In search of common ground: Political ecology and conservation in the development age
In this essay, we respond to Menon and Karthik’s recent comments on our earlier critical review, which appeared in this journal. We clarify some of our original arguments and also draw out practical implications of the conceptual interventions made earlier. Specifically, we draw attention to the com...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Geoforum 2017-06, Vol.82, p.87-88 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 88 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 87 |
| container_title | Geoforum |
| container_volume | 82 |
| creator | Srinivasan, Krithika Kasturirangan, Rajesh |
| description | In this essay, we respond to Menon and Karthik’s recent comments on our earlier critical review, which appeared in this journal. We clarify some of our original arguments and also draw out practical implications of the conceptual interventions made earlier. Specifically, we draw attention to the common ground shared by political ecology and the social formation of conservation by pointing to why conservation becomes necessary in the first place. We thus urge for a refocusing of political ecological attention from limited and limiting critiques of conservation to the root cause of socio-ecological marginalization in today’s world: the pursuit of development at multiple scales. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.04.002 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1933250210</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016718517300763</els_id><sourcerecordid>1933250210</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-e31ff7094f955f48b81b0f1355ba70331f7bea9f58cca012d772ed3da22b1bd33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFqGzEQhkVpIW6aVwiCnnc7kryWtqeW0LQGQ3KIz0IrjWyZXcmV1oa8fWTcnnOaw3z_P8xHyD2DlgFbfTu0O0w-5dPUcmCyhWULwD-QBVOSN73o1UeygEo2kqnuhnwu5QAAUqh-QbbrSAuabPc0eWrTNKVIdzmdovtOn9MY5mDNSNGmMe1eqYmuQrFgPps5VDREOu-ROjzjmI4TxpmaHX4hn7wZC979m7dk-_jr5eFPs3n6vX74uWmsUGpuUDDvJfRL33edX6pBsQE8E103GAmibuWApvedstYA405Kjk44w_nABifELfl67T3m9PeEZdaHdMqxntSsF4J3wBlUanWlbE6lZPT6mMNk8qtmoC8K9UH_V6gvCjUsdVVYgz-uQaw_nANmXWzAaNGFjHbWLoX3Kt4AWx5-UQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1933250210</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In search of common ground: Political ecology and conservation in the development age</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Srinivasan, Krithika ; Kasturirangan, Rajesh</creator><creatorcontrib>Srinivasan, Krithika ; Kasturirangan, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><description>In this essay, we respond to Menon and Karthik’s recent comments on our earlier critical review, which appeared in this journal. We clarify some of our original arguments and also draw out practical implications of the conceptual interventions made earlier. Specifically, we draw attention to the common ground shared by political ecology and the social formation of conservation by pointing to why conservation becomes necessary in the first place. We thus urge for a refocusing of political ecological attention from limited and limiting critiques of conservation to the root cause of socio-ecological marginalization in today’s world: the pursuit of development at multiple scales.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-7185</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9398</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.04.002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anthropocentrism ; Attention ; Conservation ; Development ; Ecological effects ; Ecology ; Human ecology ; Marginality ; More-than-human ; Nature-society ; Political ecology ; Politics ; Social exclusion</subject><ispartof>Geoforum, 2017-06, Vol.82, p.87-88</ispartof><rights>2017</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jun 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-e31ff7094f955f48b81b0f1355ba70331f7bea9f58cca012d772ed3da22b1bd33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-e31ff7094f955f48b81b0f1355ba70331f7bea9f58cca012d772ed3da22b1bd33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718517300763$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,33751,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Srinivasan, Krithika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasturirangan, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><title>In search of common ground: Political ecology and conservation in the development age</title><title>Geoforum</title><description>In this essay, we respond to Menon and Karthik’s recent comments on our earlier critical review, which appeared in this journal. We clarify some of our original arguments and also draw out practical implications of the conceptual interventions made earlier. Specifically, we draw attention to the common ground shared by political ecology and the social formation of conservation by pointing to why conservation becomes necessary in the first place. We thus urge for a refocusing of political ecological attention from limited and limiting critiques of conservation to the root cause of socio-ecological marginalization in today’s world: the pursuit of development at multiple scales.</description><subject>Anthropocentrism</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Development</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Human ecology</subject><subject>Marginality</subject><subject>More-than-human</subject><subject>Nature-society</subject><subject>Political ecology</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Social exclusion</subject><issn>0016-7185</issn><issn>1872-9398</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFqGzEQhkVpIW6aVwiCnnc7kryWtqeW0LQGQ3KIz0IrjWyZXcmV1oa8fWTcnnOaw3z_P8xHyD2DlgFbfTu0O0w-5dPUcmCyhWULwD-QBVOSN73o1UeygEo2kqnuhnwu5QAAUqh-QbbrSAuabPc0eWrTNKVIdzmdovtOn9MY5mDNSNGmMe1eqYmuQrFgPps5VDREOu-ROjzjmI4TxpmaHX4hn7wZC979m7dk-_jr5eFPs3n6vX74uWmsUGpuUDDvJfRL33edX6pBsQE8E103GAmibuWApvedstYA405Kjk44w_nABifELfl67T3m9PeEZdaHdMqxntSsF4J3wBlUanWlbE6lZPT6mMNk8qtmoC8K9UH_V6gvCjUsdVVYgz-uQaw_nANmXWzAaNGFjHbWLoX3Kt4AWx5-UQ</recordid><startdate>201706</startdate><enddate>201706</enddate><creator>Srinivasan, Krithika</creator><creator>Kasturirangan, Rajesh</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201706</creationdate><title>In search of common ground: Political ecology and conservation in the development age</title><author>Srinivasan, Krithika ; Kasturirangan, Rajesh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-e31ff7094f955f48b81b0f1355ba70331f7bea9f58cca012d772ed3da22b1bd33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Anthropocentrism</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Development</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Human ecology</topic><topic>Marginality</topic><topic>More-than-human</topic><topic>Nature-society</topic><topic>Political ecology</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Social exclusion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Srinivasan, Krithika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasturirangan, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Geoforum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Srinivasan, Krithika</au><au>Kasturirangan, Rajesh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In search of common ground: Political ecology and conservation in the development age</atitle><jtitle>Geoforum</jtitle><date>2017-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>82</volume><spage>87</spage><epage>88</epage><pages>87-88</pages><issn>0016-7185</issn><eissn>1872-9398</eissn><abstract>In this essay, we respond to Menon and Karthik’s recent comments on our earlier critical review, which appeared in this journal. We clarify some of our original arguments and also draw out practical implications of the conceptual interventions made earlier. Specifically, we draw attention to the common ground shared by political ecology and the social formation of conservation by pointing to why conservation becomes necessary in the first place. We thus urge for a refocusing of political ecological attention from limited and limiting critiques of conservation to the root cause of socio-ecological marginalization in today’s world: the pursuit of development at multiple scales.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.04.002</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0016-7185 |
| ispartof | Geoforum, 2017-06, Vol.82, p.87-88 |
| issn | 0016-7185 1872-9398 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1933250210 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Anthropocentrism Attention Conservation Development Ecological effects Ecology Human ecology Marginality More-than-human Nature-society Political ecology Politics Social exclusion |
| title | In search of common ground: Political ecology and conservation in the development age |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T10%3A09%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20search%20of%20common%20ground:%20Political%20ecology%20and%20conservation%20in%20the%20development%20age&rft.jtitle=Geoforum&rft.au=Srinivasan,%20Krithika&rft.date=2017-06&rft.volume=82&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=88&rft.pages=87-88&rft.issn=0016-7185&rft.eissn=1872-9398&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.04.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1933250210%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1933250210&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0016718517300763&rfr_iscdi=true |