Early action on Paris Agreement allows for more time to change energy systems
The IMAGE integrated assessment model was used to develop a set of scenarios to evaluate the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) submitted by Parties under the Paris Agreement. The scenarios project emissions and energy system changes under (i) current policies, (ii) implementation of the NDC...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Climatic change 2017-09, Vol.144 (2), p.165-179 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 179 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 165 |
container_title | Climatic change |
container_volume | 144 |
creator | van Soest, Heleen L. de Boer, Harmen Sytze Roelfsema, Mark den Elzen, Michel G.J. Admiraal, Annemiek van Vuuren, Detlef P. Hof, Andries F. van den Berg, Maarten Harmsen, Mathijs J.H.M. Gernaat, David E.H.J. Forsell, Nicklas |
description | The IMAGE integrated assessment model was used to develop a set of scenarios to evaluate the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) submitted by Parties under the Paris Agreement. The scenarios project emissions and energy system changes under (i) current policies, (ii) implementation of the NDCs, and (iii) various trajectories to a radiative forcing level of 2.8 W/m
2
in 2100, which gives a probability of about two thirds to limit warming to below 2 °C. The scenarios show that a cost-optimal pathway from 2020 onwards towards 2.8 W/m
2
leads to a global greenhouse gas emission level of 38 gigatonne CO
2
equivalent (GtCO
2
eq) by 2030, equal to a reduction of 20% compared to the 2010 level. The NDCs are projected to lead to 2030 emission levels of 50 GtCO
2
eq, which is still an increase compared to the 2010 level. A scenario that achieves the 2.8 W/m
2
forcing level in 2100 from the 2030 NDC level requires more rapid transitions after 2030 to meet the forcing target. It shows an annual reduction rate in greenhouse gas emissions of 4.7% between 2030 and 2050, rapidly phasing out unabated coal-fired power plant capacity, more rapid scale-up of low-carbon energy, and higher mitigation costs. A bridge scenario shows that enhancing the ambition level of NDCs before 2030 allows for a smoother energy system transition, with average annual emission reduction rates of 4.5% between 2030 and 2050, and more time to phase out coal capacity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10584-017-2027-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1934163339</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1934163339</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-e0659ff4f8d8b9a47113ab3d2c87f4c46366ebc809670e337199010172ea55ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UEtLAzEQDqJgrf4AbwHP0clmN49jKfUBih70HNJ0tm7Z3dRki-y_N2U9eBGGmTl8D76PkGsOtxxA3SUOlS4ZcMUKKBTTJ2TGKyUYLzWckhlwWTEAMOfkIqXd8VOFnJGXlYvtSJ0fmtDTPG8uNokuthGxw36grm3Dd6J1iLQLEenQdHkF6j9dv0WKPcbtSNOYBuzSJTmrXZvw6vfOycf96n35yJ5fH56Wi2fmRWUGhiArU9dlrTd6bVypOBduLTaF16oufSmFlLj2GoxUgEIobgzwnK1AV1UexZzcTLr7GL4OmAa7C4fYZ0vLjSi5FEKYjOITyseQUsTa7mPTuThaDvbYmp1as1nZHluzOnOKiZMyNgeMf5T_Jf0AndZuaA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1934163339</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Early action on Paris Agreement allows for more time to change energy systems</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>van Soest, Heleen L. ; de Boer, Harmen Sytze ; Roelfsema, Mark ; den Elzen, Michel G.J. ; Admiraal, Annemiek ; van Vuuren, Detlef P. ; Hof, Andries F. ; van den Berg, Maarten ; Harmsen, Mathijs J.H.M. ; Gernaat, David E.H.J. ; Forsell, Nicklas</creator><creatorcontrib>van Soest, Heleen L. ; de Boer, Harmen Sytze ; Roelfsema, Mark ; den Elzen, Michel G.J. ; Admiraal, Annemiek ; van Vuuren, Detlef P. ; Hof, Andries F. ; van den Berg, Maarten ; Harmsen, Mathijs J.H.M. ; Gernaat, David E.H.J. ; Forsell, Nicklas</creatorcontrib><description>The IMAGE integrated assessment model was used to develop a set of scenarios to evaluate the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) submitted by Parties under the Paris Agreement. The scenarios project emissions and energy system changes under (i) current policies, (ii) implementation of the NDCs, and (iii) various trajectories to a radiative forcing level of 2.8 W/m
2
in 2100, which gives a probability of about two thirds to limit warming to below 2 °C. The scenarios show that a cost-optimal pathway from 2020 onwards towards 2.8 W/m
2
leads to a global greenhouse gas emission level of 38 gigatonne CO
2
equivalent (GtCO
2
eq) by 2030, equal to a reduction of 20% compared to the 2010 level. The NDCs are projected to lead to 2030 emission levels of 50 GtCO
2
eq, which is still an increase compared to the 2010 level. A scenario that achieves the 2.8 W/m
2
forcing level in 2100 from the 2030 NDC level requires more rapid transitions after 2030 to meet the forcing target. It shows an annual reduction rate in greenhouse gas emissions of 4.7% between 2030 and 2050, rapidly phasing out unabated coal-fired power plant capacity, more rapid scale-up of low-carbon energy, and higher mitigation costs. A bridge scenario shows that enhancing the ambition level of NDCs before 2030 allows for a smoother energy system transition, with average annual emission reduction rates of 4.5% between 2030 and 2050, and more time to phase out coal capacity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1480</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10584-017-2027-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Air pollution ; Atmospheric Sciences ; Bridges ; Capacity ; Carbon dioxide ; Clean energy ; Climate change ; Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts ; Coal ; Coal-fired power plants ; Costs ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Electric power generation ; Electric power plants ; Emissions ; Emissions control ; Emissions trading ; Energy ; Energy costs ; Energy policy ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Industrial plant emissions ; Mitigation ; Mitigation costs ; Paris Agreement ; Policies ; Power plants ; Probability theory ; Radiative forcing</subject><ispartof>Climatic change, 2017-09, Vol.144 (2), p.165-179</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>Climatic Change is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-e0659ff4f8d8b9a47113ab3d2c87f4c46366ebc809670e337199010172ea55ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-e0659ff4f8d8b9a47113ab3d2c87f4c46366ebc809670e337199010172ea55ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10584-017-2027-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-017-2027-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Soest, Heleen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Boer, Harmen Sytze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roelfsema, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>den Elzen, Michel G.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Admiraal, Annemiek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Vuuren, Detlef P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hof, Andries F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Berg, Maarten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harmsen, Mathijs J.H.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gernaat, David E.H.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forsell, Nicklas</creatorcontrib><title>Early action on Paris Agreement allows for more time to change energy systems</title><title>Climatic change</title><addtitle>Climatic Change</addtitle><description>The IMAGE integrated assessment model was used to develop a set of scenarios to evaluate the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) submitted by Parties under the Paris Agreement. The scenarios project emissions and energy system changes under (i) current policies, (ii) implementation of the NDCs, and (iii) various trajectories to a radiative forcing level of 2.8 W/m
2
in 2100, which gives a probability of about two thirds to limit warming to below 2 °C. The scenarios show that a cost-optimal pathway from 2020 onwards towards 2.8 W/m
2
leads to a global greenhouse gas emission level of 38 gigatonne CO
2
equivalent (GtCO
2
eq) by 2030, equal to a reduction of 20% compared to the 2010 level. The NDCs are projected to lead to 2030 emission levels of 50 GtCO
2
eq, which is still an increase compared to the 2010 level. A scenario that achieves the 2.8 W/m
2
forcing level in 2100 from the 2030 NDC level requires more rapid transitions after 2030 to meet the forcing target. It shows an annual reduction rate in greenhouse gas emissions of 4.7% between 2030 and 2050, rapidly phasing out unabated coal-fired power plant capacity, more rapid scale-up of low-carbon energy, and higher mitigation costs. A bridge scenario shows that enhancing the ambition level of NDCs before 2030 allows for a smoother energy system transition, with average annual emission reduction rates of 4.5% between 2030 and 2050, and more time to phase out coal capacity.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Bridges</subject><subject>Capacity</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Clean energy</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</subject><subject>Coal</subject><subject>Coal-fired power plants</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Electric power generation</subject><subject>Electric power plants</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Emissions trading</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy costs</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Industrial plant emissions</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Mitigation costs</subject><subject>Paris Agreement</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Power plants</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Radiative forcing</subject><issn>0165-0009</issn><issn>1573-1480</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UEtLAzEQDqJgrf4AbwHP0clmN49jKfUBih70HNJ0tm7Z3dRki-y_N2U9eBGGmTl8D76PkGsOtxxA3SUOlS4ZcMUKKBTTJ2TGKyUYLzWckhlwWTEAMOfkIqXd8VOFnJGXlYvtSJ0fmtDTPG8uNokuthGxw36grm3Dd6J1iLQLEenQdHkF6j9dv0WKPcbtSNOYBuzSJTmrXZvw6vfOycf96n35yJ5fH56Wi2fmRWUGhiArU9dlrTd6bVypOBduLTaF16oufSmFlLj2GoxUgEIobgzwnK1AV1UexZzcTLr7GL4OmAa7C4fYZ0vLjSi5FEKYjOITyseQUsTa7mPTuThaDvbYmp1as1nZHluzOnOKiZMyNgeMf5T_Jf0AndZuaA</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>van Soest, Heleen L.</creator><creator>de Boer, Harmen Sytze</creator><creator>Roelfsema, Mark</creator><creator>den Elzen, Michel G.J.</creator><creator>Admiraal, Annemiek</creator><creator>van Vuuren, Detlef P.</creator><creator>Hof, Andries F.</creator><creator>van den Berg, Maarten</creator><creator>Harmsen, Mathijs J.H.M.</creator><creator>Gernaat, David E.H.J.</creator><creator>Forsell, Nicklas</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>Early action on Paris Agreement allows for more time to change energy systems</title><author>van Soest, Heleen L. ; de Boer, Harmen Sytze ; Roelfsema, Mark ; den Elzen, Michel G.J. ; Admiraal, Annemiek ; van Vuuren, Detlef P. ; Hof, Andries F. ; van den Berg, Maarten ; Harmsen, Mathijs J.H.M. ; Gernaat, David E.H.J. ; Forsell, Nicklas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-e0659ff4f8d8b9a47113ab3d2c87f4c46366ebc809670e337199010172ea55ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Bridges</topic><topic>Capacity</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Clean energy</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</topic><topic>Coal</topic><topic>Coal-fired power plants</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Electric power generation</topic><topic>Electric power plants</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Emissions trading</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy costs</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Industrial plant emissions</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Mitigation costs</topic><topic>Paris Agreement</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Power plants</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Radiative forcing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Soest, Heleen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Boer, Harmen Sytze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roelfsema, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>den Elzen, Michel G.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Admiraal, Annemiek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Vuuren, Detlef P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hof, Andries F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Berg, Maarten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harmsen, Mathijs J.H.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gernaat, David E.H.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forsell, Nicklas</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Climatic change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Soest, Heleen L.</au><au>de Boer, Harmen Sytze</au><au>Roelfsema, Mark</au><au>den Elzen, Michel G.J.</au><au>Admiraal, Annemiek</au><au>van Vuuren, Detlef P.</au><au>Hof, Andries F.</au><au>van den Berg, Maarten</au><au>Harmsen, Mathijs J.H.M.</au><au>Gernaat, David E.H.J.</au><au>Forsell, Nicklas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Early action on Paris Agreement allows for more time to change energy systems</atitle><jtitle>Climatic change</jtitle><stitle>Climatic Change</stitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>144</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>165</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>165-179</pages><issn>0165-0009</issn><eissn>1573-1480</eissn><abstract>The IMAGE integrated assessment model was used to develop a set of scenarios to evaluate the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) submitted by Parties under the Paris Agreement. The scenarios project emissions and energy system changes under (i) current policies, (ii) implementation of the NDCs, and (iii) various trajectories to a radiative forcing level of 2.8 W/m
2
in 2100, which gives a probability of about two thirds to limit warming to below 2 °C. The scenarios show that a cost-optimal pathway from 2020 onwards towards 2.8 W/m
2
leads to a global greenhouse gas emission level of 38 gigatonne CO
2
equivalent (GtCO
2
eq) by 2030, equal to a reduction of 20% compared to the 2010 level. The NDCs are projected to lead to 2030 emission levels of 50 GtCO
2
eq, which is still an increase compared to the 2010 level. A scenario that achieves the 2.8 W/m
2
forcing level in 2100 from the 2030 NDC level requires more rapid transitions after 2030 to meet the forcing target. It shows an annual reduction rate in greenhouse gas emissions of 4.7% between 2030 and 2050, rapidly phasing out unabated coal-fired power plant capacity, more rapid scale-up of low-carbon energy, and higher mitigation costs. A bridge scenario shows that enhancing the ambition level of NDCs before 2030 allows for a smoother energy system transition, with average annual emission reduction rates of 4.5% between 2030 and 2050, and more time to phase out coal capacity.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10584-017-2027-8</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-0009 |
ispartof | Climatic change, 2017-09, Vol.144 (2), p.165-179 |
issn | 0165-0009 1573-1480 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1934163339 |
source | PAIS Index; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Agreements Air pollution Atmospheric Sciences Bridges Capacity Carbon dioxide Clean energy Climate change Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts Coal Coal-fired power plants Costs Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Electric power generation Electric power plants Emissions Emissions control Emissions trading Energy Energy costs Energy policy Greenhouse effect Greenhouse gases Industrial plant emissions Mitigation Mitigation costs Paris Agreement Policies Power plants Probability theory Radiative forcing |
title | Early action on Paris Agreement allows for more time to change energy systems |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T11%3A15%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Early%20action%20on%20Paris%20Agreement%20allows%20for%20more%20time%20to%20change%20energy%20systems&rft.jtitle=Climatic%20change&rft.au=van%20Soest,%20Heleen%20L.&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=144&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=165&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=165-179&rft.issn=0165-0009&rft.eissn=1573-1480&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10584-017-2027-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1934163339%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1934163339&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |