The role of vegetative barriers such as fascines and dense shrub hedges in catchment management to reduce runoff and erosion effects: Experimental evidence of efficiency, and conditions of use
•Fascines and shrub hedges are vegetative barriers used in north-west France.•Their hydraulic and sedimentation efficiency has been assessed.•Their main benefits are flow slowdown and suspended sediment trapping.•Their most relevant situations at the catchment scale are given.•Combining fascines, he...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecological engineering 2017-06, Vol.103, p.455-469 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 469 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 455 |
container_title | Ecological engineering |
container_volume | 103 |
creator | Richet, Jean-Baptiste Ouvry, J.-F. Saunier, M. |
description | •Fascines and shrub hedges are vegetative barriers used in north-west France.•Their hydraulic and sedimentation efficiency has been assessed.•Their main benefits are flow slowdown and suspended sediment trapping.•Their most relevant situations at the catchment scale are given.•Combining fascines, hedges and grass gives higher efficiency for a longer period.
Despite a smooth landscape and gentle rain, the deep loamy soils of the open-field intensive arable crop-farming area known as the Pays de Caux in north-west France are subject to runoff and erosion every year. These muddy floods are induced by a low infiltration capacity of the soil due to crust sealing, and occur in late autumn and winter, as well as in spring. They turn into safety and environmental issues in many catchments. Thus, in these areas, buffer zones are of particular interest to mitigate runoff, erosion and related pollution on the catchment scale. During the last decade, two kinds of buffer zone have become popular: fascines (also known as brushwood fences) and shrub hedges, which are types of vegetative barriers. Being less space-consuming, they are more easily accepted by farmers than are grassed waterways, but their efficiency needs to be evaluated in that context. To provide such an evaluation, seven fascines and three shrub hedges of different shapes and ages have been tested in situ for hydraulic roughness, sedimentation capacity and infiltration evaluation, using a field runoff simulator. This latter allowed the record of in- and out-flow from a channel placed across the vegetative barrier, while determining topography, waterlines and wetted sections along the channel. The flow rates were generally between 0.5 and 12l/s/m. Sedimentation measurements and observations could be lead as well, using several sediment size distributions. Well-made dense fascines show Manning coefficients n between 0.5 and 1.0s/m1/3, sometimes more. Shrub hedges have n values ranging from 0.4 to 0.8s/m1/3 when the stem density is greater than 50 per linear metre. Sedimentation measures show high efficiency for catching coarser aggregates. Mean infiltration is about 400mm/h for hedges and 35mm/h for dead fascines. These results allow a description of the optimal design of these vegetative barriers, the magnitude of the efficiency that can be expected and the time needed to reach that efficiency. Thus, on the catchment scale, these vegetative barriers are more efficient when placed immediately downstream of |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.08.008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1931706209</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0925857416304918</els_id><sourcerecordid>1931706209</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-f4fa3bb21aa7ddd4692c64007ff25b021b7efe02dcf9fc9798d9957b568370c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9u3CAQxlHVSt2mfYRKSL3WDuC1Mb1UVZT-kSL1kp4RhmHNagNbwKvm7fJonfXmnhPMML8ZvvkI-chZyxkfrvct2HSAuGsFhi0bW8bGV2TDRymaQSnxmmyYEn0z9nL7lrwrZc8Yk6JXG_J0PwPNSNPk6Ql2UE0NJ6CTyTlALrQsdqamUG-KDREKNdFRB7EALXNeJjqD22E6RGpNtfMDxEofTDQ7WK810QxusThlicn7lYecSkiRgvdga_lCb_8dIYczYA4UTgEH2PVLWBFswOjx80raFF2oyJbz61LgPXnjzaHAh-fzivz5fnt_87O5-_3j1823u8Z2cqyN33rTTZPgxkjn3HZQwg5b3IL3op-Y4JMED0w465W3SqrRKdXLqR_GTjLLuivy6dL3mNPfBUrV-7TkiCM1Vx2XbBBMYVV_qbKosGTw-oiyTH7UnOmzWXqvn83SZ7M0GzWahdzXCwco4YSL12VVDS5k3JB2KbzQ4T-3pKTj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1931706209</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The role of vegetative barriers such as fascines and dense shrub hedges in catchment management to reduce runoff and erosion effects: Experimental evidence of efficiency, and conditions of use</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Richet, Jean-Baptiste ; Ouvry, J.-F. ; Saunier, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Richet, Jean-Baptiste ; Ouvry, J.-F. ; Saunier, M.</creatorcontrib><description>•Fascines and shrub hedges are vegetative barriers used in north-west France.•Their hydraulic and sedimentation efficiency has been assessed.•Their main benefits are flow slowdown and suspended sediment trapping.•Their most relevant situations at the catchment scale are given.•Combining fascines, hedges and grass gives higher efficiency for a longer period.
Despite a smooth landscape and gentle rain, the deep loamy soils of the open-field intensive arable crop-farming area known as the Pays de Caux in north-west France are subject to runoff and erosion every year. These muddy floods are induced by a low infiltration capacity of the soil due to crust sealing, and occur in late autumn and winter, as well as in spring. They turn into safety and environmental issues in many catchments. Thus, in these areas, buffer zones are of particular interest to mitigate runoff, erosion and related pollution on the catchment scale. During the last decade, two kinds of buffer zone have become popular: fascines (also known as brushwood fences) and shrub hedges, which are types of vegetative barriers. Being less space-consuming, they are more easily accepted by farmers than are grassed waterways, but their efficiency needs to be evaluated in that context. To provide such an evaluation, seven fascines and three shrub hedges of different shapes and ages have been tested in situ for hydraulic roughness, sedimentation capacity and infiltration evaluation, using a field runoff simulator. This latter allowed the record of in- and out-flow from a channel placed across the vegetative barrier, while determining topography, waterlines and wetted sections along the channel. The flow rates were generally between 0.5 and 12l/s/m. Sedimentation measurements and observations could be lead as well, using several sediment size distributions. Well-made dense fascines show Manning coefficients n between 0.5 and 1.0s/m1/3, sometimes more. Shrub hedges have n values ranging from 0.4 to 0.8s/m1/3 when the stem density is greater than 50 per linear metre. Sedimentation measures show high efficiency for catching coarser aggregates. Mean infiltration is about 400mm/h for hedges and 35mm/h for dead fascines. These results allow a description of the optimal design of these vegetative barriers, the magnitude of the efficiency that can be expected and the time needed to reach that efficiency. Thus, on the catchment scale, these vegetative barriers are more efficient when placed immediately downstream of erosion sources, across channels of concentrated runoff, or immediately upstream of local assets at risk. Combination of several kinds of buffer zone can be used to increase efficiency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-8574</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.08.008</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Age ; Aggregates ; Arable land ; Barriers ; Buffer zones ; Buffers ; Catchment area ; Catchment areas ; Catchment scale ; Catchments ; Coefficients ; Efficiency ; Erosion ; Evaluation ; Experiments ; Farming ; Fascine ; Fences ; Flow rates ; Grassed waterways ; Hydraulic roughness ; Infiltration ; Infiltration capacity ; Landscape ; Lead ; Loam ; Loam soils ; Pollution ; Rain ; Roughness ; Runoff ; Sealing ; Sedimentation ; Shrub hedge ; Simulators ; Soil ; Soil erosion ; Topography ; Topography (geology) ; Vegetative barrier ; Watershed management ; Waterways</subject><ispartof>Ecological engineering, 2017-06, Vol.103, p.455-469</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jun 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-f4fa3bb21aa7ddd4692c64007ff25b021b7efe02dcf9fc9798d9957b568370c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-f4fa3bb21aa7ddd4692c64007ff25b021b7efe02dcf9fc9798d9957b568370c03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.08.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Richet, Jean-Baptiste</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouvry, J.-F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunier, M.</creatorcontrib><title>The role of vegetative barriers such as fascines and dense shrub hedges in catchment management to reduce runoff and erosion effects: Experimental evidence of efficiency, and conditions of use</title><title>Ecological engineering</title><description>•Fascines and shrub hedges are vegetative barriers used in north-west France.•Their hydraulic and sedimentation efficiency has been assessed.•Their main benefits are flow slowdown and suspended sediment trapping.•Their most relevant situations at the catchment scale are given.•Combining fascines, hedges and grass gives higher efficiency for a longer period.
Despite a smooth landscape and gentle rain, the deep loamy soils of the open-field intensive arable crop-farming area known as the Pays de Caux in north-west France are subject to runoff and erosion every year. These muddy floods are induced by a low infiltration capacity of the soil due to crust sealing, and occur in late autumn and winter, as well as in spring. They turn into safety and environmental issues in many catchments. Thus, in these areas, buffer zones are of particular interest to mitigate runoff, erosion and related pollution on the catchment scale. During the last decade, two kinds of buffer zone have become popular: fascines (also known as brushwood fences) and shrub hedges, which are types of vegetative barriers. Being less space-consuming, they are more easily accepted by farmers than are grassed waterways, but their efficiency needs to be evaluated in that context. To provide such an evaluation, seven fascines and three shrub hedges of different shapes and ages have been tested in situ for hydraulic roughness, sedimentation capacity and infiltration evaluation, using a field runoff simulator. This latter allowed the record of in- and out-flow from a channel placed across the vegetative barrier, while determining topography, waterlines and wetted sections along the channel. The flow rates were generally between 0.5 and 12l/s/m. Sedimentation measurements and observations could be lead as well, using several sediment size distributions. Well-made dense fascines show Manning coefficients n between 0.5 and 1.0s/m1/3, sometimes more. Shrub hedges have n values ranging from 0.4 to 0.8s/m1/3 when the stem density is greater than 50 per linear metre. Sedimentation measures show high efficiency for catching coarser aggregates. Mean infiltration is about 400mm/h for hedges and 35mm/h for dead fascines. These results allow a description of the optimal design of these vegetative barriers, the magnitude of the efficiency that can be expected and the time needed to reach that efficiency. Thus, on the catchment scale, these vegetative barriers are more efficient when placed immediately downstream of erosion sources, across channels of concentrated runoff, or immediately upstream of local assets at risk. Combination of several kinds of buffer zone can be used to increase efficiency.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aggregates</subject><subject>Arable land</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Buffer zones</subject><subject>Buffers</subject><subject>Catchment area</subject><subject>Catchment areas</subject><subject>Catchment scale</subject><subject>Catchments</subject><subject>Coefficients</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Erosion</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Fascine</subject><subject>Fences</subject><subject>Flow rates</subject><subject>Grassed waterways</subject><subject>Hydraulic roughness</subject><subject>Infiltration</subject><subject>Infiltration capacity</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Lead</subject><subject>Loam</subject><subject>Loam soils</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Roughness</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Sealing</subject><subject>Sedimentation</subject><subject>Shrub hedge</subject><subject>Simulators</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Topography</subject><subject>Topography (geology)</subject><subject>Vegetative barrier</subject><subject>Watershed management</subject><subject>Waterways</subject><issn>0925-8574</issn><issn>1872-6992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc9u3CAQxlHVSt2mfYRKSL3WDuC1Mb1UVZT-kSL1kp4RhmHNagNbwKvm7fJonfXmnhPMML8ZvvkI-chZyxkfrvct2HSAuGsFhi0bW8bGV2TDRymaQSnxmmyYEn0z9nL7lrwrZc8Yk6JXG_J0PwPNSNPk6Ql2UE0NJ6CTyTlALrQsdqamUG-KDREKNdFRB7EALXNeJjqD22E6RGpNtfMDxEofTDQ7WK810QxusThlicn7lYecSkiRgvdga_lCb_8dIYczYA4UTgEH2PVLWBFswOjx80raFF2oyJbz61LgPXnjzaHAh-fzivz5fnt_87O5-_3j1823u8Z2cqyN33rTTZPgxkjn3HZQwg5b3IL3op-Y4JMED0w465W3SqrRKdXLqR_GTjLLuivy6dL3mNPfBUrV-7TkiCM1Vx2XbBBMYVV_qbKosGTw-oiyTH7UnOmzWXqvn83SZ7M0GzWahdzXCwco4YSL12VVDS5k3JB2KbzQ4T-3pKTj</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Richet, Jean-Baptiste</creator><creator>Ouvry, J.-F.</creator><creator>Saunier, M.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>The role of vegetative barriers such as fascines and dense shrub hedges in catchment management to reduce runoff and erosion effects: Experimental evidence of efficiency, and conditions of use</title><author>Richet, Jean-Baptiste ; Ouvry, J.-F. ; Saunier, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-f4fa3bb21aa7ddd4692c64007ff25b021b7efe02dcf9fc9798d9957b568370c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aggregates</topic><topic>Arable land</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Buffer zones</topic><topic>Buffers</topic><topic>Catchment area</topic><topic>Catchment areas</topic><topic>Catchment scale</topic><topic>Catchments</topic><topic>Coefficients</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Erosion</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Fascine</topic><topic>Fences</topic><topic>Flow rates</topic><topic>Grassed waterways</topic><topic>Hydraulic roughness</topic><topic>Infiltration</topic><topic>Infiltration capacity</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Lead</topic><topic>Loam</topic><topic>Loam soils</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Roughness</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Sealing</topic><topic>Sedimentation</topic><topic>Shrub hedge</topic><topic>Simulators</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Topography</topic><topic>Topography (geology)</topic><topic>Vegetative barrier</topic><topic>Watershed management</topic><topic>Waterways</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Richet, Jean-Baptiste</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouvry, J.-F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunier, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecological engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Richet, Jean-Baptiste</au><au>Ouvry, J.-F.</au><au>Saunier, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The role of vegetative barriers such as fascines and dense shrub hedges in catchment management to reduce runoff and erosion effects: Experimental evidence of efficiency, and conditions of use</atitle><jtitle>Ecological engineering</jtitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>103</volume><spage>455</spage><epage>469</epage><pages>455-469</pages><issn>0925-8574</issn><eissn>1872-6992</eissn><abstract>•Fascines and shrub hedges are vegetative barriers used in north-west France.•Their hydraulic and sedimentation efficiency has been assessed.•Their main benefits are flow slowdown and suspended sediment trapping.•Their most relevant situations at the catchment scale are given.•Combining fascines, hedges and grass gives higher efficiency for a longer period.
Despite a smooth landscape and gentle rain, the deep loamy soils of the open-field intensive arable crop-farming area known as the Pays de Caux in north-west France are subject to runoff and erosion every year. These muddy floods are induced by a low infiltration capacity of the soil due to crust sealing, and occur in late autumn and winter, as well as in spring. They turn into safety and environmental issues in many catchments. Thus, in these areas, buffer zones are of particular interest to mitigate runoff, erosion and related pollution on the catchment scale. During the last decade, two kinds of buffer zone have become popular: fascines (also known as brushwood fences) and shrub hedges, which are types of vegetative barriers. Being less space-consuming, they are more easily accepted by farmers than are grassed waterways, but their efficiency needs to be evaluated in that context. To provide such an evaluation, seven fascines and three shrub hedges of different shapes and ages have been tested in situ for hydraulic roughness, sedimentation capacity and infiltration evaluation, using a field runoff simulator. This latter allowed the record of in- and out-flow from a channel placed across the vegetative barrier, while determining topography, waterlines and wetted sections along the channel. The flow rates were generally between 0.5 and 12l/s/m. Sedimentation measurements and observations could be lead as well, using several sediment size distributions. Well-made dense fascines show Manning coefficients n between 0.5 and 1.0s/m1/3, sometimes more. Shrub hedges have n values ranging from 0.4 to 0.8s/m1/3 when the stem density is greater than 50 per linear metre. Sedimentation measures show high efficiency for catching coarser aggregates. Mean infiltration is about 400mm/h for hedges and 35mm/h for dead fascines. These results allow a description of the optimal design of these vegetative barriers, the magnitude of the efficiency that can be expected and the time needed to reach that efficiency. Thus, on the catchment scale, these vegetative barriers are more efficient when placed immediately downstream of erosion sources, across channels of concentrated runoff, or immediately upstream of local assets at risk. Combination of several kinds of buffer zone can be used to increase efficiency.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.08.008</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0925-8574 |
ispartof | Ecological engineering, 2017-06, Vol.103, p.455-469 |
issn | 0925-8574 1872-6992 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1931706209 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Age Aggregates Arable land Barriers Buffer zones Buffers Catchment area Catchment areas Catchment scale Catchments Coefficients Efficiency Erosion Evaluation Experiments Farming Fascine Fences Flow rates Grassed waterways Hydraulic roughness Infiltration Infiltration capacity Landscape Lead Loam Loam soils Pollution Rain Roughness Runoff Sealing Sedimentation Shrub hedge Simulators Soil Soil erosion Topography Topography (geology) Vegetative barrier Watershed management Waterways |
title | The role of vegetative barriers such as fascines and dense shrub hedges in catchment management to reduce runoff and erosion effects: Experimental evidence of efficiency, and conditions of use |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T15%3A41%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20role%20of%20vegetative%20barriers%20such%20as%20fascines%20and%20dense%20shrub%20hedges%20in%20catchment%20management%20to%20reduce%20runoff%20and%20erosion%20effects:%20Experimental%20evidence%20of%20efficiency,%20and%20conditions%20of%20use&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20engineering&rft.au=Richet,%20Jean-Baptiste&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=103&rft.spage=455&rft.epage=469&rft.pages=455-469&rft.issn=0925-8574&rft.eissn=1872-6992&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.08.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1931706209%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1931706209&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0925857416304918&rfr_iscdi=true |