How safe is “safe”? A comparison of different criteria for measuring safe seats

Under which conditions can a constituency be counted as safe? This question is especially important for parties and candidates, yet has found different answers among scholars. Based on results since the 1998 Bundestag election the article investigates which of several indicators proves best to predi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 2017-01, Vol.48 (2), p.350
Hauptverfasser: Pyschny, Anastasia, Hellmann, Daniel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 350
container_title Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen
container_volume 48
creator Pyschny, Anastasia
Hellmann, Daniel
description Under which conditions can a constituency be counted as safe? This question is especially important for parties and candidates, yet has found different answers among scholars. Based on results since the 1998 Bundestag election the article investigates which of several indicators proves best to predict the constituency-winner in Germany. Empirically, winning by a margin of 17 percentage points of the personal vote turns out to be a valid criterion. With regard to differences between the electoral performances of parties represented in the Bundestag it becomes clear that party specific criteria are, however, more vulnerable in case of party system change. Especially the Alternative for Germany (AfD) remains an unknown factor for the forthcoming federal election. Due to the success in Landtag elections, it seems possible, that the AfD could win direct seats not only at the state level, but also at the federal level. For SPD candidates only four constituencies are safe wins. Predictions for the CDU/CSU are much better: numerous candidates can be certain to win the constituency seat.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1922536397</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1922536397</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_19225363973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjkEKgkAYhYcoSMo7_NBamHF01FVEFO5rL5PNxEQ6Nr_S1oPU5TxJRh2g1XvwPT7ehHgsFWEQxjyaEo_yiAYsidM58RHNiTJBRUyzxCOH3D4ApVZgEIb--alD_1rDBkpbNdIZtDVYDWejtXKqbqF0plXOSNDWQaUkds7Ul68ElWxxSWZa3lD5v1yQ1X533OZB4-y9U9gWV9u5ekQFy8Lxo-BZwv9bvQGjH0N3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1922536397</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How safe is “safe”? A comparison of different criteria for measuring safe seats</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Pyschny, Anastasia ; Hellmann, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Pyschny, Anastasia ; Hellmann, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>Under which conditions can a constituency be counted as safe? This question is especially important for parties and candidates, yet has found different answers among scholars. Based on results since the 1998 Bundestag election the article investigates which of several indicators proves best to predict the constituency-winner in Germany. Empirically, winning by a margin of 17 percentage points of the personal vote turns out to be a valid criterion. With regard to differences between the electoral performances of parties represented in the Bundestag it becomes clear that party specific criteria are, however, more vulnerable in case of party system change. Especially the Alternative for Germany (AfD) remains an unknown factor for the forthcoming federal election. Due to the success in Landtag elections, it seems possible, that the AfD could win direct seats not only at the state level, but also at the federal level. For SPD candidates only four constituencies are safe wins. Predictions for the CDU/CSU are much better: numerous candidates can be certain to win the constituency seat.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-1758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1862-2534</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wiesbaden: VS Verlag</publisher><subject>Candidates ; Constituents ; Criteria ; Elections ; Intellectuals ; Voting</subject><ispartof>Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 2017-01, Vol.48 (2), p.350</ispartof><rights>Copyright VS Verlag 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pyschny, Anastasia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hellmann, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>How safe is “safe”? A comparison of different criteria for measuring safe seats</title><title>Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen</title><description>Under which conditions can a constituency be counted as safe? This question is especially important for parties and candidates, yet has found different answers among scholars. Based on results since the 1998 Bundestag election the article investigates which of several indicators proves best to predict the constituency-winner in Germany. Empirically, winning by a margin of 17 percentage points of the personal vote turns out to be a valid criterion. With regard to differences between the electoral performances of parties represented in the Bundestag it becomes clear that party specific criteria are, however, more vulnerable in case of party system change. Especially the Alternative for Germany (AfD) remains an unknown factor for the forthcoming federal election. Due to the success in Landtag elections, it seems possible, that the AfD could win direct seats not only at the state level, but also at the federal level. For SPD candidates only four constituencies are safe wins. Predictions for the CDU/CSU are much better: numerous candidates can be certain to win the constituency seat.</description><subject>Candidates</subject><subject>Constituents</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Intellectuals</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>0340-1758</issn><issn>1862-2534</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjkEKgkAYhYcoSMo7_NBamHF01FVEFO5rL5PNxEQ6Nr_S1oPU5TxJRh2g1XvwPT7ehHgsFWEQxjyaEo_yiAYsidM58RHNiTJBRUyzxCOH3D4ApVZgEIb--alD_1rDBkpbNdIZtDVYDWejtXKqbqF0plXOSNDWQaUkds7Ul68ElWxxSWZa3lD5v1yQ1X533OZB4-y9U9gWV9u5ekQFy8Lxo-BZwv9bvQGjH0N3</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Pyschny, Anastasia</creator><creator>Hellmann, Daniel</creator><general>VS Verlag</general><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>How safe is “safe”? A comparison of different criteria for measuring safe seats</title><author>Pyschny, Anastasia ; Hellmann, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_19225363973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Candidates</topic><topic>Constituents</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Intellectuals</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pyschny, Anastasia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hellmann, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pyschny, Anastasia</au><au>Hellmann, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How safe is “safe”? A comparison of different criteria for measuring safe seats</atitle><jtitle>Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen</jtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>350</spage><pages>350-</pages><issn>0340-1758</issn><eissn>1862-2534</eissn><abstract>Under which conditions can a constituency be counted as safe? This question is especially important for parties and candidates, yet has found different answers among scholars. Based on results since the 1998 Bundestag election the article investigates which of several indicators proves best to predict the constituency-winner in Germany. Empirically, winning by a margin of 17 percentage points of the personal vote turns out to be a valid criterion. With regard to differences between the electoral performances of parties represented in the Bundestag it becomes clear that party specific criteria are, however, more vulnerable in case of party system change. Especially the Alternative for Germany (AfD) remains an unknown factor for the forthcoming federal election. Due to the success in Landtag elections, it seems possible, that the AfD could win direct seats not only at the state level, but also at the federal level. For SPD candidates only four constituencies are safe wins. Predictions for the CDU/CSU are much better: numerous candidates can be certain to win the constituency seat.</abstract><cop>Wiesbaden</cop><pub>VS Verlag</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0340-1758
ispartof Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 2017-01, Vol.48 (2), p.350
issn 0340-1758
1862-2534
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1922536397
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Candidates
Constituents
Criteria
Elections
Intellectuals
Voting
title How safe is “safe”? A comparison of different criteria for measuring safe seats
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T19%3A47%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20safe%20is%20%E2%80%9Csafe%E2%80%9D?%20A%20comparison%20of%20different%20criteria%20for%20measuring%20safe%20seats&rft.jtitle=Zeitschrift%20f%C3%BCr%20Parlamentsfragen&rft.au=Pyschny,%20Anastasia&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=350&rft.pages=350-&rft.issn=0340-1758&rft.eissn=1862-2534&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1922536397%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1922536397&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true