Variability and Trends in the Arctic Sea Ice Cover: Results from Different Techniques

Variability and trend studies of sea ice in the Arctic have been conducted using products derived from the same raw passive microwave data but by different groups using different algorithms. This study provides consistency assessment of four of the leading products, namely, Goddard Bootstrap (SB2),...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Oceans 2017-08, Vol.122 (8), p.6883-6900
Hauptverfasser: Comiso, Josefino C., Meier, Walter N., Gersten, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 6900
container_issue 8
container_start_page 6883
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Oceans
container_volume 122
creator Comiso, Josefino C.
Meier, Walter N.
Gersten, Robert
description Variability and trend studies of sea ice in the Arctic have been conducted using products derived from the same raw passive microwave data but by different groups using different algorithms. This study provides consistency assessment of four of the leading products, namely, Goddard Bootstrap (SB2), Goddard NASA Team (NT1), EUMETSAT Ocean and Sea Ice Satellite Application Facility (OSI-SAF 1.2), and Hadley HadISST 2.2 data in evaluating variability and trends in the Arctic sea ice cover. All four provide generally similar ice patterns but significant disagreements in ice concentration distributions especially in the marginal ice zone and adjacent regions in winter and meltponded areas in summer. The discrepancies are primarily due to different ways the four techniques account for occurrences of new ice and meltponding. However, results show that the different products generally provide consistent and similar representation of the state of the Arctic sea ice cover. Hadley and NT1 data usually provide the highest and lowest monthly ice extents, respectively. The Hadley data also show the lowest trends in ice extent and ice area at negative 3.88 percent decade and negative 4.37 percent decade, respectively, compared to an average of negative 4.36 percent decade and negative 4.57 percent decade for all four. Trend maps also show similar spatial distribution for all four with the largest negative trends occurring at the Kara/Barents Sea and Beaufort Sea regions, where sea ice has been retreating the fastest. The good agreement of the trends especially with updated data provides strong confidence in the quantification of the rate of decline in the Arctic sea ice cover.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/2017JC012768
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1938816327</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1938816327</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4183-67e8bf382d134232a29ebb762ad10ed1201d10f8cbed78e747c75e6a508d9fb83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkL1PwzAQxS0EElXpxshgiTngjzS22aoApVUlpNKyWk5yUV2lTrFTUP57XIoQt9wb3run-yF0TckdJYTdM0LFPCeUiUyeoQGjmUoUU_T8T4vxJRqFsCVxJJVpqgZo_W68NYVtbNdj4yq88uCqgK3D3QbwxJedLfEbGDwrAeftJ_gHvIRwaLqAa9_u8KOta4ihDq-g3Dj7cYBwhS5q0wQY_e4hWj8_rfKXZPE6neWTRWJSKnmSCZBFzSWrKE8ZZ4YpKAqRMVNRAhWNL0VRy7KASkgQqSjFGDIzJrJSdSH5EN2e7u59e-zt9LY9eBcrNVVcSppxJqKLn1xftoFe773dGd9rSvQRnP4PTs-ny5wxrnhM3ZxSzgSjXefDjzOyUxEf_waveWj8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1938816327</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variability and Trends in the Arctic Sea Ice Cover: Results from Different Techniques</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>NASA Technical Reports Server</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Comiso, Josefino C. ; Meier, Walter N. ; Gersten, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Comiso, Josefino C. ; Meier, Walter N. ; Gersten, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>Variability and trend studies of sea ice in the Arctic have been conducted using products derived from the same raw passive microwave data but by different groups using different algorithms. This study provides consistency assessment of four of the leading products, namely, Goddard Bootstrap (SB2), Goddard NASA Team (NT1), EUMETSAT Ocean and Sea Ice Satellite Application Facility (OSI-SAF 1.2), and Hadley HadISST 2.2 data in evaluating variability and trends in the Arctic sea ice cover. All four provide generally similar ice patterns but significant disagreements in ice concentration distributions especially in the marginal ice zone and adjacent regions in winter and meltponded areas in summer. The discrepancies are primarily due to different ways the four techniques account for occurrences of new ice and meltponding. However, results show that the different products generally provide consistent and similar representation of the state of the Arctic sea ice cover. Hadley and NT1 data usually provide the highest and lowest monthly ice extents, respectively. The Hadley data also show the lowest trends in ice extent and ice area at negative 3.88 percent decade and negative 4.37 percent decade, respectively, compared to an average of negative 4.36 percent decade and negative 4.57 percent decade for all four. Trend maps also show similar spatial distribution for all four with the largest negative trends occurring at the Kara/Barents Sea and Beaufort Sea regions, where sea ice has been retreating the fastest. The good agreement of the trends especially with updated data provides strong confidence in the quantification of the rate of decline in the Arctic sea ice cover.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9275</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9291</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2017JC012768</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Goddard Space Flight Center: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Annual variations ; Arctic ; Arctic sea ice ; Area ; Data processing ; Distribution ; Geophysics ; Geosciences (General) ; Ice cover ; ice extents ; Interannual variability ; Melting ; Neurotrophin 1 ; Parameter estimation ; Policies ; Products ; Regions ; Satellite data ; Satellites ; Sea ice ; Spatial distribution ; Summer ; Trends ; Variability</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans, 2017-08, Vol.122 (8), p.6883-6900</ispartof><rights>2017. The Authors.</rights><rights>2017. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4183-67e8bf382d134232a29ebb762ad10ed1201d10f8cbed78e747c75e6a508d9fb83</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-0875-7433 ; 0000-0003-2857-0550</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2017JC012768$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2017JC012768$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Comiso, Josefino C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier, Walter N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gersten, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Variability and Trends in the Arctic Sea Ice Cover: Results from Different Techniques</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans</title><description>Variability and trend studies of sea ice in the Arctic have been conducted using products derived from the same raw passive microwave data but by different groups using different algorithms. This study provides consistency assessment of four of the leading products, namely, Goddard Bootstrap (SB2), Goddard NASA Team (NT1), EUMETSAT Ocean and Sea Ice Satellite Application Facility (OSI-SAF 1.2), and Hadley HadISST 2.2 data in evaluating variability and trends in the Arctic sea ice cover. All four provide generally similar ice patterns but significant disagreements in ice concentration distributions especially in the marginal ice zone and adjacent regions in winter and meltponded areas in summer. The discrepancies are primarily due to different ways the four techniques account for occurrences of new ice and meltponding. However, results show that the different products generally provide consistent and similar representation of the state of the Arctic sea ice cover. Hadley and NT1 data usually provide the highest and lowest monthly ice extents, respectively. The Hadley data also show the lowest trends in ice extent and ice area at negative 3.88 percent decade and negative 4.37 percent decade, respectively, compared to an average of negative 4.36 percent decade and negative 4.57 percent decade for all four. Trend maps also show similar spatial distribution for all four with the largest negative trends occurring at the Kara/Barents Sea and Beaufort Sea regions, where sea ice has been retreating the fastest. The good agreement of the trends especially with updated data provides strong confidence in the quantification of the rate of decline in the Arctic sea ice cover.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Annual variations</subject><subject>Arctic</subject><subject>Arctic sea ice</subject><subject>Area</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Geosciences (General)</subject><subject>Ice cover</subject><subject>ice extents</subject><subject>Interannual variability</subject><subject>Melting</subject><subject>Neurotrophin 1</subject><subject>Parameter estimation</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Products</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Satellite data</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Sea ice</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Variability</subject><issn>2169-9275</issn><issn>2169-9291</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>CYI</sourceid><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkL1PwzAQxS0EElXpxshgiTngjzS22aoApVUlpNKyWk5yUV2lTrFTUP57XIoQt9wb3run-yF0TckdJYTdM0LFPCeUiUyeoQGjmUoUU_T8T4vxJRqFsCVxJJVpqgZo_W68NYVtbNdj4yq88uCqgK3D3QbwxJedLfEbGDwrAeftJ_gHvIRwaLqAa9_u8KOta4ihDq-g3Dj7cYBwhS5q0wQY_e4hWj8_rfKXZPE6neWTRWJSKnmSCZBFzSWrKE8ZZ4YpKAqRMVNRAhWNL0VRy7KASkgQqSjFGDIzJrJSdSH5EN2e7u59e-zt9LY9eBcrNVVcSppxJqKLn1xftoFe773dGd9rSvQRnP4PTs-ny5wxrnhM3ZxSzgSjXefDjzOyUxEf_waveWj8</recordid><startdate>201708</startdate><enddate>201708</enddate><creator>Comiso, Josefino C.</creator><creator>Meier, Walter N.</creator><creator>Gersten, Robert</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CYE</scope><scope>CYI</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0875-7433</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2857-0550</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201708</creationdate><title>Variability and Trends in the Arctic Sea Ice Cover: Results from Different Techniques</title><author>Comiso, Josefino C. ; Meier, Walter N. ; Gersten, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4183-67e8bf382d134232a29ebb762ad10ed1201d10f8cbed78e747c75e6a508d9fb83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Annual variations</topic><topic>Arctic</topic><topic>Arctic sea ice</topic><topic>Area</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Geosciences (General)</topic><topic>Ice cover</topic><topic>ice extents</topic><topic>Interannual variability</topic><topic>Melting</topic><topic>Neurotrophin 1</topic><topic>Parameter estimation</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Products</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Satellite data</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Sea ice</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Variability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Comiso, Josefino C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier, Walter N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gersten, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>NASA Scientific and Technical Information</collection><collection>NASA Technical Reports Server</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Comiso, Josefino C.</au><au>Meier, Walter N.</au><au>Gersten, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variability and Trends in the Arctic Sea Ice Cover: Results from Different Techniques</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans</jtitle><date>2017-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>122</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>6883</spage><epage>6900</epage><pages>6883-6900</pages><issn>2169-9275</issn><eissn>2169-9291</eissn><abstract>Variability and trend studies of sea ice in the Arctic have been conducted using products derived from the same raw passive microwave data but by different groups using different algorithms. This study provides consistency assessment of four of the leading products, namely, Goddard Bootstrap (SB2), Goddard NASA Team (NT1), EUMETSAT Ocean and Sea Ice Satellite Application Facility (OSI-SAF 1.2), and Hadley HadISST 2.2 data in evaluating variability and trends in the Arctic sea ice cover. All four provide generally similar ice patterns but significant disagreements in ice concentration distributions especially in the marginal ice zone and adjacent regions in winter and meltponded areas in summer. The discrepancies are primarily due to different ways the four techniques account for occurrences of new ice and meltponding. However, results show that the different products generally provide consistent and similar representation of the state of the Arctic sea ice cover. Hadley and NT1 data usually provide the highest and lowest monthly ice extents, respectively. The Hadley data also show the lowest trends in ice extent and ice area at negative 3.88 percent decade and negative 4.37 percent decade, respectively, compared to an average of negative 4.36 percent decade and negative 4.57 percent decade for all four. Trend maps also show similar spatial distribution for all four with the largest negative trends occurring at the Kara/Barents Sea and Beaufort Sea regions, where sea ice has been retreating the fastest. The good agreement of the trends especially with updated data provides strong confidence in the quantification of the rate of decline in the Arctic sea ice cover.</abstract><cop>Goddard Space Flight Center</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2017JC012768</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0875-7433</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2857-0550</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9275
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Oceans, 2017-08, Vol.122 (8), p.6883-6900
issn 2169-9275
2169-9291
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1938816327
source Wiley Journals; Wiley Online Library Free Content; NASA Technical Reports Server; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Algorithms
Annual variations
Arctic
Arctic sea ice
Area
Data processing
Distribution
Geophysics
Geosciences (General)
Ice cover
ice extents
Interannual variability
Melting
Neurotrophin 1
Parameter estimation
Policies
Products
Regions
Satellite data
Satellites
Sea ice
Spatial distribution
Summer
Trends
Variability
title Variability and Trends in the Arctic Sea Ice Cover: Results from Different Techniques
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T08%3A49%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variability%20and%20Trends%20in%20the%20Arctic%20Sea%20Ice%20Cover:%20Results%20from%20Different%20Techniques&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Oceans&rft.au=Comiso,%20Josefino%20C.&rft.date=2017-08&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=6883&rft.epage=6900&rft.pages=6883-6900&rft.issn=2169-9275&rft.eissn=2169-9291&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2017JC012768&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E1938816327%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1938816327&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true