Federal Budget Policy with an Aging Population and Persistently Low Interest Rates
Some observers have argued that the projections for high and rising debt pose a grave threat to the country's economic future and give the government has less fiscal space to respond to recessions or other unexpected developments, so they urge significant changes in tax or spending policies to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of economic perspectives 2017-07, Vol.31 (3), p.175-194 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 194 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 175 |
container_title | The Journal of economic perspectives |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Elmendorf, Douglas W. Sheiner, Louise M. |
description | Some observers have argued that the projections for high and rising debt pose a grave threat to the country's economic future and give the government has less fiscal space to respond to recessions or other unexpected developments, so they urge significant changes in tax or spending policies to reduce federal borrowing. In stark contrast, others have noted that interest rates on long-term federal debt are extremely low and have argued that such persistently low interest rates justify additional federal borrowing and investment, at least for the short and medium term. We analyze this controversy focusing on two main issues: the aging of the US population and interest rates on US government debt. It is generally understood that these factors play an important role in the projected path of the US debt-to-GDP ratio. What is less recognized is that these changes also have implications for the appropriate level of US debt. We argue that many—though not all— of the factors that may be contributing to the historically low level of interest rates imply that both federal debt and federal investment should be substantially larger than they would be otherwise. In conclusion, although significant policy changes to reduce federal budget deficits ultimately will be needed, they do not have to be implemented right away. Instead, the focus of federal budget policy over the coming decade should be to increase federal investment while enacting changes in federal spending and taxes that will reduce deficits gradually over time. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1257/jep.31.3.175 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1923240827</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44321285</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44321285</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-ae0e61bb4ceaf36405c2c57219784fa813cb4785c611839b164cc8ca84a2a0ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kN9LwzAUhYMoOKdvvgoBX23NzY82fZzidDBwDH0OaZrOltrWJGXsvzdj4n25cPg4Bz6EboGkQEX-2NoxZZCyFHJxhmZQcJ7kRSbO0YzIQiSMkeISXXnfkuNlYoa2S1tZpzv8NFU7G_Bm6BpzwPsmfGHd48Wu6XcxHKdOh2boY1bhjXW-8cH2oTvg9bDHqz5YZ33AWx2sv0YXte68vfn7c_S5fPl4fkvW76-r58U6MUzKkGhLbAZlyY3VNcs4EYYakVMocslrLYGZkudSmAxAsqKEjBsjjZZcU010xebo_tQ7uuFnivOqHSbXx0kFBWWUE0nzSD2cKOMG752t1eiab-0OCog6WlPRmmKgmIrWIn53wlsfBvfPcs4oUCnYL6HdaWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1923240827</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Federal Budget Policy with an Aging Population and Persistently Low Interest Rates</title><source>Jstor Journals Open Access</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>American Economic Association Web</source><creator>Elmendorf, Douglas W. ; Sheiner, Louise M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Elmendorf, Douglas W. ; Sheiner, Louise M.</creatorcontrib><description>Some observers have argued that the projections for high and rising debt pose a grave threat to the country's economic future and give the government has less fiscal space to respond to recessions or other unexpected developments, so they urge significant changes in tax or spending policies to reduce federal borrowing. In stark contrast, others have noted that interest rates on long-term federal debt are extremely low and have argued that such persistently low interest rates justify additional federal borrowing and investment, at least for the short and medium term. We analyze this controversy focusing on two main issues: the aging of the US population and interest rates on US government debt. It is generally understood that these factors play an important role in the projected path of the US debt-to-GDP ratio. What is less recognized is that these changes also have implications for the appropriate level of US debt. We argue that many—though not all— of the factors that may be contributing to the historically low level of interest rates imply that both federal debt and federal investment should be substantially larger than they would be otherwise. In conclusion, although significant policy changes to reduce federal budget deficits ultimately will be needed, they do not have to be implemented right away. Instead, the focus of federal budget policy over the coming decade should be to increase federal investment while enacting changes in federal spending and taxes that will reduce deficits gradually over time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-3309</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7965</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1257/jep.31.3.175</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Nashville: American Economic Association</publisher><subject>Aging ; Borrowing ; Budget deficits ; Capital investments ; Change agents ; Economic theory ; Federal budget ; Financial investments ; Government ; Government spending ; Gross domestic product ; Interest rates ; Investment ; Investments ; Policy making ; Population aging ; Projections ; Public debt ; Public investments ; Recessions ; Tax cuts ; Taxation ; United States federal budget</subject><ispartof>The Journal of economic perspectives, 2017-07, Vol.31 (3), p.175-194</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 American Economic Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Economic Association Summer 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-ae0e61bb4ceaf36405c2c57219784fa813cb4785c611839b164cc8ca84a2a0ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-ae0e61bb4ceaf36405c2c57219784fa813cb4785c611839b164cc8ca84a2a0ad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44321285$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44321285$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3734,25333,27903,27904,54502,54508,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elmendorf, Douglas W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheiner, Louise M.</creatorcontrib><title>Federal Budget Policy with an Aging Population and Persistently Low Interest Rates</title><title>The Journal of economic perspectives</title><description>Some observers have argued that the projections for high and rising debt pose a grave threat to the country's economic future and give the government has less fiscal space to respond to recessions or other unexpected developments, so they urge significant changes in tax or spending policies to reduce federal borrowing. In stark contrast, others have noted that interest rates on long-term federal debt are extremely low and have argued that such persistently low interest rates justify additional federal borrowing and investment, at least for the short and medium term. We analyze this controversy focusing on two main issues: the aging of the US population and interest rates on US government debt. It is generally understood that these factors play an important role in the projected path of the US debt-to-GDP ratio. What is less recognized is that these changes also have implications for the appropriate level of US debt. We argue that many—though not all— of the factors that may be contributing to the historically low level of interest rates imply that both federal debt and federal investment should be substantially larger than they would be otherwise. In conclusion, although significant policy changes to reduce federal budget deficits ultimately will be needed, they do not have to be implemented right away. Instead, the focus of federal budget policy over the coming decade should be to increase federal investment while enacting changes in federal spending and taxes that will reduce deficits gradually over time.</description><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Borrowing</subject><subject>Budget deficits</subject><subject>Capital investments</subject><subject>Change agents</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Federal budget</subject><subject>Financial investments</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Government spending</subject><subject>Gross domestic product</subject><subject>Interest rates</subject><subject>Investment</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Population aging</subject><subject>Projections</subject><subject>Public debt</subject><subject>Public investments</subject><subject>Recessions</subject><subject>Tax cuts</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>United States federal budget</subject><issn>0895-3309</issn><issn>1944-7965</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JFNAL</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kN9LwzAUhYMoOKdvvgoBX23NzY82fZzidDBwDH0OaZrOltrWJGXsvzdj4n25cPg4Bz6EboGkQEX-2NoxZZCyFHJxhmZQcJ7kRSbO0YzIQiSMkeISXXnfkuNlYoa2S1tZpzv8NFU7G_Bm6BpzwPsmfGHd48Wu6XcxHKdOh2boY1bhjXW-8cH2oTvg9bDHqz5YZ33AWx2sv0YXte68vfn7c_S5fPl4fkvW76-r58U6MUzKkGhLbAZlyY3VNcs4EYYakVMocslrLYGZkudSmAxAsqKEjBsjjZZcU010xebo_tQ7uuFnivOqHSbXx0kFBWWUE0nzSD2cKOMG752t1eiab-0OCog6WlPRmmKgmIrWIn53wlsfBvfPcs4oUCnYL6HdaWg</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Elmendorf, Douglas W.</creator><creator>Sheiner, Louise M.</creator><general>American Economic Association</general><scope>JFNAL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>Federal Budget Policy with an Aging Population and Persistently Low Interest Rates</title><author>Elmendorf, Douglas W. ; Sheiner, Louise M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-ae0e61bb4ceaf36405c2c57219784fa813cb4785c611839b164cc8ca84a2a0ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Borrowing</topic><topic>Budget deficits</topic><topic>Capital investments</topic><topic>Change agents</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Federal budget</topic><topic>Financial investments</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Government spending</topic><topic>Gross domestic product</topic><topic>Interest rates</topic><topic>Investment</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Population aging</topic><topic>Projections</topic><topic>Public debt</topic><topic>Public investments</topic><topic>Recessions</topic><topic>Tax cuts</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>United States federal budget</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elmendorf, Douglas W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheiner, Louise M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Jstor Journals Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of economic perspectives</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elmendorf, Douglas W.</au><au>Sheiner, Louise M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Federal Budget Policy with an Aging Population and Persistently Low Interest Rates</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of economic perspectives</jtitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>175</spage><epage>194</epage><pages>175-194</pages><issn>0895-3309</issn><eissn>1944-7965</eissn><abstract>Some observers have argued that the projections for high and rising debt pose a grave threat to the country's economic future and give the government has less fiscal space to respond to recessions or other unexpected developments, so they urge significant changes in tax or spending policies to reduce federal borrowing. In stark contrast, others have noted that interest rates on long-term federal debt are extremely low and have argued that such persistently low interest rates justify additional federal borrowing and investment, at least for the short and medium term. We analyze this controversy focusing on two main issues: the aging of the US population and interest rates on US government debt. It is generally understood that these factors play an important role in the projected path of the US debt-to-GDP ratio. What is less recognized is that these changes also have implications for the appropriate level of US debt. We argue that many—though not all— of the factors that may be contributing to the historically low level of interest rates imply that both federal debt and federal investment should be substantially larger than they would be otherwise. In conclusion, although significant policy changes to reduce federal budget deficits ultimately will be needed, they do not have to be implemented right away. Instead, the focus of federal budget policy over the coming decade should be to increase federal investment while enacting changes in federal spending and taxes that will reduce deficits gradually over time.</abstract><cop>Nashville</cop><pub>American Economic Association</pub><doi>10.1257/jep.31.3.175</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0895-3309 |
ispartof | The Journal of economic perspectives, 2017-07, Vol.31 (3), p.175-194 |
issn | 0895-3309 1944-7965 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1923240827 |
source | Jstor Journals Open Access; Business Source Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; American Economic Association Web |
subjects | Aging Borrowing Budget deficits Capital investments Change agents Economic theory Federal budget Financial investments Government Government spending Gross domestic product Interest rates Investment Investments Policy making Population aging Projections Public debt Public investments Recessions Tax cuts Taxation United States federal budget |
title | Federal Budget Policy with an Aging Population and Persistently Low Interest Rates |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T04%3A47%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Federal%20Budget%20Policy%20with%20an%20Aging%20Population%20and%20Persistently%20Low%20Interest%20Rates&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20economic%20perspectives&rft.au=Elmendorf,%20Douglas%20W.&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=175&rft.epage=194&rft.pages=175-194&rft.issn=0895-3309&rft.eissn=1944-7965&rft_id=info:doi/10.1257/jep.31.3.175&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44321285%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1923240827&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44321285&rfr_iscdi=true |