Conventional as well as Emerging Arsenic Removal Technologies—a Critical Review
Arsenic poisoning from contaminated drinking water has evolved as one of the major health hazards in recent times. High concentrations of arsenic in water and soil have been found in many parts of the world. Developing countries like Taiwan, Chile, Argentina, Bangladesh, Nepal and Vietnam are most a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water, air, and soil pollution air, and soil pollution, 2017-10, Vol.228 (10), p.1, Article 381 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Water, air, and soil pollution |
container_volume | 228 |
creator | Mohanty, Debasis |
description | Arsenic poisoning from contaminated drinking water has evolved as one of the major health hazards in recent times. High concentrations of arsenic in water and soil have been found in many parts of the world. Developing countries like Taiwan, Chile, Argentina, Bangladesh, Nepal and Vietnam are most affected by the contamination of groundwater with arsenic. These countries also cannot afford expensive and large-scale treatments to remove arsenic from drinking waters to acceptable limits (10 ppb, as recommended by WHO and US EPA). The aim of this review is to summarize low-cost, effective conventional technologies currently described in the literature for arsenic removal that can be used in the third world and developing countries, compare them with the emerging technologies and discuss their advantages and disadvantages along with a brief analysis of arsenic chemistry. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11270-017-3549-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1939423286</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A505020889</galeid><sourcerecordid>A505020889</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a378t-d48ca379727158ad78d73bc17de74a6a5b3eedb656bf32d5c6de3d05566c71333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAHaRWAf8E8fxsqrKj1QJUcHacu1JMEptsNMidhyCE3ISDGHBBs9irOf3jTwPoVOCzwnG4iIRQgUuMREl45Usqz00IVywkkpG99EE4yzWUshDdJTSE85HNmKC7ubB78APLnjdFzoVr9D_9MUGYud8V8xiAu9MsYJN2GXPPZhHH_rQOUif7x-6mEc3OJNfVrBz8HqMDlrdJzj57VP0cLm4n1-Xy9urm_lsWWommqG0VWPyTQoqCG-0FY0VbG2IsCAqXWu-ZgB2XfN63TJquaktMIs5r2sjCGNsis7Guc8xvGwhDeopbGPeIikimawoo02dXeejq9M9KOfbMERtclnYOBM8tC7rM445prhpZAbICJgYUorQqufoNjq-KYLVd9RqjFrlqNV31KrKDB2ZlL2-g_jnK_9CX04ogYw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1939423286</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conventional as well as Emerging Arsenic Removal Technologies—a Critical Review</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Mohanty, Debasis</creator><creatorcontrib>Mohanty, Debasis</creatorcontrib><description>Arsenic poisoning from contaminated drinking water has evolved as one of the major health hazards in recent times. High concentrations of arsenic in water and soil have been found in many parts of the world. Developing countries like Taiwan, Chile, Argentina, Bangladesh, Nepal and Vietnam are most affected by the contamination of groundwater with arsenic. These countries also cannot afford expensive and large-scale treatments to remove arsenic from drinking waters to acceptable limits (10 ppb, as recommended by WHO and US EPA). The aim of this review is to summarize low-cost, effective conventional technologies currently described in the literature for arsenic removal that can be used in the third world and developing countries, compare them with the emerging technologies and discuss their advantages and disadvantages along with a brief analysis of arsenic chemistry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0049-6979</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11270-017-3549-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Arsenic ; Arsenic removal ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts ; Contamination ; Developing countries ; Drinking water ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Environment ; Environmental monitoring ; Groundwater ; Health aspects ; Health hazards ; Hydrogeology ; LDCs ; Poisoning ; Pollutant removal ; Removal ; Soil ; Soil contamination ; Soil Science & Conservation ; Soil water ; Water pollution ; Water Quality/Water Pollution</subject><ispartof>Water, air, and soil pollution, 2017-10, Vol.228 (10), p.1, Article 381</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing AG 2017</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Springer</rights><rights>Water, Air, & Soil Pollution is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a378t-d48ca379727158ad78d73bc17de74a6a5b3eedb656bf32d5c6de3d05566c71333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a378t-d48ca379727158ad78d73bc17de74a6a5b3eedb656bf32d5c6de3d05566c71333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11270-017-3549-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11270-017-3549-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mohanty, Debasis</creatorcontrib><title>Conventional as well as Emerging Arsenic Removal Technologies—a Critical Review</title><title>Water, air, and soil pollution</title><addtitle>Water Air Soil Pollut</addtitle><description>Arsenic poisoning from contaminated drinking water has evolved as one of the major health hazards in recent times. High concentrations of arsenic in water and soil have been found in many parts of the world. Developing countries like Taiwan, Chile, Argentina, Bangladesh, Nepal and Vietnam are most affected by the contamination of groundwater with arsenic. These countries also cannot afford expensive and large-scale treatments to remove arsenic from drinking waters to acceptable limits (10 ppb, as recommended by WHO and US EPA). The aim of this review is to summarize low-cost, effective conventional technologies currently described in the literature for arsenic removal that can be used in the third world and developing countries, compare them with the emerging technologies and discuss their advantages and disadvantages along with a brief analysis of arsenic chemistry.</description><subject>Arsenic</subject><subject>Arsenic removal</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health hazards</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Poisoning</subject><subject>Pollutant removal</subject><subject>Removal</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil contamination</subject><subject>Soil Science & Conservation</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><subject>Water Quality/Water Pollution</subject><issn>0049-6979</issn><issn>1573-2932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAHaRWAf8E8fxsqrKj1QJUcHacu1JMEptsNMidhyCE3ISDGHBBs9irOf3jTwPoVOCzwnG4iIRQgUuMREl45Usqz00IVywkkpG99EE4yzWUshDdJTSE85HNmKC7ubB78APLnjdFzoVr9D_9MUGYud8V8xiAu9MsYJN2GXPPZhHH_rQOUif7x-6mEc3OJNfVrBz8HqMDlrdJzj57VP0cLm4n1-Xy9urm_lsWWommqG0VWPyTQoqCG-0FY0VbG2IsCAqXWu-ZgB2XfN63TJquaktMIs5r2sjCGNsis7Guc8xvGwhDeopbGPeIikimawoo02dXeejq9M9KOfbMERtclnYOBM8tC7rM445prhpZAbICJgYUorQqufoNjq-KYLVd9RqjFrlqNV31KrKDB2ZlL2-g_jnK_9CX04ogYw</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Mohanty, Debasis</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>Conventional as well as Emerging Arsenic Removal Technologies—a Critical Review</title><author>Mohanty, Debasis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a378t-d48ca379727158ad78d73bc17de74a6a5b3eedb656bf32d5c6de3d05566c71333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Arsenic</topic><topic>Arsenic removal</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health hazards</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Poisoning</topic><topic>Pollutant removal</topic><topic>Removal</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil contamination</topic><topic>Soil Science & Conservation</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><topic>Water Quality/Water Pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mohanty, Debasis</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Water, air, and soil pollution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mohanty, Debasis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conventional as well as Emerging Arsenic Removal Technologies—a Critical Review</atitle><jtitle>Water, air, and soil pollution</jtitle><stitle>Water Air Soil Pollut</stitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>228</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><artnum>381</artnum><issn>0049-6979</issn><eissn>1573-2932</eissn><abstract>Arsenic poisoning from contaminated drinking water has evolved as one of the major health hazards in recent times. High concentrations of arsenic in water and soil have been found in many parts of the world. Developing countries like Taiwan, Chile, Argentina, Bangladesh, Nepal and Vietnam are most affected by the contamination of groundwater with arsenic. These countries also cannot afford expensive and large-scale treatments to remove arsenic from drinking waters to acceptable limits (10 ppb, as recommended by WHO and US EPA). The aim of this review is to summarize low-cost, effective conventional technologies currently described in the literature for arsenic removal that can be used in the third world and developing countries, compare them with the emerging technologies and discuss their advantages and disadvantages along with a brief analysis of arsenic chemistry.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s11270-017-3549-4</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0049-6979 |
ispartof | Water, air, and soil pollution, 2017-10, Vol.228 (10), p.1, Article 381 |
issn | 0049-6979 1573-2932 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1939423286 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Arsenic Arsenic removal Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts Contamination Developing countries Drinking water Earth and Environmental Science Environment Environmental monitoring Groundwater Health aspects Health hazards Hydrogeology LDCs Poisoning Pollutant removal Removal Soil Soil contamination Soil Science & Conservation Soil water Water pollution Water Quality/Water Pollution |
title | Conventional as well as Emerging Arsenic Removal Technologies—a Critical Review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T05%3A50%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conventional%20as%20well%20as%20Emerging%20Arsenic%20Removal%20Technologies%E2%80%94a%20Critical%20Review&rft.jtitle=Water,%20air,%20and%20soil%20pollution&rft.au=Mohanty,%20Debasis&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=228&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.artnum=381&rft.issn=0049-6979&rft.eissn=1573-2932&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11270-017-3549-4&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA505020889%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1939423286&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A505020889&rfr_iscdi=true |