Women and Legal Pluralism: Lessons from Indigenous Governance Systems in the Andes
The shift towards legally plural multicultural and pluri-national citizenship regimes in the Andes formally recognised indigenous peoples’ community-based governance systems. These tend to emphasise participation, deliberation and service to the collective, but are often criticised for discriminatin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Latin American studies 2017-08, Vol.49 (3), p.633-658 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 658 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 633 |
container_title | Journal of Latin American studies |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | SIEDER, RACHEL BARRERA, ANNA |
description | The shift towards legally plural multicultural and pluri-national citizenship regimes in the Andes formally recognised indigenous peoples’ community-based governance systems. These tend to emphasise participation, deliberation and service to the collective, but are often criticised for discriminating against women. We argue that recent constitutional reforms and legislation combining recognition of collective rights claims with institutional guarantees for gender equality have in fact amplified indigenous women's different strategies of ‘negotiating with patriarchy’, allowing them to further the transformation of their organisations and ‘custom’. Such strategies are necessary because of the intersections of race, class and gendered exclusions that indigenous women experience, and possible because of the diverse and dynamic nature of community governance systems. Despite systemic and structural constraints on the guarantee of indigenous peoples’ rights, the actions of organised indigenous women over the last two decades point to new ways of imagining more plural, less patriarchal forms of citizenship. La transición hacia regímenes multiculturales y plurinacionales en los Andes formalmente reconoció a los sistemas comunitarios de gobierno de los pueblos indígenas. Estos tienden a enfatizar la participación, deliberación y el servicio al colectivo, pero son con frecuencia criticados por discriminar a las mujeres. Argumentamos que las reformas constitucionales y otras legislaciones recientes que combinan el reconocimiento a las demandas de derechos colectivos con las garantías institucionales a la igualdad han posibilitado diferentes estrategias de las mujeres indígenas de ‘negociar con el patriarcado’, a la vez permitiéndoles avanzar en la transformación de sus organizaciones y de la ‘costumbre’. Dichas estrategias son necesarias debido a las intersecciones de raza, clase y exclusiones que experimentan las mujeres indígenas, y son posibles también debido a la naturaleza diversa y dinámica de los sistemas comunales de gobierno. A pesar de los límites sistémicos y estructurales en relación a la garantía de los derechos de los pueblos indígenas, las acciones de las mujeres indígenas organizadas en las dos últimas décadas señalan nuevas formas de imaginar una ciudadanía más plural y menos patriarcal. A mudança em direção a um regime de cidadania legalmente multicultural e plurinacional nos Andes garantiu formalmente o reconhecimento de sistemas de governança comu |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0022216X16002273 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1920409064</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0022216X16002273</cupid><jstor_id>26799270</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26799270</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-765ec6b9bd228d232a6b9c7aa60ab6bb315ddcf4668610b05ea6831f183055613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMFKw0AQXUTBWv0AD8KC5-jsbrJJvJWitVBQrGJvYZPd1JRkt-4kQv_ehBYRxNPMvDfvzWMIuWRww4DFt0sAzjmTKyaHLhZHZMRCmQaxjFfHZDSAwcCfkjPEDQCkUQgj8vLuGmOpspouzFrV9LnuvKorbO56ANFZpKV3DZ1bXa2NdR3Smfsy3ipbGLrcYWsapJWl7YehE6sNnpOTUtVoLg51TN4e7l-nj8HiaTafThZBIRLe9sEiU8g8zTXnieaCq34oYqUkqFzmuWCR1kUZSplIBjlERslEsJIlAqJIMjEm13vfrXefncE227iuz1VjxlIOIaQgw36L7bcK7xC9KbOtrxrldxmDbHhd9ud1veZqr9lg6_yPgMs4TXkMPS8OnqrJfaXX5tfpf12_AYVGeS0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1920409064</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Women and Legal Pluralism: Lessons from Indigenous Governance Systems in the Andes</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>SIEDER, RACHEL ; BARRERA, ANNA</creator><creatorcontrib>SIEDER, RACHEL ; BARRERA, ANNA</creatorcontrib><description>The shift towards legally plural multicultural and pluri-national citizenship regimes in the Andes formally recognised indigenous peoples’ community-based governance systems. These tend to emphasise participation, deliberation and service to the collective, but are often criticised for discriminating against women. We argue that recent constitutional reforms and legislation combining recognition of collective rights claims with institutional guarantees for gender equality have in fact amplified indigenous women's different strategies of ‘negotiating with patriarchy’, allowing them to further the transformation of their organisations and ‘custom’. Such strategies are necessary because of the intersections of race, class and gendered exclusions that indigenous women experience, and possible because of the diverse and dynamic nature of community governance systems. Despite systemic and structural constraints on the guarantee of indigenous peoples’ rights, the actions of organised indigenous women over the last two decades point to new ways of imagining more plural, less patriarchal forms of citizenship. La transición hacia regímenes multiculturales y plurinacionales en los Andes formalmente reconoció a los sistemas comunitarios de gobierno de los pueblos indígenas. Estos tienden a enfatizar la participación, deliberación y el servicio al colectivo, pero son con frecuencia criticados por discriminar a las mujeres. Argumentamos que las reformas constitucionales y otras legislaciones recientes que combinan el reconocimiento a las demandas de derechos colectivos con las garantías institucionales a la igualdad han posibilitado diferentes estrategias de las mujeres indígenas de ‘negociar con el patriarcado’, a la vez permitiéndoles avanzar en la transformación de sus organizaciones y de la ‘costumbre’. Dichas estrategias son necesarias debido a las intersecciones de raza, clase y exclusiones que experimentan las mujeres indígenas, y son posibles también debido a la naturaleza diversa y dinámica de los sistemas comunales de gobierno. A pesar de los límites sistémicos y estructurales en relación a la garantía de los derechos de los pueblos indígenas, las acciones de las mujeres indígenas organizadas en las dos últimas décadas señalan nuevas formas de imaginar una ciudadanía más plural y menos patriarcal. A mudança em direção a um regime de cidadania legalmente multicultural e plurinacional nos Andes garantiu formalmente o reconhecimento de sistemas de governança comunitários dos povos indígenas. Estes sistemas tendem a enfatizar a participação, a deliberação e o trabalho para a coletividade, mas são recorrentemente criticados pela discriminação contra mulheres. Argumentamos que reformas constitucionais recentes e legislação que combinam o reconhecimento de demandas por direitos coletivos com garantias institucionais de igualdade de gênero amplificaram, de fato, as distintas estratégias femininas de ‘negociação com o patriarcado’, permitindo que elas aprofundem a transformação de suas organizações e ‘costumes’. Estas estratégias são necessárias por causa das intersecções entre raça, classe e exclusões de gênero experimentadas por mulheres indígenas e possíveis devido à natureza diversa e dinâmica dos sistemas de governança comunitários. Apesar das restrições sistêmicas e estruturais das garantias dos direitos dos povos indígenas, as ações de mulheres indígenas organizadas durante as duas últimas décadas apontam para novas maneiras de conceber formas de cidadania mais plurais e menos patriarcais.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-216X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-767X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0022216X16002273</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Citizenship ; COMMENTARY ; Constitutional reform ; Cultural differences ; Culture ; Decision making ; Domestic violence ; Equality ; Gender ; Gender inequality ; Governance ; Indigenous peoples ; Intersectionality ; Judicial reviews ; Leadership ; Legal pluralism ; Legislation ; Minority & ethnic groups ; Multiculturalism & pluralism ; Native peoples ; Negotiation ; Oppression ; Participation ; Patriarchy ; Political activism ; Race ; Racial discrimination ; Racism ; Rights ; Social classes ; Sovereignty ; Transformation ; Transnationalism ; Violence ; Women ; Womens rights</subject><ispartof>Journal of Latin American studies, 2017-08, Vol.49 (3), p.633-658</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017</rights><rights>Cambridge University Press 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-765ec6b9bd228d232a6b9c7aa60ab6bb315ddcf4668610b05ea6831f183055613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-765ec6b9bd228d232a6b9c7aa60ab6bb315ddcf4668610b05ea6831f183055613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26799270$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022216X16002273/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,803,12845,27344,27924,27925,33774,55628,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>SIEDER, RACHEL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARRERA, ANNA</creatorcontrib><title>Women and Legal Pluralism: Lessons from Indigenous Governance Systems in the Andes</title><title>Journal of Latin American studies</title><addtitle>J. Lat. Am. Stud</addtitle><description>The shift towards legally plural multicultural and pluri-national citizenship regimes in the Andes formally recognised indigenous peoples’ community-based governance systems. These tend to emphasise participation, deliberation and service to the collective, but are often criticised for discriminating against women. We argue that recent constitutional reforms and legislation combining recognition of collective rights claims with institutional guarantees for gender equality have in fact amplified indigenous women's different strategies of ‘negotiating with patriarchy’, allowing them to further the transformation of their organisations and ‘custom’. Such strategies are necessary because of the intersections of race, class and gendered exclusions that indigenous women experience, and possible because of the diverse and dynamic nature of community governance systems. Despite systemic and structural constraints on the guarantee of indigenous peoples’ rights, the actions of organised indigenous women over the last two decades point to new ways of imagining more plural, less patriarchal forms of citizenship. La transición hacia regímenes multiculturales y plurinacionales en los Andes formalmente reconoció a los sistemas comunitarios de gobierno de los pueblos indígenas. Estos tienden a enfatizar la participación, deliberación y el servicio al colectivo, pero son con frecuencia criticados por discriminar a las mujeres. Argumentamos que las reformas constitucionales y otras legislaciones recientes que combinan el reconocimiento a las demandas de derechos colectivos con las garantías institucionales a la igualdad han posibilitado diferentes estrategias de las mujeres indígenas de ‘negociar con el patriarcado’, a la vez permitiéndoles avanzar en la transformación de sus organizaciones y de la ‘costumbre’. Dichas estrategias son necesarias debido a las intersecciones de raza, clase y exclusiones que experimentan las mujeres indígenas, y son posibles también debido a la naturaleza diversa y dinámica de los sistemas comunales de gobierno. A pesar de los límites sistémicos y estructurales en relación a la garantía de los derechos de los pueblos indígenas, las acciones de las mujeres indígenas organizadas en las dos últimas décadas señalan nuevas formas de imaginar una ciudadanía más plural y menos patriarcal. A mudança em direção a um regime de cidadania legalmente multicultural e plurinacional nos Andes garantiu formalmente o reconhecimento de sistemas de governança comunitários dos povos indígenas. Estes sistemas tendem a enfatizar a participação, a deliberação e o trabalho para a coletividade, mas são recorrentemente criticados pela discriminação contra mulheres. Argumentamos que reformas constitucionais recentes e legislação que combinam o reconhecimento de demandas por direitos coletivos com garantias institucionais de igualdade de gênero amplificaram, de fato, as distintas estratégias femininas de ‘negociação com o patriarcado’, permitindo que elas aprofundem a transformação de suas organizações e ‘costumes’. Estas estratégias são necessárias por causa das intersecções entre raça, classe e exclusões de gênero experimentadas por mulheres indígenas e possíveis devido à natureza diversa e dinâmica dos sistemas de governança comunitários. Apesar das restrições sistêmicas e estruturais das garantias dos direitos dos povos indígenas, as ações de mulheres indígenas organizadas durante as duas últimas décadas apontam para novas maneiras de conceber formas de cidadania mais plurais e menos patriarcais.</description><subject>Citizenship</subject><subject>COMMENTARY</subject><subject>Constitutional reform</subject><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Domestic violence</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender inequality</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Indigenous peoples</subject><subject>Intersectionality</subject><subject>Judicial reviews</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Legal pluralism</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Minority & ethnic groups</subject><subject>Multiculturalism & pluralism</subject><subject>Native peoples</subject><subject>Negotiation</subject><subject>Oppression</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Patriarchy</subject><subject>Political activism</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Racial discrimination</subject><subject>Racism</subject><subject>Rights</subject><subject>Social classes</subject><subject>Sovereignty</subject><subject>Transformation</subject><subject>Transnationalism</subject><subject>Violence</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens rights</subject><issn>0022-216X</issn><issn>1469-767X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PQHSC</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMFKw0AQXUTBWv0AD8KC5-jsbrJJvJWitVBQrGJvYZPd1JRkt-4kQv_ehBYRxNPMvDfvzWMIuWRww4DFt0sAzjmTKyaHLhZHZMRCmQaxjFfHZDSAwcCfkjPEDQCkUQgj8vLuGmOpspouzFrV9LnuvKorbO56ANFZpKV3DZ1bXa2NdR3Smfsy3ipbGLrcYWsapJWl7YehE6sNnpOTUtVoLg51TN4e7l-nj8HiaTafThZBIRLe9sEiU8g8zTXnieaCq34oYqUkqFzmuWCR1kUZSplIBjlERslEsJIlAqJIMjEm13vfrXefncE227iuz1VjxlIOIaQgw36L7bcK7xC9KbOtrxrldxmDbHhd9ud1veZqr9lg6_yPgMs4TXkMPS8OnqrJfaXX5tfpf12_AYVGeS0</recordid><startdate>201708</startdate><enddate>201708</enddate><creator>SIEDER, RACHEL</creator><creator>BARRERA, ANNA</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>89V</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8BY</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQHSC</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201708</creationdate><title>Women and Legal Pluralism: Lessons from Indigenous Governance Systems in the Andes</title><author>SIEDER, RACHEL ; BARRERA, ANNA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-765ec6b9bd228d232a6b9c7aa60ab6bb315ddcf4668610b05ea6831f183055613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Citizenship</topic><topic>COMMENTARY</topic><topic>Constitutional reform</topic><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Domestic violence</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender inequality</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Indigenous peoples</topic><topic>Intersectionality</topic><topic>Judicial reviews</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Legal pluralism</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Minority & ethnic groups</topic><topic>Multiculturalism & pluralism</topic><topic>Native peoples</topic><topic>Negotiation</topic><topic>Oppression</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Patriarchy</topic><topic>Political activism</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Racial discrimination</topic><topic>Racism</topic><topic>Rights</topic><topic>Social classes</topic><topic>Sovereignty</topic><topic>Transformation</topic><topic>Transnationalism</topic><topic>Violence</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens rights</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SIEDER, RACHEL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARRERA, ANNA</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PRISMA Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PRISMA Database with HAPI Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>History Study Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Latin American studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SIEDER, RACHEL</au><au>BARRERA, ANNA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Women and Legal Pluralism: Lessons from Indigenous Governance Systems in the Andes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Latin American studies</jtitle><addtitle>J. Lat. Am. Stud</addtitle><date>2017-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>633</spage><epage>658</epage><pages>633-658</pages><issn>0022-216X</issn><eissn>1469-767X</eissn><abstract>The shift towards legally plural multicultural and pluri-national citizenship regimes in the Andes formally recognised indigenous peoples’ community-based governance systems. These tend to emphasise participation, deliberation and service to the collective, but are often criticised for discriminating against women. We argue that recent constitutional reforms and legislation combining recognition of collective rights claims with institutional guarantees for gender equality have in fact amplified indigenous women's different strategies of ‘negotiating with patriarchy’, allowing them to further the transformation of their organisations and ‘custom’. Such strategies are necessary because of the intersections of race, class and gendered exclusions that indigenous women experience, and possible because of the diverse and dynamic nature of community governance systems. Despite systemic and structural constraints on the guarantee of indigenous peoples’ rights, the actions of organised indigenous women over the last two decades point to new ways of imagining more plural, less patriarchal forms of citizenship. La transición hacia regímenes multiculturales y plurinacionales en los Andes formalmente reconoció a los sistemas comunitarios de gobierno de los pueblos indígenas. Estos tienden a enfatizar la participación, deliberación y el servicio al colectivo, pero son con frecuencia criticados por discriminar a las mujeres. Argumentamos que las reformas constitucionales y otras legislaciones recientes que combinan el reconocimiento a las demandas de derechos colectivos con las garantías institucionales a la igualdad han posibilitado diferentes estrategias de las mujeres indígenas de ‘negociar con el patriarcado’, a la vez permitiéndoles avanzar en la transformación de sus organizaciones y de la ‘costumbre’. Dichas estrategias son necesarias debido a las intersecciones de raza, clase y exclusiones que experimentan las mujeres indígenas, y son posibles también debido a la naturaleza diversa y dinámica de los sistemas comunales de gobierno. A pesar de los límites sistémicos y estructurales en relación a la garantía de los derechos de los pueblos indígenas, las acciones de las mujeres indígenas organizadas en las dos últimas décadas señalan nuevas formas de imaginar una ciudadanía más plural y menos patriarcal. A mudança em direção a um regime de cidadania legalmente multicultural e plurinacional nos Andes garantiu formalmente o reconhecimento de sistemas de governança comunitários dos povos indígenas. Estes sistemas tendem a enfatizar a participação, a deliberação e o trabalho para a coletividade, mas são recorrentemente criticados pela discriminação contra mulheres. Argumentamos que reformas constitucionais recentes e legislação que combinam o reconhecimento de demandas por direitos coletivos com garantias institucionais de igualdade de gênero amplificaram, de fato, as distintas estratégias femininas de ‘negociação com o patriarcado’, permitindo que elas aprofundem a transformação de suas organizações e ‘costumes’. Estas estratégias são necessárias por causa das intersecções entre raça, classe e exclusões de gênero experimentadas por mulheres indígenas e possíveis devido à natureza diversa e dinâmica dos sistemas de governança comunitários. Apesar das restrições sistêmicas e estruturais das garantias dos direitos dos povos indígenas, as ações de mulheres indígenas organizadas durante as duas últimas décadas apontam para novas maneiras de conceber formas de cidadania mais plurais e menos patriarcais.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0022216X16002273</doi><tpages>26</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-216X |
ispartof | Journal of Latin American studies, 2017-08, Vol.49 (3), p.633-658 |
issn | 0022-216X 1469-767X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1920409064 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge Journals; Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Citizenship COMMENTARY Constitutional reform Cultural differences Culture Decision making Domestic violence Equality Gender Gender inequality Governance Indigenous peoples Intersectionality Judicial reviews Leadership Legal pluralism Legislation Minority & ethnic groups Multiculturalism & pluralism Native peoples Negotiation Oppression Participation Patriarchy Political activism Race Racial discrimination Racism Rights Social classes Sovereignty Transformation Transnationalism Violence Women Womens rights |
title | Women and Legal Pluralism: Lessons from Indigenous Governance Systems in the Andes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T17%3A51%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Women%20and%20Legal%20Pluralism:%20Lessons%20from%20Indigenous%20Governance%20Systems%20in%20the%20Andes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Latin%20American%20studies&rft.au=SIEDER,%20RACHEL&rft.date=2017-08&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=633&rft.epage=658&rft.pages=633-658&rft.issn=0022-216X&rft.eissn=1469-767X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0022216X16002273&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26799270%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1920409064&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0022216X16002273&rft_jstor_id=26799270&rfr_iscdi=true |