Particle‐size evidence of barrier estuary regime as a new proxy for ENSO climate variability

We investigate a new proxy for ENSO climate variability based on particle‐size data from long‐term, coastal sediment records preserved in a barrier estuary setting. Corresponding ~4–8 year periodicities identified from Wavelet analysis of particle‐size data from Pescadero Marsh in Central Coast Cali...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Earth surface processes and landforms 2017-08, Vol.42 (10), p.1520-1534
Hauptverfasser: Clarke, David W., Boyle, John F., Plater, Andrew J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1534
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1520
container_title Earth surface processes and landforms
container_volume 42
creator Clarke, David W.
Boyle, John F.
Plater, Andrew J.
description We investigate a new proxy for ENSO climate variability based on particle‐size data from long‐term, coastal sediment records preserved in a barrier estuary setting. Corresponding ~4–8 year periodicities identified from Wavelet analysis of particle‐size data from Pescadero Marsh in Central Coast California and rainfall data from San Francisco reflect established ENSO periodicity, as further evidenced in the Multivariate ENSO Index (MEI), and thus confirms an important ENSO control on both precipitation and barrier regime variability. Despite the fact that barrier estuary mean particle size is influenced by coastal erosion, precipitation and streamflow, balanced against barrier morphology and volume, it is encouraging that considerable correspondence can also be observed in the time series of MEI, regional rainfall and site‐based mean particle size over the period 1871–2008. This correspondence is, however, weakened after c.1970 by temporal variation in sedimentation rate and event‐based deposition. These confounding effects are more likely when: (i) accommodation space may be a limiting factor; and (ii) particularly strong El Niños, e.g. 1982/1983 and 1997/1998, deposit discrete >cm‐thick units during winter storms. The efficacy of the sediment record of climate variability appears not to be compromised by location within the back‐barrier setting, but it is limited to those El Niños that lead to barrier breakdown. For wider application of this particle size index of ENSO variability, it is important to establish a well‐resolved chronology and to sample the record at the appropriate interval to characterize deposition at a sub‐annual scale. Further, the sample site must be selected to limit the influence of decreasing accommodation space through time (infilling) and event‐based deposition. It is concluded that particle‐size data from back‐barrier sediment records have proven potential for preserving evidence of sub‐decadal climate variability, allowing researchers to explore temporal and spatial patterns in phenomena such as ENSO. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/esp.4106
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1925514728</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1925514728</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3166-1663c63a9857cf989832eb80cafc5c4f9d130f8385f78e15240adad7d63c8dee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMoWKvgIwTcuJmaTOaSLKXUCxRbqG4Np5kTSZl2ajK1jisfwWf0SUytWxeHs_n-cz5-Qs45G3DG0isM60HGWXFAepypIlFSlIekx7gqEyVEeUxOQlgwxnkmVY88T8G3ztT4_fkV3AdSfHMVrgzSxtI5eO_QUwztBnxHPb64JVIIFOgKt3Ttm_eO2sbT0cNsQk3tltAifQPvYO5q13an5MhCHfDsb_fJ083ocXiXjCe398PrcQKCF0USR5hCgJJ5aaySUTrFuWQGrMlNZlXFBbNSyNyWEnmeZgwqqMoqxmSFKPrkYn83Kr1uoq9eNBu_ii81V2me86xMZaQu95TxTQgerV77qOw7zZnetadje3rXXkSTPbp1NXb_cno0m_7yP-9Mccc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1925514728</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Particle‐size evidence of barrier estuary regime as a new proxy for ENSO climate variability</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Clarke, David W. ; Boyle, John F. ; Plater, Andrew J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Clarke, David W. ; Boyle, John F. ; Plater, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><description>We investigate a new proxy for ENSO climate variability based on particle‐size data from long‐term, coastal sediment records preserved in a barrier estuary setting. Corresponding ~4–8 year periodicities identified from Wavelet analysis of particle‐size data from Pescadero Marsh in Central Coast California and rainfall data from San Francisco reflect established ENSO periodicity, as further evidenced in the Multivariate ENSO Index (MEI), and thus confirms an important ENSO control on both precipitation and barrier regime variability. Despite the fact that barrier estuary mean particle size is influenced by coastal erosion, precipitation and streamflow, balanced against barrier morphology and volume, it is encouraging that considerable correspondence can also be observed in the time series of MEI, regional rainfall and site‐based mean particle size over the period 1871–2008. This correspondence is, however, weakened after c.1970 by temporal variation in sedimentation rate and event‐based deposition. These confounding effects are more likely when: (i) accommodation space may be a limiting factor; and (ii) particularly strong El Niños, e.g. 1982/1983 and 1997/1998, deposit discrete &gt;cm‐thick units during winter storms. The efficacy of the sediment record of climate variability appears not to be compromised by location within the back‐barrier setting, but it is limited to those El Niños that lead to barrier breakdown. For wider application of this particle size index of ENSO variability, it is important to establish a well‐resolved chronology and to sample the record at the appropriate interval to characterize deposition at a sub‐annual scale. Further, the sample site must be selected to limit the influence of decreasing accommodation space through time (infilling) and event‐based deposition. It is concluded that particle‐size data from back‐barrier sediment records have proven potential for preserving evidence of sub‐decadal climate variability, allowing researchers to explore temporal and spatial patterns in phenomena such as ENSO. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-9337</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9837</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/esp.4106</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Accommodation ; Atmospheric precipitations ; barrier estuary ; Barriers ; Breakdown ; Central Coast California ; Chronology ; Climate ; Climate variability ; Coastal erosion ; Coastal morphology ; Coastal sediments ; Data processing ; Deposition ; El Nino ; El Nino phenomena ; El Nino-Southern Oscillation event ; ENSO ; Erosion ; Estuaries ; Estuarine dynamics ; Limiting factors ; Marshes ; Particle size ; particle size analysis ; Periodicities ; Periodicity ; Precipitation ; Rain ; Rainfall ; Rainfall data ; Records ; Sediment ; Sedimentation ; Sediments ; Southern Oscillation ; Storms ; Stream discharge ; Stream flow ; Temporal variations ; Variability ; Wavelet analysis ; Winter storms</subject><ispartof>Earth surface processes and landforms, 2017-08, Vol.42 (10), p.1520-1534</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3166-1663c63a9857cf989832eb80cafc5c4f9d130f8385f78e15240adad7d63c8dee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3166-1663c63a9857cf989832eb80cafc5c4f9d130f8385f78e15240adad7d63c8dee3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1595-1875</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fesp.4106$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fesp.4106$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clarke, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, John F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plater, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><title>Particle‐size evidence of barrier estuary regime as a new proxy for ENSO climate variability</title><title>Earth surface processes and landforms</title><description>We investigate a new proxy for ENSO climate variability based on particle‐size data from long‐term, coastal sediment records preserved in a barrier estuary setting. Corresponding ~4–8 year periodicities identified from Wavelet analysis of particle‐size data from Pescadero Marsh in Central Coast California and rainfall data from San Francisco reflect established ENSO periodicity, as further evidenced in the Multivariate ENSO Index (MEI), and thus confirms an important ENSO control on both precipitation and barrier regime variability. Despite the fact that barrier estuary mean particle size is influenced by coastal erosion, precipitation and streamflow, balanced against barrier morphology and volume, it is encouraging that considerable correspondence can also be observed in the time series of MEI, regional rainfall and site‐based mean particle size over the period 1871–2008. This correspondence is, however, weakened after c.1970 by temporal variation in sedimentation rate and event‐based deposition. These confounding effects are more likely when: (i) accommodation space may be a limiting factor; and (ii) particularly strong El Niños, e.g. 1982/1983 and 1997/1998, deposit discrete &gt;cm‐thick units during winter storms. The efficacy of the sediment record of climate variability appears not to be compromised by location within the back‐barrier setting, but it is limited to those El Niños that lead to barrier breakdown. For wider application of this particle size index of ENSO variability, it is important to establish a well‐resolved chronology and to sample the record at the appropriate interval to characterize deposition at a sub‐annual scale. Further, the sample site must be selected to limit the influence of decreasing accommodation space through time (infilling) and event‐based deposition. It is concluded that particle‐size data from back‐barrier sediment records have proven potential for preserving evidence of sub‐decadal climate variability, allowing researchers to explore temporal and spatial patterns in phenomena such as ENSO. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Accommodation</subject><subject>Atmospheric precipitations</subject><subject>barrier estuary</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Breakdown</subject><subject>Central Coast California</subject><subject>Chronology</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate variability</subject><subject>Coastal erosion</subject><subject>Coastal morphology</subject><subject>Coastal sediments</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>El Nino</subject><subject>El Nino phenomena</subject><subject>El Nino-Southern Oscillation event</subject><subject>ENSO</subject><subject>Erosion</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Estuarine dynamics</subject><subject>Limiting factors</subject><subject>Marshes</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>particle size analysis</subject><subject>Periodicities</subject><subject>Periodicity</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Rainfall data</subject><subject>Records</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>Sedimentation</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Southern Oscillation</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Stream discharge</subject><subject>Stream flow</subject><subject>Temporal variations</subject><subject>Variability</subject><subject>Wavelet analysis</subject><subject>Winter storms</subject><issn>0197-9337</issn><issn>1096-9837</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMoWKvgIwTcuJmaTOaSLKXUCxRbqG4Np5kTSZl2ajK1jisfwWf0SUytWxeHs_n-cz5-Qs45G3DG0isM60HGWXFAepypIlFSlIekx7gqEyVEeUxOQlgwxnkmVY88T8G3ztT4_fkV3AdSfHMVrgzSxtI5eO_QUwztBnxHPb64JVIIFOgKt3Ttm_eO2sbT0cNsQk3tltAifQPvYO5q13an5MhCHfDsb_fJ083ocXiXjCe398PrcQKCF0USR5hCgJJ5aaySUTrFuWQGrMlNZlXFBbNSyNyWEnmeZgwqqMoqxmSFKPrkYn83Kr1uoq9eNBu_ii81V2me86xMZaQu95TxTQgerV77qOw7zZnetadje3rXXkSTPbp1NXb_cno0m_7yP-9Mccc</recordid><startdate>201708</startdate><enddate>201708</enddate><creator>Clarke, David W.</creator><creator>Boyle, John F.</creator><creator>Plater, Andrew J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1595-1875</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201708</creationdate><title>Particle‐size evidence of barrier estuary regime as a new proxy for ENSO climate variability</title><author>Clarke, David W. ; Boyle, John F. ; Plater, Andrew J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3166-1663c63a9857cf989832eb80cafc5c4f9d130f8385f78e15240adad7d63c8dee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accommodation</topic><topic>Atmospheric precipitations</topic><topic>barrier estuary</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Breakdown</topic><topic>Central Coast California</topic><topic>Chronology</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate variability</topic><topic>Coastal erosion</topic><topic>Coastal morphology</topic><topic>Coastal sediments</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>El Nino</topic><topic>El Nino phenomena</topic><topic>El Nino-Southern Oscillation event</topic><topic>ENSO</topic><topic>Erosion</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Estuarine dynamics</topic><topic>Limiting factors</topic><topic>Marshes</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>particle size analysis</topic><topic>Periodicities</topic><topic>Periodicity</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Rainfall data</topic><topic>Records</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>Sedimentation</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Southern Oscillation</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Stream discharge</topic><topic>Stream flow</topic><topic>Temporal variations</topic><topic>Variability</topic><topic>Wavelet analysis</topic><topic>Winter storms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clarke, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, John F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plater, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Earth surface processes and landforms</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clarke, David W.</au><au>Boyle, John F.</au><au>Plater, Andrew J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Particle‐size evidence of barrier estuary regime as a new proxy for ENSO climate variability</atitle><jtitle>Earth surface processes and landforms</jtitle><date>2017-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1520</spage><epage>1534</epage><pages>1520-1534</pages><issn>0197-9337</issn><eissn>1096-9837</eissn><abstract>We investigate a new proxy for ENSO climate variability based on particle‐size data from long‐term, coastal sediment records preserved in a barrier estuary setting. Corresponding ~4–8 year periodicities identified from Wavelet analysis of particle‐size data from Pescadero Marsh in Central Coast California and rainfall data from San Francisco reflect established ENSO periodicity, as further evidenced in the Multivariate ENSO Index (MEI), and thus confirms an important ENSO control on both precipitation and barrier regime variability. Despite the fact that barrier estuary mean particle size is influenced by coastal erosion, precipitation and streamflow, balanced against barrier morphology and volume, it is encouraging that considerable correspondence can also be observed in the time series of MEI, regional rainfall and site‐based mean particle size over the period 1871–2008. This correspondence is, however, weakened after c.1970 by temporal variation in sedimentation rate and event‐based deposition. These confounding effects are more likely when: (i) accommodation space may be a limiting factor; and (ii) particularly strong El Niños, e.g. 1982/1983 and 1997/1998, deposit discrete &gt;cm‐thick units during winter storms. The efficacy of the sediment record of climate variability appears not to be compromised by location within the back‐barrier setting, but it is limited to those El Niños that lead to barrier breakdown. For wider application of this particle size index of ENSO variability, it is important to establish a well‐resolved chronology and to sample the record at the appropriate interval to characterize deposition at a sub‐annual scale. Further, the sample site must be selected to limit the influence of decreasing accommodation space through time (infilling) and event‐based deposition. It is concluded that particle‐size data from back‐barrier sediment records have proven potential for preserving evidence of sub‐decadal climate variability, allowing researchers to explore temporal and spatial patterns in phenomena such as ENSO. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/esp.4106</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1595-1875</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0197-9337
ispartof Earth surface processes and landforms, 2017-08, Vol.42 (10), p.1520-1534
issn 0197-9337
1096-9837
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1925514728
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Accommodation
Atmospheric precipitations
barrier estuary
Barriers
Breakdown
Central Coast California
Chronology
Climate
Climate variability
Coastal erosion
Coastal morphology
Coastal sediments
Data processing
Deposition
El Nino
El Nino phenomena
El Nino-Southern Oscillation event
ENSO
Erosion
Estuaries
Estuarine dynamics
Limiting factors
Marshes
Particle size
particle size analysis
Periodicities
Periodicity
Precipitation
Rain
Rainfall
Rainfall data
Records
Sediment
Sedimentation
Sediments
Southern Oscillation
Storms
Stream discharge
Stream flow
Temporal variations
Variability
Wavelet analysis
Winter storms
title Particle‐size evidence of barrier estuary regime as a new proxy for ENSO climate variability
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T07%3A30%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Particle%E2%80%90size%20evidence%20of%20barrier%20estuary%20regime%20as%20a%20new%20proxy%20for%20ENSO%20climate%20variability&rft.jtitle=Earth%20surface%20processes%20and%20landforms&rft.au=Clarke,%20David%20W.&rft.date=2017-08&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1520&rft.epage=1534&rft.pages=1520-1534&rft.issn=0197-9337&rft.eissn=1096-9837&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/esp.4106&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1925514728%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1925514728&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true