The cooperation between enterprises: significant part of the innovation process – a case study of the czech machinery industry
In recent years, we have been able to see the growing importance of knowledge in the context of the emerging knowledge-based global economy. It is commonly accepted that (i) innovations are brought forward through an interactive process of knowledge generation, diffusion, and application; (ii) innov...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | E+M ekonomie a management 2016-07, Vol.19 (3), p.110-122 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 122 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 110 |
| container_title | E+M ekonomie a management |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | Stejskal, Jan Merickova, Beata Mikusova Prokop, Viktor |
| description | In recent years, we have been able to see the growing importance of knowledge in the context of the emerging knowledge-based global economy. It is commonly accepted that (i) innovations are brought forward through an interactive process of knowledge generation, diffusion, and application; (ii) innovations are increasingly seen as fundamental to the competitiveness of enterprises and economies; and (iii) knowledge is critical to the process of innovation. The relative importance of cooperation on innovative activity varies and depends upon a number of factors, i.e. the number of cooperative ties and the context in which network relations exist. The determinants of R&D cooperation differ depending on the types of cooperation: (i) the positive impact of enterprise size, R&D intensity, and incoming source-specific spillovers is weaker for competitor cooperation, reflecting greater concerns about appropriability and (ii) institutional spillovers are more generic in nature and positively impact all types of cooperation. The question is the effectiveness of different types and subjects of cooperation. This article aims to analyze the impact of (i) the cooperation and participation in the group of enterprises; (ii) cooperation with universities; (iii) the provision of state aid; on overall enterprises' performance. Analysis was performed on data from Community Innovation Survey (CIS) carried out in the Czech Republic between the period 2010-2012 by using own multiple linear regression models. The results confirm the importance of cooperation between enterprises and the positive impact of participation of enterprises in the enterprise groups. Cooperation with universities and research organizations also has a positive impact on the performance of enterprises in the machinery industry in the Czech Republic. We also show that there were inefficient provisions of public aid in machinery industry in the Czech Republic. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.15240/tul/001/2016-3-008 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1924786647</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A465696789</galeid><sourcerecordid>A465696789</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-35824f61b1aa37f17cc5652ce8519e351df679a5407c5f3e3792f01708868af33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1qVDEYhg-i0KH2CroJuPV08p8cd6VoLRTc1HXIZL7MpMwkY74cZVz1HrxDr8TYUdAEkhCeJz_fOwyXjF4xxSVdtnm3pJQtOWV6FCOl9sWw4ELoUVEtXw4LxhkfhabT2XCB-Eh701ZLbhfD08MWSCjlANW3VDJZQfsGkAnkBvVQEwK-I5g2OcUUfG7k4GsjJZLWxZRz-XryDrUEQCQ_n34QT4JHINjm9fEvGr5D2JK9D9uUoR67up6x1ePr4VX0O4SLP_P58PnD-4ebj-P9p9u7m-v7MUjB2iiU5TJqtmLeCxOZCUFpxQNYxSYQiq2jNpNXkpqgogBhJh4pM9RabX0U4nx4czq3P_TLDNjcY5lr7lc6NnFprNbSdOrqRG38DlzKsbTqQ-9r2KdQMsTU96-lVnrSxk5dePuPsJqx_w770Cu2bbjxM-L_uDjhoRbECtH1Eu99PTpG3XOarqfpeprud5pO9KUVvwDiEJTb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1924786647</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The cooperation between enterprises: significant part of the innovation process – a case study of the czech machinery industry</title><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ）</source><creator>Stejskal, Jan ; Merickova, Beata Mikusova ; Prokop, Viktor</creator><creatorcontrib>Stejskal, Jan ; Merickova, Beata Mikusova ; Prokop, Viktor</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years, we have been able to see the growing importance of knowledge in the context of the emerging knowledge-based global economy. It is commonly accepted that (i) innovations are brought forward through an interactive process of knowledge generation, diffusion, and application; (ii) innovations are increasingly seen as fundamental to the competitiveness of enterprises and economies; and (iii) knowledge is critical to the process of innovation. The relative importance of cooperation on innovative activity varies and depends upon a number of factors, i.e. the number of cooperative ties and the context in which network relations exist. The determinants of R&D cooperation differ depending on the types of cooperation: (i) the positive impact of enterprise size, R&D intensity, and incoming source-specific spillovers is weaker for competitor cooperation, reflecting greater concerns about appropriability and (ii) institutional spillovers are more generic in nature and positively impact all types of cooperation. The question is the effectiveness of different types and subjects of cooperation. This article aims to analyze the impact of (i) the cooperation and participation in the group of enterprises; (ii) cooperation with universities; (iii) the provision of state aid; on overall enterprises' performance. Analysis was performed on data from Community Innovation Survey (CIS) carried out in the Czech Republic between the period 2010-2012 by using own multiple linear regression models. The results confirm the importance of cooperation between enterprises and the positive impact of participation of enterprises in the enterprise groups. Cooperation with universities and research organizations also has a positive impact on the performance of enterprises in the machinery industry in the Czech Republic. We also show that there were inefficient provisions of public aid in machinery industry in the Czech Republic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1212-3609</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2336-5064</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15240/tul/001/2016-3-008</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Liberec: Technical University of Liberec</publisher><subject>Collaboration ; Competition ; Competitive advantage ; Competitiveness ; Cooperation ; Economic growth ; Economic models ; Forecasts and trends ; Global economy ; Human capital ; Hypotheses ; Innovations ; Knowledge ; Knowledge sharing ; Machinery ; Machinery industry ; Management ; R&D ; Regression analysis ; Research & development ; Research centers ; Spillover effect ; Strategic management ; Technological change</subject><ispartof>E+M ekonomie a management, 2016-07, Vol.19 (3), p.110-122</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Technical University of Liberec</rights><rights>Copyright Technical University of Liberec 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-35824f61b1aa37f17cc5652ce8519e351df679a5407c5f3e3792f01708868af33</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-3015-8274</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stejskal, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merickova, Beata Mikusova</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prokop, Viktor</creatorcontrib><title>The cooperation between enterprises: significant part of the innovation process – a case study of the czech machinery industry</title><title>E+M ekonomie a management</title><description>In recent years, we have been able to see the growing importance of knowledge in the context of the emerging knowledge-based global economy. It is commonly accepted that (i) innovations are brought forward through an interactive process of knowledge generation, diffusion, and application; (ii) innovations are increasingly seen as fundamental to the competitiveness of enterprises and economies; and (iii) knowledge is critical to the process of innovation. The relative importance of cooperation on innovative activity varies and depends upon a number of factors, i.e. the number of cooperative ties and the context in which network relations exist. The determinants of R&D cooperation differ depending on the types of cooperation: (i) the positive impact of enterprise size, R&D intensity, and incoming source-specific spillovers is weaker for competitor cooperation, reflecting greater concerns about appropriability and (ii) institutional spillovers are more generic in nature and positively impact all types of cooperation. The question is the effectiveness of different types and subjects of cooperation. This article aims to analyze the impact of (i) the cooperation and participation in the group of enterprises; (ii) cooperation with universities; (iii) the provision of state aid; on overall enterprises' performance. Analysis was performed on data from Community Innovation Survey (CIS) carried out in the Czech Republic between the period 2010-2012 by using own multiple linear regression models. The results confirm the importance of cooperation between enterprises and the positive impact of participation of enterprises in the enterprise groups. Cooperation with universities and research organizations also has a positive impact on the performance of enterprises in the machinery industry in the Czech Republic. We also show that there were inefficient provisions of public aid in machinery industry in the Czech Republic.</description><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Competitive advantage</subject><subject>Competitiveness</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Forecasts and trends</subject><subject>Global economy</subject><subject>Human capital</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Knowledge sharing</subject><subject>Machinery</subject><subject>Machinery industry</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Research centers</subject><subject>Spillover effect</subject><subject>Strategic management</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><issn>1212-3609</issn><issn>2336-5064</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1qVDEYhg-i0KH2CroJuPV08p8cd6VoLRTc1HXIZL7MpMwkY74cZVz1HrxDr8TYUdAEkhCeJz_fOwyXjF4xxSVdtnm3pJQtOWV6FCOl9sWw4ELoUVEtXw4LxhkfhabT2XCB-Eh701ZLbhfD08MWSCjlANW3VDJZQfsGkAnkBvVQEwK-I5g2OcUUfG7k4GsjJZLWxZRz-XryDrUEQCQ_n34QT4JHINjm9fEvGr5D2JK9D9uUoR67up6x1ePr4VX0O4SLP_P58PnD-4ebj-P9p9u7m-v7MUjB2iiU5TJqtmLeCxOZCUFpxQNYxSYQiq2jNpNXkpqgogBhJh4pM9RabX0U4nx4czq3P_TLDNjcY5lr7lc6NnFprNbSdOrqRG38DlzKsbTqQ-9r2KdQMsTU96-lVnrSxk5dePuPsJqx_w770Cu2bbjxM-L_uDjhoRbECtH1Eu99PTpG3XOarqfpeprud5pO9KUVvwDiEJTb</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Stejskal, Jan</creator><creator>Merickova, Beata Mikusova</creator><creator>Prokop, Viktor</creator><general>Technical University of Liberec</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3015-8274</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>The cooperation between enterprises: significant part of the innovation process – a case study of the czech machinery industry</title><author>Stejskal, Jan ; Merickova, Beata Mikusova ; Prokop, Viktor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-35824f61b1aa37f17cc5652ce8519e351df679a5407c5f3e3792f01708868af33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Competitive advantage</topic><topic>Competitiveness</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Forecasts and trends</topic><topic>Global economy</topic><topic>Human capital</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Knowledge sharing</topic><topic>Machinery</topic><topic>Machinery industry</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Research centers</topic><topic>Spillover effect</topic><topic>Strategic management</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stejskal, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merickova, Beata Mikusova</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prokop, Viktor</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale_Business Insights: Global</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>E+M ekonomie a management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stejskal, Jan</au><au>Merickova, Beata Mikusova</au><au>Prokop, Viktor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The cooperation between enterprises: significant part of the innovation process – a case study of the czech machinery industry</atitle><jtitle>E+M ekonomie a management</jtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>110</spage><epage>122</epage><pages>110-122</pages><issn>1212-3609</issn><eissn>2336-5064</eissn><abstract>In recent years, we have been able to see the growing importance of knowledge in the context of the emerging knowledge-based global economy. It is commonly accepted that (i) innovations are brought forward through an interactive process of knowledge generation, diffusion, and application; (ii) innovations are increasingly seen as fundamental to the competitiveness of enterprises and economies; and (iii) knowledge is critical to the process of innovation. The relative importance of cooperation on innovative activity varies and depends upon a number of factors, i.e. the number of cooperative ties and the context in which network relations exist. The determinants of R&D cooperation differ depending on the types of cooperation: (i) the positive impact of enterprise size, R&D intensity, and incoming source-specific spillovers is weaker for competitor cooperation, reflecting greater concerns about appropriability and (ii) institutional spillovers are more generic in nature and positively impact all types of cooperation. The question is the effectiveness of different types and subjects of cooperation. This article aims to analyze the impact of (i) the cooperation and participation in the group of enterprises; (ii) cooperation with universities; (iii) the provision of state aid; on overall enterprises' performance. Analysis was performed on data from Community Innovation Survey (CIS) carried out in the Czech Republic between the period 2010-2012 by using own multiple linear regression models. The results confirm the importance of cooperation between enterprises and the positive impact of participation of enterprises in the enterprise groups. Cooperation with universities and research organizations also has a positive impact on the performance of enterprises in the machinery industry in the Czech Republic. We also show that there were inefficient provisions of public aid in machinery industry in the Czech Republic.</abstract><cop>Liberec</cop><pub>Technical University of Liberec</pub><doi>10.15240/tul/001/2016-3-008</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3015-8274</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1212-3609 |
| ispartof | E+M ekonomie a management, 2016-07, Vol.19 (3), p.110-122 |
| issn | 1212-3609 2336-5064 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1924786647 |
| source | Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ） |
| subjects | Collaboration Competition Competitive advantage Competitiveness Cooperation Economic growth Economic models Forecasts and trends Global economy Human capital Hypotheses Innovations Knowledge Knowledge sharing Machinery Machinery industry Management R&D Regression analysis Research & development Research centers Spillover effect Strategic management Technological change |
| title | The cooperation between enterprises: significant part of the innovation process – a case study of the czech machinery industry |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T08%3A27%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20cooperation%20between%20enterprises:%20significant%20part%20of%20the%20innovation%20process%20%E2%80%93%20a%20case%20study%20of%20the%20czech%20machinery%20industry&rft.jtitle=E+M%20ekonomie%20a%20management&rft.au=Stejskal,%20Jan&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=110&rft.epage=122&rft.pages=110-122&rft.issn=1212-3609&rft.eissn=2336-5064&rft_id=info:doi/10.15240/tul/001/2016-3-008&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA465696789%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1924786647&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A465696789&rfr_iscdi=true |