EUROPEAN MYRIAD OF APPROACHES TO PARASITIC COMMERCIAL PRACTICES

Research background: The Post-Lisbon EU aims at smart, sustainable, and inclusive growth on the single internal market, as indicated by the Europe 2020. The interplay of the competition and consumer protection on such a market is subject to harmonization. The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive ha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oeconomia Copernicana 2017-06, Vol.8 (2), p.167-180
1. Verfasser: MacGregor Pelikánová, Radka
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 180
container_issue 2
container_start_page 167
container_title Oeconomia Copernicana
container_volume 8
creator MacGregor Pelikánová, Radka
description Research background: The Post-Lisbon EU aims at smart, sustainable, and inclusive growth on the single internal market, as indicated by the Europe 2020. The interplay of the competition and consumer protection on such a market is subject to harmonization. The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive has been made in order to achieve a full harmonization in this respect in 2007. However, EU member states share different social, political, legal and economic traditions and their approaches to unfair competition, in particular if committed via parasitic commercial practices, are dramatically diverse. In such a context, is it feasible, effective and efficient to install a full harmonization? Purpose of the article: The primary purpose of this article is to describe and assess approaches to unfair competition, in particular if committed via parasitic commercial practices, by the EU law and EU member states law. The secondary purpose is to study and evaluate possibilities for the feasible, effective and efficient harmonization, or their lack. Methods: The cross-disciplinary and multi-jurisdictional nature of this article, and its dual purposes, implies the use of Meta-Analysis, of the critical comparison of laws and the impact of their application, to the holistic perception of historical and national contexts, and to case studies. The primary and secondary sources are explored and the yield knowledge and data are confronted with the status quo. The dominating qualitative research and data are complemented by the quantitative research and data. Findings Value added: The EU opted for an ambitious challenge to install via the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive a full harmonization of the regime against unfair commercial practices, including parasitic ones. The exploration pursuant to the duo of purposes suggests that the challenge is perhaps too ambitious and that the EU underestimated the dramatic diversity of approaches to unfair commercial practices, especially parasitic ones.
doi_str_mv 10.24136/oc.v8i2.11
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_econi</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1933261745</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>554752</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>554752</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-7a4a3879fbc622dfd7b4dc4e56fdfa53ca99380289d4a311791e20cc17f488cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM9LwzAYhoMoOOZOXj0EPEpnfjbJSULttLDZ0m0HT6FNU6jMZbab4H9vdIOdvpePh_eFB4BbjKaEYRo_ejv9lh2ZYnwBRoRyGmFJxGXISIZMhLgGk2HoasSY4EwqNQJP6brMi1S_wcV7melnmM-gLooy18lruoSrHBa61MtslSUwyReLtEwyPYdFqZPwSpc34KqtNoObnO4YrGfpKnmN5vlLluh5ZKkg-0hUrKJSqLa2MSFN24iaNZY5HrdNW3FqK6WoRESqJoAYC4UdQdZi0TIpbU3H4P7Yu-v918ENe_PhD_02TBqsKCUxFowH6uFI2d4PQ-9as-u7z6r_MRiZf0nGW_MnyWAcaHiknfXbbjizAqGYYxWKx-DuVOic35w3OQ8GCf0FzGxneA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1933261745</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EUROPEAN MYRIAD OF APPROACHES TO PARASITIC COMMERCIAL PRACTICES</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>MacGregor Pelikánová, Radka</creator><creatorcontrib>MacGregor Pelikánová, Radka</creatorcontrib><description>Research background: The Post-Lisbon EU aims at smart, sustainable, and inclusive growth on the single internal market, as indicated by the Europe 2020. The interplay of the competition and consumer protection on such a market is subject to harmonization. The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive has been made in order to achieve a full harmonization in this respect in 2007. However, EU member states share different social, political, legal and economic traditions and their approaches to unfair competition, in particular if committed via parasitic commercial practices, are dramatically diverse. In such a context, is it feasible, effective and efficient to install a full harmonization? Purpose of the article: The primary purpose of this article is to describe and assess approaches to unfair competition, in particular if committed via parasitic commercial practices, by the EU law and EU member states law. The secondary purpose is to study and evaluate possibilities for the feasible, effective and efficient harmonization, or their lack. Methods: The cross-disciplinary and multi-jurisdictional nature of this article, and its dual purposes, implies the use of Meta-Analysis, of the critical comparison of laws and the impact of their application, to the holistic perception of historical and national contexts, and to case studies. The primary and secondary sources are explored and the yield knowledge and data are confronted with the status quo. The dominating qualitative research and data are complemented by the quantitative research and data. Findings Value added: The EU opted for an ambitious challenge to install via the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive a full harmonization of the regime against unfair commercial practices, including parasitic ones. The exploration pursuant to the duo of purposes suggests that the challenge is perhaps too ambitious and that the EU underestimated the dramatic diversity of approaches to unfair commercial practices, especially parasitic ones.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2083-1277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2353-1827</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.24136/oc.v8i2.11</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Torun: Institute of Economic Research</publisher><subject>Blacklisting ; Case studies ; Competition ; Consumer protection ; Consumers ; Economy ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Law ; Meta-analysis ; Qualitative research ; Studies ; Supranational / Global Economy</subject><ispartof>Oeconomia Copernicana, 2017-06, Vol.8 (2), p.167-180</ispartof><rights>Copyright Nicolaus Copernicus University Press Jun 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-7a4a3879fbc622dfd7b4dc4e56fdfa53ca99380289d4a311791e20cc17f488cb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2017_33784.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>MacGregor Pelikánová, Radka</creatorcontrib><title>EUROPEAN MYRIAD OF APPROACHES TO PARASITIC COMMERCIAL PRACTICES</title><title>Oeconomia Copernicana</title><addtitle>Oeconomia Copernicana</addtitle><description>Research background: The Post-Lisbon EU aims at smart, sustainable, and inclusive growth on the single internal market, as indicated by the Europe 2020. The interplay of the competition and consumer protection on such a market is subject to harmonization. The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive has been made in order to achieve a full harmonization in this respect in 2007. However, EU member states share different social, political, legal and economic traditions and their approaches to unfair competition, in particular if committed via parasitic commercial practices, are dramatically diverse. In such a context, is it feasible, effective and efficient to install a full harmonization? Purpose of the article: The primary purpose of this article is to describe and assess approaches to unfair competition, in particular if committed via parasitic commercial practices, by the EU law and EU member states law. The secondary purpose is to study and evaluate possibilities for the feasible, effective and efficient harmonization, or their lack. Methods: The cross-disciplinary and multi-jurisdictional nature of this article, and its dual purposes, implies the use of Meta-Analysis, of the critical comparison of laws and the impact of their application, to the holistic perception of historical and national contexts, and to case studies. The primary and secondary sources are explored and the yield knowledge and data are confronted with the status quo. The dominating qualitative research and data are complemented by the quantitative research and data. Findings Value added: The EU opted for an ambitious challenge to install via the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive a full harmonization of the regime against unfair commercial practices, including parasitic ones. The exploration pursuant to the duo of purposes suggests that the challenge is perhaps too ambitious and that the EU underestimated the dramatic diversity of approaches to unfair commercial practices, especially parasitic ones.</description><subject>Blacklisting</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Consumer protection</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Economy</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Supranational / Global Economy</subject><issn>2083-1277</issn><issn>2353-1827</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkM9LwzAYhoMoOOZOXj0EPEpnfjbJSULttLDZ0m0HT6FNU6jMZbab4H9vdIOdvpePh_eFB4BbjKaEYRo_ejv9lh2ZYnwBRoRyGmFJxGXISIZMhLgGk2HoasSY4EwqNQJP6brMi1S_wcV7melnmM-gLooy18lruoSrHBa61MtslSUwyReLtEwyPYdFqZPwSpc34KqtNoObnO4YrGfpKnmN5vlLluh5ZKkg-0hUrKJSqLa2MSFN24iaNZY5HrdNW3FqK6WoRESqJoAYC4UdQdZi0TIpbU3H4P7Yu-v918ENe_PhD_02TBqsKCUxFowH6uFI2d4PQ-9as-u7z6r_MRiZf0nGW_MnyWAcaHiknfXbbjizAqGYYxWKx-DuVOic35w3OQ8GCf0FzGxneA</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>MacGregor Pelikánová, Radka</creator><general>Institute of Economic Research</general><general>Instytut Badań Gospodarczych</general><general>Nicolaus Copernicus University Press</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>EUROPEAN MYRIAD OF APPROACHES TO PARASITIC COMMERCIAL PRACTICES</title><author>MacGregor Pelikánová, Radka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-7a4a3879fbc622dfd7b4dc4e56fdfa53ca99380289d4a311791e20cc17f488cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Blacklisting</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Consumer protection</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Economy</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Supranational / Global Economy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MacGregor Pelikánová, Radka</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Oeconomia Copernicana</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MacGregor Pelikánová, Radka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EUROPEAN MYRIAD OF APPROACHES TO PARASITIC COMMERCIAL PRACTICES</atitle><jtitle>Oeconomia Copernicana</jtitle><addtitle>Oeconomia Copernicana</addtitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>167</spage><epage>180</epage><pages>167-180</pages><issn>2083-1277</issn><eissn>2353-1827</eissn><abstract>Research background: The Post-Lisbon EU aims at smart, sustainable, and inclusive growth on the single internal market, as indicated by the Europe 2020. The interplay of the competition and consumer protection on such a market is subject to harmonization. The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive has been made in order to achieve a full harmonization in this respect in 2007. However, EU member states share different social, political, legal and economic traditions and their approaches to unfair competition, in particular if committed via parasitic commercial practices, are dramatically diverse. In such a context, is it feasible, effective and efficient to install a full harmonization? Purpose of the article: The primary purpose of this article is to describe and assess approaches to unfair competition, in particular if committed via parasitic commercial practices, by the EU law and EU member states law. The secondary purpose is to study and evaluate possibilities for the feasible, effective and efficient harmonization, or their lack. Methods: The cross-disciplinary and multi-jurisdictional nature of this article, and its dual purposes, implies the use of Meta-Analysis, of the critical comparison of laws and the impact of their application, to the holistic perception of historical and national contexts, and to case studies. The primary and secondary sources are explored and the yield knowledge and data are confronted with the status quo. The dominating qualitative research and data are complemented by the quantitative research and data. Findings Value added: The EU opted for an ambitious challenge to install via the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive a full harmonization of the regime against unfair commercial practices, including parasitic ones. The exploration pursuant to the duo of purposes suggests that the challenge is perhaps too ambitious and that the EU underestimated the dramatic diversity of approaches to unfair commercial practices, especially parasitic ones.</abstract><cop>Torun</cop><pub>Institute of Economic Research</pub><doi>10.24136/oc.v8i2.11</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2083-1277
ispartof Oeconomia Copernicana, 2017-06, Vol.8 (2), p.167-180
issn 2083-1277
2353-1827
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1933261745
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Blacklisting
Case studies
Competition
Consumer protection
Consumers
Economy
Interdisciplinary aspects
Law
Meta-analysis
Qualitative research
Studies
Supranational / Global Economy
title EUROPEAN MYRIAD OF APPROACHES TO PARASITIC COMMERCIAL PRACTICES
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T18%3A20%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_econi&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EUROPEAN%20MYRIAD%20OF%20APPROACHES%20TO%20PARASITIC%20COMMERCIAL%20PRACTICES&rft.jtitle=Oeconomia%20Copernicana&rft.au=MacGregor%20Pelik%C3%A1nov%C3%A1,%20Radka&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=167&rft.epage=180&rft.pages=167-180&rft.issn=2083-1277&rft.eissn=2353-1827&rft_id=info:doi/10.24136/oc.v8i2.11&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_econi%3E554752%3C/ceeol_econi%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1933261745&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=554752&rfr_iscdi=true