THE COMPETITIVE EFFECTS OF LOYALTY DISCOUNTS IN A MODEL OF COMPETITION IMPLIED BY THE DISCOUNT ATTRIBUTION TEST
The cost to the buyer of accepting either seller's offer is that it loses discounts on the other seller's non-contested sales. Because a buyer's lost discounts are larger if it accepts the less preferred seller's loyalty discount offer, this gives the more preferred seller an adv...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Antitrust law journal 2017-06, Vol.81 (2), p.475-506 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 506 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 475 |
container_title | Antitrust law journal |
container_volume | 81 |
creator | Durkin, Sean |
description | The cost to the buyer of accepting either seller's offer is that it loses discounts on the other seller's non-contested sales. Because a buyer's lost discounts are larger if it accepts the less preferred seller's loyalty discount offer, this gives the more preferred seller an advantage over the less preferred seller in competing for contested sales in that it can offer a higher discounted price than its rival and still win the contested sales. [...]although the less preferred seller has an advantage competing for contested sales in a single-price equilibrium, the more preferred seller has an advantage in the loyalty-discount equilibrium. In this case, the less preferred seller offers more of a constraint on the price of the more preferred seller in the single-price equilibrium where it has more of an advantage. [...]while loyalty discounts do not cause the loyalty-discount equilibrium if the less preferred seller loses sales as a result of loyalty discounts Seller B makes sales in the single-price equilibrium as long as P*a > P*b If so, then it loses sales in the loyalty-discount equilibrium if Ca < Cb since the lower production cost seller wins sales in the loyalty-discount equilibrium. According to (6), P*i is an increasing function of Ci, so if P*b < P*a when Cb = Ca, it must also be true if Cb < Ca. For Qc and Qnb, buyers pay P*b in the single-price equilibrium and Pa in the loyalty-discount equilibrium. [...]buyer costs are higher with loyalty discounts in this situation. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1925686185</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A538725123</galeid><jstor_id>26411569</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A538725123</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g277t-8ea7ce84f63364e01f3e93d53feae3b0d4f7a3ce7899a5ff4392df005e16445e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptjdtKw0AQhoMoWA-PICx4a2QP2U1yGdOtDaRNsVuhV2GbzsaUNtFseuHbG88KZWAGZr7vnyNnQBkVbuj73rEzwBgzV2AuTp0zazcYE0woGTiNGksUZ5OZVIlKHiWSo5GM1RxlI5RmyyhVSzRM5nG2mPbLZIoiNMmGMn2__2jZFCWTWZrIIbpbovfEbwVFSj0kd4sPRsm5unBOjN5auPya585iJFU8dtPsPomj1C2p73duANovIPCMYEx4gIlhELI1ZwY0sBVee8bXrAA_CEPNjfFYSNcGYw5EeB4Hdu5cf-Y-t83LHmyXb5p9W_cvcxJSLgJBAv5LlXoLeVWbpmt1satskUecBT7lhLKecg9QJdTQ6m1Tg6n69T_-9gDf1xp2VXFQuPkjrPa2qsH2zVblU2dLvbf2P371iW9s17T5c1vtdPuaU-ERwkXI3gBMLJC6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1925686185</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THE COMPETITIVE EFFECTS OF LOYALTY DISCOUNTS IN A MODEL OF COMPETITION IMPLIED BY THE DISCOUNT ATTRIBUTION TEST</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Durkin, Sean</creator><creatorcontrib>Durkin, Sean</creatorcontrib><description>The cost to the buyer of accepting either seller's offer is that it loses discounts on the other seller's non-contested sales. Because a buyer's lost discounts are larger if it accepts the less preferred seller's loyalty discount offer, this gives the more preferred seller an advantage over the less preferred seller in competing for contested sales in that it can offer a higher discounted price than its rival and still win the contested sales. [...]although the less preferred seller has an advantage competing for contested sales in a single-price equilibrium, the more preferred seller has an advantage in the loyalty-discount equilibrium. In this case, the less preferred seller offers more of a constraint on the price of the more preferred seller in the single-price equilibrium where it has more of an advantage. [...]while loyalty discounts do not cause the loyalty-discount equilibrium if the less preferred seller loses sales as a result of loyalty discounts Seller B makes sales in the single-price equilibrium as long as P*a > P*b If so, then it loses sales in the loyalty-discount equilibrium if Ca < Cb since the lower production cost seller wins sales in the loyalty-discount equilibrium. According to (6), P*i is an increasing function of Ci, so if P*b < P*a when Cb = Ca, it must also be true if Cb < Ca. For Qc and Qnb, buyers pay P*b in the single-price equilibrium and Pa in the loyalty-discount equilibrium. [...]buyer costs are higher with loyalty discounts in this situation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-6056</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2326-9774</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: American Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law</publisher><subject>Antitrust laws ; Competition ; Costs ; Discounts ; Equilibrium ; Foreclosure ; Influence ; Loyalty programs (Marketing) ; Methods ; Price fixing ; Production costs ; Profits ; Purchasing ; SYMPOSIUM: CONDITIONAL PRICING PRACTICES ; Tax increases</subject><ispartof>Antitrust law journal, 2017-06, Vol.81 (2), p.475-506</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2017 American Bar Association</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 American Bar Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Bar Association 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26411569$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26411569$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Durkin, Sean</creatorcontrib><title>THE COMPETITIVE EFFECTS OF LOYALTY DISCOUNTS IN A MODEL OF COMPETITION IMPLIED BY THE DISCOUNT ATTRIBUTION TEST</title><title>Antitrust law journal</title><description>The cost to the buyer of accepting either seller's offer is that it loses discounts on the other seller's non-contested sales. Because a buyer's lost discounts are larger if it accepts the less preferred seller's loyalty discount offer, this gives the more preferred seller an advantage over the less preferred seller in competing for contested sales in that it can offer a higher discounted price than its rival and still win the contested sales. [...]although the less preferred seller has an advantage competing for contested sales in a single-price equilibrium, the more preferred seller has an advantage in the loyalty-discount equilibrium. In this case, the less preferred seller offers more of a constraint on the price of the more preferred seller in the single-price equilibrium where it has more of an advantage. [...]while loyalty discounts do not cause the loyalty-discount equilibrium if the less preferred seller loses sales as a result of loyalty discounts Seller B makes sales in the single-price equilibrium as long as P*a > P*b If so, then it loses sales in the loyalty-discount equilibrium if Ca < Cb since the lower production cost seller wins sales in the loyalty-discount equilibrium. According to (6), P*i is an increasing function of Ci, so if P*b < P*a when Cb = Ca, it must also be true if Cb < Ca. For Qc and Qnb, buyers pay P*b in the single-price equilibrium and Pa in the loyalty-discount equilibrium. [...]buyer costs are higher with loyalty discounts in this situation.</description><subject>Antitrust laws</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Discounts</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Foreclosure</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Loyalty programs (Marketing)</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Price fixing</subject><subject>Production costs</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>Purchasing</subject><subject>SYMPOSIUM: CONDITIONAL PRICING PRACTICES</subject><subject>Tax increases</subject><issn>0003-6056</issn><issn>2326-9774</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptjdtKw0AQhoMoWA-PICx4a2QP2U1yGdOtDaRNsVuhV2GbzsaUNtFseuHbG88KZWAGZr7vnyNnQBkVbuj73rEzwBgzV2AuTp0zazcYE0woGTiNGksUZ5OZVIlKHiWSo5GM1RxlI5RmyyhVSzRM5nG2mPbLZIoiNMmGMn2__2jZFCWTWZrIIbpbovfEbwVFSj0kd4sPRsm5unBOjN5auPya585iJFU8dtPsPomj1C2p73duANovIPCMYEx4gIlhELI1ZwY0sBVee8bXrAA_CEPNjfFYSNcGYw5EeB4Hdu5cf-Y-t83LHmyXb5p9W_cvcxJSLgJBAv5LlXoLeVWbpmt1satskUecBT7lhLKecg9QJdTQ6m1Tg6n69T_-9gDf1xp2VXFQuPkjrPa2qsH2zVblU2dLvbf2P371iW9s17T5c1vtdPuaU-ERwkXI3gBMLJC6</recordid><startdate>20170622</startdate><enddate>20170622</enddate><creator>Durkin, Sean</creator><general>American Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law</general><general>American Bar Association</general><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>ILT</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170622</creationdate><title>THE COMPETITIVE EFFECTS OF LOYALTY DISCOUNTS IN A MODEL OF COMPETITION IMPLIED BY THE DISCOUNT ATTRIBUTION TEST</title><author>Durkin, Sean</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g277t-8ea7ce84f63364e01f3e93d53feae3b0d4f7a3ce7899a5ff4392df005e16445e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Antitrust laws</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Discounts</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Foreclosure</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Loyalty programs (Marketing)</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Price fixing</topic><topic>Production costs</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>Purchasing</topic><topic>SYMPOSIUM: CONDITIONAL PRICING PRACTICES</topic><topic>Tax increases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Durkin, Sean</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Antitrust law journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Durkin, Sean</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THE COMPETITIVE EFFECTS OF LOYALTY DISCOUNTS IN A MODEL OF COMPETITION IMPLIED BY THE DISCOUNT ATTRIBUTION TEST</atitle><jtitle>Antitrust law journal</jtitle><date>2017-06-22</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>475</spage><epage>506</epage><pages>475-506</pages><issn>0003-6056</issn><eissn>2326-9774</eissn><abstract>The cost to the buyer of accepting either seller's offer is that it loses discounts on the other seller's non-contested sales. Because a buyer's lost discounts are larger if it accepts the less preferred seller's loyalty discount offer, this gives the more preferred seller an advantage over the less preferred seller in competing for contested sales in that it can offer a higher discounted price than its rival and still win the contested sales. [...]although the less preferred seller has an advantage competing for contested sales in a single-price equilibrium, the more preferred seller has an advantage in the loyalty-discount equilibrium. In this case, the less preferred seller offers more of a constraint on the price of the more preferred seller in the single-price equilibrium where it has more of an advantage. [...]while loyalty discounts do not cause the loyalty-discount equilibrium if the less preferred seller loses sales as a result of loyalty discounts Seller B makes sales in the single-price equilibrium as long as P*a > P*b If so, then it loses sales in the loyalty-discount equilibrium if Ca < Cb since the lower production cost seller wins sales in the loyalty-discount equilibrium. According to (6), P*i is an increasing function of Ci, so if P*b < P*a when Cb = Ca, it must also be true if Cb < Ca. For Qc and Qnb, buyers pay P*b in the single-price equilibrium and Pa in the loyalty-discount equilibrium. [...]buyer costs are higher with loyalty discounts in this situation.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>American Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law</pub><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-6056 |
ispartof | Antitrust law journal, 2017-06, Vol.81 (2), p.475-506 |
issn | 0003-6056 2326-9774 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1925686185 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Antitrust laws Competition Costs Discounts Equilibrium Foreclosure Influence Loyalty programs (Marketing) Methods Price fixing Production costs Profits Purchasing SYMPOSIUM: CONDITIONAL PRICING PRACTICES Tax increases |
title | THE COMPETITIVE EFFECTS OF LOYALTY DISCOUNTS IN A MODEL OF COMPETITION IMPLIED BY THE DISCOUNT ATTRIBUTION TEST |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T06%3A35%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20COMPETITIVE%20EFFECTS%20OF%20LOYALTY%20DISCOUNTS%20IN%20A%20MODEL%20OF%20COMPETITION%20IMPLIED%20BY%20THE%20DISCOUNT%20ATTRIBUTION%20TEST&rft.jtitle=Antitrust%20law%20journal&rft.au=Durkin,%20Sean&rft.date=2017-06-22&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=475&rft.epage=506&rft.pages=475-506&rft.issn=0003-6056&rft.eissn=2326-9774&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA538725123%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1925686185&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A538725123&rft_jstor_id=26411569&rfr_iscdi=true |