The invisible obstacle to educational equality: gender bias in textbooks
Gender bias in textbooks (GBIT) is a low-profile education issue, given the 72,000,000 children who still have no access to schooling, but this article argues that GBIT is: (1) an important, (2) near-universal, (3) remarkably uniform, (4) quite persistent but (5) virtually invisible obstacle on the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Prospects (Paris) 2008-09, Vol.38 (3), p.345-361 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 361 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 345 |
container_title | Prospects (Paris) |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Blumberg, Rae Lesser |
description | Gender bias in textbooks (GBIT) is a low-profile education issue, given the 72,000,000 children who still have no access to schooling, but this article argues that GBIT is: (1) an important, (2) near-universal, (3) remarkably uniform, (4) quite persistent but (5) virtually invisible obstacle on the road to gender equality in education—an obstacle camouflaged by taken-for-granted stereotypes about gender roles. Specifically, GBIT: (1) is important because (a) textbooks occupy ~80% of classroom time, and (b) it may contribute to lowering girls’ achievements, especially in weak schools in poor countries; (2) has been found worldwide to varying degrees (except, perhaps, Sweden in recent years); (3) involves nearly identical patterns of under-representation of females, plus stereotypes of both genders’ occupational and household roles that overwhelmingly underplay women’s rising worldly importance; (4) is decreasing very slowly, according to “second generation” re-studies; and (5) remains obscured by the “hidden-in-plain-sight” system of gender stratification and roles. Case studies from Syria, India, Romania, China and the US document these points. Other case studies from Sweden and Latin America describe government initiatives to reduce GBIT, with differing levels of success. Totally revising textbooks (and curricula) to eliminate this bias is quite unlikely, partly because it is very costly. The article concludes by presenting inexpensive alternate methods that
can
combat GBIT. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11125-009-9086-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_193850175</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ849088</ericid><sourcerecordid>1897715091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2511-297a4c8137033b6b3e53eaa24f3ee599297438a1087568e41555b75efb93d3253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMFOwzAMjRBIjMEHIHGouBfiplkTbmgaDDSJyzhHSeeOjNJsSYrY35OpCHHhZFvvPfv5EXIJ9AYorW4DABQ8p1TmkopJDkdkBLxiaZL0mIwoZSwHzsQpOQthQylUJYURmS_fMLPdpw3WtJg5E6KuUxNdhqu-1tG6TrcZ7nrd2ri_y9bYrdBnxuqQdFnEr2icew_n5KTRbcCLnzomrw-z5XSeL14en6b3i7wuOEBeyEqXtQBWJUNmYhhyhloXZcMQuZQJL5nQQEXFJwJL4JybimNjJFuxgrMxuR72br3b9Rii2rjeJ49BgWSCp8cOJBhItXcheGzU1tsP7fcKqDrkpYa8VMpLHfJSkDRXgwa9rX_5s2dRJoJIcDHAIUHdGv2fu__u_AYjl3UX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>193850175</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The invisible obstacle to educational equality: gender bias in textbooks</title><source>Education Source</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Blumberg, Rae Lesser</creator><creatorcontrib>Blumberg, Rae Lesser</creatorcontrib><description>Gender bias in textbooks (GBIT) is a low-profile education issue, given the 72,000,000 children who still have no access to schooling, but this article argues that GBIT is: (1) an important, (2) near-universal, (3) remarkably uniform, (4) quite persistent but (5) virtually invisible obstacle on the road to gender equality in education—an obstacle camouflaged by taken-for-granted stereotypes about gender roles. Specifically, GBIT: (1) is important because (a) textbooks occupy ~80% of classroom time, and (b) it may contribute to lowering girls’ achievements, especially in weak schools in poor countries; (2) has been found worldwide to varying degrees (except, perhaps, Sweden in recent years); (3) involves nearly identical patterns of under-representation of females, plus stereotypes of both genders’ occupational and household roles that overwhelmingly underplay women’s rising worldly importance; (4) is decreasing very slowly, according to “second generation” re-studies; and (5) remains obscured by the “hidden-in-plain-sight” system of gender stratification and roles. Case studies from Syria, India, Romania, China and the US document these points. Other case studies from Sweden and Latin America describe government initiatives to reduce GBIT, with differing levels of success. Totally revising textbooks (and curricula) to eliminate this bias is quite unlikely, partly because it is very costly. The article concludes by presenting inexpensive alternate methods that
can
combat GBIT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-1538</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-9090</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11125-009-9086-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Barriers ; Bias ; Case Studies ; Change Strategies ; China ; Comparative Education ; Education ; Education discrimination ; Educational Assessment ; Educational Indicators ; Educational Testing ; Equal Education ; Foreign Countries ; Gender Bias ; Girls education ; Improvement Programs ; India ; Inequality ; International and Comparative Education ; International education ; Open File ; Romania ; Sex discrimination ; Sex Role ; Sweden ; Syria ; Textbook Bias ; Textbook Evaluation ; Textbooks ; United States ; Womens Studies</subject><ispartof>Prospects (Paris), 2008-09, Vol.38 (3), p.345-361</ispartof><rights>UNESCO IBE 2009</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2511-297a4c8137033b6b3e53eaa24f3ee599297438a1087568e41555b75efb93d3253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2511-297a4c8137033b6b3e53eaa24f3ee599297438a1087568e41555b75efb93d3253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11125-009-9086-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11125-009-9086-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ849088$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blumberg, Rae Lesser</creatorcontrib><title>The invisible obstacle to educational equality: gender bias in textbooks</title><title>Prospects (Paris)</title><addtitle>Prospects</addtitle><description>Gender bias in textbooks (GBIT) is a low-profile education issue, given the 72,000,000 children who still have no access to schooling, but this article argues that GBIT is: (1) an important, (2) near-universal, (3) remarkably uniform, (4) quite persistent but (5) virtually invisible obstacle on the road to gender equality in education—an obstacle camouflaged by taken-for-granted stereotypes about gender roles. Specifically, GBIT: (1) is important because (a) textbooks occupy ~80% of classroom time, and (b) it may contribute to lowering girls’ achievements, especially in weak schools in poor countries; (2) has been found worldwide to varying degrees (except, perhaps, Sweden in recent years); (3) involves nearly identical patterns of under-representation of females, plus stereotypes of both genders’ occupational and household roles that overwhelmingly underplay women’s rising worldly importance; (4) is decreasing very slowly, according to “second generation” re-studies; and (5) remains obscured by the “hidden-in-plain-sight” system of gender stratification and roles. Case studies from Syria, India, Romania, China and the US document these points. Other case studies from Sweden and Latin America describe government initiatives to reduce GBIT, with differing levels of success. Totally revising textbooks (and curricula) to eliminate this bias is quite unlikely, partly because it is very costly. The article concludes by presenting inexpensive alternate methods that
can
combat GBIT.</description><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>Change Strategies</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Comparative Education</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education discrimination</subject><subject>Educational Assessment</subject><subject>Educational Indicators</subject><subject>Educational Testing</subject><subject>Equal Education</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Gender Bias</subject><subject>Girls education</subject><subject>Improvement Programs</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>International and Comparative Education</subject><subject>International education</subject><subject>Open File</subject><subject>Romania</subject><subject>Sex discrimination</subject><subject>Sex Role</subject><subject>Sweden</subject><subject>Syria</subject><subject>Textbook Bias</subject><subject>Textbook Evaluation</subject><subject>Textbooks</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Womens Studies</subject><issn>0033-1538</issn><issn>1573-9090</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMFOwzAMjRBIjMEHIHGouBfiplkTbmgaDDSJyzhHSeeOjNJsSYrY35OpCHHhZFvvPfv5EXIJ9AYorW4DABQ8p1TmkopJDkdkBLxiaZL0mIwoZSwHzsQpOQthQylUJYURmS_fMLPdpw3WtJg5E6KuUxNdhqu-1tG6TrcZ7nrd2ri_y9bYrdBnxuqQdFnEr2icew_n5KTRbcCLnzomrw-z5XSeL14en6b3i7wuOEBeyEqXtQBWJUNmYhhyhloXZcMQuZQJL5nQQEXFJwJL4JybimNjJFuxgrMxuR72br3b9Rii2rjeJ49BgWSCp8cOJBhItXcheGzU1tsP7fcKqDrkpYa8VMpLHfJSkDRXgwa9rX_5s2dRJoJIcDHAIUHdGv2fu__u_AYjl3UX</recordid><startdate>20080901</startdate><enddate>20080901</enddate><creator>Blumberg, Rae Lesser</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080901</creationdate><title>The invisible obstacle to educational equality: gender bias in textbooks</title><author>Blumberg, Rae Lesser</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2511-297a4c8137033b6b3e53eaa24f3ee599297438a1087568e41555b75efb93d3253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>Change Strategies</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Comparative Education</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education discrimination</topic><topic>Educational Assessment</topic><topic>Educational Indicators</topic><topic>Educational Testing</topic><topic>Equal Education</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Gender Bias</topic><topic>Girls education</topic><topic>Improvement Programs</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>International and Comparative Education</topic><topic>International education</topic><topic>Open File</topic><topic>Romania</topic><topic>Sex discrimination</topic><topic>Sex Role</topic><topic>Sweden</topic><topic>Syria</topic><topic>Textbook Bias</topic><topic>Textbook Evaluation</topic><topic>Textbooks</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Womens Studies</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blumberg, Rae Lesser</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Prospects (Paris)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blumberg, Rae Lesser</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ849088</ericid><atitle>The invisible obstacle to educational equality: gender bias in textbooks</atitle><jtitle>Prospects (Paris)</jtitle><stitle>Prospects</stitle><date>2008-09-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>345</spage><epage>361</epage><pages>345-361</pages><issn>0033-1538</issn><eissn>1573-9090</eissn><abstract>Gender bias in textbooks (GBIT) is a low-profile education issue, given the 72,000,000 children who still have no access to schooling, but this article argues that GBIT is: (1) an important, (2) near-universal, (3) remarkably uniform, (4) quite persistent but (5) virtually invisible obstacle on the road to gender equality in education—an obstacle camouflaged by taken-for-granted stereotypes about gender roles. Specifically, GBIT: (1) is important because (a) textbooks occupy ~80% of classroom time, and (b) it may contribute to lowering girls’ achievements, especially in weak schools in poor countries; (2) has been found worldwide to varying degrees (except, perhaps, Sweden in recent years); (3) involves nearly identical patterns of under-representation of females, plus stereotypes of both genders’ occupational and household roles that overwhelmingly underplay women’s rising worldly importance; (4) is decreasing very slowly, according to “second generation” re-studies; and (5) remains obscured by the “hidden-in-plain-sight” system of gender stratification and roles. Case studies from Syria, India, Romania, China and the US document these points. Other case studies from Sweden and Latin America describe government initiatives to reduce GBIT, with differing levels of success. Totally revising textbooks (and curricula) to eliminate this bias is quite unlikely, partly because it is very costly. The article concludes by presenting inexpensive alternate methods that
can
combat GBIT.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11125-009-9086-1</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-1538 |
ispartof | Prospects (Paris), 2008-09, Vol.38 (3), p.345-361 |
issn | 0033-1538 1573-9090 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_193850175 |
source | Education Source; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Barriers Bias Case Studies Change Strategies China Comparative Education Education Education discrimination Educational Assessment Educational Indicators Educational Testing Equal Education Foreign Countries Gender Bias Girls education Improvement Programs India Inequality International and Comparative Education International education Open File Romania Sex discrimination Sex Role Sweden Syria Textbook Bias Textbook Evaluation Textbooks United States Womens Studies |
title | The invisible obstacle to educational equality: gender bias in textbooks |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T20%3A24%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20invisible%20obstacle%20to%20educational%20equality:%20gender%20bias%20in%20textbooks&rft.jtitle=Prospects%20(Paris)&rft.au=Blumberg,%20Rae%20Lesser&rft.date=2008-09-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=345&rft.epage=361&rft.pages=345-361&rft.issn=0033-1538&rft.eissn=1573-9090&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11125-009-9086-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1897715091%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=193850175&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ849088&rfr_iscdi=true |