Market expansion, state intervention and wage differentials between economic sectors in urban China: A multilevel analysis

The rising earnings inequality in China has sparked a heated debate on the socioeconomic outcomes of market transformation. While a large body of literature has focussed on the temporal trend of wage inequality during the reform period, much less attention has been devoted to the structural causes o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urban studies (Edinburgh, Scotland) Scotland), 2017-08, Vol.54 (11), p.2631-2651
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Ye, Xu, Wei, Shen, Jianfa, Wang, Guixin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2651
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2631
container_title Urban studies (Edinburgh, Scotland)
container_volume 54
creator Liu, Ye
Xu, Wei
Shen, Jianfa
Wang, Guixin
description The rising earnings inequality in China has sparked a heated debate on the socioeconomic outcomes of market transformation. While a large body of literature has focussed on the temporal trend of wage inequality during the reform period, much less attention has been devoted to the structural causes of regional variations in sectoral wage differentials. Using a micro-data sample from the 2005 one percent population sample survey and multilevel methods, this article examines the geographic variability of wage differentials between economic sectors in urban China, with a particular focus on the combination effects of market expansion and state intervention. The results indicate that sectoral wage differentials vary substantially across regions, and that market expansion interacts with state intervention to reconfigure earnings outcomes. Specifically, prefectures located in the interior region tend to exhibit a large wage premium for the state sectors, while prefectures located in the coastal region tend to display a wage advantage of the foreign-invested sector. The wage gap between the state and non-state sectors is smaller in areas with diversified ownership; openness to foreign investment increases the relative wages of foreign-invested-sector employees; stringent government regulation of industries increases the wage gap between the state monopoly sector and the non-monopoly sector; and strong redistributive power increases the wage premium for the public service sector over other sectors. Our findings suggest the necessity to take into account contextually constituted and locally specific wage-setting mechanisms when studying China’s wage inequality. 中国不断攀升的收入不平等弓丨发了关于市场化转型之社会经济后果的激烈争论。大量研宄文献 注重分析改革开放以来工资不平等的发展趋势,但很少有研究关注行业工资差别的地区差异之 结构性原因。本文利用 2005 年对百分之一人口的抽样调查微观样本,采用多层方法,考察了中国城市中不同经济部门之间 工资差别的地理变化,尤其注重考察市场扩张与政府干预的双重影响。结果表明,不同地区的 行业工资差别有着显著不同,而市场扩张与政府干预联合重塑了收入结果。具体而言,内陆省 份往往表现为国有部门工资溢价高,而沿海省份则往往表现为外商投资的行业部门有工资优势 。在所有权多元化的地区,国有和非国有部门之间的工资差距较小;对外商投资的开放使外商 投资的行业部门员工工资相对较高;政府对行业的严格监管增加了国有垄断行业与非垄断行业 之间的工资差距;强大的再分配权力使公共服务部门的工资溢价高于其他部门。我们的发现表 明,在研宄中国的工资不平等时,有必要考虑由特定语境构成、并具有地方特殊性的工资设定 机制。
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0042098016650421
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1928355373</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26428335</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0042098016650421</sage_id><sourcerecordid>26428335</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-15d141c39adde67c12f0d304d43f32305377e2648804ac77e755af4d501960dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LxDAQxYMouK7evQgBr1YnnSbdHmXxC1a8KHgr2WSqXd10TbKu_vemVEQETzPM_N6b4TF2KOBUiLI8AyhyqCYglJKpFVtsJFBBBgoft9moX2f9fpfthbAAAJVXcsTMrfYvFDl9rLQLbedOeIg6Em9dJP9OLqYZ187yjX4ibtumId9P9Wvgc4obIsfJdK5btoYHMrHzIYn52s-149Pn1ul9ttMknA6-65g9XF7cT6-z2d3VzfR8lhksMWZCWlEIg5W2llRpRN6ARShsgQ3mCBLLknJVTCZQaJP6UkrdFFaCqBRYg2N2PPiufPe2phDrRbf2Lp2sRZVPUCYHTBQMlPFdCJ6aeuXbpfaftYC6j7L-G2WSZIMkpAx-mf7PHw38IqQ4fvzT7-kLlPgFpW18lw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928355373</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Market expansion, state intervention and wage differentials between economic sectors in urban China: A multilevel analysis</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Liu, Ye ; Xu, Wei ; Shen, Jianfa ; Wang, Guixin</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ye ; Xu, Wei ; Shen, Jianfa ; Wang, Guixin</creatorcontrib><description>The rising earnings inequality in China has sparked a heated debate on the socioeconomic outcomes of market transformation. While a large body of literature has focussed on the temporal trend of wage inequality during the reform period, much less attention has been devoted to the structural causes of regional variations in sectoral wage differentials. Using a micro-data sample from the 2005 one percent population sample survey and multilevel methods, this article examines the geographic variability of wage differentials between economic sectors in urban China, with a particular focus on the combination effects of market expansion and state intervention. The results indicate that sectoral wage differentials vary substantially across regions, and that market expansion interacts with state intervention to reconfigure earnings outcomes. Specifically, prefectures located in the interior region tend to exhibit a large wage premium for the state sectors, while prefectures located in the coastal region tend to display a wage advantage of the foreign-invested sector. The wage gap between the state and non-state sectors is smaller in areas with diversified ownership; openness to foreign investment increases the relative wages of foreign-invested-sector employees; stringent government regulation of industries increases the wage gap between the state monopoly sector and the non-monopoly sector; and strong redistributive power increases the wage premium for the public service sector over other sectors. Our findings suggest the necessity to take into account contextually constituted and locally specific wage-setting mechanisms when studying China’s wage inequality. 中国不断攀升的收入不平等弓丨发了关于市场化转型之社会经济后果的激烈争论。大量研宄文献 注重分析改革开放以来工资不平等的发展趋势,但很少有研究关注行业工资差别的地区差异之 结构性原因。本文利用 2005 年对百分之一人口的抽样调查微观样本,采用多层方法,考察了中国城市中不同经济部门之间 工资差别的地理变化,尤其注重考察市场扩张与政府干预的双重影响。结果表明,不同地区的 行业工资差别有着显著不同,而市场扩张与政府干预联合重塑了收入结果。具体而言,内陆省 份往往表现为国有部门工资溢价高,而沿海省份则往往表现为外商投资的行业部门有工资优势 。在所有权多元化的地区,国有和非国有部门之间的工资差距较小;对外商投资的开放使外商 投资的行业部门员工工资相对较高;政府对行业的严格监管增加了国有垄断行业与非垄断行业 之间的工资差距;强大的再分配权力使公共服务部门的工资溢价高于其他部门。我们的发现表 明,在研宄中国的工资不平等时,有必要考虑由特定语境构成、并具有地方特殊性的工资设定 机制。</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-0980</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1360-063X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0042098016650421</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications Ltd</publisher><subject>Business government relations ; Coastal areas ; Coastal zone ; Districts ; Earnings ; Economic analysis ; Economic models ; Economic reform ; Economic sectors ; Economics ; Foreign investment ; Government employees ; Government regulations ; Income ; Income inequality ; Inequality ; International financing ; Markets ; Monopolies ; Multilevel ; Multilevel analysis ; Openness ; Ownership ; Power ; Profits ; Public sector ; Public service ; Reforms ; Regional variations ; Regulation ; Service industries ; Socioeconomic factors ; State intervention ; Transformation ; Transition economies ; Urban areas ; Variability ; Wage determination ; Wage differential ; Wages &amp; salaries</subject><ispartof>Urban studies (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2017-08, Vol.54 (11), p.2631-2651</ispartof><rights>Urban Studies Journal Limited 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-15d141c39adde67c12f0d304d43f32305377e2648804ac77e755af4d501960dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-15d141c39adde67c12f0d304d43f32305377e2648804ac77e755af4d501960dc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26428335$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26428335$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,21819,27866,27924,27925,33774,43621,43622,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Jianfa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Guixin</creatorcontrib><title>Market expansion, state intervention and wage differentials between economic sectors in urban China: A multilevel analysis</title><title>Urban studies (Edinburgh, Scotland)</title><description>The rising earnings inequality in China has sparked a heated debate on the socioeconomic outcomes of market transformation. While a large body of literature has focussed on the temporal trend of wage inequality during the reform period, much less attention has been devoted to the structural causes of regional variations in sectoral wage differentials. Using a micro-data sample from the 2005 one percent population sample survey and multilevel methods, this article examines the geographic variability of wage differentials between economic sectors in urban China, with a particular focus on the combination effects of market expansion and state intervention. The results indicate that sectoral wage differentials vary substantially across regions, and that market expansion interacts with state intervention to reconfigure earnings outcomes. Specifically, prefectures located in the interior region tend to exhibit a large wage premium for the state sectors, while prefectures located in the coastal region tend to display a wage advantage of the foreign-invested sector. The wage gap between the state and non-state sectors is smaller in areas with diversified ownership; openness to foreign investment increases the relative wages of foreign-invested-sector employees; stringent government regulation of industries increases the wage gap between the state monopoly sector and the non-monopoly sector; and strong redistributive power increases the wage premium for the public service sector over other sectors. Our findings suggest the necessity to take into account contextually constituted and locally specific wage-setting mechanisms when studying China’s wage inequality. 中国不断攀升的收入不平等弓丨发了关于市场化转型之社会经济后果的激烈争论。大量研宄文献 注重分析改革开放以来工资不平等的发展趋势,但很少有研究关注行业工资差别的地区差异之 结构性原因。本文利用 2005 年对百分之一人口的抽样调查微观样本,采用多层方法,考察了中国城市中不同经济部门之间 工资差别的地理变化,尤其注重考察市场扩张与政府干预的双重影响。结果表明,不同地区的 行业工资差别有着显著不同,而市场扩张与政府干预联合重塑了收入结果。具体而言,内陆省 份往往表现为国有部门工资溢价高,而沿海省份则往往表现为外商投资的行业部门有工资优势 。在所有权多元化的地区,国有和非国有部门之间的工资差距较小;对外商投资的开放使外商 投资的行业部门员工工资相对较高;政府对行业的严格监管增加了国有垄断行业与非垄断行业 之间的工资差距;强大的再分配权力使公共服务部门的工资溢价高于其他部门。我们的发现表 明,在研宄中国的工资不平等时,有必要考虑由特定语境构成、并具有地方特殊性的工资设定 机制。</description><subject>Business government relations</subject><subject>Coastal areas</subject><subject>Coastal zone</subject><subject>Districts</subject><subject>Earnings</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economic reform</subject><subject>Economic sectors</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Foreign investment</subject><subject>Government employees</subject><subject>Government regulations</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Income inequality</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>International financing</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Monopolies</subject><subject>Multilevel</subject><subject>Multilevel analysis</subject><subject>Openness</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>Public sector</subject><subject>Public service</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Regional variations</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Service industries</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>State intervention</subject><subject>Transformation</subject><subject>Transition economies</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Variability</subject><subject>Wage determination</subject><subject>Wage differential</subject><subject>Wages &amp; salaries</subject><issn>0042-0980</issn><issn>1360-063X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LxDAQxYMouK7evQgBr1YnnSbdHmXxC1a8KHgr2WSqXd10TbKu_vemVEQETzPM_N6b4TF2KOBUiLI8AyhyqCYglJKpFVtsJFBBBgoft9moX2f9fpfthbAAAJVXcsTMrfYvFDl9rLQLbedOeIg6Em9dJP9OLqYZ187yjX4ibtumId9P9Wvgc4obIsfJdK5btoYHMrHzIYn52s-149Pn1ul9ttMknA6-65g9XF7cT6-z2d3VzfR8lhksMWZCWlEIg5W2llRpRN6ARShsgQ3mCBLLknJVTCZQaJP6UkrdFFaCqBRYg2N2PPiufPe2phDrRbf2Lp2sRZVPUCYHTBQMlPFdCJ6aeuXbpfaftYC6j7L-G2WSZIMkpAx-mf7PHw38IqQ4fvzT7-kLlPgFpW18lw</recordid><startdate>20170801</startdate><enddate>20170801</enddate><creator>Liu, Ye</creator><creator>Xu, Wei</creator><creator>Shen, Jianfa</creator><creator>Wang, Guixin</creator><general>SAGE Publications Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170801</creationdate><title>Market expansion, state intervention and wage differentials between economic sectors in urban China</title><author>Liu, Ye ; Xu, Wei ; Shen, Jianfa ; Wang, Guixin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-15d141c39adde67c12f0d304d43f32305377e2648804ac77e755af4d501960dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Business government relations</topic><topic>Coastal areas</topic><topic>Coastal zone</topic><topic>Districts</topic><topic>Earnings</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economic reform</topic><topic>Economic sectors</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Foreign investment</topic><topic>Government employees</topic><topic>Government regulations</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Income inequality</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>International financing</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Monopolies</topic><topic>Multilevel</topic><topic>Multilevel analysis</topic><topic>Openness</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>Public sector</topic><topic>Public service</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Regional variations</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Service industries</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>State intervention</topic><topic>Transformation</topic><topic>Transition economies</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Variability</topic><topic>Wage determination</topic><topic>Wage differential</topic><topic>Wages &amp; salaries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Jianfa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Guixin</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Urban studies (Edinburgh, Scotland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Ye</au><au>Xu, Wei</au><au>Shen, Jianfa</au><au>Wang, Guixin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Market expansion, state intervention and wage differentials between economic sectors in urban China: A multilevel analysis</atitle><jtitle>Urban studies (Edinburgh, Scotland)</jtitle><date>2017-08-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2631</spage><epage>2651</epage><pages>2631-2651</pages><issn>0042-0980</issn><eissn>1360-063X</eissn><abstract>The rising earnings inequality in China has sparked a heated debate on the socioeconomic outcomes of market transformation. While a large body of literature has focussed on the temporal trend of wage inequality during the reform period, much less attention has been devoted to the structural causes of regional variations in sectoral wage differentials. Using a micro-data sample from the 2005 one percent population sample survey and multilevel methods, this article examines the geographic variability of wage differentials between economic sectors in urban China, with a particular focus on the combination effects of market expansion and state intervention. The results indicate that sectoral wage differentials vary substantially across regions, and that market expansion interacts with state intervention to reconfigure earnings outcomes. Specifically, prefectures located in the interior region tend to exhibit a large wage premium for the state sectors, while prefectures located in the coastal region tend to display a wage advantage of the foreign-invested sector. The wage gap between the state and non-state sectors is smaller in areas with diversified ownership; openness to foreign investment increases the relative wages of foreign-invested-sector employees; stringent government regulation of industries increases the wage gap between the state monopoly sector and the non-monopoly sector; and strong redistributive power increases the wage premium for the public service sector over other sectors. Our findings suggest the necessity to take into account contextually constituted and locally specific wage-setting mechanisms when studying China’s wage inequality. 中国不断攀升的收入不平等弓丨发了关于市场化转型之社会经济后果的激烈争论。大量研宄文献 注重分析改革开放以来工资不平等的发展趋势,但很少有研究关注行业工资差别的地区差异之 结构性原因。本文利用 2005 年对百分之一人口的抽样调查微观样本,采用多层方法,考察了中国城市中不同经济部门之间 工资差别的地理变化,尤其注重考察市场扩张与政府干预的双重影响。结果表明,不同地区的 行业工资差别有着显著不同,而市场扩张与政府干预联合重塑了收入结果。具体而言,内陆省 份往往表现为国有部门工资溢价高,而沿海省份则往往表现为外商投资的行业部门有工资优势 。在所有权多元化的地区,国有和非国有部门之间的工资差距较小;对外商投资的开放使外商 投资的行业部门员工工资相对较高;政府对行业的严格监管增加了国有垄断行业与非垄断行业 之间的工资差距;强大的再分配权力使公共服务部门的工资溢价高于其他部门。我们的发现表 明,在研宄中国的工资不平等时,有必要考虑由特定语境构成、并具有地方特殊性的工资设定 机制。</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications Ltd</pub><doi>10.1177/0042098016650421</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0042-0980
ispartof Urban studies (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2017-08, Vol.54 (11), p.2631-2651
issn 0042-0980
1360-063X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1928355373
source Access via SAGE; PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Business government relations
Coastal areas
Coastal zone
Districts
Earnings
Economic analysis
Economic models
Economic reform
Economic sectors
Economics
Foreign investment
Government employees
Government regulations
Income
Income inequality
Inequality
International financing
Markets
Monopolies
Multilevel
Multilevel analysis
Openness
Ownership
Power
Profits
Public sector
Public service
Reforms
Regional variations
Regulation
Service industries
Socioeconomic factors
State intervention
Transformation
Transition economies
Urban areas
Variability
Wage determination
Wage differential
Wages & salaries
title Market expansion, state intervention and wage differentials between economic sectors in urban China: A multilevel analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T03%3A44%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Market%20expansion,%20state%20intervention%20and%20wage%20differentials%20between%20economic%20sectors%20in%20urban%20China:%20A%20multilevel%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Urban%20studies%20(Edinburgh,%20Scotland)&rft.au=Liu,%20Ye&rft.date=2017-08-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2631&rft.epage=2651&rft.pages=2631-2651&rft.issn=0042-0980&rft.eissn=1360-063X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0042098016650421&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26428335%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928355373&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26428335&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0042098016650421&rfr_iscdi=true