Enforcing Corporate Social Responsibility Codes Under Private Law: On the Disciplining Power of Legal Doctrine
A central question in the debate on corporate social responsibility is to what extent CSR codes can be enforced among private parties. This contribution argues that this question is best answered by reference to the applicable doctrinal legal system. Such a doctrinal approach has recently regained i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Indiana journal of global legal studies 2017-01, Vol.24 (1), p.99-113 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 113 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 99 |
container_title | Indiana journal of global legal studies |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Smits, Jan M |
description | A central question in the debate on corporate social responsibility is to what extent CSR codes can be enforced among private parties. This contribution argues that this question is best answered by reference to the applicable doctrinal legal system. Such a doctrinal approach has recently regained importance in American scholarship, while it is still the prevailing method of legal analysis in Europe. Applying a doctrinal analysis of CSR codes allows for the possibility of private law enforcement, that is, enforcement by means of contract or tort, dependent on three different elements: the exact type of claim that is brought, the evolving societal standards about the binding nature of CSR codes, and the normative complexity of the doctrinal system itself. This approach allows for a typology of cases in which the enforceability of CSR codes can be disputed. It is subsequently argued that societal standards have not yet reached the stage where the average consumer who buys a product from a retailer can hold that retailer legally liable for violations of the norms incorporated in the code. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2979/indjglolegstu.24.1.0099 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1932060088</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A622650477</galeid><jstor_id>10.2979/indjglolegstu.24.1.0099</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A622650477</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-9fa46a403b16c13d15d7fe831dc84c1cc36ba1710fdbef4e558818a5059e762f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtP3TAQhSNUJCj0N9RSt82tHb-S7tCFPqQrgUpZW47jBEe5dupxQPz7OqLqhR0b29J8c-aMT1F8JHhTNbL54nw3DlOY7ABp2VRsQzYYN81RcUo4oyWmQr7Lb1zjEstKnhTvAUacEULYaeGvfB-icX5A2xDnEHWy6DYYpyf0y8IcPLjWTS495XpnAd35zkZ0E93DSu7041d07VG6t-jSgXHz5PwqdhMeMxZ6tLNDlroMJkXn7Xlx3OsJ7Id_91lx9-3q9_ZHubv-_nN7sSsN5TyVTa-Z0AzTlghDaEd4J3tbU9KZmhliDBWtJpLgvmttzyzndU1qzTFvrBRVT8-KT8-6cwx_FgtJjWGJPo9UpKEVFhjX9YHKFq1y-SdS1Gaf91AXoqoEx0zKTH1-QbUL5D0gH-CG-wSDXgBe4_IZNzEARNurObq9jk-KYLUmpl4lpiqmiFoTy53sv-nRmrRfwB58C15XolG3a6prqOv6GDN2aBshhfjmaX8BlwCv1w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1932060088</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enforcing Corporate Social Responsibility Codes Under Private Law: On the Disciplining Power of Legal Doctrine</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Smits, Jan M</creator><creatorcontrib>Smits, Jan M</creatorcontrib><description>A central question in the debate on corporate social responsibility is to what extent CSR codes can be enforced among private parties. This contribution argues that this question is best answered by reference to the applicable doctrinal legal system. Such a doctrinal approach has recently regained importance in American scholarship, while it is still the prevailing method of legal analysis in Europe. Applying a doctrinal analysis of CSR codes allows for the possibility of private law enforcement, that is, enforcement by means of contract or tort, dependent on three different elements: the exact type of claim that is brought, the evolving societal standards about the binding nature of CSR codes, and the normative complexity of the doctrinal system itself. This approach allows for a typology of cases in which the enforceability of CSR codes can be disputed. It is subsequently argued that societal standards have not yet reached the stage where the average consumer who buys a product from a retailer can hold that retailer legally liable for violations of the norms incorporated in the code.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1080-0727</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-0367</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2979/indjglolegstu.24.1.0099</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bloomington: Indiana University Press</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Conflict of laws ; Consumers ; Contract law ; Contracts ; Contracts (International law) ; Corporate regulation ; Corporate social responsibility ; Criminal law ; Ethical aspects ; Ethical codes ; Ethics ; Evaluation ; Human rights ; International law ; Law ; Law enforcement ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Legal arguments ; Legal studies ; Legal system ; Legal systems ; Plaintiffs ; Power ; Principles ; Privacy rights ; Scholarship ; Social norms ; Social responsibility ; Supply chain management ; Tort ; Typology ; Uniform Commercial Code-US ; Violations</subject><ispartof>Indiana journal of global legal studies, 2017-01, Vol.24 (1), p.99-113</ispartof><rights>Indiana University Maurer School of Law</rights><rights>Copyright © Indiana University School of Law.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Indiana University Press</rights><rights>Copyright Indiana University Press Winter 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-9fa46a403b16c13d15d7fe831dc84c1cc36ba1710fdbef4e558818a5059e762f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,12824,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smits, Jan M</creatorcontrib><title>Enforcing Corporate Social Responsibility Codes Under Private Law: On the Disciplining Power of Legal Doctrine</title><title>Indiana journal of global legal studies</title><description>A central question in the debate on corporate social responsibility is to what extent CSR codes can be enforced among private parties. This contribution argues that this question is best answered by reference to the applicable doctrinal legal system. Such a doctrinal approach has recently regained importance in American scholarship, while it is still the prevailing method of legal analysis in Europe. Applying a doctrinal analysis of CSR codes allows for the possibility of private law enforcement, that is, enforcement by means of contract or tort, dependent on three different elements: the exact type of claim that is brought, the evolving societal standards about the binding nature of CSR codes, and the normative complexity of the doctrinal system itself. This approach allows for a typology of cases in which the enforceability of CSR codes can be disputed. It is subsequently argued that societal standards have not yet reached the stage where the average consumer who buys a product from a retailer can hold that retailer legally liable for violations of the norms incorporated in the code.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Conflict of laws</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Contract law</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Contracts (International law)</subject><subject>Corporate regulation</subject><subject>Corporate social responsibility</subject><subject>Criminal law</subject><subject>Ethical aspects</subject><subject>Ethical codes</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Law enforcement</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Legal arguments</subject><subject>Legal studies</subject><subject>Legal system</subject><subject>Legal systems</subject><subject>Plaintiffs</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Principles</subject><subject>Privacy rights</subject><subject>Scholarship</subject><subject>Social norms</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Supply chain management</subject><subject>Tort</subject><subject>Typology</subject><subject>Uniform Commercial Code-US</subject><subject>Violations</subject><issn>1080-0727</issn><issn>1543-0367</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtP3TAQhSNUJCj0N9RSt82tHb-S7tCFPqQrgUpZW47jBEe5dupxQPz7OqLqhR0b29J8c-aMT1F8JHhTNbL54nw3DlOY7ABp2VRsQzYYN81RcUo4oyWmQr7Lb1zjEstKnhTvAUacEULYaeGvfB-icX5A2xDnEHWy6DYYpyf0y8IcPLjWTS495XpnAd35zkZ0E93DSu7041d07VG6t-jSgXHz5PwqdhMeMxZ6tLNDlroMJkXn7Xlx3OsJ7Id_91lx9-3q9_ZHubv-_nN7sSsN5TyVTa-Z0AzTlghDaEd4J3tbU9KZmhliDBWtJpLgvmttzyzndU1qzTFvrBRVT8-KT8-6cwx_FgtJjWGJPo9UpKEVFhjX9YHKFq1y-SdS1Gaf91AXoqoEx0zKTH1-QbUL5D0gH-CG-wSDXgBe4_IZNzEARNurObq9jk-KYLUmpl4lpiqmiFoTy53sv-nRmrRfwB58C15XolG3a6prqOv6GDN2aBshhfjmaX8BlwCv1w</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Smits, Jan M</creator><general>Indiana University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>ILT</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Enforcing Corporate Social Responsibility Codes Under Private Law: On the Disciplining Power of Legal Doctrine</title><author>Smits, Jan M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-9fa46a403b16c13d15d7fe831dc84c1cc36ba1710fdbef4e558818a5059e762f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Conflict of laws</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Contract law</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Contracts (International law)</topic><topic>Corporate regulation</topic><topic>Corporate social responsibility</topic><topic>Criminal law</topic><topic>Ethical aspects</topic><topic>Ethical codes</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Law enforcement</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Legal arguments</topic><topic>Legal studies</topic><topic>Legal system</topic><topic>Legal systems</topic><topic>Plaintiffs</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Principles</topic><topic>Privacy rights</topic><topic>Scholarship</topic><topic>Social norms</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Supply chain management</topic><topic>Tort</topic><topic>Typology</topic><topic>Uniform Commercial Code-US</topic><topic>Violations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smits, Jan M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Indiana journal of global legal studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smits, Jan M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enforcing Corporate Social Responsibility Codes Under Private Law: On the Disciplining Power of Legal Doctrine</atitle><jtitle>Indiana journal of global legal studies</jtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>99</spage><epage>113</epage><pages>99-113</pages><issn>1080-0727</issn><eissn>1543-0367</eissn><abstract>A central question in the debate on corporate social responsibility is to what extent CSR codes can be enforced among private parties. This contribution argues that this question is best answered by reference to the applicable doctrinal legal system. Such a doctrinal approach has recently regained importance in American scholarship, while it is still the prevailing method of legal analysis in Europe. Applying a doctrinal analysis of CSR codes allows for the possibility of private law enforcement, that is, enforcement by means of contract or tort, dependent on three different elements: the exact type of claim that is brought, the evolving societal standards about the binding nature of CSR codes, and the normative complexity of the doctrinal system itself. This approach allows for a typology of cases in which the enforceability of CSR codes can be disputed. It is subsequently argued that societal standards have not yet reached the stage where the average consumer who buys a product from a retailer can hold that retailer legally liable for violations of the norms incorporated in the code.</abstract><cop>Bloomington</cop><pub>Indiana University Press</pub><doi>10.2979/indjglolegstu.24.1.0099</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1080-0727 |
ispartof | Indiana journal of global legal studies, 2017-01, Vol.24 (1), p.99-113 |
issn | 1080-0727 1543-0367 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1932060088 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Analysis Conflict of laws Consumers Contract law Contracts Contracts (International law) Corporate regulation Corporate social responsibility Criminal law Ethical aspects Ethical codes Ethics Evaluation Human rights International law Law Law enforcement Laws, regulations and rules Legal arguments Legal studies Legal system Legal systems Plaintiffs Power Principles Privacy rights Scholarship Social norms Social responsibility Supply chain management Tort Typology Uniform Commercial Code-US Violations |
title | Enforcing Corporate Social Responsibility Codes Under Private Law: On the Disciplining Power of Legal Doctrine |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T19%3A37%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enforcing%20Corporate%20Social%20Responsibility%20Codes%20Under%20Private%20Law:%20On%20the%20Disciplining%20Power%20of%20Legal%20Doctrine&rft.jtitle=Indiana%20journal%20of%20global%20legal%20studies&rft.au=Smits,%20Jan%20M&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=113&rft.pages=99-113&rft.issn=1080-0727&rft.eissn=1543-0367&rft_id=info:doi/10.2979/indjglolegstu.24.1.0099&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA622650477%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1932060088&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A622650477&rft_jstor_id=10.2979/indjglolegstu.24.1.0099&rfr_iscdi=true |