Testing for errors in estimating bird mortality rates at wind farms and power lines

Wind power, as an alternative to fossil fuels, is increasingly common, and is expanding worldwide. Wind farms cause mortality of flying animals through collision with moving rotor blades, and from electrocution on associated power lines. Avian mortality rates have been estimated from birds collected...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bird conservation international 2017-09, Vol.27 (3), p.431-439
Hauptverfasser: FARFÁN, MIGUEL ÁNGEL, DUARTE, JESÚS, FA, JOHN E., REAL, RAIMUNDO, VARGAS, JUAN MARIO
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 439
container_issue 3
container_start_page 431
container_title Bird conservation international
container_volume 27
creator FARFÁN, MIGUEL ÁNGEL
DUARTE, JESÚS
FA, JOHN E.
REAL, RAIMUNDO
VARGAS, JUAN MARIO
description Wind power, as an alternative to fossil fuels, is increasingly common, and is expanding worldwide. Wind farms cause mortality of flying animals through collision with moving rotor blades, and from electrocution on associated power lines. Avian mortality rates have been estimated from birds collected under turbines over varying time intervals. However, without adequate and frequent monitoring, dead birds may be removed by scavengers and thus cause an underestimation of fatalities. In this paper, we tested experimentally for possible errors arising in avian mortality caused by the removal of carcasses by scavengers. At two different wind farms and associated power lines in southern Spain, we placed pigeon and quail carcasses to determine their disappearance rate. All dead pigeons were radio-tagged to estimate distances taken by scavengers. We found significant differences in carcass disappearance rates of pigeons and quails, and between wind farms and power lines but not between habitats. All quails and 45% of pigeon carcasses had disappeared by the third and fourteenth day, respectively. Less than half (40%) of the carcasses were found < 100 m from where they were deposited. While scavenging losses may vary according to the location of the wind farm or power line, here we propose a method to estimate correctly the number of fatalities at any wind farm and power line. Using this method, we can improve our understanding of the real impact of wind structures on adjacent bird communities, and adopt appropriate measures to ensure their conservation.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0959270916000460
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1931255709</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0959270916000460</cupid><sourcerecordid>1931255709</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-ee950861110f2044eaafc4501ba377647633d76e44de05a89da84e28bb62227e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMlqwzAQFaWFpssH9Cbo2e1osWQfS-gGgR6Sno0cj4NCbKUjh5C_r9zkUCg9zfLmzcx7jN0JeBAg7OMcyryUFkphAEAbOGMToa3OUiXO2WSEsxG_ZFcxrlNX5cpM2HyBcfD9ireBOBIFitz3fGx27geoPTW8CzS4jR8OnNyAkbuB733f8NZRl6qUbcMeiW98j_GGXbRuE_H2FK_Z58vzYvqWzT5e36dPs2ypDAwZYplDYYQQ0ErQGp1rlzoHUTtlrdHWKNVYg1o3CLkrysYVGmVR10ZKaVFds_vj3i2Fr116uVqHHfXpZCVKJWSeJ71pShynlhRiJGyrLSVtdKgEVKN31R_vEkedOK6ryTcr_LX6X9Y3U_tv2Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1931255709</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testing for errors in estimating bird mortality rates at wind farms and power lines</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>FARFÁN, MIGUEL ÁNGEL ; DUARTE, JESÚS ; FA, JOHN E. ; REAL, RAIMUNDO ; VARGAS, JUAN MARIO</creator><creatorcontrib>FARFÁN, MIGUEL ÁNGEL ; DUARTE, JESÚS ; FA, JOHN E. ; REAL, RAIMUNDO ; VARGAS, JUAN MARIO</creatorcontrib><description>Wind power, as an alternative to fossil fuels, is increasingly common, and is expanding worldwide. Wind farms cause mortality of flying animals through collision with moving rotor blades, and from electrocution on associated power lines. Avian mortality rates have been estimated from birds collected under turbines over varying time intervals. However, without adequate and frequent monitoring, dead birds may be removed by scavengers and thus cause an underestimation of fatalities. In this paper, we tested experimentally for possible errors arising in avian mortality caused by the removal of carcasses by scavengers. At two different wind farms and associated power lines in southern Spain, we placed pigeon and quail carcasses to determine their disappearance rate. All dead pigeons were radio-tagged to estimate distances taken by scavengers. We found significant differences in carcass disappearance rates of pigeons and quails, and between wind farms and power lines but not between habitats. All quails and 45% of pigeon carcasses had disappeared by the third and fourteenth day, respectively. Less than half (40%) of the carcasses were found &lt; 100 m from where they were deposited. While scavenging losses may vary according to the location of the wind farm or power line, here we propose a method to estimate correctly the number of fatalities at any wind farm and power line. Using this method, we can improve our understanding of the real impact of wind structures on adjacent bird communities, and adopt appropriate measures to ensure their conservation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-2709</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-0001</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0959270916000460</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Bird strike tests ; Birds ; Carcasses ; Collision mortality ; Electrocutions ; Fatalities ; Flight ; Fossil fuels ; Mortality ; Pigeons ; Power lines ; Rotor blades ; Rotor blades (turbomachinery) ; Scavengers ; Scavenging ; Turbines ; Wind farms ; Wind power ; Wind power generation</subject><ispartof>Bird conservation international, 2017-09, Vol.27 (3), p.431-439</ispartof><rights>Copyright © BirdLife International 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-ee950861110f2044eaafc4501ba377647633d76e44de05a89da84e28bb62227e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-ee950861110f2044eaafc4501ba377647633d76e44de05a89da84e28bb62227e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0959270916000460/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>FARFÁN, MIGUEL ÁNGEL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUARTE, JESÚS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FA, JOHN E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>REAL, RAIMUNDO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VARGAS, JUAN MARIO</creatorcontrib><title>Testing for errors in estimating bird mortality rates at wind farms and power lines</title><title>Bird conservation international</title><addtitle>Bird Conservation International</addtitle><description>Wind power, as an alternative to fossil fuels, is increasingly common, and is expanding worldwide. Wind farms cause mortality of flying animals through collision with moving rotor blades, and from electrocution on associated power lines. Avian mortality rates have been estimated from birds collected under turbines over varying time intervals. However, without adequate and frequent monitoring, dead birds may be removed by scavengers and thus cause an underestimation of fatalities. In this paper, we tested experimentally for possible errors arising in avian mortality caused by the removal of carcasses by scavengers. At two different wind farms and associated power lines in southern Spain, we placed pigeon and quail carcasses to determine their disappearance rate. All dead pigeons were radio-tagged to estimate distances taken by scavengers. We found significant differences in carcass disappearance rates of pigeons and quails, and between wind farms and power lines but not between habitats. All quails and 45% of pigeon carcasses had disappeared by the third and fourteenth day, respectively. Less than half (40%) of the carcasses were found &lt; 100 m from where they were deposited. While scavenging losses may vary according to the location of the wind farm or power line, here we propose a method to estimate correctly the number of fatalities at any wind farm and power line. Using this method, we can improve our understanding of the real impact of wind structures on adjacent bird communities, and adopt appropriate measures to ensure their conservation.</description><subject>Bird strike tests</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Carcasses</subject><subject>Collision mortality</subject><subject>Electrocutions</subject><subject>Fatalities</subject><subject>Flight</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Pigeons</subject><subject>Power lines</subject><subject>Rotor blades</subject><subject>Rotor blades (turbomachinery)</subject><subject>Scavengers</subject><subject>Scavenging</subject><subject>Turbines</subject><subject>Wind farms</subject><subject>Wind power</subject><subject>Wind power generation</subject><issn>0959-2709</issn><issn>1474-0001</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMlqwzAQFaWFpssH9Cbo2e1osWQfS-gGgR6Sno0cj4NCbKUjh5C_r9zkUCg9zfLmzcx7jN0JeBAg7OMcyryUFkphAEAbOGMToa3OUiXO2WSEsxG_ZFcxrlNX5cpM2HyBcfD9ireBOBIFitz3fGx27geoPTW8CzS4jR8OnNyAkbuB733f8NZRl6qUbcMeiW98j_GGXbRuE_H2FK_Z58vzYvqWzT5e36dPs2ypDAwZYplDYYQQ0ErQGp1rlzoHUTtlrdHWKNVYg1o3CLkrysYVGmVR10ZKaVFds_vj3i2Fr116uVqHHfXpZCVKJWSeJ71pShynlhRiJGyrLSVtdKgEVKN31R_vEkedOK6ryTcr_LX6X9Y3U_tv2Q</recordid><startdate>201709</startdate><enddate>201709</enddate><creator>FARFÁN, MIGUEL ÁNGEL</creator><creator>DUARTE, JESÚS</creator><creator>FA, JOHN E.</creator><creator>REAL, RAIMUNDO</creator><creator>VARGAS, JUAN MARIO</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201709</creationdate><title>Testing for errors in estimating bird mortality rates at wind farms and power lines</title><author>FARFÁN, MIGUEL ÁNGEL ; DUARTE, JESÚS ; FA, JOHN E. ; REAL, RAIMUNDO ; VARGAS, JUAN MARIO</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-ee950861110f2044eaafc4501ba377647633d76e44de05a89da84e28bb62227e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Bird strike tests</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Carcasses</topic><topic>Collision mortality</topic><topic>Electrocutions</topic><topic>Fatalities</topic><topic>Flight</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Pigeons</topic><topic>Power lines</topic><topic>Rotor blades</topic><topic>Rotor blades (turbomachinery)</topic><topic>Scavengers</topic><topic>Scavenging</topic><topic>Turbines</topic><topic>Wind farms</topic><topic>Wind power</topic><topic>Wind power generation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FARFÁN, MIGUEL ÁNGEL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUARTE, JESÚS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FA, JOHN E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>REAL, RAIMUNDO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VARGAS, JUAN MARIO</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Bird conservation international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FARFÁN, MIGUEL ÁNGEL</au><au>DUARTE, JESÚS</au><au>FA, JOHN E.</au><au>REAL, RAIMUNDO</au><au>VARGAS, JUAN MARIO</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Testing for errors in estimating bird mortality rates at wind farms and power lines</atitle><jtitle>Bird conservation international</jtitle><addtitle>Bird Conservation International</addtitle><date>2017-09</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>431</spage><epage>439</epage><pages>431-439</pages><issn>0959-2709</issn><eissn>1474-0001</eissn><abstract>Wind power, as an alternative to fossil fuels, is increasingly common, and is expanding worldwide. Wind farms cause mortality of flying animals through collision with moving rotor blades, and from electrocution on associated power lines. Avian mortality rates have been estimated from birds collected under turbines over varying time intervals. However, without adequate and frequent monitoring, dead birds may be removed by scavengers and thus cause an underestimation of fatalities. In this paper, we tested experimentally for possible errors arising in avian mortality caused by the removal of carcasses by scavengers. At two different wind farms and associated power lines in southern Spain, we placed pigeon and quail carcasses to determine their disappearance rate. All dead pigeons were radio-tagged to estimate distances taken by scavengers. We found significant differences in carcass disappearance rates of pigeons and quails, and between wind farms and power lines but not between habitats. All quails and 45% of pigeon carcasses had disappeared by the third and fourteenth day, respectively. Less than half (40%) of the carcasses were found &lt; 100 m from where they were deposited. While scavenging losses may vary according to the location of the wind farm or power line, here we propose a method to estimate correctly the number of fatalities at any wind farm and power line. Using this method, we can improve our understanding of the real impact of wind structures on adjacent bird communities, and adopt appropriate measures to ensure their conservation.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0959270916000460</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-2709
ispartof Bird conservation international, 2017-09, Vol.27 (3), p.431-439
issn 0959-2709
1474-0001
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1931255709
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Bird strike tests
Birds
Carcasses
Collision mortality
Electrocutions
Fatalities
Flight
Fossil fuels
Mortality
Pigeons
Power lines
Rotor blades
Rotor blades (turbomachinery)
Scavengers
Scavenging
Turbines
Wind farms
Wind power
Wind power generation
title Testing for errors in estimating bird mortality rates at wind farms and power lines
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T17%3A48%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testing%20for%20errors%20in%20estimating%20bird%20mortality%20rates%20at%20wind%20farms%20and%20power%20lines&rft.jtitle=Bird%20conservation%20international&rft.au=FARF%C3%81N,%20MIGUEL%20%C3%81NGEL&rft.date=2017-09&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=431&rft.epage=439&rft.pages=431-439&rft.issn=0959-2709&rft.eissn=1474-0001&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0959270916000460&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1931255709%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1931255709&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0959270916000460&rfr_iscdi=true