Seed removal by different functional mammal groups in a protected and grazed landscape of the Monte, Argentina
Mammal species contribute in different ways to seed dispersal effectiveness, acting as endozoochorous dispersers, scatter-hoarders and seed predators. Seed removal by these functional mammal groups could be affected by anthropogenic drivers, such as grazing management, a common practice in drylands....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Seed science research 2017-09, Vol.27 (3), p.174-182 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 182 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 174 |
container_title | Seed science research |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Miguel, Florencia Cona, Mónica I. Campos, Claudia M. |
description | Mammal species contribute in different ways to seed dispersal effectiveness, acting as endozoochorous dispersers, scatter-hoarders and seed predators. Seed removal by these functional mammal groups could be affected by anthropogenic drivers, such as grazing management, a common practice in drylands. We evaluated removal of seeds from a native tree species (Prosopis flexuosa) by terrestrial wildlife mammals with different functional roles, on grazed and ungrazed sites and at different times during the fruiting period of Prosopis. We offered Prosopis fruits, each containing 15 seeds, to animals and used camera traps to identify the species removing them. We obtained the number of seeds removed (1 fruit removed = 15 seeds removed) by each animal species and each functional group. Native and domestic mammals removed 65.4% of the total seeds offered; 69.5% of offered seeds were removed from the grazed area and 61% from the ungrazed site. Considering removal times, 64.25% of offered seeds were removed during the beginning of the fruiting period of Prosopis and 67% towards the end of this period. Small mammals acting either as seed predators (Graomys griseoflavus and Akodon dolores) or scatter-hoarders (Microcavia australis) were the functional mammal groups removing the highest amount of seeds. Seed predators removed more seeds from the ungrazed site, whereas the scatter-hoarder did so at the grazed site. In the ungrazed area, it would be important to ensure habitat heterogeneity in order to improve seed removal by functional groups that disperse seeds, such as endozoochorous dispersers and scatter-hoarders. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0960258517000101 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1931578644</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0960258517000101</cupid><sourcerecordid>1931578644</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-a32af8df51e81f2943f4efa15f54d13bbb739bc6e4e0acae9f1f461aef97faa53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UEtLAzEQDqJgrf4AbwGvriabZB_HUnxBxUP1vMzuztQt3WxNskL99abYgyCevo_5HswMY5dS3Egh89ulKDORmsLIXAgRR0dsInVukjRX5phN9nKy10_Zmffr6CnKVE-YXSK23GE_fMKG1zvedkTo0AZOo21CN9g476HvI6zcMG497ywHvnVDwCbEMNg2KvAV6SZy38AW-UA8vCN_HmzAaz5zq9jYWThnJwQbjxcHnLK3-7vX-WOyeHl4ms8WSaMyERJQKVDRkpFYSEpLrUgjgTRkdCtVXde5KusmQ40CGsCSJOlMAlKZE4BRU3b10xvX_BjRh2o9jC6e4itZKmnyItM6uuSPq3GD9w6p2rquB7erpKj2b63-vDVm1CEDfe26doW_qv9NfQP7r3tY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1931578644</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seed removal by different functional mammal groups in a protected and grazed landscape of the Monte, Argentina</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><creator>Miguel, Florencia ; Cona, Mónica I. ; Campos, Claudia M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Miguel, Florencia ; Cona, Mónica I. ; Campos, Claudia M.</creatorcontrib><description>Mammal species contribute in different ways to seed dispersal effectiveness, acting as endozoochorous dispersers, scatter-hoarders and seed predators. Seed removal by these functional mammal groups could be affected by anthropogenic drivers, such as grazing management, a common practice in drylands. We evaluated removal of seeds from a native tree species (Prosopis flexuosa) by terrestrial wildlife mammals with different functional roles, on grazed and ungrazed sites and at different times during the fruiting period of Prosopis. We offered Prosopis fruits, each containing 15 seeds, to animals and used camera traps to identify the species removing them. We obtained the number of seeds removed (1 fruit removed = 15 seeds removed) by each animal species and each functional group. Native and domestic mammals removed 65.4% of the total seeds offered; 69.5% of offered seeds were removed from the grazed area and 61% from the ungrazed site. Considering removal times, 64.25% of offered seeds were removed during the beginning of the fruiting period of Prosopis and 67% towards the end of this period. Small mammals acting either as seed predators (Graomys griseoflavus and Akodon dolores) or scatter-hoarders (Microcavia australis) were the functional mammal groups removing the highest amount of seeds. Seed predators removed more seeds from the ungrazed site, whereas the scatter-hoarder did so at the grazed site. In the ungrazed area, it would be important to ensure habitat heterogeneity in order to improve seed removal by functional groups that disperse seeds, such as endozoochorous dispersers and scatter-hoarders.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-2585</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-2735</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0960258517000101</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Animal species ; Animals ; Anthropogenic factors ; Arid zones ; Biogeography ; Cattle ; Dispersal ; Dispersion ; Environmental protection ; Fruits ; Functional groups ; Grazing ; Habitats ; Heterogeneity ; Hoarding behavior ; Hypotheses ; Indigenous species ; Mammals ; Pasture management ; Plant species ; Predators ; Prosopis ; Research Papers ; Scattering ; Seed dispersal ; Seeds ; Species ; Wildlife ; Wildlife habitats ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Seed science research, 2017-09, Vol.27 (3), p.174-182</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-a32af8df51e81f2943f4efa15f54d13bbb739bc6e4e0acae9f1f461aef97faa53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-a32af8df51e81f2943f4efa15f54d13bbb739bc6e4e0acae9f1f461aef97faa53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0960258517000101/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miguel, Florencia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cona, Mónica I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos, Claudia M.</creatorcontrib><title>Seed removal by different functional mammal groups in a protected and grazed landscape of the Monte, Argentina</title><title>Seed science research</title><addtitle>Seed Sci. Res</addtitle><description>Mammal species contribute in different ways to seed dispersal effectiveness, acting as endozoochorous dispersers, scatter-hoarders and seed predators. Seed removal by these functional mammal groups could be affected by anthropogenic drivers, such as grazing management, a common practice in drylands. We evaluated removal of seeds from a native tree species (Prosopis flexuosa) by terrestrial wildlife mammals with different functional roles, on grazed and ungrazed sites and at different times during the fruiting period of Prosopis. We offered Prosopis fruits, each containing 15 seeds, to animals and used camera traps to identify the species removing them. We obtained the number of seeds removed (1 fruit removed = 15 seeds removed) by each animal species and each functional group. Native and domestic mammals removed 65.4% of the total seeds offered; 69.5% of offered seeds were removed from the grazed area and 61% from the ungrazed site. Considering removal times, 64.25% of offered seeds were removed during the beginning of the fruiting period of Prosopis and 67% towards the end of this period. Small mammals acting either as seed predators (Graomys griseoflavus and Akodon dolores) or scatter-hoarders (Microcavia australis) were the functional mammal groups removing the highest amount of seeds. Seed predators removed more seeds from the ungrazed site, whereas the scatter-hoarder did so at the grazed site. In the ungrazed area, it would be important to ensure habitat heterogeneity in order to improve seed removal by functional groups that disperse seeds, such as endozoochorous dispersers and scatter-hoarders.</description><subject>Animal species</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Arid zones</subject><subject>Biogeography</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Dispersion</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Functional groups</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Hoarding behavior</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Pasture management</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Prosopis</subject><subject>Research Papers</subject><subject>Scattering</subject><subject>Seed dispersal</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0960-2585</issn><issn>1475-2735</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UEtLAzEQDqJgrf4AbwGvriabZB_HUnxBxUP1vMzuztQt3WxNskL99abYgyCevo_5HswMY5dS3Egh89ulKDORmsLIXAgRR0dsInVukjRX5phN9nKy10_Zmffr6CnKVE-YXSK23GE_fMKG1zvedkTo0AZOo21CN9g476HvI6zcMG497ywHvnVDwCbEMNg2KvAV6SZy38AW-UA8vCN_HmzAaz5zq9jYWThnJwQbjxcHnLK3-7vX-WOyeHl4ms8WSaMyERJQKVDRkpFYSEpLrUgjgTRkdCtVXde5KusmQ40CGsCSJOlMAlKZE4BRU3b10xvX_BjRh2o9jC6e4itZKmnyItM6uuSPq3GD9w6p2rquB7erpKj2b63-vDVm1CEDfe26doW_qv9NfQP7r3tY</recordid><startdate>201709</startdate><enddate>201709</enddate><creator>Miguel, Florencia</creator><creator>Cona, Mónica I.</creator><creator>Campos, Claudia M.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201709</creationdate><title>Seed removal by different functional mammal groups in a protected and grazed landscape of the Monte, Argentina</title><author>Miguel, Florencia ; Cona, Mónica I. ; Campos, Claudia M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-a32af8df51e81f2943f4efa15f54d13bbb739bc6e4e0acae9f1f461aef97faa53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animal species</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Arid zones</topic><topic>Biogeography</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Dispersion</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Functional groups</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Hoarding behavior</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Pasture management</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Prosopis</topic><topic>Research Papers</topic><topic>Scattering</topic><topic>Seed dispersal</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miguel, Florencia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cona, Mónica I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos, Claudia M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Seed science research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miguel, Florencia</au><au>Cona, Mónica I.</au><au>Campos, Claudia M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seed removal by different functional mammal groups in a protected and grazed landscape of the Monte, Argentina</atitle><jtitle>Seed science research</jtitle><addtitle>Seed Sci. Res</addtitle><date>2017-09</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>174</spage><epage>182</epage><pages>174-182</pages><issn>0960-2585</issn><eissn>1475-2735</eissn><abstract>Mammal species contribute in different ways to seed dispersal effectiveness, acting as endozoochorous dispersers, scatter-hoarders and seed predators. Seed removal by these functional mammal groups could be affected by anthropogenic drivers, such as grazing management, a common practice in drylands. We evaluated removal of seeds from a native tree species (Prosopis flexuosa) by terrestrial wildlife mammals with different functional roles, on grazed and ungrazed sites and at different times during the fruiting period of Prosopis. We offered Prosopis fruits, each containing 15 seeds, to animals and used camera traps to identify the species removing them. We obtained the number of seeds removed (1 fruit removed = 15 seeds removed) by each animal species and each functional group. Native and domestic mammals removed 65.4% of the total seeds offered; 69.5% of offered seeds were removed from the grazed area and 61% from the ungrazed site. Considering removal times, 64.25% of offered seeds were removed during the beginning of the fruiting period of Prosopis and 67% towards the end of this period. Small mammals acting either as seed predators (Graomys griseoflavus and Akodon dolores) or scatter-hoarders (Microcavia australis) were the functional mammal groups removing the highest amount of seeds. Seed predators removed more seeds from the ungrazed site, whereas the scatter-hoarder did so at the grazed site. In the ungrazed area, it would be important to ensure habitat heterogeneity in order to improve seed removal by functional groups that disperse seeds, such as endozoochorous dispersers and scatter-hoarders.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0960258517000101</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-2585 |
ispartof | Seed science research, 2017-09, Vol.27 (3), p.174-182 |
issn | 0960-2585 1475-2735 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1931578644 |
source | Cambridge Journals Online |
subjects | Animal species Animals Anthropogenic factors Arid zones Biogeography Cattle Dispersal Dispersion Environmental protection Fruits Functional groups Grazing Habitats Heterogeneity Hoarding behavior Hypotheses Indigenous species Mammals Pasture management Plant species Predators Prosopis Research Papers Scattering Seed dispersal Seeds Species Wildlife Wildlife habitats Wildlife management |
title | Seed removal by different functional mammal groups in a protected and grazed landscape of the Monte, Argentina |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T14%3A50%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seed%20removal%20by%20different%20functional%20mammal%20groups%20in%20a%20protected%20and%20grazed%20landscape%20of%20the%20Monte,%20Argentina&rft.jtitle=Seed%20science%20research&rft.au=Miguel,%20Florencia&rft.date=2017-09&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=174&rft.epage=182&rft.pages=174-182&rft.issn=0960-2585&rft.eissn=1475-2735&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0960258517000101&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1931578644%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1931578644&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0960258517000101&rfr_iscdi=true |