Lithium ion, lithium metal, and alternative rechargeable battery technologies: the odyssey for high energy density
Since their market introduction in 1991, lithium ion batteries (LIBs) have developed evolutionary in terms of their specific energies (Wh/kg) and energy densities (Wh/L). Currently, they do not only dominate the small format battery market for portable electronic devices, but have also been successf...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of solid state electrochemistry 2017-07, Vol.21 (7), p.1939-1964 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1964 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1939 |
container_title | Journal of solid state electrochemistry |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Placke, Tobias Kloepsch, Richard Dühnen, Simon Winter, Martin |
description | Since their market introduction in 1991, lithium ion batteries (LIBs) have developed evolutionary in terms of their specific energies (Wh/kg) and energy densities (Wh/L). Currently, they do not only dominate the small format battery market for portable electronic devices, but have also been successfully implemented as the technology of choice for electromobility as well as for stationary energy storage. Besides LIBs, a variety of different technologically promising battery concepts exists that, depending on the respective technology, might also be suitable for various application purposes. These systems of the “next generation,” the so-called post-lithium ion batteries (PLIBs), such as metal/sulfur, metal/air or metal/oxygen, or “post-lithium technologies” (systems without Li), which are based on alternative single (Na
+
, K
+
) or multivalent ions (Mg
2+
, Ca
2+
), are currently being studied intensively. From today’s point of view, it seems quite clear that there will not only be a single technology for all applications (technology monopoly), but different battery systems, which can be especially suitable or combined for a particular application (technology diversity). In this review, we place the lithium ion technology in a historical context and give insights into the battery technology diversity that evolved during the past decades and which will, in turn, influence future research and development. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10008-017-3610-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1918882076</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1918882076</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-f77ffc6b9940ff08279835f9133f0fc0a5eba53527d9254bc23402c4411d9eb53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxAewssa3Bj6R22KGKl1SJDawtJxknrtK42C5S_h6XdsGGjcczPnckH4RuGL1jlMr7mE-qCGWSiAWjRJ6gGSuEIFQu1OnvnRNVKHWOLmJc0wxmbIbCyqXe7TbY-XGOh2OzgWSGOTZji82QIIwmuW_AAZrehA5MPQCuTcovE055OPrBdw7iA049YN9OMcKErQ-4d12PYYTQTbiFMbo0XaEza4YI18d6iT6fnz6Wr2T1_vK2fFyRpuAsESultc2irqqCWksVl5USpa2YEJbahpoSalOKksu24mVRN1wUlDdFwVhbQV2KS3R72LsN_msHMem13-WvDFGziimleHaTKXagmuBjDGD1NriNCZNmVO_V6oNanY3pvVotc4YfMjGzYwfhz-Z_Qz-35nz2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1918882076</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lithium ion, lithium metal, and alternative rechargeable battery technologies: the odyssey for high energy density</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Placke, Tobias ; Kloepsch, Richard ; Dühnen, Simon ; Winter, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Placke, Tobias ; Kloepsch, Richard ; Dühnen, Simon ; Winter, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>Since their market introduction in 1991, lithium ion batteries (LIBs) have developed evolutionary in terms of their specific energies (Wh/kg) and energy densities (Wh/L). Currently, they do not only dominate the small format battery market for portable electronic devices, but have also been successfully implemented as the technology of choice for electromobility as well as for stationary energy storage. Besides LIBs, a variety of different technologically promising battery concepts exists that, depending on the respective technology, might also be suitable for various application purposes. These systems of the “next generation,” the so-called post-lithium ion batteries (PLIBs), such as metal/sulfur, metal/air or metal/oxygen, or “post-lithium technologies” (systems without Li), which are based on alternative single (Na
+
, K
+
) or multivalent ions (Mg
2+
, Ca
2+
), are currently being studied intensively. From today’s point of view, it seems quite clear that there will not only be a single technology for all applications (technology monopoly), but different battery systems, which can be especially suitable or combined for a particular application (technology diversity). In this review, we place the lithium ion technology in a historical context and give insights into the battery technology diversity that evolved during the past decades and which will, in turn, influence future research and development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-8488</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-0768</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10008-017-3610-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Analytical Chemistry ; Batteries ; Characterization and Evaluation of Materials ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Condensed Matter Physics ; Electrochemistry ; Electronic devices ; Energy Storage ; Flux density ; Lithium ; Lithium batteries ; Lithium-ion batteries ; Markets ; Physical Chemistry ; Portable equipment ; Product design ; R&D ; Rechargeable batteries ; Research & development ; Review ; Sulfur</subject><ispartof>Journal of solid state electrochemistry, 2017-07, Vol.21 (7), p.1939-1964</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-f77ffc6b9940ff08279835f9133f0fc0a5eba53527d9254bc23402c4411d9eb53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-f77ffc6b9940ff08279835f9133f0fc0a5eba53527d9254bc23402c4411d9eb53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10008-017-3610-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10008-017-3610-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Placke, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kloepsch, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dühnen, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winter, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>Lithium ion, lithium metal, and alternative rechargeable battery technologies: the odyssey for high energy density</title><title>Journal of solid state electrochemistry</title><addtitle>J Solid State Electrochem</addtitle><description>Since their market introduction in 1991, lithium ion batteries (LIBs) have developed evolutionary in terms of their specific energies (Wh/kg) and energy densities (Wh/L). Currently, they do not only dominate the small format battery market for portable electronic devices, but have also been successfully implemented as the technology of choice for electromobility as well as for stationary energy storage. Besides LIBs, a variety of different technologically promising battery concepts exists that, depending on the respective technology, might also be suitable for various application purposes. These systems of the “next generation,” the so-called post-lithium ion batteries (PLIBs), such as metal/sulfur, metal/air or metal/oxygen, or “post-lithium technologies” (systems without Li), which are based on alternative single (Na
+
, K
+
) or multivalent ions (Mg
2+
, Ca
2+
), are currently being studied intensively. From today’s point of view, it seems quite clear that there will not only be a single technology for all applications (technology monopoly), but different battery systems, which can be especially suitable or combined for a particular application (technology diversity). In this review, we place the lithium ion technology in a historical context and give insights into the battery technology diversity that evolved during the past decades and which will, in turn, influence future research and development.</description><subject>Analytical Chemistry</subject><subject>Batteries</subject><subject>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Condensed Matter Physics</subject><subject>Electrochemistry</subject><subject>Electronic devices</subject><subject>Energy Storage</subject><subject>Flux density</subject><subject>Lithium</subject><subject>Lithium batteries</subject><subject>Lithium-ion batteries</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Physical Chemistry</subject><subject>Portable equipment</subject><subject>Product design</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Rechargeable batteries</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><issn>1432-8488</issn><issn>1433-0768</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxAewssa3Bj6R22KGKl1SJDawtJxknrtK42C5S_h6XdsGGjcczPnckH4RuGL1jlMr7mE-qCGWSiAWjRJ6gGSuEIFQu1OnvnRNVKHWOLmJc0wxmbIbCyqXe7TbY-XGOh2OzgWSGOTZji82QIIwmuW_AAZrehA5MPQCuTcovE055OPrBdw7iA049YN9OMcKErQ-4d12PYYTQTbiFMbo0XaEza4YI18d6iT6fnz6Wr2T1_vK2fFyRpuAsESultc2irqqCWksVl5USpa2YEJbahpoSalOKksu24mVRN1wUlDdFwVhbQV2KS3R72LsN_msHMem13-WvDFGziimleHaTKXagmuBjDGD1NriNCZNmVO_V6oNanY3pvVotc4YfMjGzYwfhz-Z_Qz-35nz2</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Placke, Tobias</creator><creator>Kloepsch, Richard</creator><creator>Dühnen, Simon</creator><creator>Winter, Martin</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>Lithium ion, lithium metal, and alternative rechargeable battery technologies: the odyssey for high energy density</title><author>Placke, Tobias ; Kloepsch, Richard ; Dühnen, Simon ; Winter, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-f77ffc6b9940ff08279835f9133f0fc0a5eba53527d9254bc23402c4411d9eb53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Analytical Chemistry</topic><topic>Batteries</topic><topic>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Condensed Matter Physics</topic><topic>Electrochemistry</topic><topic>Electronic devices</topic><topic>Energy Storage</topic><topic>Flux density</topic><topic>Lithium</topic><topic>Lithium batteries</topic><topic>Lithium-ion batteries</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Physical Chemistry</topic><topic>Portable equipment</topic><topic>Product design</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Rechargeable batteries</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Placke, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kloepsch, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dühnen, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winter, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of solid state electrochemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Placke, Tobias</au><au>Kloepsch, Richard</au><au>Dühnen, Simon</au><au>Winter, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lithium ion, lithium metal, and alternative rechargeable battery technologies: the odyssey for high energy density</atitle><jtitle>Journal of solid state electrochemistry</jtitle><stitle>J Solid State Electrochem</stitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1939</spage><epage>1964</epage><pages>1939-1964</pages><issn>1432-8488</issn><eissn>1433-0768</eissn><abstract>Since their market introduction in 1991, lithium ion batteries (LIBs) have developed evolutionary in terms of their specific energies (Wh/kg) and energy densities (Wh/L). Currently, they do not only dominate the small format battery market for portable electronic devices, but have also been successfully implemented as the technology of choice for electromobility as well as for stationary energy storage. Besides LIBs, a variety of different technologically promising battery concepts exists that, depending on the respective technology, might also be suitable for various application purposes. These systems of the “next generation,” the so-called post-lithium ion batteries (PLIBs), such as metal/sulfur, metal/air or metal/oxygen, or “post-lithium technologies” (systems without Li), which are based on alternative single (Na
+
, K
+
) or multivalent ions (Mg
2+
, Ca
2+
), are currently being studied intensively. From today’s point of view, it seems quite clear that there will not only be a single technology for all applications (technology monopoly), but different battery systems, which can be especially suitable or combined for a particular application (technology diversity). In this review, we place the lithium ion technology in a historical context and give insights into the battery technology diversity that evolved during the past decades and which will, in turn, influence future research and development.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s10008-017-3610-7</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1432-8488 |
ispartof | Journal of solid state electrochemistry, 2017-07, Vol.21 (7), p.1939-1964 |
issn | 1432-8488 1433-0768 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1918882076 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Analytical Chemistry Batteries Characterization and Evaluation of Materials Chemistry Chemistry and Materials Science Condensed Matter Physics Electrochemistry Electronic devices Energy Storage Flux density Lithium Lithium batteries Lithium-ion batteries Markets Physical Chemistry Portable equipment Product design R&D Rechargeable batteries Research & development Review Sulfur |
title | Lithium ion, lithium metal, and alternative rechargeable battery technologies: the odyssey for high energy density |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T17%3A57%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lithium%20ion,%20lithium%20metal,%20and%20alternative%20rechargeable%20battery%20technologies:%20the%20odyssey%20for%20high%20energy%20density&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20solid%20state%20electrochemistry&rft.au=Placke,%20Tobias&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1939&rft.epage=1964&rft.pages=1939-1964&rft.issn=1432-8488&rft.eissn=1433-0768&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10008-017-3610-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1918882076%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1918882076&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |