Diptilomiopus floridanus (Acari: Eriophyoidea: Diptilomiopidae): Its Distribution and Relative Abundance with Other Eriophyoid Species on Dooryard, Varietal Block, and Commercial Citrus in Florida
We sampled 526 dooryard, 18 varietal block, and 784 commercial citrus trees in Florida between May 2009 and Apr 2014 for eriophyoid mites including Diptilomiopus floridanus Craemer & Amrine, Aceria sheldoni (Ewing), Aculops pelekassi (Keifer), and Phyllocoptruta oleivora (Ashmead). In total, 1,4...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Florida entomologist 2017-06, Vol.100 (2), p.325-333 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 333 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 325 |
container_title | The Florida entomologist |
container_volume | 100 |
creator | Childers, Carl C Rogers, Michael E Ebert, Timothy A Achor, Diann S |
description | We sampled 526 dooryard, 18 varietal block, and 784 commercial citrus trees in Florida between May 2009 and Apr 2014 for eriophyoid mites including Diptilomiopus floridanus Craemer & Amrine, Aceria sheldoni (Ewing), Aculops pelekassi (Keifer), and Phyllocoptruta oleivora (Ashmead). In total, 1,423 D. floridanus individuals were collected from dooryard citrus trees and 1 each from the lemon cultivar ‘Bearss’ and sweet lime trees from the Florida Citrus Arboretum in Winter Haven. Diptilomiopus floridanus was collected from dooryard citrus in the following counties in Florida: Broward, Collier, Dade, Indian River, Lee, Martin, Palm Beach, Pinellas, Polk, Sarasota, and St. Lucie. The mite was not observed in Charlotte, Hardee, Hendry, Highlands, Manatee, or Okeechobee counties (Florida). Percentages of the eriophyoid mite species collected from dooryard citrus trees and varietal blocks were: A. pelekassi 3.2%, A. sheldoni 9.1%, D. floridanus 17.3%, and P. oleivora 84.2%. The 6 counties with the highest percentages of D. floridanus on dooryard trees were: Collier 36%, Broward 25%, Indian River 25%, Palm Beach 25%, Martin 23%, and St. Lucie 22%. In commercial citrus, A. sheldoni was collected less than 1.0%, A. pelekassi 4.0%, and P. oleivora 75.5%, of the time. Diptilomiopus floridanus was not collected in commercial citrus orchards during this survey. Diptilomiopus floridanus had significantly greater infestation rates on lime and lemon trees compared with grapefruit, tangerine, tangelo, sweet orange, and pummelo trees. However, infestation rates on lime and lemon trees were not significantly different from those on sour orange trees. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1653/024.100.0230 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_JFNAL</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1940168848</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A521162978</galeid><jstor_id>26358892</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A521162978</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b431t-12fff22d7a1b832e439a6878178584c5d6376cfb72346ebd071df02f8b765a303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk9v1DAQxSMEEkvhxhXJEhdabZaxHSfO3pbtH1aqVKkFrpHj2F0vSRxsp-1-Pz4Y3gah9oJ88Gjm9968wyTJewwLnDP6GUi2wAALIBReJDNcUp4yDORlMgPALM0gg9fJG-93AFASxmbJ71MzBNPazthh9Ei31plG9LH8tJLCmSU6c3G03VvTKLFET_DIqeMl2gQfuz44U4_B2B6JvkHXqhXB3Cm0qsc--kmF7k3YoquwVe6JJboZlDTKo6g7tdbthWvm6EdcrIJo0ZfWyp_zR8e17TrlpIndtQkuBjQ9Op_ivk1eadF69e7vf5R8Pz_7tv6aXl5dbNary7TOKA4pJlprQppC4JpTojJaipwXHBec8UyyJqdFLnVdEJrlqm6gwI0Gonld5ExQoEfJx8l3cPbXqHyodnZ0fVxZ4TIDnHOe8UgtJupWtKoyvbbBCRlfozojba-0if0VIxjnpCwOguNngsgE9RBuxeh9tbm5fs7OJ1Y6671Tuhqc6YTbVxiqwxFU8QhiDdXhCCL-YcJ3Plj3jyU5ZZyXJM5PpnltbEz2f7M_YOe7mg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1940168848</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diptilomiopus floridanus (Acari: Eriophyoidea: Diptilomiopidae): Its Distribution and Relative Abundance with Other Eriophyoid Species on Dooryard, Varietal Block, and Commercial Citrus in Florida</title><source>JSTOR Open Access Journals</source><creator>Childers, Carl C ; Rogers, Michael E ; Ebert, Timothy A ; Achor, Diann S</creator><creatorcontrib>Childers, Carl C ; Rogers, Michael E ; Ebert, Timothy A ; Achor, Diann S</creatorcontrib><description>We sampled 526 dooryard, 18 varietal block, and 784 commercial citrus trees in Florida between May 2009 and Apr 2014 for eriophyoid mites including Diptilomiopus floridanus Craemer & Amrine, Aceria sheldoni (Ewing), Aculops pelekassi (Keifer), and Phyllocoptruta oleivora (Ashmead). In total, 1,423 D. floridanus individuals were collected from dooryard citrus trees and 1 each from the lemon cultivar ‘Bearss’ and sweet lime trees from the Florida Citrus Arboretum in Winter Haven. Diptilomiopus floridanus was collected from dooryard citrus in the following counties in Florida: Broward, Collier, Dade, Indian River, Lee, Martin, Palm Beach, Pinellas, Polk, Sarasota, and St. Lucie. The mite was not observed in Charlotte, Hardee, Hendry, Highlands, Manatee, or Okeechobee counties (Florida). Percentages of the eriophyoid mite species collected from dooryard citrus trees and varietal blocks were: A. pelekassi 3.2%, A. sheldoni 9.1%, D. floridanus 17.3%, and P. oleivora 84.2%. The 6 counties with the highest percentages of D. floridanus on dooryard trees were: Collier 36%, Broward 25%, Indian River 25%, Palm Beach 25%, Martin 23%, and St. Lucie 22%. In commercial citrus, A. sheldoni was collected less than 1.0%, A. pelekassi 4.0%, and P. oleivora 75.5%, of the time. Diptilomiopus floridanus was not collected in commercial citrus orchards during this survey. Diptilomiopus floridanus had significantly greater infestation rates on lime and lemon trees compared with grapefruit, tangerine, tangelo, sweet orange, and pummelo trees. However, infestation rates on lime and lemon trees were not significantly different from those on sour orange trees.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-4040</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1653/024.100.0230</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lutz: Florida Entomological Society</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Acari ; Aceria sheldoni ; Aculops pelekassi ; Agriculture ; Aquatic mammals ; Arboreta ; Citrus fruits ; Citrus trees ; Commercial species ; Diptilomiopidae ; Diptilomiopus floridanus ; Distribution ; Eriophyidae ; Eriophyoidea ; Flowers & plants ; Freshwater mammals ; Fruit trees ; Grapefruit ; Horticulture ; Infestation ; Marine mammals ; Mites ; Orchards ; Phyllocoptruta oleivora ; Relative abundance ; RESEARCH PAPERS ; Seasonal distribution ; Trees ; Winter</subject><ispartof>The Florida entomologist, 2017-06, Vol.100 (2), p.325-333</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Florida Entomological Society</rights><rights>Copyright Florida Entomological Society Jun 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b431t-12fff22d7a1b832e439a6878178584c5d6376cfb72346ebd071df02f8b765a303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b431t-12fff22d7a1b832e439a6878178584c5d6376cfb72346ebd071df02f8b765a303</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1653/024.100.0230$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26358892$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>109,314,780,784,864,25354,27924,27925,52719,54524,54530</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26358892$$EView_record_in_JSTOR$$FView_record_in_$$GJSTOR</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Childers, Carl C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Michael E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebert, Timothy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achor, Diann S</creatorcontrib><title>Diptilomiopus floridanus (Acari: Eriophyoidea: Diptilomiopidae): Its Distribution and Relative Abundance with Other Eriophyoid Species on Dooryard, Varietal Block, and Commercial Citrus in Florida</title><title>The Florida entomologist</title><description>We sampled 526 dooryard, 18 varietal block, and 784 commercial citrus trees in Florida between May 2009 and Apr 2014 for eriophyoid mites including Diptilomiopus floridanus Craemer & Amrine, Aceria sheldoni (Ewing), Aculops pelekassi (Keifer), and Phyllocoptruta oleivora (Ashmead). In total, 1,423 D. floridanus individuals were collected from dooryard citrus trees and 1 each from the lemon cultivar ‘Bearss’ and sweet lime trees from the Florida Citrus Arboretum in Winter Haven. Diptilomiopus floridanus was collected from dooryard citrus in the following counties in Florida: Broward, Collier, Dade, Indian River, Lee, Martin, Palm Beach, Pinellas, Polk, Sarasota, and St. Lucie. The mite was not observed in Charlotte, Hardee, Hendry, Highlands, Manatee, or Okeechobee counties (Florida). Percentages of the eriophyoid mite species collected from dooryard citrus trees and varietal blocks were: A. pelekassi 3.2%, A. sheldoni 9.1%, D. floridanus 17.3%, and P. oleivora 84.2%. The 6 counties with the highest percentages of D. floridanus on dooryard trees were: Collier 36%, Broward 25%, Indian River 25%, Palm Beach 25%, Martin 23%, and St. Lucie 22%. In commercial citrus, A. sheldoni was collected less than 1.0%, A. pelekassi 4.0%, and P. oleivora 75.5%, of the time. Diptilomiopus floridanus was not collected in commercial citrus orchards during this survey. Diptilomiopus floridanus had significantly greater infestation rates on lime and lemon trees compared with grapefruit, tangerine, tangelo, sweet orange, and pummelo trees. However, infestation rates on lime and lemon trees were not significantly different from those on sour orange trees.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Acari</subject><subject>Aceria sheldoni</subject><subject>Aculops pelekassi</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Aquatic mammals</subject><subject>Arboreta</subject><subject>Citrus fruits</subject><subject>Citrus trees</subject><subject>Commercial species</subject><subject>Diptilomiopidae</subject><subject>Diptilomiopus floridanus</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Eriophyidae</subject><subject>Eriophyoidea</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Freshwater mammals</subject><subject>Fruit trees</subject><subject>Grapefruit</subject><subject>Horticulture</subject><subject>Infestation</subject><subject>Marine mammals</subject><subject>Mites</subject><subject>Orchards</subject><subject>Phyllocoptruta oleivora</subject><subject>Relative abundance</subject><subject>RESEARCH PAPERS</subject><subject>Seasonal distribution</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>0015-4040</issn><issn>1938-5102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk9v1DAQxSMEEkvhxhXJEhdabZaxHSfO3pbtH1aqVKkFrpHj2F0vSRxsp-1-Pz4Y3gah9oJ88Gjm9968wyTJewwLnDP6GUi2wAALIBReJDNcUp4yDORlMgPALM0gg9fJG-93AFASxmbJ71MzBNPazthh9Ei31plG9LH8tJLCmSU6c3G03VvTKLFET_DIqeMl2gQfuz44U4_B2B6JvkHXqhXB3Cm0qsc--kmF7k3YoquwVe6JJboZlDTKo6g7tdbthWvm6EdcrIJo0ZfWyp_zR8e17TrlpIndtQkuBjQ9Op_ivk1eadF69e7vf5R8Pz_7tv6aXl5dbNary7TOKA4pJlprQppC4JpTojJaipwXHBec8UyyJqdFLnVdEJrlqm6gwI0Gonld5ExQoEfJx8l3cPbXqHyodnZ0fVxZ4TIDnHOe8UgtJupWtKoyvbbBCRlfozojba-0if0VIxjnpCwOguNngsgE9RBuxeh9tbm5fs7OJ1Y6671Tuhqc6YTbVxiqwxFU8QhiDdXhCCL-YcJ3Plj3jyU5ZZyXJM5PpnltbEz2f7M_YOe7mg</recordid><startdate>201706</startdate><enddate>201706</enddate><creator>Childers, Carl C</creator><creator>Rogers, Michael E</creator><creator>Ebert, Timothy A</creator><creator>Achor, Diann S</creator><general>Florida Entomological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201706</creationdate><title>Diptilomiopus floridanus (Acari: Eriophyoidea: Diptilomiopidae): Its Distribution and Relative Abundance with Other Eriophyoid Species on Dooryard, Varietal Block, and Commercial Citrus in Florida</title><author>Childers, Carl C ; Rogers, Michael E ; Ebert, Timothy A ; Achor, Diann S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b431t-12fff22d7a1b832e439a6878178584c5d6376cfb72346ebd071df02f8b765a303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Acari</topic><topic>Aceria sheldoni</topic><topic>Aculops pelekassi</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Aquatic mammals</topic><topic>Arboreta</topic><topic>Citrus fruits</topic><topic>Citrus trees</topic><topic>Commercial species</topic><topic>Diptilomiopidae</topic><topic>Diptilomiopus floridanus</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Eriophyidae</topic><topic>Eriophyoidea</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Freshwater mammals</topic><topic>Fruit trees</topic><topic>Grapefruit</topic><topic>Horticulture</topic><topic>Infestation</topic><topic>Marine mammals</topic><topic>Mites</topic><topic>Orchards</topic><topic>Phyllocoptruta oleivora</topic><topic>Relative abundance</topic><topic>RESEARCH PAPERS</topic><topic>Seasonal distribution</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Childers, Carl C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Michael E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebert, Timothy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achor, Diann S</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Florida entomologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Childers, Carl C</au><au>Rogers, Michael E</au><au>Ebert, Timothy A</au><au>Achor, Diann S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diptilomiopus floridanus (Acari: Eriophyoidea: Diptilomiopidae): Its Distribution and Relative Abundance with Other Eriophyoid Species on Dooryard, Varietal Block, and Commercial Citrus in Florida</atitle><jtitle>The Florida entomologist</jtitle><date>2017-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>325</spage><epage>333</epage><pages>325-333</pages><issn>0015-4040</issn><eissn>1938-5102</eissn><abstract>We sampled 526 dooryard, 18 varietal block, and 784 commercial citrus trees in Florida between May 2009 and Apr 2014 for eriophyoid mites including Diptilomiopus floridanus Craemer & Amrine, Aceria sheldoni (Ewing), Aculops pelekassi (Keifer), and Phyllocoptruta oleivora (Ashmead). In total, 1,423 D. floridanus individuals were collected from dooryard citrus trees and 1 each from the lemon cultivar ‘Bearss’ and sweet lime trees from the Florida Citrus Arboretum in Winter Haven. Diptilomiopus floridanus was collected from dooryard citrus in the following counties in Florida: Broward, Collier, Dade, Indian River, Lee, Martin, Palm Beach, Pinellas, Polk, Sarasota, and St. Lucie. The mite was not observed in Charlotte, Hardee, Hendry, Highlands, Manatee, or Okeechobee counties (Florida). Percentages of the eriophyoid mite species collected from dooryard citrus trees and varietal blocks were: A. pelekassi 3.2%, A. sheldoni 9.1%, D. floridanus 17.3%, and P. oleivora 84.2%. The 6 counties with the highest percentages of D. floridanus on dooryard trees were: Collier 36%, Broward 25%, Indian River 25%, Palm Beach 25%, Martin 23%, and St. Lucie 22%. In commercial citrus, A. sheldoni was collected less than 1.0%, A. pelekassi 4.0%, and P. oleivora 75.5%, of the time. Diptilomiopus floridanus was not collected in commercial citrus orchards during this survey. Diptilomiopus floridanus had significantly greater infestation rates on lime and lemon trees compared with grapefruit, tangerine, tangelo, sweet orange, and pummelo trees. However, infestation rates on lime and lemon trees were not significantly different from those on sour orange trees.</abstract><cop>Lutz</cop><pub>Florida Entomological Society</pub><doi>10.1653/024.100.0230</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0015-4040 |
ispartof | The Florida entomologist, 2017-06, Vol.100 (2), p.325-333 |
issn | 0015-4040 1938-5102 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1940168848 |
source | JSTOR Open Access Journals |
subjects | Abundance Acari Aceria sheldoni Aculops pelekassi Agriculture Aquatic mammals Arboreta Citrus fruits Citrus trees Commercial species Diptilomiopidae Diptilomiopus floridanus Distribution Eriophyidae Eriophyoidea Flowers & plants Freshwater mammals Fruit trees Grapefruit Horticulture Infestation Marine mammals Mites Orchards Phyllocoptruta oleivora Relative abundance RESEARCH PAPERS Seasonal distribution Trees Winter |
title | Diptilomiopus floridanus (Acari: Eriophyoidea: Diptilomiopidae): Its Distribution and Relative Abundance with Other Eriophyoid Species on Dooryard, Varietal Block, and Commercial Citrus in Florida |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T02%3A36%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_JFNAL&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diptilomiopus%20floridanus%20(Acari:%20Eriophyoidea:%20Diptilomiopidae):%20Its%20Distribution%20and%20Relative%20Abundance%20with%20Other%20Eriophyoid%20Species%20on%20Dooryard,%20Varietal%20Block,%20and%20Commercial%20Citrus%20in%20Florida&rft.jtitle=The%20Florida%20entomologist&rft.au=Childers,%20Carl%20C&rft.date=2017-06&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=325&rft.epage=333&rft.pages=325-333&rft.issn=0015-4040&rft.eissn=1938-5102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1653/024.100.0230&rft_dat=%3Cgale_JFNAL%3EA521162978%3C/gale_JFNAL%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1940168848&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A521162978&rft_jstor_id=26358892&rfr_iscdi=true |