Seasonal Analysis of Cloud Objects in the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) Model Using Object-Based Verification
In this study, object-based verification using the method for object-based diagnostic evaluation (MODE) is used to assess the accuracy of cloud-cover forecasts from the experimental High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRRx) model during the warm and cool seasons. This is accomplished by comparing cloud...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied meteorology and climatology 2017-08, Vol.56 (8), p.2317 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 2317 |
container_title | Journal of applied meteorology and climatology |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Griffin, Sarah M Otkin, Jason A Rozoff, Christopher M Sieglaff, Justin M Cronce, Lee M Alexander, Curtis R Jensen, Tara L Wolff, Jamie K |
description | In this study, object-based verification using the method for object-based diagnostic evaluation (MODE) is used to assess the accuracy of cloud-cover forecasts from the experimental High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRRx) model during the warm and cool seasons. This is accomplished by comparing cloud objects identified by MODE in observed and simulated Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite 10.7-μm brightness temperatures for August 2015 and January 2016. The analysis revealed that more cloud objects and a more pronounced diurnal cycle occurred during August, with larger object sizes observed in January because of the prevalence of synoptic-scale cloud features. With the exception of the 0-h analyses, the forecasts contained fewer cloud objects than were observed. HRRRx forecast accuracy is assessed using two methods: traditional verification, which compares the locations of grid points identified as observation and forecast objects, and the MODE composite score, an area-weighted calculation using the object-pair interest values computed by MODE. The 1-h forecasts for both August and January were the most accurate for their respective months. Inspection of the individual MODE attribute interest scores showed that, even though displacement errors between the forecast and observation objects increased between the 0-h analyses and 1-h forecasts, the forecasts were more accurate than the analyses because the sizes of the largest cloud objects more closely matched the observations. The 1-h forecasts from August were found to be more accurate than those during January because the spatial displacement between the cloud objects was smaller and the forecast objects better represented the size of the observation objects. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0004.1"> |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1927604011</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1927604011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_19276040113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjktLxDAUhYMoOD7-gKuLbnSRMbeTmnEjjFUpwiDEx3aI09tpSmjG3nThv7fC4NrNOWfxfXCEOEM1RTT59fNiWcgHiUYqpfQUz-_2xATzfC7nepbt_-1MH4oj5naEtDH5RKRXchw7F2Axxjd7hlhDEeJQwctnS-vE4DtIDUHpN420xDEMyccOrNv6CizVPXEDl6W19gqWsaIA7-y7zc6X946pgg_qfe3X7lc9EQe1C0ynuz4WF0-Pb0Upt338GojTqo1DP_7hFd5m5kZphTj7H_UDBSNRVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1927604011</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seasonal Analysis of Cloud Objects in the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) Model Using Object-Based Verification</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>AMS Journals (Meteorology)</source><creator>Griffin, Sarah M ; Otkin, Jason A ; Rozoff, Christopher M ; Sieglaff, Justin M ; Cronce, Lee M ; Alexander, Curtis R ; Jensen, Tara L ; Wolff, Jamie K</creator><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Sarah M ; Otkin, Jason A ; Rozoff, Christopher M ; Sieglaff, Justin M ; Cronce, Lee M ; Alexander, Curtis R ; Jensen, Tara L ; Wolff, Jamie K</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, object-based verification using the method for object-based diagnostic evaluation (MODE) is used to assess the accuracy of cloud-cover forecasts from the experimental High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRRx) model during the warm and cool seasons. This is accomplished by comparing cloud objects identified by MODE in observed and simulated Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite 10.7-μm brightness temperatures for August 2015 and January 2016. The analysis revealed that more cloud objects and a more pronounced diurnal cycle occurred during August, with larger object sizes observed in January because of the prevalence of synoptic-scale cloud features. With the exception of the 0-h analyses, the forecasts contained fewer cloud objects than were observed. HRRRx forecast accuracy is assessed using two methods: traditional verification, which compares the locations of grid points identified as observation and forecast objects, and the MODE composite score, an area-weighted calculation using the object-pair interest values computed by MODE. The 1-h forecasts for both August and January were the most accurate for their respective months. Inspection of the individual MODE attribute interest scores showed that, even though displacement errors between the forecast and observation objects increased between the 0-h analyses and 1-h forecasts, the forecasts were more accurate than the analyses because the sizes of the largest cloud objects more closely matched the observations. The 1-h forecasts from August were found to be more accurate than those during January because the spatial displacement between the cloud objects was smaller and the forecast objects better represented the size of the observation objects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1558-8424</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-8432</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0004.1"></identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Brightness ; Brightness temperature ; Cloud computing ; Clouds ; Computer simulation ; Diagnostic systems ; Displacement ; Diurnal cycle ; Diurnal variations ; Evaluation ; Forecast accuracy ; GOES satellites ; High resolution ; Identification ; Identification methods ; Inspection ; Mathematical models ; Meteorological satellites ; Rain ; Resolution ; Satellites ; Seasons ; Studies ; Weather forecasting</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied meteorology and climatology, 2017-08, Vol.56 (8), p.2317</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Aug 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Sarah M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otkin, Jason A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozoff, Christopher M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sieglaff, Justin M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cronce, Lee M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Curtis R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Tara L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolff, Jamie K</creatorcontrib><title>Seasonal Analysis of Cloud Objects in the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) Model Using Object-Based Verification</title><title>Journal of applied meteorology and climatology</title><description>In this study, object-based verification using the method for object-based diagnostic evaluation (MODE) is used to assess the accuracy of cloud-cover forecasts from the experimental High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRRx) model during the warm and cool seasons. This is accomplished by comparing cloud objects identified by MODE in observed and simulated Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite 10.7-μm brightness temperatures for August 2015 and January 2016. The analysis revealed that more cloud objects and a more pronounced diurnal cycle occurred during August, with larger object sizes observed in January because of the prevalence of synoptic-scale cloud features. With the exception of the 0-h analyses, the forecasts contained fewer cloud objects than were observed. HRRRx forecast accuracy is assessed using two methods: traditional verification, which compares the locations of grid points identified as observation and forecast objects, and the MODE composite score, an area-weighted calculation using the object-pair interest values computed by MODE. The 1-h forecasts for both August and January were the most accurate for their respective months. Inspection of the individual MODE attribute interest scores showed that, even though displacement errors between the forecast and observation objects increased between the 0-h analyses and 1-h forecasts, the forecasts were more accurate than the analyses because the sizes of the largest cloud objects more closely matched the observations. The 1-h forecasts from August were found to be more accurate than those during January because the spatial displacement between the cloud objects was smaller and the forecast objects better represented the size of the observation objects.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Brightness</subject><subject>Brightness temperature</subject><subject>Cloud computing</subject><subject>Clouds</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Displacement</subject><subject>Diurnal cycle</subject><subject>Diurnal variations</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Forecast accuracy</subject><subject>GOES satellites</subject><subject>High resolution</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Identification methods</subject><subject>Inspection</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Meteorological satellites</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Resolution</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><issn>1558-8424</issn><issn>1558-8432</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjktLxDAUhYMoOD7-gKuLbnSRMbeTmnEjjFUpwiDEx3aI09tpSmjG3nThv7fC4NrNOWfxfXCEOEM1RTT59fNiWcgHiUYqpfQUz-_2xATzfC7nepbt_-1MH4oj5naEtDH5RKRXchw7F2Axxjd7hlhDEeJQwctnS-vE4DtIDUHpN420xDEMyccOrNv6CizVPXEDl6W19gqWsaIA7-y7zc6X946pgg_qfe3X7lc9EQe1C0ynuz4WF0-Pb0Upt338GojTqo1DP_7hFd5m5kZphTj7H_UDBSNRVg</recordid><startdate>20170801</startdate><enddate>20170801</enddate><creator>Griffin, Sarah M</creator><creator>Otkin, Jason A</creator><creator>Rozoff, Christopher M</creator><creator>Sieglaff, Justin M</creator><creator>Cronce, Lee M</creator><creator>Alexander, Curtis R</creator><creator>Jensen, Tara L</creator><creator>Wolff, Jamie K</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170801</creationdate><title>Seasonal Analysis of Cloud Objects in the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) Model Using Object-Based Verification</title><author>Griffin, Sarah M ; Otkin, Jason A ; Rozoff, Christopher M ; Sieglaff, Justin M ; Cronce, Lee M ; Alexander, Curtis R ; Jensen, Tara L ; Wolff, Jamie K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_19276040113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Brightness</topic><topic>Brightness temperature</topic><topic>Cloud computing</topic><topic>Clouds</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Displacement</topic><topic>Diurnal cycle</topic><topic>Diurnal variations</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Forecast accuracy</topic><topic>GOES satellites</topic><topic>High resolution</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Identification methods</topic><topic>Inspection</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Meteorological satellites</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Resolution</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Sarah M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otkin, Jason A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozoff, Christopher M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sieglaff, Justin M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cronce, Lee M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Curtis R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Tara L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolff, Jamie K</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied meteorology and climatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Griffin, Sarah M</au><au>Otkin, Jason A</au><au>Rozoff, Christopher M</au><au>Sieglaff, Justin M</au><au>Cronce, Lee M</au><au>Alexander, Curtis R</au><au>Jensen, Tara L</au><au>Wolff, Jamie K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seasonal Analysis of Cloud Objects in the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) Model Using Object-Based Verification</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied meteorology and climatology</jtitle><date>2017-08-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2317</spage><pages>2317-</pages><issn>1558-8424</issn><eissn>1558-8432</eissn><abstract>In this study, object-based verification using the method for object-based diagnostic evaluation (MODE) is used to assess the accuracy of cloud-cover forecasts from the experimental High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRRx) model during the warm and cool seasons. This is accomplished by comparing cloud objects identified by MODE in observed and simulated Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite 10.7-μm brightness temperatures for August 2015 and January 2016. The analysis revealed that more cloud objects and a more pronounced diurnal cycle occurred during August, with larger object sizes observed in January because of the prevalence of synoptic-scale cloud features. With the exception of the 0-h analyses, the forecasts contained fewer cloud objects than were observed. HRRRx forecast accuracy is assessed using two methods: traditional verification, which compares the locations of grid points identified as observation and forecast objects, and the MODE composite score, an area-weighted calculation using the object-pair interest values computed by MODE. The 1-h forecasts for both August and January were the most accurate for their respective months. Inspection of the individual MODE attribute interest scores showed that, even though displacement errors between the forecast and observation objects increased between the 0-h analyses and 1-h forecasts, the forecasts were more accurate than the analyses because the sizes of the largest cloud objects more closely matched the observations. The 1-h forecasts from August were found to be more accurate than those during January because the spatial displacement between the cloud objects was smaller and the forecast objects better represented the size of the observation objects.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0004.1"></doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1558-8424 |
ispartof | Journal of applied meteorology and climatology, 2017-08, Vol.56 (8), p.2317 |
issn | 1558-8424 1558-8432 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1927604011 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library; AMS Journals (Meteorology) |
subjects | Accuracy Brightness Brightness temperature Cloud computing Clouds Computer simulation Diagnostic systems Displacement Diurnal cycle Diurnal variations Evaluation Forecast accuracy GOES satellites High resolution Identification Identification methods Inspection Mathematical models Meteorological satellites Rain Resolution Satellites Seasons Studies Weather forecasting |
title | Seasonal Analysis of Cloud Objects in the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) Model Using Object-Based Verification |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T18%3A35%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seasonal%20Analysis%20of%20Cloud%20Objects%20in%20the%20High-Resolution%20Rapid%20Refresh%20(HRRR)%20Model%20Using%20Object-Based%20Verification&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20meteorology%20and%20climatology&rft.au=Griffin,%20Sarah%20M&rft.date=2017-08-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2317&rft.pages=2317-&rft.issn=1558-8424&rft.eissn=1558-8432&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0004.1%22%3E&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1927604011%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1927604011&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |