The impact of ‘free choice’: Family reforms of France and Belgium, a synthetic control analysis

Between the 1980s and the late 1990s, France and Belgium introduced two long‐leave schemes and several measures to support childcare at home. Although this change was presented under the umbrella of the ‘free‐choice‐for‐women’ rhetoric, it moved both countries towards a more familistic model. To eva...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of social welfare 2017-10, Vol.26 (4), p.340-352
1. Verfasser: Podesta, Federico
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 352
container_issue 4
container_start_page 340
container_title International journal of social welfare
container_volume 26
creator Podesta, Federico
description Between the 1980s and the late 1990s, France and Belgium introduced two long‐leave schemes and several measures to support childcare at home. Although this change was presented under the umbrella of the ‘free‐choice‐for‐women’ rhetoric, it moved both countries towards a more familistic model. To evaluate the impact of this reform phase on female labour force participation, the present study employed the synthetic control method. This approach made it possible to contrast the evolution of the French and Belgian female labour force participation rates, observed in consequence of the implementation of the policies under investigation, with the corresponding evolution of the same rates reconstructed in the absence of such family programmes. The results of this exercise suggest that if France and Belgium had not undergone this policy treatment, their female labour market participation rates would have been higher than those actually measured. Key Practitioner Message: • Combining long‐leave schemes with low incentives to support employment of a childminder obstructs female labour force participation.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ijsw.12256
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1937325951</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1937325951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3676-6e453240784dd5fc81a5cb202427bc65615bca53a2dab22f498e876e7844b3943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90L1OwzAQB3ALgUQpLDyBJTZEir-TsEFF-VAlBooYLcdxqKukLnaqKlsfA16vT4JLmPFyHn53uvsDcI7RCMd3bRdhM8KEcHEABpiJLCE0Tw_jn4o8EZkQx-AkhAVCiOWID4CezQ20zUrpFroK7rZflTcG6rmz2uy23zdwohpbd9Cbyvkm7NHEq6U2UC1LeGfqD7turqCCoVu2c9NaDbVbtt7VEai6CzacgqNK1cGc_dUheJvcz8aPyfTl4Wl8O000FalIhGGcEobSjJUlr3SGFdcFQYSRtNCCC8wLrThVpFQFIRXLM5OlwkTPCpozOgQX_dyVd59rE1q5cGsflwgS5zSlhOccR3XZK-1dCPEsufK2Ub6TGMl9iHIfovwNMWLc442tTfePlE_Pr-99zw_sLXV_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1937325951</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of ‘free choice’: Family reforms of France and Belgium, a synthetic control analysis</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Podesta, Federico</creator><creatorcontrib>Podesta, Federico</creatorcontrib><description>Between the 1980s and the late 1990s, France and Belgium introduced two long‐leave schemes and several measures to support childcare at home. Although this change was presented under the umbrella of the ‘free‐choice‐for‐women’ rhetoric, it moved both countries towards a more familistic model. To evaluate the impact of this reform phase on female labour force participation, the present study employed the synthetic control method. This approach made it possible to contrast the evolution of the French and Belgian female labour force participation rates, observed in consequence of the implementation of the policies under investigation, with the corresponding evolution of the same rates reconstructed in the absence of such family programmes. The results of this exercise suggest that if France and Belgium had not undergone this policy treatment, their female labour market participation rates would have been higher than those actually measured. Key Practitioner Message: • Combining long‐leave schemes with low incentives to support employment of a childminder obstructs female labour force participation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1369-6866</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2397</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ijsw.12256</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Child care ; Childminders ; Employment ; Employment policies ; Exports ; Families &amp; family life ; Familism ; family allowances ; female labour market participation ; Females ; Incentives ; Labor force ; Labor force participation ; Labor market ; parental leaves ; Policy analysis ; policy evaluation ; Policy implementation ; Reforms ; Rhetoric ; synthetic control method ; Women</subject><ispartof>International journal of social welfare, 2017-10, Vol.26 (4), p.340-352</ispartof><rights>2017 The Author(s). International Journal of Social Welfare © 2017 International Journal of Social Welfare and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd and the International Journal of Social Welfare</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3676-6e453240784dd5fc81a5cb202427bc65615bca53a2dab22f498e876e7844b3943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3676-6e453240784dd5fc81a5cb202427bc65615bca53a2dab22f498e876e7844b3943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fijsw.12256$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fijsw.12256$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27843,27901,27902,33751,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Podesta, Federico</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of ‘free choice’: Family reforms of France and Belgium, a synthetic control analysis</title><title>International journal of social welfare</title><description>Between the 1980s and the late 1990s, France and Belgium introduced two long‐leave schemes and several measures to support childcare at home. Although this change was presented under the umbrella of the ‘free‐choice‐for‐women’ rhetoric, it moved both countries towards a more familistic model. To evaluate the impact of this reform phase on female labour force participation, the present study employed the synthetic control method. This approach made it possible to contrast the evolution of the French and Belgian female labour force participation rates, observed in consequence of the implementation of the policies under investigation, with the corresponding evolution of the same rates reconstructed in the absence of such family programmes. The results of this exercise suggest that if France and Belgium had not undergone this policy treatment, their female labour market participation rates would have been higher than those actually measured. Key Practitioner Message: • Combining long‐leave schemes with low incentives to support employment of a childminder obstructs female labour force participation.</description><subject>Child care</subject><subject>Childminders</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Employment policies</subject><subject>Exports</subject><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>Familism</subject><subject>family allowances</subject><subject>female labour market participation</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Labor force</subject><subject>Labor force participation</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>parental leaves</subject><subject>Policy analysis</subject><subject>policy evaluation</subject><subject>Policy implementation</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>synthetic control method</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1369-6866</issn><issn>1468-2397</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp90L1OwzAQB3ALgUQpLDyBJTZEir-TsEFF-VAlBooYLcdxqKukLnaqKlsfA16vT4JLmPFyHn53uvsDcI7RCMd3bRdhM8KEcHEABpiJLCE0Tw_jn4o8EZkQx-AkhAVCiOWID4CezQ20zUrpFroK7rZflTcG6rmz2uy23zdwohpbd9Cbyvkm7NHEq6U2UC1LeGfqD7turqCCoVu2c9NaDbVbtt7VEai6CzacgqNK1cGc_dUheJvcz8aPyfTl4Wl8O000FalIhGGcEobSjJUlr3SGFdcFQYSRtNCCC8wLrThVpFQFIRXLM5OlwkTPCpozOgQX_dyVd59rE1q5cGsflwgS5zSlhOccR3XZK-1dCPEsufK2Ub6TGMl9iHIfovwNMWLc442tTfePlE_Pr-99zw_sLXV_</recordid><startdate>201710</startdate><enddate>201710</enddate><creator>Podesta, Federico</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201710</creationdate><title>The impact of ‘free choice’: Family reforms of France and Belgium, a synthetic control analysis</title><author>Podesta, Federico</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3676-6e453240784dd5fc81a5cb202427bc65615bca53a2dab22f498e876e7844b3943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Child care</topic><topic>Childminders</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Employment policies</topic><topic>Exports</topic><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>Familism</topic><topic>family allowances</topic><topic>female labour market participation</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Labor force</topic><topic>Labor force participation</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>parental leaves</topic><topic>Policy analysis</topic><topic>policy evaluation</topic><topic>Policy implementation</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>synthetic control method</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Podesta, Federico</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>International journal of social welfare</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Podesta, Federico</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of ‘free choice’: Family reforms of France and Belgium, a synthetic control analysis</atitle><jtitle>International journal of social welfare</jtitle><date>2017-10</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>340</spage><epage>352</epage><pages>340-352</pages><issn>1369-6866</issn><eissn>1468-2397</eissn><abstract>Between the 1980s and the late 1990s, France and Belgium introduced two long‐leave schemes and several measures to support childcare at home. Although this change was presented under the umbrella of the ‘free‐choice‐for‐women’ rhetoric, it moved both countries towards a more familistic model. To evaluate the impact of this reform phase on female labour force participation, the present study employed the synthetic control method. This approach made it possible to contrast the evolution of the French and Belgian female labour force participation rates, observed in consequence of the implementation of the policies under investigation, with the corresponding evolution of the same rates reconstructed in the absence of such family programmes. The results of this exercise suggest that if France and Belgium had not undergone this policy treatment, their female labour market participation rates would have been higher than those actually measured. Key Practitioner Message: • Combining long‐leave schemes with low incentives to support employment of a childminder obstructs female labour force participation.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ijsw.12256</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1369-6866
ispartof International journal of social welfare, 2017-10, Vol.26 (4), p.340-352
issn 1369-6866
1468-2397
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1937325951
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Child care
Childminders
Employment
Employment policies
Exports
Families & family life
Familism
family allowances
female labour market participation
Females
Incentives
Labor force
Labor force participation
Labor market
parental leaves
Policy analysis
policy evaluation
Policy implementation
Reforms
Rhetoric
synthetic control method
Women
title The impact of ‘free choice’: Family reforms of France and Belgium, a synthetic control analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T11%3A21%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20%E2%80%98free%20choice%E2%80%99:%20Family%20reforms%20of%20France%20and%20Belgium,%20a%20synthetic%20control%20analysis&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20social%20welfare&rft.au=Podesta,%20Federico&rft.date=2017-10&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=340&rft.epage=352&rft.pages=340-352&rft.issn=1369-6866&rft.eissn=1468-2397&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ijsw.12256&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1937325951%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1937325951&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true