Factors influencing the distribution of lactic acid bacteria on Pennisetum grasses

Successful silage production depends on the promotion of lactic acid fermentation and one of the key factors influencing the fermentation quality of silage is lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Therefore, epiphytic LAB on grasses play an important role in silage production. The present research investigate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Grassland science 2017-07, Vol.63 (3), p.150-158
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Xinzhu, Zhuang, Yifen, Dong, Zhaoxia, Zhang, Jianguo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 158
container_issue 3
container_start_page 150
container_title Grassland science
container_volume 63
creator Chen, Xinzhu
Zhuang, Yifen
Dong, Zhaoxia
Zhang, Jianguo
description Successful silage production depends on the promotion of lactic acid fermentation and one of the key factors influencing the fermentation quality of silage is lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Therefore, epiphytic LAB on grasses play an important role in silage production. The present research investigated the distribution of LAB on Pennisetum spp. and factors influencing its presence. Lactic acid bacteria on four grass cultivars, cv. MT‐1, cv. Mott, cv. Reyan No. 4 (Reyan) and cv. Guimu No. 1 (Guimu), were investigated by both culture‐dependent methods and 16S rRNA amplicon sequence analysis and polymerase chain reaction‐denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR‐DGGE). Mott grass had significantly lower contents of dry matter and lower pH and higher water‐soluble carbohydrates (WSC) content than the other three cultivars (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/grs.12161
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1920473914</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1920473914</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3241-95512ae9afb217f72ecad7026b304655b64ce4ec41798f1f779eea13abf28a4a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWD8O_oOAJw_bZrLZTXOUYqtQUKqCt5BNJzVlu1uTXaT_3uiKN-cyL8wzM_AQcgVsDKkmmxDHwKGEIzICKURWKvl2_JdLOCVnMW4Zy6esZCOymhvbtSFS37i6x8b6ZkO7d6RrH7vgq77zbUNbR-vEeUuN9WtapYzBG5pGT9g0PmLX7-gmmBgxXpATZ-qIl7_9nLzO715m99nycfEwu11mNucCMlUUwA0q4yoO0kmO1qwl42WVM1EWRVUKiwKtAKmmDpyUCtFAbirHp0aY_JxcD3f3of3oMXZ62_ahSS81KM6EzBWIRN0MlA1tjAGd3ge_M-GggelvZTop0z_KEjsZ2E9f4-F_UC9Wz8PGFySgbgg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1920473914</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors influencing the distribution of lactic acid bacteria on Pennisetum grasses</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Chen, Xinzhu ; Zhuang, Yifen ; Dong, Zhaoxia ; Zhang, Jianguo</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xinzhu ; Zhuang, Yifen ; Dong, Zhaoxia ; Zhang, Jianguo</creatorcontrib><description>Successful silage production depends on the promotion of lactic acid fermentation and one of the key factors influencing the fermentation quality of silage is lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Therefore, epiphytic LAB on grasses play an important role in silage production. The present research investigated the distribution of LAB on Pennisetum spp. and factors influencing its presence. Lactic acid bacteria on four grass cultivars, cv. MT‐1, cv. Mott, cv. Reyan No. 4 (Reyan) and cv. Guimu No. 1 (Guimu), were investigated by both culture‐dependent methods and 16S rRNA amplicon sequence analysis and polymerase chain reaction‐denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR‐DGGE). Mott grass had significantly lower contents of dry matter and lower pH and higher water‐soluble carbohydrates (WSC) content than the other three cultivars (P &lt; 0.05). Mott also epiphyted the largest number of LAB (2.56 × 103 cfu g−1), while MT‐1 supported the least (41 cfu g−1). A diversity of LAB were recovered from the species including the following proportional representation: 33.4% Lactobacillus plantarum, 8.3% Lactobacillus pentosus, 8.3% Lactococcus lactis, 8.3% Leuconostoc citreum, 25.0% Weissella confusa and 16.7% Weissella cibaria on Mott, 20.0% L. plantarum, 20.0% L. pentosus and 60.0% Lc. lactis on MT‐1, 83.3% L. plantarum and 16.7% Lc. lactis on Reyan, 16.7% L. plantarum and 83.3% Lc. lactis on Guimu. The DGGE analyses of rRNA amplicons also revealed a similar distribution of these species. While the species composition and abundance of LAB differed among the four grasses. The number of LAB on grasses was positively correlated with the WSC content in the grasses (P &lt; 0.01), and negatively correlated with the pH of the grasses (P &lt; 0.05).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1744-6961</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-697X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/grs.12161</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Acids ; Bacteria ; Biodiversity ; Carbohydrates ; Correlation ; Cultivars ; Distribution ; Dry matter ; Electrophoresis ; Fermentation ; Gel electrophoresis ; grass ; Grasses ; Lactic acid ; Lactic acid bacteria ; Lactobacillus plantarum ; Lactococcus lactis ; Leuconostoc ; Pennisetum ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Promotion ; rRNA 16S ; Silage ; Species composition ; Species diversity</subject><ispartof>Grassland science, 2017-07, Vol.63 (3), p.150-158</ispartof><rights>2017 Japanese Society of Grassland Science</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Japanese Society of Grassland Science</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3241-95512ae9afb217f72ecad7026b304655b64ce4ec41798f1f779eea13abf28a4a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3241-95512ae9afb217f72ecad7026b304655b64ce4ec41798f1f779eea13abf28a4a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fgrs.12161$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fgrs.12161$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xinzhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhuang, Yifen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Zhaoxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jianguo</creatorcontrib><title>Factors influencing the distribution of lactic acid bacteria on Pennisetum grasses</title><title>Grassland science</title><description>Successful silage production depends on the promotion of lactic acid fermentation and one of the key factors influencing the fermentation quality of silage is lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Therefore, epiphytic LAB on grasses play an important role in silage production. The present research investigated the distribution of LAB on Pennisetum spp. and factors influencing its presence. Lactic acid bacteria on four grass cultivars, cv. MT‐1, cv. Mott, cv. Reyan No. 4 (Reyan) and cv. Guimu No. 1 (Guimu), were investigated by both culture‐dependent methods and 16S rRNA amplicon sequence analysis and polymerase chain reaction‐denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR‐DGGE). Mott grass had significantly lower contents of dry matter and lower pH and higher water‐soluble carbohydrates (WSC) content than the other three cultivars (P &lt; 0.05). Mott also epiphyted the largest number of LAB (2.56 × 103 cfu g−1), while MT‐1 supported the least (41 cfu g−1). A diversity of LAB were recovered from the species including the following proportional representation: 33.4% Lactobacillus plantarum, 8.3% Lactobacillus pentosus, 8.3% Lactococcus lactis, 8.3% Leuconostoc citreum, 25.0% Weissella confusa and 16.7% Weissella cibaria on Mott, 20.0% L. plantarum, 20.0% L. pentosus and 60.0% Lc. lactis on MT‐1, 83.3% L. plantarum and 16.7% Lc. lactis on Reyan, 16.7% L. plantarum and 83.3% Lc. lactis on Guimu. The DGGE analyses of rRNA amplicons also revealed a similar distribution of these species. While the species composition and abundance of LAB differed among the four grasses. The number of LAB on grasses was positively correlated with the WSC content in the grasses (P &lt; 0.01), and negatively correlated with the pH of the grasses (P &lt; 0.05).</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Dry matter</subject><subject>Electrophoresis</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Gel electrophoresis</subject><subject>grass</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Lactic acid</subject><subject>Lactic acid bacteria</subject><subject>Lactobacillus plantarum</subject><subject>Lactococcus lactis</subject><subject>Leuconostoc</subject><subject>Pennisetum</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Promotion</subject><subject>rRNA 16S</subject><subject>Silage</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><issn>1744-6961</issn><issn>1744-697X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWD8O_oOAJw_bZrLZTXOUYqtQUKqCt5BNJzVlu1uTXaT_3uiKN-cyL8wzM_AQcgVsDKkmmxDHwKGEIzICKURWKvl2_JdLOCVnMW4Zy6esZCOymhvbtSFS37i6x8b6ZkO7d6RrH7vgq77zbUNbR-vEeUuN9WtapYzBG5pGT9g0PmLX7-gmmBgxXpATZ-qIl7_9nLzO715m99nycfEwu11mNucCMlUUwA0q4yoO0kmO1qwl42WVM1EWRVUKiwKtAKmmDpyUCtFAbirHp0aY_JxcD3f3of3oMXZ62_ahSS81KM6EzBWIRN0MlA1tjAGd3ge_M-GggelvZTop0z_KEjsZ2E9f4-F_UC9Wz8PGFySgbgg</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>Chen, Xinzhu</creator><creator>Zhuang, Yifen</creator><creator>Dong, Zhaoxia</creator><creator>Zhang, Jianguo</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>Factors influencing the distribution of lactic acid bacteria on Pennisetum grasses</title><author>Chen, Xinzhu ; Zhuang, Yifen ; Dong, Zhaoxia ; Zhang, Jianguo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3241-95512ae9afb217f72ecad7026b304655b64ce4ec41798f1f779eea13abf28a4a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Dry matter</topic><topic>Electrophoresis</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Gel electrophoresis</topic><topic>grass</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Lactic acid</topic><topic>Lactic acid bacteria</topic><topic>Lactobacillus plantarum</topic><topic>Lactococcus lactis</topic><topic>Leuconostoc</topic><topic>Pennisetum</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Promotion</topic><topic>rRNA 16S</topic><topic>Silage</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xinzhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhuang, Yifen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Zhaoxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jianguo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Grassland science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Xinzhu</au><au>Zhuang, Yifen</au><au>Dong, Zhaoxia</au><au>Zhang, Jianguo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors influencing the distribution of lactic acid bacteria on Pennisetum grasses</atitle><jtitle>Grassland science</jtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>150</spage><epage>158</epage><pages>150-158</pages><issn>1744-6961</issn><eissn>1744-697X</eissn><abstract>Successful silage production depends on the promotion of lactic acid fermentation and one of the key factors influencing the fermentation quality of silage is lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Therefore, epiphytic LAB on grasses play an important role in silage production. The present research investigated the distribution of LAB on Pennisetum spp. and factors influencing its presence. Lactic acid bacteria on four grass cultivars, cv. MT‐1, cv. Mott, cv. Reyan No. 4 (Reyan) and cv. Guimu No. 1 (Guimu), were investigated by both culture‐dependent methods and 16S rRNA amplicon sequence analysis and polymerase chain reaction‐denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR‐DGGE). Mott grass had significantly lower contents of dry matter and lower pH and higher water‐soluble carbohydrates (WSC) content than the other three cultivars (P &lt; 0.05). Mott also epiphyted the largest number of LAB (2.56 × 103 cfu g−1), while MT‐1 supported the least (41 cfu g−1). A diversity of LAB were recovered from the species including the following proportional representation: 33.4% Lactobacillus plantarum, 8.3% Lactobacillus pentosus, 8.3% Lactococcus lactis, 8.3% Leuconostoc citreum, 25.0% Weissella confusa and 16.7% Weissella cibaria on Mott, 20.0% L. plantarum, 20.0% L. pentosus and 60.0% Lc. lactis on MT‐1, 83.3% L. plantarum and 16.7% Lc. lactis on Reyan, 16.7% L. plantarum and 83.3% Lc. lactis on Guimu. The DGGE analyses of rRNA amplicons also revealed a similar distribution of these species. While the species composition and abundance of LAB differed among the four grasses. The number of LAB on grasses was positively correlated with the WSC content in the grasses (P &lt; 0.01), and negatively correlated with the pH of the grasses (P &lt; 0.05).</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/grs.12161</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1744-6961
ispartof Grassland science, 2017-07, Vol.63 (3), p.150-158
issn 1744-6961
1744-697X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1920473914
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Abundance
Acids
Bacteria
Biodiversity
Carbohydrates
Correlation
Cultivars
Distribution
Dry matter
Electrophoresis
Fermentation
Gel electrophoresis
grass
Grasses
Lactic acid
Lactic acid bacteria
Lactobacillus plantarum
Lactococcus lactis
Leuconostoc
Pennisetum
Polymerase chain reaction
Promotion
rRNA 16S
Silage
Species composition
Species diversity
title Factors influencing the distribution of lactic acid bacteria on Pennisetum grasses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T19%3A57%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20influencing%20the%20distribution%20of%20lactic%20acid%20bacteria%20on%20Pennisetum%20grasses&rft.jtitle=Grassland%20science&rft.au=Chen,%20Xinzhu&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=150&rft.epage=158&rft.pages=150-158&rft.issn=1744-6961&rft.eissn=1744-697X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/grs.12161&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1920473914%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1920473914&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true