Insecticides based on insect chitin synthesis inhibitors
The following benzoylurea chitin synthesis inhibitors—diflubenzuron used in Dimilin and Gerold formulations, lufenuron registered as Match, and a Lufox combined insecticide based on two active ingredients, lufenuron and fenoxycarb (juvenoid)—have been tested. The effectiveness of the Dimilin insecti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Russian agricultural sciences 2017-05, Vol.43 (3), p.238-243 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 243 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 238 |
container_title | Russian agricultural sciences |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Dolzhenko, V. I. Dolzhenko, T. V. |
description | The following benzoylurea chitin synthesis inhibitors—diflubenzuron used in Dimilin and Gerold formulations, lufenuron registered as Match, and a Lufox combined insecticide based on two active ingredients, lufenuron and fenoxycarb (juvenoid)—have been tested. The effectiveness of the Dimilin insecticide in regulating the codling moth (
Cydia pomonella
L.) population was assessed in Tambov oblast, Rostov-on-Don oblast, and Krasnodar krai in 2010–2011. Reduction of damage in the harvested fruit at the maximum application rate comprised 90–100% in all the regions. The biological effectiveness of the Gerold preparation in regulating the complex population consisted of leafrollers and currant bud moths (Incurvaria capitella Cl.) and comprised 85–87% in the Tambov oblast and reached 100% in the Orel and Leningradskaya oblasts (2012–2014). The field tests to assess the biological effectiveness of the Match insecticide in regulating the population of cotton worm (Heliothis armigera Hb) in Krasnodar krai and Astrakhan oblast proved that the preparation was capable to reduce the number of the cotton worm larvae on tomato plants (up to 99.0%). The Lufox combined insecticide effectively reduced the larval population of codling moth and, hence, the damage of apple fruit in Krasnodar krai and Rostov-on-Don oblast (up to 96.8%). The tested plant protection products are recommended for use in the ecologized systems. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3103/S1068367417030065 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1919073673</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1919073673</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1135-98e931471d4ed3b5d02bf788a2e1cae51ff1a83f7f7615c0f3baa1a9eee961ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UDtPwzAQthBIlMIPYIvEHPDlktgeUcWjUiUGYI4c50xcQVJ86dB_j0sZkBDTnb7X6T4hLkFeI0i8eQZZa6xVCUqilHV1JGZgsMy1RHWc9kTne_5UnDGvpazqosSZ0MuByU3BhY44ay1Tl41DFr7RzPVhCkPGu2HqiQMnvA9tmMbI5-LE23emi585F6_3dy-Lx3z19LBc3K5yB4BVbjQZhFJBV1KHbdXJovVKa1sQOEsVeA9Wo1de1VA56bG1FqwhIlODJZyLq0PuJo6fW-KpWY_bOKSTDRgwUqWnMKngoHJxZI7km00MHzbuGpDNvqDmT0HJUxw8nLTDG8Vfyf-avgBdHGdH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1919073673</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Insecticides based on insect chitin synthesis inhibitors</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Dolzhenko, V. I. ; Dolzhenko, T. V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dolzhenko, V. I. ; Dolzhenko, T. V.</creatorcontrib><description>The following benzoylurea chitin synthesis inhibitors—diflubenzuron used in Dimilin and Gerold formulations, lufenuron registered as Match, and a Lufox combined insecticide based on two active ingredients, lufenuron and fenoxycarb (juvenoid)—have been tested. The effectiveness of the Dimilin insecticide in regulating the codling moth (
Cydia pomonella
L.) population was assessed in Tambov oblast, Rostov-on-Don oblast, and Krasnodar krai in 2010–2011. Reduction of damage in the harvested fruit at the maximum application rate comprised 90–100% in all the regions. The biological effectiveness of the Gerold preparation in regulating the complex population consisted of leafrollers and currant bud moths (Incurvaria capitella Cl.) and comprised 85–87% in the Tambov oblast and reached 100% in the Orel and Leningradskaya oblasts (2012–2014). The field tests to assess the biological effectiveness of the Match insecticide in regulating the population of cotton worm (Heliothis armigera Hb) in Krasnodar krai and Astrakhan oblast proved that the preparation was capable to reduce the number of the cotton worm larvae on tomato plants (up to 99.0%). The Lufox combined insecticide effectively reduced the larval population of codling moth and, hence, the damage of apple fruit in Krasnodar krai and Rostov-on-Don oblast (up to 96.8%). The tested plant protection products are recommended for use in the ecologized systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-3674</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-8037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3103/S1068367417030065</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Allerton Press</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Agrochemicals ; Apples ; Biological effects ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Butterflies & moths ; Chitin ; Cotton ; Damage ; Diflubenzuron ; Fenoxycarb ; Field tests ; Formulations ; Fruits ; Ingredients ; Inhibitors ; Insecticides ; Larvae ; Life Sciences ; Plant Biochemistry ; Plant Protection ; Plants (botany) ; Population ; Synthesis ; Tomatoes</subject><ispartof>Russian agricultural sciences, 2017-05, Vol.43 (3), p.238-243</ispartof><rights>Allerton Press, Inc. 2017</rights><rights>Russian Agricultural Sciences is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3103/S1068367417030065$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3103/S1068367417030065$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dolzhenko, V. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolzhenko, T. V.</creatorcontrib><title>Insecticides based on insect chitin synthesis inhibitors</title><title>Russian agricultural sciences</title><addtitle>Russ. Agricult. Sci</addtitle><description>The following benzoylurea chitin synthesis inhibitors—diflubenzuron used in Dimilin and Gerold formulations, lufenuron registered as Match, and a Lufox combined insecticide based on two active ingredients, lufenuron and fenoxycarb (juvenoid)—have been tested. The effectiveness of the Dimilin insecticide in regulating the codling moth (
Cydia pomonella
L.) population was assessed in Tambov oblast, Rostov-on-Don oblast, and Krasnodar krai in 2010–2011. Reduction of damage in the harvested fruit at the maximum application rate comprised 90–100% in all the regions. The biological effectiveness of the Gerold preparation in regulating the complex population consisted of leafrollers and currant bud moths (Incurvaria capitella Cl.) and comprised 85–87% in the Tambov oblast and reached 100% in the Orel and Leningradskaya oblasts (2012–2014). The field tests to assess the biological effectiveness of the Match insecticide in regulating the population of cotton worm (Heliothis armigera Hb) in Krasnodar krai and Astrakhan oblast proved that the preparation was capable to reduce the number of the cotton worm larvae on tomato plants (up to 99.0%). The Lufox combined insecticide effectively reduced the larval population of codling moth and, hence, the damage of apple fruit in Krasnodar krai and Rostov-on-Don oblast (up to 96.8%). The tested plant protection products are recommended for use in the ecologized systems.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agrochemicals</subject><subject>Apples</subject><subject>Biological effects</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Butterflies & moths</subject><subject>Chitin</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Diflubenzuron</subject><subject>Fenoxycarb</subject><subject>Field tests</subject><subject>Formulations</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Ingredients</subject><subject>Inhibitors</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Plant Biochemistry</subject><subject>Plant Protection</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Synthesis</subject><subject>Tomatoes</subject><issn>1068-3674</issn><issn>1934-8037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UDtPwzAQthBIlMIPYIvEHPDlktgeUcWjUiUGYI4c50xcQVJ86dB_j0sZkBDTnb7X6T4hLkFeI0i8eQZZa6xVCUqilHV1JGZgsMy1RHWc9kTne_5UnDGvpazqosSZ0MuByU3BhY44ay1Tl41DFr7RzPVhCkPGu2HqiQMnvA9tmMbI5-LE23emi585F6_3dy-Lx3z19LBc3K5yB4BVbjQZhFJBV1KHbdXJovVKa1sQOEsVeA9Wo1de1VA56bG1FqwhIlODJZyLq0PuJo6fW-KpWY_bOKSTDRgwUqWnMKngoHJxZI7km00MHzbuGpDNvqDmT0HJUxw8nLTDG8Vfyf-avgBdHGdH</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Dolzhenko, V. I.</creator><creator>Dolzhenko, T. V.</creator><general>Allerton Press</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>Insecticides based on insect chitin synthesis inhibitors</title><author>Dolzhenko, V. I. ; Dolzhenko, T. V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1135-98e931471d4ed3b5d02bf788a2e1cae51ff1a83f7f7615c0f3baa1a9eee961ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agrochemicals</topic><topic>Apples</topic><topic>Biological effects</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Butterflies & moths</topic><topic>Chitin</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Diflubenzuron</topic><topic>Fenoxycarb</topic><topic>Field tests</topic><topic>Formulations</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Ingredients</topic><topic>Inhibitors</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Plant Biochemistry</topic><topic>Plant Protection</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Synthesis</topic><topic>Tomatoes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dolzhenko, V. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolzhenko, T. V.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Russian agricultural sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dolzhenko, V. I.</au><au>Dolzhenko, T. V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Insecticides based on insect chitin synthesis inhibitors</atitle><jtitle>Russian agricultural sciences</jtitle><stitle>Russ. Agricult. Sci</stitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>238</spage><epage>243</epage><pages>238-243</pages><issn>1068-3674</issn><eissn>1934-8037</eissn><abstract>The following benzoylurea chitin synthesis inhibitors—diflubenzuron used in Dimilin and Gerold formulations, lufenuron registered as Match, and a Lufox combined insecticide based on two active ingredients, lufenuron and fenoxycarb (juvenoid)—have been tested. The effectiveness of the Dimilin insecticide in regulating the codling moth (
Cydia pomonella
L.) population was assessed in Tambov oblast, Rostov-on-Don oblast, and Krasnodar krai in 2010–2011. Reduction of damage in the harvested fruit at the maximum application rate comprised 90–100% in all the regions. The biological effectiveness of the Gerold preparation in regulating the complex population consisted of leafrollers and currant bud moths (Incurvaria capitella Cl.) and comprised 85–87% in the Tambov oblast and reached 100% in the Orel and Leningradskaya oblasts (2012–2014). The field tests to assess the biological effectiveness of the Match insecticide in regulating the population of cotton worm (Heliothis armigera Hb) in Krasnodar krai and Astrakhan oblast proved that the preparation was capable to reduce the number of the cotton worm larvae on tomato plants (up to 99.0%). The Lufox combined insecticide effectively reduced the larval population of codling moth and, hence, the damage of apple fruit in Krasnodar krai and Rostov-on-Don oblast (up to 96.8%). The tested plant protection products are recommended for use in the ecologized systems.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Allerton Press</pub><doi>10.3103/S1068367417030065</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1068-3674 |
ispartof | Russian agricultural sciences, 2017-05, Vol.43 (3), p.238-243 |
issn | 1068-3674 1934-8037 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1919073673 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Agriculture Agrochemicals Apples Biological effects Biomedical and Life Sciences Butterflies & moths Chitin Cotton Damage Diflubenzuron Fenoxycarb Field tests Formulations Fruits Ingredients Inhibitors Insecticides Larvae Life Sciences Plant Biochemistry Plant Protection Plants (botany) Population Synthesis Tomatoes |
title | Insecticides based on insect chitin synthesis inhibitors |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T10%3A53%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Insecticides%20based%20on%20insect%20chitin%20synthesis%20inhibitors&rft.jtitle=Russian%20agricultural%20sciences&rft.au=Dolzhenko,%20V.%20I.&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=238&rft.epage=243&rft.pages=238-243&rft.issn=1068-3674&rft.eissn=1934-8037&rft_id=info:doi/10.3103/S1068367417030065&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1919073673%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1919073673&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |