation of missing data. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01949948. Between Sept 1, 2012, and Sept 30, 2016, 1107 patients met the inclusion criteria and seven patients were excluded because informed consent was withdrawn or eligibility for thrombolytic treatment was reconsidered. 1100 patients were randomly assigned to the tenecteplase (n=549) or alteplase (n=551) groups. The median age of participants was 77 years (IQR 64–79) and the median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at baseline was 4 points (IQR 2–8). A final diagnosis other than ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack was found in 99 (18%) patients in the tenecteplase group and 91 (17%) patients in the alteplase group. The primary outcome was achieved by 354 (64%) patients in the tenecteplase group and 345 (63%) patients in the alteplase group (odds ratio 1·08, 95% CI 0·84–1·38; p=0·52). By 3 months, 29 (5%) patients had died in the tenecteplase group compared with 26 (5%) in the alteplase group. The frequency of serious adverse events was similar between groups (145 [26%] in the tenecteplase group vs 141 [26%] in the alteplase group; p=0·74). Tenecteplase was not superior to alteplase and showed a similar safety profile. Most patients enrolled in this study had mild stroke. Further trials are needed to establish the safety and efficacy in patients with severe stroke and whether tenecteplase is non-inferior to alteplase. Research Council of Norway.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28780236</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30253-3</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1474-4422
ispartof Lancet neurology, 2017-10, Vol.16 (10), p.781-788
issn 1474-4422
1474-4465
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1940617612
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Brain Ischemia - drug therapy
Clinical outcomes
Double-Blind Method
Female
Fibrinolytic Agents
Heart attacks
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Norway
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Researchers
Stroke
Stroke - drug therapy
Studies
Tissue Plasminogen Activator - administration & dosage
Tissue Plasminogen Activator - adverse effects
Tissue Plasminogen Activator - pharmacology
title Tenecteplase versus alteplase for management of acute ischaemic stroke (NOR-TEST): a phase 3, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T13%3A08%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tenecteplase%20versus%20alteplase%20for%20management%20of%20acute%20ischaemic%20stroke%20(NOR-TEST):%20a%20phase%203,%20randomised,%20open-label,%20blinded%20endpoint%20trial&rft.jtitle=Lancet%20neurology&rft.au=Logallo,%20Nicola&rft.date=2017-10&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=781&rft.epage=788&rft.pages=781-788&rft.issn=1474-4422&rft.eissn=1474-4465&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30253-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1940617612%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1940617612&rft_id=info:pmid/28780236&rft_els_id=S1474442217302533&rfr_iscdi=true