Critiquing Critiques: A Genre Analysis of Feedback Across Novice to Expert Design Studios
In the discipline of design, the most common presentation genre is the critique, and the most central aspect of this genre is the feedback. Using a qualitative framework, this article identifies a typology of feedback, compares the frequencies of feedback types between different levels of design stu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of business and technical communication 2008-04, Vol.22 (2), p.135-159 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 159 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 135 |
container_title | Journal of business and technical communication |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Dannels, Deanna P. Martin, Kelly Norris |
description | In the discipline of design, the most common presentation genre is the critique, and the most central aspect of this genre is the feedback. Using a qualitative framework, this article identifies a typology of feedback, compares the frequencies of feedback types between different levels of design studios ranging from novice to expert, and explores what the feedback reflects about the social and educational context of these design studios. Results suggest that the feedback socialized students into egalitarian relationships and autonomous decision-making identities that were perhaps more reflective of academic developmental stages or idealized workplace contexts than of actual professional settings—therefore potentially complicating the preprofessional goals of the critique. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1050651907311923 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1928599653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1050651907311923</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1928599653</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-a3dd702d64e2f606ebe6b0b0d05269d49a38b02d8288c2857e3fe69e0641f4483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1T7tKBDEUDaLgutpZWArW0ZubdymDL1iw0TpkJskyi-6syWzh35ththDB29wD58Uh5IrBLWNa3zGQoCSzoDljFvkRWTApkQqpxXHFlaYTf0rOStlAPaNxQS6b3I_9177frq8PMJZzcpL8R4kXh78k748Pb80zXb0-vTT3K9qhwpF6HoIGDEpETApUbKNqoYUAEpUNwnpu2sobNKZDI3XkKSobQQmWhDB8SW7m3F0ept7RbYZ93tZKVycYaa2SvKpgVnV5KCXH5Ha5__T52zFw03b3d3u10NlS_Dr-Cv1P_wMv6FW7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928599653</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Critiquing Critiques: A Genre Analysis of Feedback Across Novice to Expert Design Studios</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Dannels, Deanna P. ; Martin, Kelly Norris</creator><creatorcontrib>Dannels, Deanna P. ; Martin, Kelly Norris</creatorcontrib><description>In the discipline of design, the most common presentation genre is the critique, and the most central aspect of this genre is the feedback. Using a qualitative framework, this article identifies a typology of feedback, compares the frequencies of feedback types between different levels of design studios ranging from novice to expert, and explores what the feedback reflects about the social and educational context of these design studios. Results suggest that the feedback socialized students into egalitarian relationships and autonomous decision-making identities that were perhaps more reflective of academic developmental stages or idealized workplace contexts than of actual professional settings—therefore potentially complicating the preprofessional goals of the critique.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1050-6519</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4574</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1050651907311923</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Product design</subject><ispartof>Journal of business and technical communication, 2008-04, Vol.22 (2), p.135-159</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Apr 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-a3dd702d64e2f606ebe6b0b0d05269d49a38b02d8288c2857e3fe69e0641f4483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1050651907311923$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1050651907311923$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dannels, Deanna P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Kelly Norris</creatorcontrib><title>Critiquing Critiques: A Genre Analysis of Feedback Across Novice to Expert Design Studios</title><title>Journal of business and technical communication</title><description>In the discipline of design, the most common presentation genre is the critique, and the most central aspect of this genre is the feedback. Using a qualitative framework, this article identifies a typology of feedback, compares the frequencies of feedback types between different levels of design studios ranging from novice to expert, and explores what the feedback reflects about the social and educational context of these design studios. Results suggest that the feedback socialized students into egalitarian relationships and autonomous decision-making identities that were perhaps more reflective of academic developmental stages or idealized workplace contexts than of actual professional settings—therefore potentially complicating the preprofessional goals of the critique.</description><subject>Product design</subject><issn>1050-6519</issn><issn>1552-4574</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1T7tKBDEUDaLgutpZWArW0ZubdymDL1iw0TpkJskyi-6syWzh35ththDB29wD58Uh5IrBLWNa3zGQoCSzoDljFvkRWTApkQqpxXHFlaYTf0rOStlAPaNxQS6b3I_9177frq8PMJZzcpL8R4kXh78k748Pb80zXb0-vTT3K9qhwpF6HoIGDEpETApUbKNqoYUAEpUNwnpu2sobNKZDI3XkKSobQQmWhDB8SW7m3F0ept7RbYZ93tZKVycYaa2SvKpgVnV5KCXH5Ha5__T52zFw03b3d3u10NlS_Dr-Cv1P_wMv6FW7</recordid><startdate>200804</startdate><enddate>200804</enddate><creator>Dannels, Deanna P.</creator><creator>Martin, Kelly Norris</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200804</creationdate><title>Critiquing Critiques</title><author>Dannels, Deanna P. ; Martin, Kelly Norris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-a3dd702d64e2f606ebe6b0b0d05269d49a38b02d8288c2857e3fe69e0641f4483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Product design</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dannels, Deanna P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Kelly Norris</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of business and technical communication</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dannels, Deanna P.</au><au>Martin, Kelly Norris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Critiquing Critiques: A Genre Analysis of Feedback Across Novice to Expert Design Studios</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business and technical communication</jtitle><date>2008-04</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>135</spage><epage>159</epage><pages>135-159</pages><issn>1050-6519</issn><eissn>1552-4574</eissn><abstract>In the discipline of design, the most common presentation genre is the critique, and the most central aspect of this genre is the feedback. Using a qualitative framework, this article identifies a typology of feedback, compares the frequencies of feedback types between different levels of design studios ranging from novice to expert, and explores what the feedback reflects about the social and educational context of these design studios. Results suggest that the feedback socialized students into egalitarian relationships and autonomous decision-making identities that were perhaps more reflective of academic developmental stages or idealized workplace contexts than of actual professional settings—therefore potentially complicating the preprofessional goals of the critique.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1050651907311923</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1050-6519 |
ispartof | Journal of business and technical communication, 2008-04, Vol.22 (2), p.135-159 |
issn | 1050-6519 1552-4574 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1928599653 |
source | Access via SAGE |
subjects | Product design |
title | Critiquing Critiques: A Genre Analysis of Feedback Across Novice to Expert Design Studios |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T23%3A55%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Critiquing%20Critiques:%20A%20Genre%20Analysis%20of%20Feedback%20Across%20Novice%20to%20Expert%20Design%20Studios&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20and%20technical%20communication&rft.au=Dannels,%20Deanna%20P.&rft.date=2008-04&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=159&rft.pages=135-159&rft.issn=1050-6519&rft.eissn=1552-4574&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1050651907311923&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1928599653%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928599653&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1050651907311923&rfr_iscdi=true |