Emergent Constraints in Climate Projections: A Case Study of Changes in High-Latitude Temperature Variability

Climate projections from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) ensemble show a decrease in interannual surface temperature variability over high latitudes with a large intermodel spread, in particular over the areas of sea ice retreat. Here relationships are found between the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of climate 2017-05, Vol.30 (10), p.3655-3670
Hauptverfasser: Borodina, Aleksandra, Fischer, Erich M., Knutti, Reto
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3670
container_issue 10
container_start_page 3655
container_title Journal of climate
container_volume 30
creator Borodina, Aleksandra
Fischer, Erich M.
Knutti, Reto
description Climate projections from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) ensemble show a decrease in interannual surface temperature variability over high latitudes with a large intermodel spread, in particular over the areas of sea ice retreat. Here relationships are found between the models’ present-day performance in sea ice–related metrics and future changes in temperature variability. These relations, so-called emergent constraints, can produce ensembles of models calibrated with present-day observations with a narrower spread across their members than across the full ensemble. The underlying assumption is that models in better agreement with observations or reanalyses in a carefully selected metric probably have a more realistic representation of local processes, and therefore are more reliable for projections. Thus, the reliability of this method depends on the availability of high-quality observations or reanalyses. This work represents a step toward formalization of the emergent constraints framework, as so far there is no consensus on how the constraints should be best implemented. The authors quantify the reduction in spread from emerging constraints for various metrics and their combinations, different emission scenarios, and seasons. Some of the general features of emerging constraints are discussed, and how to effectively aggregate information across metrics and seasons to achieve the largest reduction in model spread. It is demonstrated, based on the case of temperature variability, that a robust constraint can be obtained by combining relevant metrics across all seasons. Such a constraint results in a strongly reduced spread across model projections, which is consistent with a process understanding of variability changes due to sea ice retreat.
doi_str_mv 10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0662.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1924722391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26388025</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26388025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-5db5bbf80c516bd33bda5c3e74beba8e5810f3599577aa4590606ebf1a23c8993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kDFPwzAQRi0EEqWwsyBFYkQuZzvn2CNKCxRVggFmy04dlKhNiu0O_PsmCmK64d733ekRcstgwViBj2_lZk2XlEkKUvIFOyMzhhwo5Dk_JzNQOqeqQLwkVzG2AIxLgBl5WO19-PZdysq-iynYpksxa7qs3DV7m3z2EfrWV6kZttfkora76G_-5px8Pa8-y1e6eX9Zl08bWgmBieLWoXO1ggqZdFsh3NZiJXyRO--s8qgY1AK1xqKwNkcNEqR3NbNcVEprMSf3U-8h9D9HH5Np-2PohpOGaZ4XnAvNBgomqgp9jMHX5hCGl8OvYWBGJWZUYpaGSTMqMWPkboq0MfXhn-dSKAUcxQmOtFzo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1924722391</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Emergent Constraints in Climate Projections: A Case Study of Changes in High-Latitude Temperature Variability</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Borodina, Aleksandra ; Fischer, Erich M. ; Knutti, Reto</creator><creatorcontrib>Borodina, Aleksandra ; Fischer, Erich M. ; Knutti, Reto</creatorcontrib><description>Climate projections from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) ensemble show a decrease in interannual surface temperature variability over high latitudes with a large intermodel spread, in particular over the areas of sea ice retreat. Here relationships are found between the models’ present-day performance in sea ice–related metrics and future changes in temperature variability. These relations, so-called emergent constraints, can produce ensembles of models calibrated with present-day observations with a narrower spread across their members than across the full ensemble. The underlying assumption is that models in better agreement with observations or reanalyses in a carefully selected metric probably have a more realistic representation of local processes, and therefore are more reliable for projections. Thus, the reliability of this method depends on the availability of high-quality observations or reanalyses. This work represents a step toward formalization of the emergent constraints framework, as so far there is no consensus on how the constraints should be best implemented. The authors quantify the reduction in spread from emerging constraints for various metrics and their combinations, different emission scenarios, and seasons. Some of the general features of emerging constraints are discussed, and how to effectively aggregate information across metrics and seasons to achieve the largest reduction in model spread. It is demonstrated, based on the case of temperature variability, that a robust constraint can be obtained by combining relevant metrics across all seasons. Such a constraint results in a strongly reduced spread across model projections, which is consistent with a process understanding of variability changes due to sea ice retreat.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-8755</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0442</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0662.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Aggregates ; Case studies ; Climate ; Climate change ; Climate models ; Climate science ; Constraint modelling ; Frameworks ; Intercomparison ; Latitude ; Phase transitions ; Reduction ; Reliability ; Sea ice ; Seasons ; Surface temperature ; Temperature effects ; Temperature variability ; Variability</subject><ispartof>Journal of climate, 2017-05, Vol.30 (10), p.3655-3670</ispartof><rights>2017 American Meteorological Society</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society May 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-5db5bbf80c516bd33bda5c3e74beba8e5810f3599577aa4590606ebf1a23c8993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-5db5bbf80c516bd33bda5c3e74beba8e5810f3599577aa4590606ebf1a23c8993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26388025$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26388025$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3668,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Borodina, Aleksandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Erich M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knutti, Reto</creatorcontrib><title>Emergent Constraints in Climate Projections: A Case Study of Changes in High-Latitude Temperature Variability</title><title>Journal of climate</title><description>Climate projections from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) ensemble show a decrease in interannual surface temperature variability over high latitudes with a large intermodel spread, in particular over the areas of sea ice retreat. Here relationships are found between the models’ present-day performance in sea ice–related metrics and future changes in temperature variability. These relations, so-called emergent constraints, can produce ensembles of models calibrated with present-day observations with a narrower spread across their members than across the full ensemble. The underlying assumption is that models in better agreement with observations or reanalyses in a carefully selected metric probably have a more realistic representation of local processes, and therefore are more reliable for projections. Thus, the reliability of this method depends on the availability of high-quality observations or reanalyses. This work represents a step toward formalization of the emergent constraints framework, as so far there is no consensus on how the constraints should be best implemented. The authors quantify the reduction in spread from emerging constraints for various metrics and their combinations, different emission scenarios, and seasons. Some of the general features of emerging constraints are discussed, and how to effectively aggregate information across metrics and seasons to achieve the largest reduction in model spread. It is demonstrated, based on the case of temperature variability, that a robust constraint can be obtained by combining relevant metrics across all seasons. Such a constraint results in a strongly reduced spread across model projections, which is consistent with a process understanding of variability changes due to sea ice retreat.</description><subject>Aggregates</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Climate science</subject><subject>Constraint modelling</subject><subject>Frameworks</subject><subject>Intercomparison</subject><subject>Latitude</subject><subject>Phase transitions</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Sea ice</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Surface temperature</subject><subject>Temperature effects</subject><subject>Temperature variability</subject><subject>Variability</subject><issn>0894-8755</issn><issn>1520-0442</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kDFPwzAQRi0EEqWwsyBFYkQuZzvn2CNKCxRVggFmy04dlKhNiu0O_PsmCmK64d733ekRcstgwViBj2_lZk2XlEkKUvIFOyMzhhwo5Dk_JzNQOqeqQLwkVzG2AIxLgBl5WO19-PZdysq-iynYpksxa7qs3DV7m3z2EfrWV6kZttfkora76G_-5px8Pa8-y1e6eX9Zl08bWgmBieLWoXO1ggqZdFsh3NZiJXyRO--s8qgY1AK1xqKwNkcNEqR3NbNcVEprMSf3U-8h9D9HH5Np-2PohpOGaZ4XnAvNBgomqgp9jMHX5hCGl8OvYWBGJWZUYpaGSTMqMWPkboq0MfXhn-dSKAUcxQmOtFzo</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Borodina, Aleksandra</creator><creator>Fischer, Erich M.</creator><creator>Knutti, Reto</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>Emergent Constraints in Climate Projections</title><author>Borodina, Aleksandra ; Fischer, Erich M. ; Knutti, Reto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-5db5bbf80c516bd33bda5c3e74beba8e5810f3599577aa4590606ebf1a23c8993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aggregates</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Climate science</topic><topic>Constraint modelling</topic><topic>Frameworks</topic><topic>Intercomparison</topic><topic>Latitude</topic><topic>Phase transitions</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Sea ice</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Surface temperature</topic><topic>Temperature effects</topic><topic>Temperature variability</topic><topic>Variability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Borodina, Aleksandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Erich M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knutti, Reto</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of climate</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Borodina, Aleksandra</au><au>Fischer, Erich M.</au><au>Knutti, Reto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Emergent Constraints in Climate Projections: A Case Study of Changes in High-Latitude Temperature Variability</atitle><jtitle>Journal of climate</jtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3655</spage><epage>3670</epage><pages>3655-3670</pages><issn>0894-8755</issn><eissn>1520-0442</eissn><abstract>Climate projections from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) ensemble show a decrease in interannual surface temperature variability over high latitudes with a large intermodel spread, in particular over the areas of sea ice retreat. Here relationships are found between the models’ present-day performance in sea ice–related metrics and future changes in temperature variability. These relations, so-called emergent constraints, can produce ensembles of models calibrated with present-day observations with a narrower spread across their members than across the full ensemble. The underlying assumption is that models in better agreement with observations or reanalyses in a carefully selected metric probably have a more realistic representation of local processes, and therefore are more reliable for projections. Thus, the reliability of this method depends on the availability of high-quality observations or reanalyses. This work represents a step toward formalization of the emergent constraints framework, as so far there is no consensus on how the constraints should be best implemented. The authors quantify the reduction in spread from emerging constraints for various metrics and their combinations, different emission scenarios, and seasons. Some of the general features of emerging constraints are discussed, and how to effectively aggregate information across metrics and seasons to achieve the largest reduction in model spread. It is demonstrated, based on the case of temperature variability, that a robust constraint can be obtained by combining relevant metrics across all seasons. Such a constraint results in a strongly reduced spread across model projections, which is consistent with a process understanding of variability changes due to sea ice retreat.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0662.1</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0894-8755
ispartof Journal of climate, 2017-05, Vol.30 (10), p.3655-3670
issn 0894-8755
1520-0442
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1924722391
source Jstor Complete Legacy; American Meteorological Society; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Aggregates
Case studies
Climate
Climate change
Climate models
Climate science
Constraint modelling
Frameworks
Intercomparison
Latitude
Phase transitions
Reduction
Reliability
Sea ice
Seasons
Surface temperature
Temperature effects
Temperature variability
Variability
title Emergent Constraints in Climate Projections: A Case Study of Changes in High-Latitude Temperature Variability
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T03%3A07%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Emergent%20Constraints%20in%20Climate%20Projections:%20A%20Case%20Study%20of%20Changes%20in%20High-Latitude%20Temperature%20Variability&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20climate&rft.au=Borodina,%20Aleksandra&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3655&rft.epage=3670&rft.pages=3655-3670&rft.issn=0894-8755&rft.eissn=1520-0442&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0662.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26388025%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1924722391&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26388025&rfr_iscdi=true