Patient-based integrated teaching program with the inclusion of psychomotor and affective domains

[5] Although lecturing facilitates the sharing of information with a large audience of students transmitting effective factual information,[4] it exposes the students merely to content, leading to passive reception of information, whereas it is the active processing of information that leads to lear...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:National journal of physiology, pharmacy and pharmacology pharmacy and pharmacology, 2017, Vol.7 (8), p.1
Hauptverfasser: Jagzape, Arunita, Jagzape, Tushar, Rawekar, Alka
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1
container_title National journal of physiology, pharmacy and pharmacology
container_volume 7
creator Jagzape, Arunita
Jagzape, Tushar
Rawekar, Alka
description [5] Although lecturing facilitates the sharing of information with a large audience of students transmitting effective factual information,[4] it exposes the students merely to content, leading to passive reception of information, whereas it is the active processing of information that leads to learning[4,6-8] and in which students are encouraged to involve in the building and testing their own mental models from information that they attain. According to Table 5, the students responded that this ITP helped to analyze the topic clinically and guided them how to approach the patient. [22] The most common method of instruction in ITP is also lecture, at last leading to passive reception of integrated information. [...]to engage the senses of the students and result in active learning, patient-based ITP was conceived along with inclusion of cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains and a real case of nephrotic syndrome. In the closed-ended responses in feedback, majority of the students agreed that teaching aids were adequately used (72%), learning objectives were identified (64%), lectures were in logical sequence (49% agreed, 42% strongly agreed), helped in understanding the concept of the topic (48% agreed, 37% strongly agreed), adequate discussion occurred (20% strongly agreed, 65% agreed), incorporation of psychomotor skills was helpful (66%), doctor-patient relationship was better understood (60% strongly agreed), and summarization was useful (53%).
doi_str_mv 10.5455/njppp.2017.7.0306802042017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1938529184</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1938529184</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c149t-e00ac5f4f3b9da4e37e24c119044fdcb7d1f2e33f232af51c7a26196d412c5a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUMtOwzAQtBBIVKX_YME5wa8kDTdU8ZIqwQHO1saxG1eNHWwX1L_HpVzYy8yuRrs7g9A1JWUlqurWbadpKhmhTdmUhJN6SRgRx_4MzRjjtOCM1OeZZyxE3bBLtIhxS3K1gmbFDMEbJKtdKjqIusfWJb0JkDJNGtRg3QZPwefRiL9tGnAadBap3T5a77A3eIoHNfjRJx8wuB6DMVol-6Vx70ewLl6hCwO7qBd_OEcfjw_vq-di_fr0srpfF4qKNhWaEFCVEYZ3bQ9C80YzoShtiRCmV13TU8M05yabAVNR1QCraVv32YiqoOZzdHPam__93OuY5Nbvg8snJW35smItXYqsujupVPAxBm3kFOwI4SApkcdU5W-q8piibOS_VPkPYwxuBw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1938529184</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient-based integrated teaching program with the inclusion of psychomotor and affective domains</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Jagzape, Arunita ; Jagzape, Tushar ; Rawekar, Alka</creator><creatorcontrib>Jagzape, Arunita ; Jagzape, Tushar ; Rawekar, Alka</creatorcontrib><description>[5] Although lecturing facilitates the sharing of information with a large audience of students transmitting effective factual information,[4] it exposes the students merely to content, leading to passive reception of information, whereas it is the active processing of information that leads to learning[4,6-8] and in which students are encouraged to involve in the building and testing their own mental models from information that they attain. According to Table 5, the students responded that this ITP helped to analyze the topic clinically and guided them how to approach the patient. [22] The most common method of instruction in ITP is also lecture, at last leading to passive reception of integrated information. [...]to engage the senses of the students and result in active learning, patient-based ITP was conceived along with inclusion of cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains and a real case of nephrotic syndrome. In the closed-ended responses in feedback, majority of the students agreed that teaching aids were adequately used (72%), learning objectives were identified (64%), lectures were in logical sequence (49% agreed, 42% strongly agreed), helped in understanding the concept of the topic (48% agreed, 37% strongly agreed), adequate discussion occurred (20% strongly agreed, 65% agreed), incorporation of psychomotor skills was helpful (66%), doctor-patient relationship was better understood (60% strongly agreed), and summarization was useful (53%).</description><identifier>ISSN: 2320-4672</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2231-3206</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5455/njppp.2017.7.0306802042017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Surat: Association of Physiologists, Pharmacists &amp; Pharmacologists</publisher><subject>Active learning ; Anatomy &amp; physiology ; Biochemistry ; Communication ; Curricula ; Departments ; Focus groups ; Independent study ; Methods ; Pediatrics ; Physics ; Physiology ; Public speaking ; Science education ; Students ; Studies ; Teaching</subject><ispartof>National journal of physiology, pharmacy and pharmacology, 2017, Vol.7 (8), p.1</ispartof><rights>Copyright Association of Physiologists, Pharmacists &amp; Pharmacologists 2017</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4022,27922,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jagzape, Arunita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jagzape, Tushar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rawekar, Alka</creatorcontrib><title>Patient-based integrated teaching program with the inclusion of psychomotor and affective domains</title><title>National journal of physiology, pharmacy and pharmacology</title><description>[5] Although lecturing facilitates the sharing of information with a large audience of students transmitting effective factual information,[4] it exposes the students merely to content, leading to passive reception of information, whereas it is the active processing of information that leads to learning[4,6-8] and in which students are encouraged to involve in the building and testing their own mental models from information that they attain. According to Table 5, the students responded that this ITP helped to analyze the topic clinically and guided them how to approach the patient. [22] The most common method of instruction in ITP is also lecture, at last leading to passive reception of integrated information. [...]to engage the senses of the students and result in active learning, patient-based ITP was conceived along with inclusion of cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains and a real case of nephrotic syndrome. In the closed-ended responses in feedback, majority of the students agreed that teaching aids were adequately used (72%), learning objectives were identified (64%), lectures were in logical sequence (49% agreed, 42% strongly agreed), helped in understanding the concept of the topic (48% agreed, 37% strongly agreed), adequate discussion occurred (20% strongly agreed, 65% agreed), incorporation of psychomotor skills was helpful (66%), doctor-patient relationship was better understood (60% strongly agreed), and summarization was useful (53%).</description><subject>Active learning</subject><subject>Anatomy &amp; physiology</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Departments</subject><subject>Focus groups</subject><subject>Independent study</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Public speaking</subject><subject>Science education</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><issn>2320-4672</issn><issn>2231-3206</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUMtOwzAQtBBIVKX_YME5wa8kDTdU8ZIqwQHO1saxG1eNHWwX1L_HpVzYy8yuRrs7g9A1JWUlqurWbadpKhmhTdmUhJN6SRgRx_4MzRjjtOCM1OeZZyxE3bBLtIhxS3K1gmbFDMEbJKtdKjqIusfWJb0JkDJNGtRg3QZPwefRiL9tGnAadBap3T5a77A3eIoHNfjRJx8wuB6DMVol-6Vx70ewLl6hCwO7qBd_OEcfjw_vq-di_fr0srpfF4qKNhWaEFCVEYZ3bQ9C80YzoShtiRCmV13TU8M05yabAVNR1QCraVv32YiqoOZzdHPam__93OuY5Nbvg8snJW35smItXYqsujupVPAxBm3kFOwI4SApkcdU5W-q8piibOS_VPkPYwxuBw</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Jagzape, Arunita</creator><creator>Jagzape, Tushar</creator><creator>Rawekar, Alka</creator><general>Association of Physiologists, Pharmacists &amp; Pharmacologists</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>04Q</scope><scope>04S</scope><scope>04W</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Patient-based integrated teaching program with the inclusion of psychomotor and affective domains</title><author>Jagzape, Arunita ; Jagzape, Tushar ; Rawekar, Alka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c149t-e00ac5f4f3b9da4e37e24c119044fdcb7d1f2e33f232af51c7a26196d412c5a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Active learning</topic><topic>Anatomy &amp; physiology</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Departments</topic><topic>Focus groups</topic><topic>Independent study</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Public speaking</topic><topic>Science education</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jagzape, Arunita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jagzape, Tushar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rawekar, Alka</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>India Database</collection><collection>India Database: Business</collection><collection>India Database: Science &amp; Technology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>National journal of physiology, pharmacy and pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jagzape, Arunita</au><au>Jagzape, Tushar</au><au>Rawekar, Alka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient-based integrated teaching program with the inclusion of psychomotor and affective domains</atitle><jtitle>National journal of physiology, pharmacy and pharmacology</jtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>2320-4672</issn><eissn>2231-3206</eissn><abstract>[5] Although lecturing facilitates the sharing of information with a large audience of students transmitting effective factual information,[4] it exposes the students merely to content, leading to passive reception of information, whereas it is the active processing of information that leads to learning[4,6-8] and in which students are encouraged to involve in the building and testing their own mental models from information that they attain. According to Table 5, the students responded that this ITP helped to analyze the topic clinically and guided them how to approach the patient. [22] The most common method of instruction in ITP is also lecture, at last leading to passive reception of integrated information. [...]to engage the senses of the students and result in active learning, patient-based ITP was conceived along with inclusion of cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains and a real case of nephrotic syndrome. In the closed-ended responses in feedback, majority of the students agreed that teaching aids were adequately used (72%), learning objectives were identified (64%), lectures were in logical sequence (49% agreed, 42% strongly agreed), helped in understanding the concept of the topic (48% agreed, 37% strongly agreed), adequate discussion occurred (20% strongly agreed, 65% agreed), incorporation of psychomotor skills was helpful (66%), doctor-patient relationship was better understood (60% strongly agreed), and summarization was useful (53%).</abstract><cop>Surat</cop><pub>Association of Physiologists, Pharmacists &amp; Pharmacologists</pub><doi>10.5455/njppp.2017.7.0306802042017</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2320-4672
ispartof National journal of physiology, pharmacy and pharmacology, 2017, Vol.7 (8), p.1
issn 2320-4672
2231-3206
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1938529184
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Active learning
Anatomy & physiology
Biochemistry
Communication
Curricula
Departments
Focus groups
Independent study
Methods
Pediatrics
Physics
Physiology
Public speaking
Science education
Students
Studies
Teaching
title Patient-based integrated teaching program with the inclusion of psychomotor and affective domains
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T08%3A12%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient-based%20integrated%20teaching%20program%20with%20the%20inclusion%20of%20psychomotor%20and%20affective%20domains&rft.jtitle=National%20journal%20of%20physiology,%20pharmacy%20and%20pharmacology&rft.au=Jagzape,%20Arunita&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=2320-4672&rft.eissn=2231-3206&rft_id=info:doi/10.5455/njppp.2017.7.0306802042017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1938529184%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1938529184&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true