Numerical analysis of instrumented mechanically stabilized gabion walls with large vertical reinforcement spacing

The paper describes numerical models that were developed to simulate the performance of two instrumented mechanically stabilized earth walls constructed in Izmir, Turkey. These walls were constructed with gabion facing, hybrid reinforcement layers, and fill on a rigid foundation. The hybrid reinforc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geotextiles and geomembranes 2017-08, Vol.45 (4), p.294-306
Hauptverfasser: Gu, Meixiang, Collin, James G., Han, Jie, Zhang, Zhen, Tanyu, Burak F., Leshchinsky, Dov, Ling, Hoe I., Rimoldi, Pietro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 306
container_issue 4
container_start_page 294
container_title Geotextiles and geomembranes
container_volume 45
creator Gu, Meixiang
Collin, James G.
Han, Jie
Zhang, Zhen
Tanyu, Burak F.
Leshchinsky, Dov
Ling, Hoe I.
Rimoldi, Pietro
description The paper describes numerical models that were developed to simulate the performance of two instrumented mechanically stabilized earth walls constructed in Izmir, Turkey. These walls were constructed with gabion facing, hybrid reinforcement layers, and fill on a rigid foundation. The hybrid reinforcement layers comprised primary reinforcement (geogrid) and secondary reinforcement (wire mesh). The vertical spacing between the primary reinforcement changed from 1 m to 2 m in two walls while other properties were kept the same. The responses of the field walls at the end of construction were simulated and compared with the numerical results. The results calculated from the numerical models showed generally good agreement with the measured wall facing displacements, horizontal fill displacements, and tensile forces in the geogrid and in the wire mesh. The maximum calculated facing displacements for the walls with 1 m and 2 m reinforcement spacing were 30.7 and 36.4 mm, respectively. The maximum tensile forces in the geogrid layers were increased by 1.5 times in the 2 m spacing wall as compared with the 1 m spacing wall due to the increase of primary reinforcement spacing. However, the spacing change did not have an obvious effect on the increase of tensile forces in the secondary reinforcement (the wire mesh). The calculated results were also compared with theoretical results relating to the earth pressure distributions and the location of the maximum tensile strains in the primary reinforcement. The horizontal earth pressures against the wall facing were close to the active earth pressures for both walls. The maximum tensile strain line of the reinforcement was close to the Rankine's failure line.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.04.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1938550428</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1938550428</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-43658a27ac0c2a00170b8c0f8128cf992160b8f0207404c8d283738dc1239e483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtOwzAURC0EEqXwDVhinXD9SOIsUcVLqmADa8t1ndRR4rS2SylfjwOI1b2aGY00B6FrAjkBUt52eWvGaD4HM-QUSJUDzwHoCZoRUdUZKwQ_RTOgZZkRwvk5ugihAwBe1WKGdi_7wXirVY-VU_0x2IDHBlsXok-Oi2aNB6M3yk2Z_ohDVCvb26-kt-kbHT4kPeCDjRvcK98a_GF8_Gn0xrpm9NpMRThslbauvURnjeqDufq7c_T-cP-2eMqWr4_Pi7tlpiknMeOsLISildKgqYI0DFZCQyMIFbqpa0rKJDRAoeLAtVhTwSom1ppQVhsu2Bzd_PZu_bjbmxBlN-592hgkqZkoCuB0SlW_Ke3HELxp5NbbQfmjJCAnvrKT_3zlxFcCl4kv-wbYT3N5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1938550428</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Numerical analysis of instrumented mechanically stabilized gabion walls with large vertical reinforcement spacing</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Gu, Meixiang ; Collin, James G. ; Han, Jie ; Zhang, Zhen ; Tanyu, Burak F. ; Leshchinsky, Dov ; Ling, Hoe I. ; Rimoldi, Pietro</creator><creatorcontrib>Gu, Meixiang ; Collin, James G. ; Han, Jie ; Zhang, Zhen ; Tanyu, Burak F. ; Leshchinsky, Dov ; Ling, Hoe I. ; Rimoldi, Pietro</creatorcontrib><description>The paper describes numerical models that were developed to simulate the performance of two instrumented mechanically stabilized earth walls constructed in Izmir, Turkey. These walls were constructed with gabion facing, hybrid reinforcement layers, and fill on a rigid foundation. The hybrid reinforcement layers comprised primary reinforcement (geogrid) and secondary reinforcement (wire mesh). The vertical spacing between the primary reinforcement changed from 1 m to 2 m in two walls while other properties were kept the same. The responses of the field walls at the end of construction were simulated and compared with the numerical results. The results calculated from the numerical models showed generally good agreement with the measured wall facing displacements, horizontal fill displacements, and tensile forces in the geogrid and in the wire mesh. The maximum calculated facing displacements for the walls with 1 m and 2 m reinforcement spacing were 30.7 and 36.4 mm, respectively. The maximum tensile forces in the geogrid layers were increased by 1.5 times in the 2 m spacing wall as compared with the 1 m spacing wall due to the increase of primary reinforcement spacing. However, the spacing change did not have an obvious effect on the increase of tensile forces in the secondary reinforcement (the wire mesh). The calculated results were also compared with theoretical results relating to the earth pressure distributions and the location of the maximum tensile strains in the primary reinforcement. The horizontal earth pressures against the wall facing were close to the active earth pressures for both walls. The maximum tensile strain line of the reinforcement was close to the Rankine's failure line.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-1144</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.04.002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Essex: Elsevier BV</publisher><subject>Boundary conditions ; Computer simulation ; Construction ; Design ; Displacement ; Earth pressure ; Finite element method ; Mathematical models ; Numerical analysis ; Reinforcement ; Walls ; Wire cloth</subject><ispartof>Geotextiles and geomembranes, 2017-08, Vol.45 (4), p.294-306</ispartof><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Aug 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-43658a27ac0c2a00170b8c0f8128cf992160b8f0207404c8d283738dc1239e483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-43658a27ac0c2a00170b8c0f8128cf992160b8f0207404c8d283738dc1239e483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gu, Meixiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collin, James G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanyu, Burak F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leshchinsky, Dov</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ling, Hoe I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rimoldi, Pietro</creatorcontrib><title>Numerical analysis of instrumented mechanically stabilized gabion walls with large vertical reinforcement spacing</title><title>Geotextiles and geomembranes</title><description>The paper describes numerical models that were developed to simulate the performance of two instrumented mechanically stabilized earth walls constructed in Izmir, Turkey. These walls were constructed with gabion facing, hybrid reinforcement layers, and fill on a rigid foundation. The hybrid reinforcement layers comprised primary reinforcement (geogrid) and secondary reinforcement (wire mesh). The vertical spacing between the primary reinforcement changed from 1 m to 2 m in two walls while other properties were kept the same. The responses of the field walls at the end of construction were simulated and compared with the numerical results. The results calculated from the numerical models showed generally good agreement with the measured wall facing displacements, horizontal fill displacements, and tensile forces in the geogrid and in the wire mesh. The maximum calculated facing displacements for the walls with 1 m and 2 m reinforcement spacing were 30.7 and 36.4 mm, respectively. The maximum tensile forces in the geogrid layers were increased by 1.5 times in the 2 m spacing wall as compared with the 1 m spacing wall due to the increase of primary reinforcement spacing. However, the spacing change did not have an obvious effect on the increase of tensile forces in the secondary reinforcement (the wire mesh). The calculated results were also compared with theoretical results relating to the earth pressure distributions and the location of the maximum tensile strains in the primary reinforcement. The horizontal earth pressures against the wall facing were close to the active earth pressures for both walls. The maximum tensile strain line of the reinforcement was close to the Rankine's failure line.</description><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Displacement</subject><subject>Earth pressure</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Numerical analysis</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Walls</subject><subject>Wire cloth</subject><issn>0266-1144</issn><issn>1879-3584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kMtOwzAURC0EEqXwDVhinXD9SOIsUcVLqmADa8t1ndRR4rS2SylfjwOI1b2aGY00B6FrAjkBUt52eWvGaD4HM-QUSJUDzwHoCZoRUdUZKwQ_RTOgZZkRwvk5ugihAwBe1WKGdi_7wXirVY-VU_0x2IDHBlsXok-Oi2aNB6M3yk2Z_ohDVCvb26-kt-kbHT4kPeCDjRvcK98a_GF8_Gn0xrpm9NpMRThslbauvURnjeqDufq7c_T-cP-2eMqWr4_Pi7tlpiknMeOsLISildKgqYI0DFZCQyMIFbqpa0rKJDRAoeLAtVhTwSom1ppQVhsu2Bzd_PZu_bjbmxBlN-592hgkqZkoCuB0SlW_Ke3HELxp5NbbQfmjJCAnvrKT_3zlxFcCl4kv-wbYT3N5</recordid><startdate>20170801</startdate><enddate>20170801</enddate><creator>Gu, Meixiang</creator><creator>Collin, James G.</creator><creator>Han, Jie</creator><creator>Zhang, Zhen</creator><creator>Tanyu, Burak F.</creator><creator>Leshchinsky, Dov</creator><creator>Ling, Hoe I.</creator><creator>Rimoldi, Pietro</creator><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170801</creationdate><title>Numerical analysis of instrumented mechanically stabilized gabion walls with large vertical reinforcement spacing</title><author>Gu, Meixiang ; Collin, James G. ; Han, Jie ; Zhang, Zhen ; Tanyu, Burak F. ; Leshchinsky, Dov ; Ling, Hoe I. ; Rimoldi, Pietro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-43658a27ac0c2a00170b8c0f8128cf992160b8f0207404c8d283738dc1239e483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Displacement</topic><topic>Earth pressure</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Numerical analysis</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Walls</topic><topic>Wire cloth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gu, Meixiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collin, James G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanyu, Burak F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leshchinsky, Dov</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ling, Hoe I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rimoldi, Pietro</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Geotextiles and geomembranes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gu, Meixiang</au><au>Collin, James G.</au><au>Han, Jie</au><au>Zhang, Zhen</au><au>Tanyu, Burak F.</au><au>Leshchinsky, Dov</au><au>Ling, Hoe I.</au><au>Rimoldi, Pietro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Numerical analysis of instrumented mechanically stabilized gabion walls with large vertical reinforcement spacing</atitle><jtitle>Geotextiles and geomembranes</jtitle><date>2017-08-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>294</spage><epage>306</epage><pages>294-306</pages><issn>0266-1144</issn><eissn>1879-3584</eissn><abstract>The paper describes numerical models that were developed to simulate the performance of two instrumented mechanically stabilized earth walls constructed in Izmir, Turkey. These walls were constructed with gabion facing, hybrid reinforcement layers, and fill on a rigid foundation. The hybrid reinforcement layers comprised primary reinforcement (geogrid) and secondary reinforcement (wire mesh). The vertical spacing between the primary reinforcement changed from 1 m to 2 m in two walls while other properties were kept the same. The responses of the field walls at the end of construction were simulated and compared with the numerical results. The results calculated from the numerical models showed generally good agreement with the measured wall facing displacements, horizontal fill displacements, and tensile forces in the geogrid and in the wire mesh. The maximum calculated facing displacements for the walls with 1 m and 2 m reinforcement spacing were 30.7 and 36.4 mm, respectively. The maximum tensile forces in the geogrid layers were increased by 1.5 times in the 2 m spacing wall as compared with the 1 m spacing wall due to the increase of primary reinforcement spacing. However, the spacing change did not have an obvious effect on the increase of tensile forces in the secondary reinforcement (the wire mesh). The calculated results were also compared with theoretical results relating to the earth pressure distributions and the location of the maximum tensile strains in the primary reinforcement. The horizontal earth pressures against the wall facing were close to the active earth pressures for both walls. The maximum tensile strain line of the reinforcement was close to the Rankine's failure line.</abstract><cop>Essex</cop><pub>Elsevier BV</pub><doi>10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.04.002</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0266-1144
ispartof Geotextiles and geomembranes, 2017-08, Vol.45 (4), p.294-306
issn 0266-1144
1879-3584
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1938550428
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Boundary conditions
Computer simulation
Construction
Design
Displacement
Earth pressure
Finite element method
Mathematical models
Numerical analysis
Reinforcement
Walls
Wire cloth
title Numerical analysis of instrumented mechanically stabilized gabion walls with large vertical reinforcement spacing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T23%3A08%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Numerical%20analysis%20of%20instrumented%20mechanically%20stabilized%20gabion%20walls%20with%20large%20vertical%20reinforcement%20spacing&rft.jtitle=Geotextiles%20and%20geomembranes&rft.au=Gu,%20Meixiang&rft.date=2017-08-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=294&rft.epage=306&rft.pages=294-306&rft.issn=0266-1144&rft.eissn=1879-3584&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.04.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1938550428%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1938550428&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true