Population differentiation in whiskered auklets Aethia pygmaea: do diurnal and nocturnal colonies differ in genetics, morphometry and acoustics?

Despite a great number of empirical studies, the mechanisms of population differentiation and the factors that influence this process, particularly in seabirds, remain insufficiently understood. Here we analyzed population structure in the whiskered auklet Aethia pygmaea, a previously poorly studied...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of avian biology 2017-08, Vol.48 (8), p.1047-1061
Hauptverfasser: Pshenichnikova, Olesya S., Klenova, Anna V., Sorokin, Pavel A., Konyukhov, Nikolay B., Andreev, Aleхander V., Kharitonov, Sergei P., Zubakin, Victor A., Artukhin, Yuri B., Schacter, Carley R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1061
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1047
container_title Journal of avian biology
container_volume 48
creator Pshenichnikova, Olesya S.
Klenova, Anna V.
Sorokin, Pavel A.
Konyukhov, Nikolay B.
Andreev, Aleхander V.
Kharitonov, Sergei P.
Zubakin, Victor A.
Artukhin, Yuri B.
Schacter, Carley R.
description Despite a great number of empirical studies, the mechanisms of population differentiation and the factors that influence this process, particularly in seabirds, remain insufficiently understood. Here we analyzed population structure in the whiskered auklet Aethia pygmaea, a previously poorly studied alcid species with unusual differentiation in colony attendance rhythms (i.e. diurnal in the Sea of Okhotsk vs nocturnal in the Bering Sea), and examined the influence of it on intraspecific differentiation. For this study, we analyzed morphometric measurements, acoustic variables, mitochondrial control region fragment and five microsatellite loci from nine whiskered auklet colonies spanning the breeding range. Previous research has shown a clinal morphometric variation in this species. We build on this analysis by adding auklets from more colonies, for the first time analyzing vocalizations from different colonies and genetic structure of this species. Our data supports a clinal variation in morphometric and acoustic characters with the largest size and the lowest call frequency in western birds, and the smallest size and highest call frequency in the east. We also found two mitochondrial lineages – whiskered auklets from colonies in the Sea of Okhotsk and the Commander Is. (Bering Sea) and from the Aleutian Is. (Bering Sea), that were presumably formed during Sangamonian interglacial period (115 000–130 000 years ago). Genetic clusters found did not reflect differences in colony attendance rhythms, suggesting that they were shaped by other factors (e.g. differences in predator pressure) and are unlikely to have participated in the formation of population structure. Colony fidelity, mobility of birds, proximity of foraging grounds and location of colonies in relation to seasonal ice pack, seem to be more likely determinants of population differentiation.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jav.01124
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_24P</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1933857876</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>90012659</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>90012659</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3844-5c1c842099f11d360415465106c9ecbb42a86de0d9429c332547e3b9725f907a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFYP_gAh4MlD6uxndi9CKfWLgh5UvC3bZGM3TZO4m1j6742meHMuwwzPOy_zInSOYYL7ui7M1wQwJuwAjbAAiIHJ90M0AgUylpInx-gkhAIAKFF8hG6e66YrTevqKspcnltvq9YNs6ui7cqFdb_LItOtS9uGaGrblTNRs_vYGGtO0VFuymDP9n2MXm_nL7P7ePF09zCbLuKUSsZinuJUMgJK5RhnVADDnAmOQaTKpsslI0aKzEKmGFEppYSzxNKlSgjPFSSGjtHlcLfx9WdnQ6uLuvNVb6mxorT_Syaip64GKvV1CN7muvFuY_xOY9A_8eg-Hv0bT89OBnbrSrv7H9SP07e94GIQFKGt_Z9AAWAiuKLfUyFuew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1933857876</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Population differentiation in whiskered auklets Aethia pygmaea: do diurnal and nocturnal colonies differ in genetics, morphometry and acoustics?</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><creator>Pshenichnikova, Olesya S. ; Klenova, Anna V. ; Sorokin, Pavel A. ; Konyukhov, Nikolay B. ; Andreev, Aleхander V. ; Kharitonov, Sergei P. ; Zubakin, Victor A. ; Artukhin, Yuri B. ; Schacter, Carley R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pshenichnikova, Olesya S. ; Klenova, Anna V. ; Sorokin, Pavel A. ; Konyukhov, Nikolay B. ; Andreev, Aleхander V. ; Kharitonov, Sergei P. ; Zubakin, Victor A. ; Artukhin, Yuri B. ; Schacter, Carley R.</creatorcontrib><description>Despite a great number of empirical studies, the mechanisms of population differentiation and the factors that influence this process, particularly in seabirds, remain insufficiently understood. Here we analyzed population structure in the whiskered auklet Aethia pygmaea, a previously poorly studied alcid species with unusual differentiation in colony attendance rhythms (i.e. diurnal in the Sea of Okhotsk vs nocturnal in the Bering Sea), and examined the influence of it on intraspecific differentiation. For this study, we analyzed morphometric measurements, acoustic variables, mitochondrial control region fragment and five microsatellite loci from nine whiskered auklet colonies spanning the breeding range. Previous research has shown a clinal morphometric variation in this species. We build on this analysis by adding auklets from more colonies, for the first time analyzing vocalizations from different colonies and genetic structure of this species. Our data supports a clinal variation in morphometric and acoustic characters with the largest size and the lowest call frequency in western birds, and the smallest size and highest call frequency in the east. We also found two mitochondrial lineages – whiskered auklets from colonies in the Sea of Okhotsk and the Commander Is. (Bering Sea) and from the Aleutian Is. (Bering Sea), that were presumably formed during Sangamonian interglacial period (115 000–130 000 years ago). Genetic clusters found did not reflect differences in colony attendance rhythms, suggesting that they were shaped by other factors (e.g. differences in predator pressure) and are unlikely to have participated in the formation of population structure. Colony fidelity, mobility of birds, proximity of foraging grounds and location of colonies in relation to seasonal ice pack, seem to be more likely determinants of population differentiation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0908-8857</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-048X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jav.01124</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Nordic Society Oikos</publisher><subject>Acoustics ; Aquatic birds ; Birds ; Breeding ; Colonies ; Diurnal ; Foraging ; Genetic structure ; Genetics ; Ice ; Interglacial periods ; Microsatellites ; Mitochondria ; Morphometry ; Nocturnal ; Population ; Population differentiation ; Population structure ; Predators ; Seabirds ; Species</subject><ispartof>Journal of avian biology, 2017-08, Vol.48 (8), p.1047-1061</ispartof><rights>2017 Nordic Society Oikos</rights><rights>2017 The Authors</rights><rights>Journal of Avian Biology © 2016 Nordic Society Oikos</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3844-5c1c842099f11d360415465106c9ecbb42a86de0d9429c332547e3b9725f907a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3844-5c1c842099f11d360415465106c9ecbb42a86de0d9429c332547e3b9725f907a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjav.01124$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjav.01124$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fjav.01124$$EView_record_in_Wiley-Blackwell$$FView_record_in_$$GWiley-Blackwell</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pshenichnikova, Olesya S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klenova, Anna V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorokin, Pavel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konyukhov, Nikolay B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreev, Aleхander V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kharitonov, Sergei P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zubakin, Victor A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Artukhin, Yuri B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schacter, Carley R.</creatorcontrib><title>Population differentiation in whiskered auklets Aethia pygmaea: do diurnal and nocturnal colonies differ in genetics, morphometry and acoustics?</title><title>Journal of avian biology</title><description>Despite a great number of empirical studies, the mechanisms of population differentiation and the factors that influence this process, particularly in seabirds, remain insufficiently understood. Here we analyzed population structure in the whiskered auklet Aethia pygmaea, a previously poorly studied alcid species with unusual differentiation in colony attendance rhythms (i.e. diurnal in the Sea of Okhotsk vs nocturnal in the Bering Sea), and examined the influence of it on intraspecific differentiation. For this study, we analyzed morphometric measurements, acoustic variables, mitochondrial control region fragment and five microsatellite loci from nine whiskered auklet colonies spanning the breeding range. Previous research has shown a clinal morphometric variation in this species. We build on this analysis by adding auklets from more colonies, for the first time analyzing vocalizations from different colonies and genetic structure of this species. Our data supports a clinal variation in morphometric and acoustic characters with the largest size and the lowest call frequency in western birds, and the smallest size and highest call frequency in the east. We also found two mitochondrial lineages – whiskered auklets from colonies in the Sea of Okhotsk and the Commander Is. (Bering Sea) and from the Aleutian Is. (Bering Sea), that were presumably formed during Sangamonian interglacial period (115 000–130 000 years ago). Genetic clusters found did not reflect differences in colony attendance rhythms, suggesting that they were shaped by other factors (e.g. differences in predator pressure) and are unlikely to have participated in the formation of population structure. Colony fidelity, mobility of birds, proximity of foraging grounds and location of colonies in relation to seasonal ice pack, seem to be more likely determinants of population differentiation.</description><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Aquatic birds</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Colonies</subject><subject>Diurnal</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Genetic structure</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Ice</subject><subject>Interglacial periods</subject><subject>Microsatellites</subject><subject>Mitochondria</subject><subject>Morphometry</subject><subject>Nocturnal</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population differentiation</subject><subject>Population structure</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Seabirds</subject><subject>Species</subject><issn>0908-8857</issn><issn>1600-048X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFYP_gAh4MlD6uxndi9CKfWLgh5UvC3bZGM3TZO4m1j6742meHMuwwzPOy_zInSOYYL7ui7M1wQwJuwAjbAAiIHJ90M0AgUylpInx-gkhAIAKFF8hG6e66YrTevqKspcnltvq9YNs6ui7cqFdb_LItOtS9uGaGrblTNRs_vYGGtO0VFuymDP9n2MXm_nL7P7ePF09zCbLuKUSsZinuJUMgJK5RhnVADDnAmOQaTKpsslI0aKzEKmGFEppYSzxNKlSgjPFSSGjtHlcLfx9WdnQ6uLuvNVb6mxorT_Syaip64GKvV1CN7muvFuY_xOY9A_8eg-Hv0bT89OBnbrSrv7H9SP07e94GIQFKGt_Z9AAWAiuKLfUyFuew</recordid><startdate>201708</startdate><enddate>201708</enddate><creator>Pshenichnikova, Olesya S.</creator><creator>Klenova, Anna V.</creator><creator>Sorokin, Pavel A.</creator><creator>Konyukhov, Nikolay B.</creator><creator>Andreev, Aleхander V.</creator><creator>Kharitonov, Sergei P.</creator><creator>Zubakin, Victor A.</creator><creator>Artukhin, Yuri B.</creator><creator>Schacter, Carley R.</creator><general>Nordic Society Oikos</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201708</creationdate><title>Population differentiation in whiskered auklets Aethia pygmaea</title><author>Pshenichnikova, Olesya S. ; Klenova, Anna V. ; Sorokin, Pavel A. ; Konyukhov, Nikolay B. ; Andreev, Aleхander V. ; Kharitonov, Sergei P. ; Zubakin, Victor A. ; Artukhin, Yuri B. ; Schacter, Carley R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3844-5c1c842099f11d360415465106c9ecbb42a86de0d9429c332547e3b9725f907a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Aquatic birds</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Colonies</topic><topic>Diurnal</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Genetic structure</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Ice</topic><topic>Interglacial periods</topic><topic>Microsatellites</topic><topic>Mitochondria</topic><topic>Morphometry</topic><topic>Nocturnal</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population differentiation</topic><topic>Population structure</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Seabirds</topic><topic>Species</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pshenichnikova, Olesya S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klenova, Anna V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorokin, Pavel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konyukhov, Nikolay B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreev, Aleхander V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kharitonov, Sergei P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zubakin, Victor A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Artukhin, Yuri B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schacter, Carley R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of avian biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pshenichnikova, Olesya S.</au><au>Klenova, Anna V.</au><au>Sorokin, Pavel A.</au><au>Konyukhov, Nikolay B.</au><au>Andreev, Aleхander V.</au><au>Kharitonov, Sergei P.</au><au>Zubakin, Victor A.</au><au>Artukhin, Yuri B.</au><au>Schacter, Carley R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Population differentiation in whiskered auklets Aethia pygmaea: do diurnal and nocturnal colonies differ in genetics, morphometry and acoustics?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of avian biology</jtitle><date>2017-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1047</spage><epage>1061</epage><pages>1047-1061</pages><issn>0908-8857</issn><eissn>1600-048X</eissn><abstract>Despite a great number of empirical studies, the mechanisms of population differentiation and the factors that influence this process, particularly in seabirds, remain insufficiently understood. Here we analyzed population structure in the whiskered auklet Aethia pygmaea, a previously poorly studied alcid species with unusual differentiation in colony attendance rhythms (i.e. diurnal in the Sea of Okhotsk vs nocturnal in the Bering Sea), and examined the influence of it on intraspecific differentiation. For this study, we analyzed morphometric measurements, acoustic variables, mitochondrial control region fragment and five microsatellite loci from nine whiskered auklet colonies spanning the breeding range. Previous research has shown a clinal morphometric variation in this species. We build on this analysis by adding auklets from more colonies, for the first time analyzing vocalizations from different colonies and genetic structure of this species. Our data supports a clinal variation in morphometric and acoustic characters with the largest size and the lowest call frequency in western birds, and the smallest size and highest call frequency in the east. We also found two mitochondrial lineages – whiskered auklets from colonies in the Sea of Okhotsk and the Commander Is. (Bering Sea) and from the Aleutian Is. (Bering Sea), that were presumably formed during Sangamonian interglacial period (115 000–130 000 years ago). Genetic clusters found did not reflect differences in colony attendance rhythms, suggesting that they were shaped by other factors (e.g. differences in predator pressure) and are unlikely to have participated in the formation of population structure. Colony fidelity, mobility of birds, proximity of foraging grounds and location of colonies in relation to seasonal ice pack, seem to be more likely determinants of population differentiation.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Nordic Society Oikos</pub><doi>10.1111/jav.01124</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0908-8857
ispartof Journal of avian biology, 2017-08, Vol.48 (8), p.1047-1061
issn 0908-8857
1600-048X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1933857876
source Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles
subjects Acoustics
Aquatic birds
Birds
Breeding
Colonies
Diurnal
Foraging
Genetic structure
Genetics
Ice
Interglacial periods
Microsatellites
Mitochondria
Morphometry
Nocturnal
Population
Population differentiation
Population structure
Predators
Seabirds
Species
title Population differentiation in whiskered auklets Aethia pygmaea: do diurnal and nocturnal colonies differ in genetics, morphometry and acoustics?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T00%3A55%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_24P&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Population%20differentiation%20in%20whiskered%20auklets%20Aethia%20pygmaea:%20do%20diurnal%20and%20nocturnal%20colonies%20differ%20in%20genetics,%20morphometry%20and%20acoustics?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20avian%20biology&rft.au=Pshenichnikova,%20Olesya%20S.&rft.date=2017-08&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1047&rft.epage=1061&rft.pages=1047-1061&rft.issn=0908-8857&rft.eissn=1600-048X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jav.01124&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_24P%3E90012659%3C/jstor_24P%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1933857876&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=90012659&rfr_iscdi=true