Stimulation of N2O emission by manure application to agricultural soils may largely offset carbon benefits: a global meta‐analysis
Animal manure application as organic fertilizer does not only sustain agricultural productivity and increase soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks, but also affects soil nitrogen cycling and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. However, given that the sign and magnitude of manure effects on soil N2O emissions...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Global change biology 2017-10, Vol.23 (10), p.4068-4083 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 4083 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 4068 |
| container_title | Global change biology |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | Zhou, Minghua Zhu, Bo Wang, Shijie Zhu, Xinyu Vereecken, Harry Brüggemann, Nicolas |
| description | Animal manure application as organic fertilizer does not only sustain agricultural productivity and increase soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks, but also affects soil nitrogen cycling and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. However, given that the sign and magnitude of manure effects on soil N2O emissions is uncertain, the net climatic impact of manure application in arable land is unknown. Here, we performed a global meta‐analysis using field experimental data published in peer‐reviewed journals prior to December 2015. In this meta‐analysis, we quantified the responses of N2O emissions to manure application relative to synthetic N fertilizer application from individual studies and analyzed manure characteristics, experimental duration, climate, and soil properties as explanatory factors. Manure application significantly increased N2O emissions by an average 32.7% (95% confidence interval: 5.1–58.2%) compared to application of synthetic N fertilizer alone. The significant stimulation of N2O emissions occurred following cattle and poultry manure applications, subsurface manure application, and raw manure application. Furthermore, the significant stimulatory effects on N2O emissions were also observed for warm temperate climate, acid soils (pH |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/gcb.13648 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1937413790</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1937413790</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j2898-33058f10f01de2470f8b247b473195faad6b8c3edd5aa2a891824f4ad7fe9cdf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1OwzAQhS0EEqWw4AaWWKe1Yydx2EEFBamiC2AdTRI7cuX8YDtC2bHgAJyRk-C2zOa9kb55Gj2ErilZ0DDLpioXlKVcnKBZ0CSKuUhP9z7hESWUnaML53aEEBaTdIa-X71uRwNe9x3uFX6Jt1i22rn9Xk64hW60EsMwGF0dKd9jaKyuRuNHCwa7XhsXwAkbsI00U8hRTnpcgS33KbKTSnt3iwE3pi_DSSs9_H79QAdmctpdojMFxsmrf52j98eHt9VTtNmun1d3m2gXi1xEjJFEKEoUobWMeUaUKIOUPGM0TxRAnZaiYrKuE4AYRE5FzBWHOlMyr2rF5ujmmDvY_mOUzhe7frThCVfQnGWcsiwngVoeqU9t5FQMVrdgp4KSYt9wERouDg0X69X9wbA_fghzoA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1937413790</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stimulation of N2O emission by manure application to agricultural soils may largely offset carbon benefits: a global meta‐analysis</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Zhou, Minghua ; Zhu, Bo ; Wang, Shijie ; Zhu, Xinyu ; Vereecken, Harry ; Brüggemann, Nicolas</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Minghua ; Zhu, Bo ; Wang, Shijie ; Zhu, Xinyu ; Vereecken, Harry ; Brüggemann, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><description>Animal manure application as organic fertilizer does not only sustain agricultural productivity and increase soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks, but also affects soil nitrogen cycling and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. However, given that the sign and magnitude of manure effects on soil N2O emissions is uncertain, the net climatic impact of manure application in arable land is unknown. Here, we performed a global meta‐analysis using field experimental data published in peer‐reviewed journals prior to December 2015. In this meta‐analysis, we quantified the responses of N2O emissions to manure application relative to synthetic N fertilizer application from individual studies and analyzed manure characteristics, experimental duration, climate, and soil properties as explanatory factors. Manure application significantly increased N2O emissions by an average 32.7% (95% confidence interval: 5.1–58.2%) compared to application of synthetic N fertilizer alone. The significant stimulation of N2O emissions occurred following cattle and poultry manure applications, subsurface manure application, and raw manure application. Furthermore, the significant stimulatory effects on N2O emissions were also observed for warm temperate climate, acid soils (pH < 6.5), and soil texture classes of sandy loam and clay loam. Average direct N2O emission factors (EFs) of 1.87% and 0.24% were estimated for upland soils and rice paddy soils receiving manure application, respectively. Although manure application increased SOC stocks, our study suggested that the benefit of increasing SOC stocks as GHG sinks could be largely offset by stimulation of soil N2O emissions and aggravated by CH4 emissions if, particularly for rice paddy soils, the stimulation of CH4 emissions by manure application was taken into account.
The uncertain manure effects on N2O emissions constrain evaluation of the net climatic impact of manure application in arable lands. A global meta‐analysis was performed to quantify the overall responses of N2O emissions to manure application relative to synthetic N fertilizer in agricultural soils. Manure application on average significantly increased N2O emissions by 32.7% as compared to synthetic N fertilizer alone, and the sign and magnitude of N2O emissions were dependent on manure characteristics, climate, and soil properties. The benefit of C sequestration could be largely offset by stimulation of soil N2O emissions and aggravated by CH4 emissions if, particularly for rice paddy soils, the stimulation of CH4 emissions by manure application was taken into account.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-1013</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13648</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Acidic soils ; Agricultural land ; Agricultural production ; Agrochemicals ; animal manure ; Animal wastes ; Arable land ; Clay ; Clay loam ; Climate ; Composting ; Confidence intervals ; Data processing ; Duration ; Emission ; emission factor ; Emissions ; Fertilizer application ; Fertilizers ; greenhouse gas balance ; Greenhouse gases ; Loam ; manure characteristics ; Manures ; Meta-analysis ; Methane ; Nitrogen ; Nitrogen cycle ; Nitrous oxide ; Organic carbon ; Organic fertilizers ; Organic soils ; pH effects ; Poultry manure ; Reviews ; Rice fields ; Sandy loam ; Sandy soils ; Sinkholes ; Soil ; soil pH ; Soil properties ; Soil texture ; Stimulation ; Stocks ; Texture</subject><ispartof>Global change biology, 2017-10, Vol.23 (10), p.4068-4083</ispartof><rights>2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-0003-2892</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fgcb.13648$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fgcb.13648$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Minghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shijie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Xinyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vereecken, Harry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brüggemann, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><title>Stimulation of N2O emission by manure application to agricultural soils may largely offset carbon benefits: a global meta‐analysis</title><title>Global change biology</title><description>Animal manure application as organic fertilizer does not only sustain agricultural productivity and increase soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks, but also affects soil nitrogen cycling and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. However, given that the sign and magnitude of manure effects on soil N2O emissions is uncertain, the net climatic impact of manure application in arable land is unknown. Here, we performed a global meta‐analysis using field experimental data published in peer‐reviewed journals prior to December 2015. In this meta‐analysis, we quantified the responses of N2O emissions to manure application relative to synthetic N fertilizer application from individual studies and analyzed manure characteristics, experimental duration, climate, and soil properties as explanatory factors. Manure application significantly increased N2O emissions by an average 32.7% (95% confidence interval: 5.1–58.2%) compared to application of synthetic N fertilizer alone. The significant stimulation of N2O emissions occurred following cattle and poultry manure applications, subsurface manure application, and raw manure application. Furthermore, the significant stimulatory effects on N2O emissions were also observed for warm temperate climate, acid soils (pH < 6.5), and soil texture classes of sandy loam and clay loam. Average direct N2O emission factors (EFs) of 1.87% and 0.24% were estimated for upland soils and rice paddy soils receiving manure application, respectively. Although manure application increased SOC stocks, our study suggested that the benefit of increasing SOC stocks as GHG sinks could be largely offset by stimulation of soil N2O emissions and aggravated by CH4 emissions if, particularly for rice paddy soils, the stimulation of CH4 emissions by manure application was taken into account.
The uncertain manure effects on N2O emissions constrain evaluation of the net climatic impact of manure application in arable lands. A global meta‐analysis was performed to quantify the overall responses of N2O emissions to manure application relative to synthetic N fertilizer in agricultural soils. Manure application on average significantly increased N2O emissions by 32.7% as compared to synthetic N fertilizer alone, and the sign and magnitude of N2O emissions were dependent on manure characteristics, climate, and soil properties. The benefit of C sequestration could be largely offset by stimulation of soil N2O emissions and aggravated by CH4 emissions if, particularly for rice paddy soils, the stimulation of CH4 emissions by manure application was taken into account.</description><subject>Acidic soils</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agrochemicals</subject><subject>animal manure</subject><subject>Animal wastes</subject><subject>Arable land</subject><subject>Clay</subject><subject>Clay loam</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Composting</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Duration</subject><subject>Emission</subject><subject>emission factor</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Fertilizer application</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>greenhouse gas balance</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Loam</subject><subject>manure characteristics</subject><subject>Manures</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen cycle</subject><subject>Nitrous oxide</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Organic fertilizers</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>pH effects</subject><subject>Poultry manure</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Rice fields</subject><subject>Sandy loam</subject><subject>Sandy soils</subject><subject>Sinkholes</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>soil pH</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><subject>Soil texture</subject><subject>Stimulation</subject><subject>Stocks</subject><subject>Texture</subject><issn>1354-1013</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkE1OwzAQhS0EEqWw4AaWWKe1Yydx2EEFBamiC2AdTRI7cuX8YDtC2bHgAJyRk-C2zOa9kb55Gj2ErilZ0DDLpioXlKVcnKBZ0CSKuUhP9z7hESWUnaML53aEEBaTdIa-X71uRwNe9x3uFX6Jt1i22rn9Xk64hW60EsMwGF0dKd9jaKyuRuNHCwa7XhsXwAkbsI00U8hRTnpcgS33KbKTSnt3iwE3pi_DSSs9_H79QAdmctpdojMFxsmrf52j98eHt9VTtNmun1d3m2gXi1xEjJFEKEoUobWMeUaUKIOUPGM0TxRAnZaiYrKuE4AYRE5FzBWHOlMyr2rF5ujmmDvY_mOUzhe7frThCVfQnGWcsiwngVoeqU9t5FQMVrdgp4KSYt9wERouDg0X69X9wbA_fghzoA</recordid><startdate>201710</startdate><enddate>201710</enddate><creator>Zhou, Minghua</creator><creator>Zhu, Bo</creator><creator>Wang, Shijie</creator><creator>Zhu, Xinyu</creator><creator>Vereecken, Harry</creator><creator>Brüggemann, Nicolas</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0003-2892</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201710</creationdate><title>Stimulation of N2O emission by manure application to agricultural soils may largely offset carbon benefits: a global meta‐analysis</title><author>Zhou, Minghua ; Zhu, Bo ; Wang, Shijie ; Zhu, Xinyu ; Vereecken, Harry ; Brüggemann, Nicolas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j2898-33058f10f01de2470f8b247b473195faad6b8c3edd5aa2a891824f4ad7fe9cdf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Acidic soils</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agrochemicals</topic><topic>animal manure</topic><topic>Animal wastes</topic><topic>Arable land</topic><topic>Clay</topic><topic>Clay loam</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Composting</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Duration</topic><topic>Emission</topic><topic>emission factor</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Fertilizer application</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>greenhouse gas balance</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Loam</topic><topic>manure characteristics</topic><topic>Manures</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen cycle</topic><topic>Nitrous oxide</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Organic fertilizers</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>pH effects</topic><topic>Poultry manure</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Rice fields</topic><topic>Sandy loam</topic><topic>Sandy soils</topic><topic>Sinkholes</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>soil pH</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><topic>Soil texture</topic><topic>Stimulation</topic><topic>Stocks</topic><topic>Texture</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Minghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shijie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Xinyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vereecken, Harry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brüggemann, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhou, Minghua</au><au>Zhu, Bo</au><au>Wang, Shijie</au><au>Zhu, Xinyu</au><au>Vereecken, Harry</au><au>Brüggemann, Nicolas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stimulation of N2O emission by manure application to agricultural soils may largely offset carbon benefits: a global meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle><date>2017-10</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>4068</spage><epage>4083</epage><pages>4068-4083</pages><issn>1354-1013</issn><eissn>1365-2486</eissn><abstract>Animal manure application as organic fertilizer does not only sustain agricultural productivity and increase soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks, but also affects soil nitrogen cycling and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. However, given that the sign and magnitude of manure effects on soil N2O emissions is uncertain, the net climatic impact of manure application in arable land is unknown. Here, we performed a global meta‐analysis using field experimental data published in peer‐reviewed journals prior to December 2015. In this meta‐analysis, we quantified the responses of N2O emissions to manure application relative to synthetic N fertilizer application from individual studies and analyzed manure characteristics, experimental duration, climate, and soil properties as explanatory factors. Manure application significantly increased N2O emissions by an average 32.7% (95% confidence interval: 5.1–58.2%) compared to application of synthetic N fertilizer alone. The significant stimulation of N2O emissions occurred following cattle and poultry manure applications, subsurface manure application, and raw manure application. Furthermore, the significant stimulatory effects on N2O emissions were also observed for warm temperate climate, acid soils (pH < 6.5), and soil texture classes of sandy loam and clay loam. Average direct N2O emission factors (EFs) of 1.87% and 0.24% were estimated for upland soils and rice paddy soils receiving manure application, respectively. Although manure application increased SOC stocks, our study suggested that the benefit of increasing SOC stocks as GHG sinks could be largely offset by stimulation of soil N2O emissions and aggravated by CH4 emissions if, particularly for rice paddy soils, the stimulation of CH4 emissions by manure application was taken into account.
The uncertain manure effects on N2O emissions constrain evaluation of the net climatic impact of manure application in arable lands. A global meta‐analysis was performed to quantify the overall responses of N2O emissions to manure application relative to synthetic N fertilizer in agricultural soils. Manure application on average significantly increased N2O emissions by 32.7% as compared to synthetic N fertilizer alone, and the sign and magnitude of N2O emissions were dependent on manure characteristics, climate, and soil properties. The benefit of C sequestration could be largely offset by stimulation of soil N2O emissions and aggravated by CH4 emissions if, particularly for rice paddy soils, the stimulation of CH4 emissions by manure application was taken into account.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/gcb.13648</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0003-2892</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1354-1013 |
| ispartof | Global change biology, 2017-10, Vol.23 (10), p.4068-4083 |
| issn | 1354-1013 1365-2486 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1937413790 |
| source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
| subjects | Acidic soils Agricultural land Agricultural production Agrochemicals animal manure Animal wastes Arable land Clay Clay loam Climate Composting Confidence intervals Data processing Duration Emission emission factor Emissions Fertilizer application Fertilizers greenhouse gas balance Greenhouse gases Loam manure characteristics Manures Meta-analysis Methane Nitrogen Nitrogen cycle Nitrous oxide Organic carbon Organic fertilizers Organic soils pH effects Poultry manure Reviews Rice fields Sandy loam Sandy soils Sinkholes Soil soil pH Soil properties Soil texture Stimulation Stocks Texture |
| title | Stimulation of N2O emission by manure application to agricultural soils may largely offset carbon benefits: a global meta‐analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A38%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stimulation%20of%20N2O%20emission%20by%20manure%20application%20to%20agricultural%20soils%20may%20largely%20offset%20carbon%20benefits:%20a%20global%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Global%20change%20biology&rft.au=Zhou,%20Minghua&rft.date=2017-10&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=4068&rft.epage=4083&rft.pages=4068-4083&rft.issn=1354-1013&rft.eissn=1365-2486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/gcb.13648&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E1937413790%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1937413790&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |