RELIGION AND THE REGIME: Cooperation and Conflict in Contemporary Russia and China
What is the nature of religion and state relations in authoritarian regimes? How do religious and regime actors negotiate the terms of their relationship; what do the two sides want from one another; and how cooperative or conflictual are their interactions? To address these questions, the author co...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World politics 2017-10, Vol.69 (4), p.676-712 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 712 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 676 |
container_title | World politics |
container_volume | 69 |
creator | KOESEL, KARRIE J. |
description | What is the nature of religion and state relations in authoritarian regimes? How do religious and regime actors negotiate the terms of their relationship; what do the two sides want from one another; and how cooperative or conflictual are their interactions? To address these questions, the author compares religion-regime relations in contemporary Russia and China—two autocracies with long histories of religious repression, diverse religious profiles, and distinct relations between religion and the state. The article introduces a new theoretical framework anchored in interests and subnational authoritarian politics to explain how religious and political authorities negotiate their relationship and the constraints and opportunities that shape their interaction. Although there are many reasons to expect different types of religion-regime relations across Russia and China, the data demonstrate that subnational governments and diverse religious actors often forge innovative partnerships to govern more efficiently, gain access to resources, and safeguard their survival. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S004388711700017X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1938361718</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26792642</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26792642</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-6eefaea789e4f890d6a909b8ba492facd7b12b350b73bbff51a8f108da1c7b653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUE1LAzEQDaJgrZ7Fg1DwvJpJsvk4lrq2C7WFtoK3kGwTcLFuTXYP_fdmqdSDp4GZ9zHvIXQH-BEwiKc1xoxKKQAExmnxfoYGgCXPKKXyHA36c9bfL9FVjHWCACdigG5XxbyclsvFaLx4Hm1mxWhVTMvX4hpdePMZ3c3vHKK3l2IzmWXz5bScjOdZRRRpM-6cN84IqRzzUuEtNworK61hinhTbYUFYmmOraDWep-DkT79tTVQCctzOkQPR919aL47F1tdN134SpYaFJWUgwCZUHBEVaGJMTiv9-FjZ8JBA9Z9fv0vf-Kwk3LtqnbXRfcnzgVgRvS676ivCARLPNzT7o-0OrZNOPkQLhThjNAf2Y9i_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1938361718</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>RELIGION AND THE REGIME: Cooperation and Conflict in Contemporary Russia and China</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>KOESEL, KARRIE J.</creator><creatorcontrib>KOESEL, KARRIE J.</creatorcontrib><description>What is the nature of religion and state relations in authoritarian regimes? How do religious and regime actors negotiate the terms of their relationship; what do the two sides want from one another; and how cooperative or conflictual are their interactions? To address these questions, the author compares religion-regime relations in contemporary Russia and China—two autocracies with long histories of religious repression, diverse religious profiles, and distinct relations between religion and the state. The article introduces a new theoretical framework anchored in interests and subnational authoritarian politics to explain how religious and political authorities negotiate their relationship and the constraints and opportunities that shape their interaction. Although there are many reasons to expect different types of religion-regime relations across Russia and China, the data demonstrate that subnational governments and diverse religious actors often forge innovative partnerships to govern more efficiently, gain access to resources, and safeguard their survival.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-8871</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1086-3338</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S004388711700017X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Princeton: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Authoritarianism ; Autocracy ; Church & state ; Cooperation ; Negotiation ; Oppression ; Partnerships ; Politics ; Profiles ; Religion ; Religion & politics</subject><ispartof>World politics, 2017-10, Vol.69 (4), p.676-712</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 Trustees of Princeton University</rights><rights>Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University</rights><rights>Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-6eefaea789e4f890d6a909b8ba492facd7b12b350b73bbff51a8f108da1c7b653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26792642$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26792642$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,12826,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>KOESEL, KARRIE J.</creatorcontrib><title>RELIGION AND THE REGIME: Cooperation and Conflict in Contemporary Russia and China</title><title>World politics</title><description>What is the nature of religion and state relations in authoritarian regimes? How do religious and regime actors negotiate the terms of their relationship; what do the two sides want from one another; and how cooperative or conflictual are their interactions? To address these questions, the author compares religion-regime relations in contemporary Russia and China—two autocracies with long histories of religious repression, diverse religious profiles, and distinct relations between religion and the state. The article introduces a new theoretical framework anchored in interests and subnational authoritarian politics to explain how religious and political authorities negotiate their relationship and the constraints and opportunities that shape their interaction. Although there are many reasons to expect different types of religion-regime relations across Russia and China, the data demonstrate that subnational governments and diverse religious actors often forge innovative partnerships to govern more efficiently, gain access to resources, and safeguard their survival.</description><subject>Authoritarianism</subject><subject>Autocracy</subject><subject>Church & state</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Negotiation</subject><subject>Oppression</subject><subject>Partnerships</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Profiles</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religion & politics</subject><issn>0043-8871</issn><issn>1086-3338</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNplUE1LAzEQDaJgrZ7Fg1DwvJpJsvk4lrq2C7WFtoK3kGwTcLFuTXYP_fdmqdSDp4GZ9zHvIXQH-BEwiKc1xoxKKQAExmnxfoYGgCXPKKXyHA36c9bfL9FVjHWCACdigG5XxbyclsvFaLx4Hm1mxWhVTMvX4hpdePMZ3c3vHKK3l2IzmWXz5bScjOdZRRRpM-6cN84IqRzzUuEtNworK61hinhTbYUFYmmOraDWep-DkT79tTVQCctzOkQPR919aL47F1tdN134SpYaFJWUgwCZUHBEVaGJMTiv9-FjZ8JBA9Z9fv0vf-Kwk3LtqnbXRfcnzgVgRvS676ivCARLPNzT7o-0OrZNOPkQLhThjNAf2Y9i_Q</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>KOESEL, KARRIE J.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Johns Hopkins University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>RELIGION AND THE REGIME</title><author>KOESEL, KARRIE J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-6eefaea789e4f890d6a909b8ba492facd7b12b350b73bbff51a8f108da1c7b653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Authoritarianism</topic><topic>Autocracy</topic><topic>Church & state</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Negotiation</topic><topic>Oppression</topic><topic>Partnerships</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Profiles</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religion & politics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KOESEL, KARRIE J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>World politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KOESEL, KARRIE J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>RELIGION AND THE REGIME: Cooperation and Conflict in Contemporary Russia and China</atitle><jtitle>World politics</jtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>676</spage><epage>712</epage><pages>676-712</pages><issn>0043-8871</issn><eissn>1086-3338</eissn><abstract>What is the nature of religion and state relations in authoritarian regimes? How do religious and regime actors negotiate the terms of their relationship; what do the two sides want from one another; and how cooperative or conflictual are their interactions? To address these questions, the author compares religion-regime relations in contemporary Russia and China—two autocracies with long histories of religious repression, diverse religious profiles, and distinct relations between religion and the state. The article introduces a new theoretical framework anchored in interests and subnational authoritarian politics to explain how religious and political authorities negotiate their relationship and the constraints and opportunities that shape their interaction. Although there are many reasons to expect different types of religion-regime relations across Russia and China, the data demonstrate that subnational governments and diverse religious actors often forge innovative partnerships to govern more efficiently, gain access to resources, and safeguard their survival.</abstract><cop>Princeton</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S004388711700017X</doi><tpages>37</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-8871 |
ispartof | World politics, 2017-10, Vol.69 (4), p.676-712 |
issn | 0043-8871 1086-3338 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1938361718 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Jstor Complete Legacy; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Authoritarianism Autocracy Church & state Cooperation Negotiation Oppression Partnerships Politics Profiles Religion Religion & politics |
title | RELIGION AND THE REGIME: Cooperation and Conflict in Contemporary Russia and China |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T20%3A48%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=RELIGION%20AND%20THE%20REGIME:%20Cooperation%20and%20Conflict%20in%20Contemporary%20Russia%20and%20China&rft.jtitle=World%20politics&rft.au=KOESEL,%20KARRIE%20J.&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=676&rft.epage=712&rft.pages=676-712&rft.issn=0043-8871&rft.eissn=1086-3338&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S004388711700017X&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26792642%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1938361718&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26792642&rfr_iscdi=true |