Enforcing Corporate Social Responsibility Codes Under Private Law: On the Disciplining Power of Legal Doctrine

A central question in the debate on corporate social responsibility is to what extent CSR codes can be enforced among private parties. This contribution argues that this question is best answered by reference to the applicable doctrinal legal system. Such a doctrinal approach has recently regained i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Indiana journal of global legal studies 2017-01, Vol.24 (1), p.99-113
1. Verfasser: Smits, Jan M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 113
container_issue 1
container_start_page 99
container_title Indiana journal of global legal studies
container_volume 24
creator Smits, Jan M
description A central question in the debate on corporate social responsibility is to what extent CSR codes can be enforced among private parties. This contribution argues that this question is best answered by reference to the applicable doctrinal legal system. Such a doctrinal approach has recently regained importance in American scholarship, while it is still the prevailing method of legal analysis in Europe. Applying a doctrinal analysis of CSR codes allows for the possibility of private law enforcement, that is, enforcement by means of contract or tort, dependent on three different elements: the exact type of claim that is brought, the evolving societal standards about the binding nature of CSR codes, and the normative complexity of the doctrinal system itself. This approach allows for a typology of cases in which the enforceability of CSR codes can be disputed. It is subsequently argued that societal standards have not yet reached the stage where the average consumer who buys a product from a retailer can hold that retailer legally liable for violations of the norms incorporated in the code.
doi_str_mv 10.2979/indjglolegstu.24.1.0099
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1932060088</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A622650477</galeid><jstor_id>10.2979/indjglolegstu.24.1.0099</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A622650477</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-9fa46a403b16c13d15d7fe831dc84c1cc36ba1710fdbef4e558818a5059e762f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtP3TAQhSNUJCj0N9RSt82tHb-S7tCFPqQrgUpZW47jBEe5dupxQPz7OqLqhR0b29J8c-aMT1F8JHhTNbL54nw3DlOY7ABp2VRsQzYYN81RcUo4oyWmQr7Lb1zjEstKnhTvAUacEULYaeGvfB-icX5A2xDnEHWy6DYYpyf0y8IcPLjWTS495XpnAd35zkZ0E93DSu7041d07VG6t-jSgXHz5PwqdhMeMxZ6tLNDlroMJkXn7Xlx3OsJ7Id_91lx9-3q9_ZHubv-_nN7sSsN5TyVTa-Z0AzTlghDaEd4J3tbU9KZmhliDBWtJpLgvmttzyzndU1qzTFvrBRVT8-KT8-6cwx_FgtJjWGJPo9UpKEVFhjX9YHKFq1y-SdS1Gaf91AXoqoEx0zKTH1-QbUL5D0gH-CG-wSDXgBe4_IZNzEARNurObq9jk-KYLUmpl4lpiqmiFoTy53sv-nRmrRfwB58C15XolG3a6prqOv6GDN2aBshhfjmaX8BlwCv1w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1932060088</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enforcing Corporate Social Responsibility Codes Under Private Law: On the Disciplining Power of Legal Doctrine</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Smits, Jan M</creator><creatorcontrib>Smits, Jan M</creatorcontrib><description>A central question in the debate on corporate social responsibility is to what extent CSR codes can be enforced among private parties. This contribution argues that this question is best answered by reference to the applicable doctrinal legal system. Such a doctrinal approach has recently regained importance in American scholarship, while it is still the prevailing method of legal analysis in Europe. Applying a doctrinal analysis of CSR codes allows for the possibility of private law enforcement, that is, enforcement by means of contract or tort, dependent on three different elements: the exact type of claim that is brought, the evolving societal standards about the binding nature of CSR codes, and the normative complexity of the doctrinal system itself. This approach allows for a typology of cases in which the enforceability of CSR codes can be disputed. It is subsequently argued that societal standards have not yet reached the stage where the average consumer who buys a product from a retailer can hold that retailer legally liable for violations of the norms incorporated in the code.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1080-0727</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-0367</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2979/indjglolegstu.24.1.0099</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bloomington: Indiana University Press</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Conflict of laws ; Consumers ; Contract law ; Contracts ; Contracts (International law) ; Corporate regulation ; Corporate social responsibility ; Criminal law ; Ethical aspects ; Ethical codes ; Ethics ; Evaluation ; Human rights ; International law ; Law ; Law enforcement ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Legal arguments ; Legal studies ; Legal system ; Legal systems ; Plaintiffs ; Power ; Principles ; Privacy rights ; Scholarship ; Social norms ; Social responsibility ; Supply chain management ; Tort ; Typology ; Uniform Commercial Code-US ; Violations</subject><ispartof>Indiana journal of global legal studies, 2017-01, Vol.24 (1), p.99-113</ispartof><rights>Indiana University Maurer School of Law</rights><rights>Copyright © Indiana University School of Law.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Indiana University Press</rights><rights>Copyright Indiana University Press Winter 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-9fa46a403b16c13d15d7fe831dc84c1cc36ba1710fdbef4e558818a5059e762f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,12824,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smits, Jan M</creatorcontrib><title>Enforcing Corporate Social Responsibility Codes Under Private Law: On the Disciplining Power of Legal Doctrine</title><title>Indiana journal of global legal studies</title><description>A central question in the debate on corporate social responsibility is to what extent CSR codes can be enforced among private parties. This contribution argues that this question is best answered by reference to the applicable doctrinal legal system. Such a doctrinal approach has recently regained importance in American scholarship, while it is still the prevailing method of legal analysis in Europe. Applying a doctrinal analysis of CSR codes allows for the possibility of private law enforcement, that is, enforcement by means of contract or tort, dependent on three different elements: the exact type of claim that is brought, the evolving societal standards about the binding nature of CSR codes, and the normative complexity of the doctrinal system itself. This approach allows for a typology of cases in which the enforceability of CSR codes can be disputed. It is subsequently argued that societal standards have not yet reached the stage where the average consumer who buys a product from a retailer can hold that retailer legally liable for violations of the norms incorporated in the code.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Conflict of laws</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Contract law</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Contracts (International law)</subject><subject>Corporate regulation</subject><subject>Corporate social responsibility</subject><subject>Criminal law</subject><subject>Ethical aspects</subject><subject>Ethical codes</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Law enforcement</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Legal arguments</subject><subject>Legal studies</subject><subject>Legal system</subject><subject>Legal systems</subject><subject>Plaintiffs</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Principles</subject><subject>Privacy rights</subject><subject>Scholarship</subject><subject>Social norms</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Supply chain management</subject><subject>Tort</subject><subject>Typology</subject><subject>Uniform Commercial Code-US</subject><subject>Violations</subject><issn>1080-0727</issn><issn>1543-0367</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtP3TAQhSNUJCj0N9RSt82tHb-S7tCFPqQrgUpZW47jBEe5dupxQPz7OqLqhR0b29J8c-aMT1F8JHhTNbL54nw3DlOY7ABp2VRsQzYYN81RcUo4oyWmQr7Lb1zjEstKnhTvAUacEULYaeGvfB-icX5A2xDnEHWy6DYYpyf0y8IcPLjWTS495XpnAd35zkZ0E93DSu7041d07VG6t-jSgXHz5PwqdhMeMxZ6tLNDlroMJkXn7Xlx3OsJ7Id_91lx9-3q9_ZHubv-_nN7sSsN5TyVTa-Z0AzTlghDaEd4J3tbU9KZmhliDBWtJpLgvmttzyzndU1qzTFvrBRVT8-KT8-6cwx_FgtJjWGJPo9UpKEVFhjX9YHKFq1y-SdS1Gaf91AXoqoEx0zKTH1-QbUL5D0gH-CG-wSDXgBe4_IZNzEARNurObq9jk-KYLUmpl4lpiqmiFoTy53sv-nRmrRfwB58C15XolG3a6prqOv6GDN2aBshhfjmaX8BlwCv1w</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Smits, Jan M</creator><general>Indiana University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>ILT</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Enforcing Corporate Social Responsibility Codes Under Private Law: On the Disciplining Power of Legal Doctrine</title><author>Smits, Jan M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-9fa46a403b16c13d15d7fe831dc84c1cc36ba1710fdbef4e558818a5059e762f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Conflict of laws</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Contract law</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Contracts (International law)</topic><topic>Corporate regulation</topic><topic>Corporate social responsibility</topic><topic>Criminal law</topic><topic>Ethical aspects</topic><topic>Ethical codes</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Law enforcement</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Legal arguments</topic><topic>Legal studies</topic><topic>Legal system</topic><topic>Legal systems</topic><topic>Plaintiffs</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Principles</topic><topic>Privacy rights</topic><topic>Scholarship</topic><topic>Social norms</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Supply chain management</topic><topic>Tort</topic><topic>Typology</topic><topic>Uniform Commercial Code-US</topic><topic>Violations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smits, Jan M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Indiana journal of global legal studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smits, Jan M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enforcing Corporate Social Responsibility Codes Under Private Law: On the Disciplining Power of Legal Doctrine</atitle><jtitle>Indiana journal of global legal studies</jtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>99</spage><epage>113</epage><pages>99-113</pages><issn>1080-0727</issn><eissn>1543-0367</eissn><abstract>A central question in the debate on corporate social responsibility is to what extent CSR codes can be enforced among private parties. This contribution argues that this question is best answered by reference to the applicable doctrinal legal system. Such a doctrinal approach has recently regained importance in American scholarship, while it is still the prevailing method of legal analysis in Europe. Applying a doctrinal analysis of CSR codes allows for the possibility of private law enforcement, that is, enforcement by means of contract or tort, dependent on three different elements: the exact type of claim that is brought, the evolving societal standards about the binding nature of CSR codes, and the normative complexity of the doctrinal system itself. This approach allows for a typology of cases in which the enforceability of CSR codes can be disputed. It is subsequently argued that societal standards have not yet reached the stage where the average consumer who buys a product from a retailer can hold that retailer legally liable for violations of the norms incorporated in the code.</abstract><cop>Bloomington</cop><pub>Indiana University Press</pub><doi>10.2979/indjglolegstu.24.1.0099</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1080-0727
ispartof Indiana journal of global legal studies, 2017-01, Vol.24 (1), p.99-113
issn 1080-0727
1543-0367
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1932060088
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Analysis
Conflict of laws
Consumers
Contract law
Contracts
Contracts (International law)
Corporate regulation
Corporate social responsibility
Criminal law
Ethical aspects
Ethical codes
Ethics
Evaluation
Human rights
International law
Law
Law enforcement
Laws, regulations and rules
Legal arguments
Legal studies
Legal system
Legal systems
Plaintiffs
Power
Principles
Privacy rights
Scholarship
Social norms
Social responsibility
Supply chain management
Tort
Typology
Uniform Commercial Code-US
Violations
title Enforcing Corporate Social Responsibility Codes Under Private Law: On the Disciplining Power of Legal Doctrine
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T19%3A37%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enforcing%20Corporate%20Social%20Responsibility%20Codes%20Under%20Private%20Law:%20On%20the%20Disciplining%20Power%20of%20Legal%20Doctrine&rft.jtitle=Indiana%20journal%20of%20global%20legal%20studies&rft.au=Smits,%20Jan%20M&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=113&rft.pages=99-113&rft.issn=1080-0727&rft.eissn=1543-0367&rft_id=info:doi/10.2979/indjglolegstu.24.1.0099&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA622650477%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1932060088&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A622650477&rft_jstor_id=10.2979/indjglolegstu.24.1.0099&rfr_iscdi=true