Social network ties predict land use diversity and land use change: a case study in Ghana

While it is well documented that informal social ties play a role in information exchange on land management practices, the structural features of such networks that govern individual choice on land use change remain elusive. This study aims to correlate information network structures with localized...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Regional environmental change 2017-08, Vol.17 (6), p.1823-1833
Hauptverfasser: Isaac, M.E., Matous, P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1833
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1823
container_title Regional environmental change
container_volume 17
creator Isaac, M.E.
Matous, P.
description While it is well documented that informal social ties play a role in information exchange on land management practices, the structural features of such networks that govern individual choice on land use change remain elusive. This study aims to correlate information network structures with localized or “micro-level” land use diversification and land use change. We ask the following: (i) what is the network structure of producers who manage diverse land use types? and (ii) are network topologies and the emergence of new network ties related to land use change? This work draws on a longitudinal study with producers in the transition zone of Ghana. We use social network analysis to assess the social relationships of 40 focal producers embedded in networks of 116 producers, combined with field observation to chart land use types and size. Land use ordered across eight types, from forest and agroforests to crops and grasslands. Converting land to crop production was correlated to the addition of ties in a focal producer’s network, while the diversity of land use types was correlated to the number of institutional ties as well as gender of the focal producer. We illustrate that local networks relate to land use change whereas external ties drive the introduction of new land use types. Given that the diversity of land use types may be a signature of livelihood resilience, the promotion of external, bridging ties can contribute to an increase in land use diversification. However, a strong local network is needed to implement this change.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10113-017-1151-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1919696160</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A716401493</galeid><sourcerecordid>A716401493</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-8c3f975f266e23386e27de4d373bf7a71220f7aa021b626a66426271939d0a8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhRdRsFZ_gLeA562ZZJtsvJWiVSh4UEFPIU2yNXW7W5Os0n9vlpXiRQKZzON9k-Fl2SXgCWDMrwNgAJpj4DnAFHJ6lI2goCynvHw9PrxFeZqdhbDBycg4HmVvT612qkaNjd-t_0DR2YB23hqnI6pVY1AXLDLuy_rg4h71ykHW76pZ2xukkFapDbEze-QatEi6Os9OKlUHe_Fbx9nL3e3z_D5fPi4e5rNlrgsCMS81rQSfVoQxSygt082NLQzldFVxxYEQnKrCBFaMMMVYQRjhIKgwWJWGjrOrYe7Ot5-dDVFu2s436UsJAgQTDBhOrsngWqvaStdUbfRKp2Ps1um2sZVL-owDKzAUgiYABkD7NgRvK7nzbqv8XgKWfeRyiFymJGUfuewZMjAheVMy_s8q_0I_NV2Bnw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1919696160</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social network ties predict land use diversity and land use change: a case study in Ghana</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Isaac, M.E. ; Matous, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Isaac, M.E. ; Matous, P.</creatorcontrib><description>While it is well documented that informal social ties play a role in information exchange on land management practices, the structural features of such networks that govern individual choice on land use change remain elusive. This study aims to correlate information network structures with localized or “micro-level” land use diversification and land use change. We ask the following: (i) what is the network structure of producers who manage diverse land use types? and (ii) are network topologies and the emergence of new network ties related to land use change? This work draws on a longitudinal study with producers in the transition zone of Ghana. We use social network analysis to assess the social relationships of 40 focal producers embedded in networks of 116 producers, combined with field observation to chart land use types and size. Land use ordered across eight types, from forest and agroforests to crops and grasslands. Converting land to crop production was correlated to the addition of ties in a focal producer’s network, while the diversity of land use types was correlated to the number of institutional ties as well as gender of the focal producer. We illustrate that local networks relate to land use change whereas external ties drive the introduction of new land use types. Given that the diversity of land use types may be a signature of livelihood resilience, the promotion of external, bridging ties can contribute to an increase in land use diversification. However, a strong local network is needed to implement this change.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1436-3798</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-378X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10113-017-1151-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Agroforestry ; Analysis ; Case studies ; Climate Change ; Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts ; Correlation analysis ; Crop production ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Environment ; Geography ; Grasslands ; Information management ; Land management ; Land use ; Land use management ; Longitudinal studies ; Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism ; Nature Conservation ; Network analysis ; Oceanography ; Original Article ; Promotion ; Regional/Spatial Science ; Resilience ; Social networks ; Social organization ; Transition zone</subject><ispartof>Regional environmental change, 2017-08, Vol.17 (6), p.1823-1833</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Springer</rights><rights>Regional Environmental Change is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-8c3f975f266e23386e27de4d373bf7a71220f7aa021b626a66426271939d0a8d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-8c3f975f266e23386e27de4d373bf7a71220f7aa021b626a66426271939d0a8d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10113-017-1151-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10113-017-1151-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Isaac, M.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matous, P.</creatorcontrib><title>Social network ties predict land use diversity and land use change: a case study in Ghana</title><title>Regional environmental change</title><addtitle>Reg Environ Change</addtitle><description>While it is well documented that informal social ties play a role in information exchange on land management practices, the structural features of such networks that govern individual choice on land use change remain elusive. This study aims to correlate information network structures with localized or “micro-level” land use diversification and land use change. We ask the following: (i) what is the network structure of producers who manage diverse land use types? and (ii) are network topologies and the emergence of new network ties related to land use change? This work draws on a longitudinal study with producers in the transition zone of Ghana. We use social network analysis to assess the social relationships of 40 focal producers embedded in networks of 116 producers, combined with field observation to chart land use types and size. Land use ordered across eight types, from forest and agroforests to crops and grasslands. Converting land to crop production was correlated to the addition of ties in a focal producer’s network, while the diversity of land use types was correlated to the number of institutional ties as well as gender of the focal producer. We illustrate that local networks relate to land use change whereas external ties drive the introduction of new land use types. Given that the diversity of land use types may be a signature of livelihood resilience, the promotion of external, bridging ties can contribute to an increase in land use diversification. However, a strong local network is needed to implement this change.</description><subject>Agroforestry</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Climate Change</subject><subject>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Information management</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Land use management</subject><subject>Longitudinal studies</subject><subject>Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>Network analysis</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Promotion</subject><subject>Regional/Spatial Science</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social organization</subject><subject>Transition zone</subject><issn>1436-3798</issn><issn>1436-378X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhRdRsFZ_gLeA562ZZJtsvJWiVSh4UEFPIU2yNXW7W5Os0n9vlpXiRQKZzON9k-Fl2SXgCWDMrwNgAJpj4DnAFHJ6lI2goCynvHw9PrxFeZqdhbDBycg4HmVvT612qkaNjd-t_0DR2YB23hqnI6pVY1AXLDLuy_rg4h71ykHW76pZ2xukkFapDbEze-QatEi6Os9OKlUHe_Fbx9nL3e3z_D5fPi4e5rNlrgsCMS81rQSfVoQxSygt082NLQzldFVxxYEQnKrCBFaMMMVYQRjhIKgwWJWGjrOrYe7Ot5-dDVFu2s436UsJAgQTDBhOrsngWqvaStdUbfRKp2Ps1um2sZVL-owDKzAUgiYABkD7NgRvK7nzbqv8XgKWfeRyiFymJGUfuewZMjAheVMy_s8q_0I_NV2Bnw</recordid><startdate>20170801</startdate><enddate>20170801</enddate><creator>Isaac, M.E.</creator><creator>Matous, P.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170801</creationdate><title>Social network ties predict land use diversity and land use change: a case study in Ghana</title><author>Isaac, M.E. ; Matous, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-8c3f975f266e23386e27de4d373bf7a71220f7aa021b626a66426271939d0a8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Agroforestry</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Climate Change</topic><topic>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Information management</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Land use management</topic><topic>Longitudinal studies</topic><topic>Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>Network analysis</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Promotion</topic><topic>Regional/Spatial Science</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social organization</topic><topic>Transition zone</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Isaac, M.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matous, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Regional environmental change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Isaac, M.E.</au><au>Matous, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social network ties predict land use diversity and land use change: a case study in Ghana</atitle><jtitle>Regional environmental change</jtitle><stitle>Reg Environ Change</stitle><date>2017-08-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1823</spage><epage>1833</epage><pages>1823-1833</pages><issn>1436-3798</issn><eissn>1436-378X</eissn><abstract>While it is well documented that informal social ties play a role in information exchange on land management practices, the structural features of such networks that govern individual choice on land use change remain elusive. This study aims to correlate information network structures with localized or “micro-level” land use diversification and land use change. We ask the following: (i) what is the network structure of producers who manage diverse land use types? and (ii) are network topologies and the emergence of new network ties related to land use change? This work draws on a longitudinal study with producers in the transition zone of Ghana. We use social network analysis to assess the social relationships of 40 focal producers embedded in networks of 116 producers, combined with field observation to chart land use types and size. Land use ordered across eight types, from forest and agroforests to crops and grasslands. Converting land to crop production was correlated to the addition of ties in a focal producer’s network, while the diversity of land use types was correlated to the number of institutional ties as well as gender of the focal producer. We illustrate that local networks relate to land use change whereas external ties drive the introduction of new land use types. Given that the diversity of land use types may be a signature of livelihood resilience, the promotion of external, bridging ties can contribute to an increase in land use diversification. However, a strong local network is needed to implement this change.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s10113-017-1151-3</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1436-3798
ispartof Regional environmental change, 2017-08, Vol.17 (6), p.1823-1833
issn 1436-3798
1436-378X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1919696160
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Agroforestry
Analysis
Case studies
Climate Change
Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts
Correlation analysis
Crop production
Earth and Environmental Science
Environment
Geography
Grasslands
Information management
Land management
Land use
Land use management
Longitudinal studies
Multiculturalism & pluralism
Nature Conservation
Network analysis
Oceanography
Original Article
Promotion
Regional/Spatial Science
Resilience
Social networks
Social organization
Transition zone
title Social network ties predict land use diversity and land use change: a case study in Ghana
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T04%3A49%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20network%20ties%20predict%20land%20use%20diversity%20and%20land%20use%20change:%20a%20case%20study%20in%20Ghana&rft.jtitle=Regional%20environmental%20change&rft.au=Isaac,%20M.E.&rft.date=2017-08-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1823&rft.epage=1833&rft.pages=1823-1833&rft.issn=1436-3798&rft.eissn=1436-378X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10113-017-1151-3&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA716401493%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1919696160&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A716401493&rfr_iscdi=true