The impact of ‘free choice’: Family reforms of France and Belgium, a synthetic control analysis
Between the 1980s and the late 1990s, France and Belgium introduced two long‐leave schemes and several measures to support childcare at home. Although this change was presented under the umbrella of the ‘free‐choice‐for‐women’ rhetoric, it moved both countries towards a more familistic model. To eva...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of social welfare 2017-10, Vol.26 (4), p.340-352 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 352 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 340 |
container_title | International journal of social welfare |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Podesta, Federico |
description | Between the 1980s and the late 1990s, France and Belgium introduced two long‐leave schemes and several measures to support childcare at home. Although this change was presented under the umbrella of the ‘free‐choice‐for‐women’ rhetoric, it moved both countries towards a more familistic model. To evaluate the impact of this reform phase on female labour force participation, the present study employed the synthetic control method. This approach made it possible to contrast the evolution of the French and Belgian female labour force participation rates, observed in consequence of the implementation of the policies under investigation, with the corresponding evolution of the same rates reconstructed in the absence of such family programmes. The results of this exercise suggest that if France and Belgium had not undergone this policy treatment, their female labour market participation rates would have been higher than those actually measured.
Key Practitioner Message: • Combining long‐leave schemes with low incentives to support employment of a childminder obstructs female labour force participation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ijsw.12256 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1937325951</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1937325951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3676-6e453240784dd5fc81a5cb202427bc65615bca53a2dab22f498e876e7844b3943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90L1OwzAQB3ALgUQpLDyBJTZEir-TsEFF-VAlBooYLcdxqKukLnaqKlsfA16vT4JLmPFyHn53uvsDcI7RCMd3bRdhM8KEcHEABpiJLCE0Tw_jn4o8EZkQx-AkhAVCiOWID4CezQ20zUrpFroK7rZflTcG6rmz2uy23zdwohpbd9Cbyvkm7NHEq6U2UC1LeGfqD7turqCCoVu2c9NaDbVbtt7VEai6CzacgqNK1cGc_dUheJvcz8aPyfTl4Wl8O000FalIhGGcEobSjJUlr3SGFdcFQYSRtNCCC8wLrThVpFQFIRXLM5OlwkTPCpozOgQX_dyVd59rE1q5cGsflwgS5zSlhOccR3XZK-1dCPEsufK2Ub6TGMl9iHIfovwNMWLc442tTfePlE_Pr-99zw_sLXV_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1937325951</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of ‘free choice’: Family reforms of France and Belgium, a synthetic control analysis</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Podesta, Federico</creator><creatorcontrib>Podesta, Federico</creatorcontrib><description>Between the 1980s and the late 1990s, France and Belgium introduced two long‐leave schemes and several measures to support childcare at home. Although this change was presented under the umbrella of the ‘free‐choice‐for‐women’ rhetoric, it moved both countries towards a more familistic model. To evaluate the impact of this reform phase on female labour force participation, the present study employed the synthetic control method. This approach made it possible to contrast the evolution of the French and Belgian female labour force participation rates, observed in consequence of the implementation of the policies under investigation, with the corresponding evolution of the same rates reconstructed in the absence of such family programmes. The results of this exercise suggest that if France and Belgium had not undergone this policy treatment, their female labour market participation rates would have been higher than those actually measured.
Key Practitioner Message: • Combining long‐leave schemes with low incentives to support employment of a childminder obstructs female labour force participation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1369-6866</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2397</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ijsw.12256</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Child care ; Childminders ; Employment ; Employment policies ; Exports ; Families & family life ; Familism ; family allowances ; female labour market participation ; Females ; Incentives ; Labor force ; Labor force participation ; Labor market ; parental leaves ; Policy analysis ; policy evaluation ; Policy implementation ; Reforms ; Rhetoric ; synthetic control method ; Women</subject><ispartof>International journal of social welfare, 2017-10, Vol.26 (4), p.340-352</ispartof><rights>2017 The Author(s). International Journal of Social Welfare © 2017 International Journal of Social Welfare and John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and the International Journal of Social Welfare</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3676-6e453240784dd5fc81a5cb202427bc65615bca53a2dab22f498e876e7844b3943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3676-6e453240784dd5fc81a5cb202427bc65615bca53a2dab22f498e876e7844b3943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fijsw.12256$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fijsw.12256$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27843,27901,27902,33751,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Podesta, Federico</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of ‘free choice’: Family reforms of France and Belgium, a synthetic control analysis</title><title>International journal of social welfare</title><description>Between the 1980s and the late 1990s, France and Belgium introduced two long‐leave schemes and several measures to support childcare at home. Although this change was presented under the umbrella of the ‘free‐choice‐for‐women’ rhetoric, it moved both countries towards a more familistic model. To evaluate the impact of this reform phase on female labour force participation, the present study employed the synthetic control method. This approach made it possible to contrast the evolution of the French and Belgian female labour force participation rates, observed in consequence of the implementation of the policies under investigation, with the corresponding evolution of the same rates reconstructed in the absence of such family programmes. The results of this exercise suggest that if France and Belgium had not undergone this policy treatment, their female labour market participation rates would have been higher than those actually measured.
Key Practitioner Message: • Combining long‐leave schemes with low incentives to support employment of a childminder obstructs female labour force participation.</description><subject>Child care</subject><subject>Childminders</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Employment policies</subject><subject>Exports</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Familism</subject><subject>family allowances</subject><subject>female labour market participation</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Labor force</subject><subject>Labor force participation</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>parental leaves</subject><subject>Policy analysis</subject><subject>policy evaluation</subject><subject>Policy implementation</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>synthetic control method</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1369-6866</issn><issn>1468-2397</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp90L1OwzAQB3ALgUQpLDyBJTZEir-TsEFF-VAlBooYLcdxqKukLnaqKlsfA16vT4JLmPFyHn53uvsDcI7RCMd3bRdhM8KEcHEABpiJLCE0Tw_jn4o8EZkQx-AkhAVCiOWID4CezQ20zUrpFroK7rZflTcG6rmz2uy23zdwohpbd9Cbyvkm7NHEq6U2UC1LeGfqD7turqCCoVu2c9NaDbVbtt7VEai6CzacgqNK1cGc_dUheJvcz8aPyfTl4Wl8O000FalIhGGcEobSjJUlr3SGFdcFQYSRtNCCC8wLrThVpFQFIRXLM5OlwkTPCpozOgQX_dyVd59rE1q5cGsflwgS5zSlhOccR3XZK-1dCPEsufK2Ub6TGMl9iHIfovwNMWLc442tTfePlE_Pr-99zw_sLXV_</recordid><startdate>201710</startdate><enddate>201710</enddate><creator>Podesta, Federico</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201710</creationdate><title>The impact of ‘free choice’: Family reforms of France and Belgium, a synthetic control analysis</title><author>Podesta, Federico</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3676-6e453240784dd5fc81a5cb202427bc65615bca53a2dab22f498e876e7844b3943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Child care</topic><topic>Childminders</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Employment policies</topic><topic>Exports</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Familism</topic><topic>family allowances</topic><topic>female labour market participation</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Labor force</topic><topic>Labor force participation</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>parental leaves</topic><topic>Policy analysis</topic><topic>policy evaluation</topic><topic>Policy implementation</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>synthetic control method</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Podesta, Federico</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>International journal of social welfare</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Podesta, Federico</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of ‘free choice’: Family reforms of France and Belgium, a synthetic control analysis</atitle><jtitle>International journal of social welfare</jtitle><date>2017-10</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>340</spage><epage>352</epage><pages>340-352</pages><issn>1369-6866</issn><eissn>1468-2397</eissn><abstract>Between the 1980s and the late 1990s, France and Belgium introduced two long‐leave schemes and several measures to support childcare at home. Although this change was presented under the umbrella of the ‘free‐choice‐for‐women’ rhetoric, it moved both countries towards a more familistic model. To evaluate the impact of this reform phase on female labour force participation, the present study employed the synthetic control method. This approach made it possible to contrast the evolution of the French and Belgian female labour force participation rates, observed in consequence of the implementation of the policies under investigation, with the corresponding evolution of the same rates reconstructed in the absence of such family programmes. The results of this exercise suggest that if France and Belgium had not undergone this policy treatment, their female labour market participation rates would have been higher than those actually measured.
Key Practitioner Message: • Combining long‐leave schemes with low incentives to support employment of a childminder obstructs female labour force participation.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ijsw.12256</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1369-6866 |
ispartof | International journal of social welfare, 2017-10, Vol.26 (4), p.340-352 |
issn | 1369-6866 1468-2397 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1937325951 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Child care Childminders Employment Employment policies Exports Families & family life Familism family allowances female labour market participation Females Incentives Labor force Labor force participation Labor market parental leaves Policy analysis policy evaluation Policy implementation Reforms Rhetoric synthetic control method Women |
title | The impact of ‘free choice’: Family reforms of France and Belgium, a synthetic control analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T11%3A21%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20%E2%80%98free%20choice%E2%80%99:%20Family%20reforms%20of%20France%20and%20Belgium,%20a%20synthetic%20control%20analysis&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20social%20welfare&rft.au=Podesta,%20Federico&rft.date=2017-10&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=340&rft.epage=352&rft.pages=340-352&rft.issn=1369-6866&rft.eissn=1468-2397&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ijsw.12256&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1937325951%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1937325951&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |