Treatment additives reduced arsenic and cadmium bioavailability and increased 1,2-dichloroethane biodegradation and microbial enzyme activities in co-contaminated soil
Purpose Bioremediation of co-contaminated environments is difficult because of the mixed nature of the contaminants and the fact that the two components often must be treated differently. This study investigated the use of inorganic treatment additives, namely calcium carbonate (CaCO 3 ), gypsum (Ca...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of soils and sediments 2017-08, Vol.17 (8), p.2019-2029 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2029 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 2019 |
container_title | Journal of soils and sediments |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Olaniran, Ademola O. Balgobind, Adhika Kumar, Ajit Pillay, Balakrishna |
description | Purpose
Bioremediation of co-contaminated environments is difficult because of the mixed nature of the contaminants and the fact that the two components often must be treated differently. This study investigated the use of inorganic treatment additives, namely calcium carbonate (CaCO
3
), gypsum (CaSO
4
·2H
2
O), and disodium phosphate (Na
2
HPO
4
) to improve remediation of soil co-contaminated with 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) and arsenic or cadmium.
Materials and methods
The soil samples were collected from a specific site in the Westville area in Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Microcosms were set up by artificially co-contaminating the soil sample (100 g mixed with 75 ml of synthetic groundwater in sterile screw-capped 250-ml serum bottles) with 1,2-DCA + risk elements; As
3+
(150 mg/kg); or Cd
2+
(170 mg/kg). Thereafter, each microcosm was amended with either 5 g CaCO
3
, 2 g CaSO
4
·2H
2
O, or 1.12 g Na
2
HPO
4
+ 0.046 g NaCl, separately. The samples were analyzed for the degradation of 1,2-DCA using GC–MS, while total 1,2-DCA degrading bacterial populations were determined at different sampling times using a standard spread plate technique. Soil dehydrogenase and urease activities were also monitored during the experimental period using standard enzyme assays.
Results and discussion
Addition of CaCO
3
resulted in an approximately 2-fold increase in 1,2-DCA degradation in both the As
3+
and the Cd
2+
co-contaminated soil as compared to the co-contaminated soil without CaCO
3
. All the treatment additives were more effective in the As
3+
co-contaminated soil resulting in 11.19, 9.25, and 5.63% increase in 1,2-DCA degradation in the presence of CaCO
3
, Na
2
HPO
4
+ NaCl, and CaSO
4
·2H
2
O, respectively, compared to the Cd
2+
co-contaminated soil. The total 1,2-DCA degrading bacterial population increased in treated soils over time. Overall, soil dehydrogenase and urease activities were lower in the heavy metal co-contaminated samples compared to the treated soil. The inhibitory effect of heavy metal was less in As
3+
co-contaminated soil for both CaCO
3
- and Na
2
HPO
4
+ NaCl-treated soil, with up to 7.92% increase in dehydrogenase activity obtained compared to soil co-contaminated with Cd
2+
.
Conclusions
Results from this study indicate that treatment additives can be used to reduce bioavailable fractions of risk elements in the soil matrices, thereby limiting the toxicity of these risk elements to 1,2-DCA degrading microorganisms. Thus, thi |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11368-017-1683-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1918297581</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1918297581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-572a98d46131b2468c5792fc7d5773cc590bbfddd0a3d054fbe579f3ec40d3cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFr3TAQhE1pIWmaH5CboNeq0Vq2ZR9LaNNCoJf0LNbSOtlgS6mkF3j9Q_2b0cvroZecJJhvZlimaS5AfQalzGUG0MMoFRgJw6iledOcwgCdNN2o3tZ_p6eqqvGkeZ_zg1LaVPm0-XubCMtGoQj0ngs_URaJ_M6RF5gyBXYCgxcO_ca7Tcwc8Ql5xZlXLvsXjYOrKbk64FMrPbv7NaZI5R4DHQye7hJ6LBzDC7-xS3FmXAWFP_uNBLpaXMtrNwfhonQxFNw4YKmhOfL6oXm34Jrp_N971vz69vX26ru8-Xn94-rLjXQahiJ70-I0-m4ADXPbDaPrzdQuzvjeGO1cP6l5Xrz3CrVXfbfMVIFFk-uU127WZ83HY-5jir93lIt9iLsUaqWFCcZ2Mv0IlYIjVe_IOdFiHxNvmPYWlD3sYY972LqHPexhTfW0R0-ubLij9F_yq6ZnbQiSHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1918297581</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treatment additives reduced arsenic and cadmium bioavailability and increased 1,2-dichloroethane biodegradation and microbial enzyme activities in co-contaminated soil</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Olaniran, Ademola O. ; Balgobind, Adhika ; Kumar, Ajit ; Pillay, Balakrishna</creator><creatorcontrib>Olaniran, Ademola O. ; Balgobind, Adhika ; Kumar, Ajit ; Pillay, Balakrishna</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Bioremediation of co-contaminated environments is difficult because of the mixed nature of the contaminants and the fact that the two components often must be treated differently. This study investigated the use of inorganic treatment additives, namely calcium carbonate (CaCO
3
), gypsum (CaSO
4
·2H
2
O), and disodium phosphate (Na
2
HPO
4
) to improve remediation of soil co-contaminated with 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) and arsenic or cadmium.
Materials and methods
The soil samples were collected from a specific site in the Westville area in Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Microcosms were set up by artificially co-contaminating the soil sample (100 g mixed with 75 ml of synthetic groundwater in sterile screw-capped 250-ml serum bottles) with 1,2-DCA + risk elements; As
3+
(150 mg/kg); or Cd
2+
(170 mg/kg). Thereafter, each microcosm was amended with either 5 g CaCO
3
, 2 g CaSO
4
·2H
2
O, or 1.12 g Na
2
HPO
4
+ 0.046 g NaCl, separately. The samples were analyzed for the degradation of 1,2-DCA using GC–MS, while total 1,2-DCA degrading bacterial populations were determined at different sampling times using a standard spread plate technique. Soil dehydrogenase and urease activities were also monitored during the experimental period using standard enzyme assays.
Results and discussion
Addition of CaCO
3
resulted in an approximately 2-fold increase in 1,2-DCA degradation in both the As
3+
and the Cd
2+
co-contaminated soil as compared to the co-contaminated soil without CaCO
3
. All the treatment additives were more effective in the As
3+
co-contaminated soil resulting in 11.19, 9.25, and 5.63% increase in 1,2-DCA degradation in the presence of CaCO
3
, Na
2
HPO
4
+ NaCl, and CaSO
4
·2H
2
O, respectively, compared to the Cd
2+
co-contaminated soil. The total 1,2-DCA degrading bacterial population increased in treated soils over time. Overall, soil dehydrogenase and urease activities were lower in the heavy metal co-contaminated samples compared to the treated soil. The inhibitory effect of heavy metal was less in As
3+
co-contaminated soil for both CaCO
3
- and Na
2
HPO
4
+ NaCl-treated soil, with up to 7.92% increase in dehydrogenase activity obtained compared to soil co-contaminated with Cd
2+
.
Conclusions
Results from this study indicate that treatment additives can be used to reduce bioavailable fractions of risk elements in the soil matrices, thereby limiting the toxicity of these risk elements to 1,2-DCA degrading microorganisms. Thus, this approach can be applied to enhance organic compound degradation in co-contaminated soil environments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1439-0108</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7480</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11368-017-1683-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Additives ; Arsenic ; Assaying ; Bacteria ; Bioavailability ; Biodegradation ; Bioremediation ; Cadmium ; Calcium ; Calcium carbonate ; Calcium carbonates ; Capping ; Carbonates ; Cobalt ; Components ; Contaminants ; Dehydrogenase ; Dichloroethane ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Environment ; Environmental Physics ; Enzymatic activity ; Enzymes ; Groundwater ; Gypsum ; Heavy metals ; Matrices (mathematics) ; Methods ; Microcosms ; Microorganisms ; Organic compounds ; Phosphates ; Populations ; Remediation ; Risk ; Sec 1 • Soil Organic Matter Dynamics and Nutrient Cycling • Research Article ; Serum ; Sodium chloride ; Soil ; Soil contamination ; Soil environment ; Soil microorganisms ; Soil pollution ; Soil remediation ; Soil Science & Conservation ; Soil treatment ; Soils ; Toxicity ; Urease</subject><ispartof>Journal of soils and sediments, 2017-08, Vol.17 (8), p.2019-2029</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017</rights><rights>Journal of Soils and Sediments is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-572a98d46131b2468c5792fc7d5773cc590bbfddd0a3d054fbe579f3ec40d3cb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-572a98d46131b2468c5792fc7d5773cc590bbfddd0a3d054fbe579f3ec40d3cb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11368-017-1683-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11368-017-1683-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olaniran, Ademola O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balgobind, Adhika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Ajit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pillay, Balakrishna</creatorcontrib><title>Treatment additives reduced arsenic and cadmium bioavailability and increased 1,2-dichloroethane biodegradation and microbial enzyme activities in co-contaminated soil</title><title>Journal of soils and sediments</title><addtitle>J Soils Sediments</addtitle><description>Purpose
Bioremediation of co-contaminated environments is difficult because of the mixed nature of the contaminants and the fact that the two components often must be treated differently. This study investigated the use of inorganic treatment additives, namely calcium carbonate (CaCO
3
), gypsum (CaSO
4
·2H
2
O), and disodium phosphate (Na
2
HPO
4
) to improve remediation of soil co-contaminated with 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) and arsenic or cadmium.
Materials and methods
The soil samples were collected from a specific site in the Westville area in Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Microcosms were set up by artificially co-contaminating the soil sample (100 g mixed with 75 ml of synthetic groundwater in sterile screw-capped 250-ml serum bottles) with 1,2-DCA + risk elements; As
3+
(150 mg/kg); or Cd
2+
(170 mg/kg). Thereafter, each microcosm was amended with either 5 g CaCO
3
, 2 g CaSO
4
·2H
2
O, or 1.12 g Na
2
HPO
4
+ 0.046 g NaCl, separately. The samples were analyzed for the degradation of 1,2-DCA using GC–MS, while total 1,2-DCA degrading bacterial populations were determined at different sampling times using a standard spread plate technique. Soil dehydrogenase and urease activities were also monitored during the experimental period using standard enzyme assays.
Results and discussion
Addition of CaCO
3
resulted in an approximately 2-fold increase in 1,2-DCA degradation in both the As
3+
and the Cd
2+
co-contaminated soil as compared to the co-contaminated soil without CaCO
3
. All the treatment additives were more effective in the As
3+
co-contaminated soil resulting in 11.19, 9.25, and 5.63% increase in 1,2-DCA degradation in the presence of CaCO
3
, Na
2
HPO
4
+ NaCl, and CaSO
4
·2H
2
O, respectively, compared to the Cd
2+
co-contaminated soil. The total 1,2-DCA degrading bacterial population increased in treated soils over time. Overall, soil dehydrogenase and urease activities were lower in the heavy metal co-contaminated samples compared to the treated soil. The inhibitory effect of heavy metal was less in As
3+
co-contaminated soil for both CaCO
3
- and Na
2
HPO
4
+ NaCl-treated soil, with up to 7.92% increase in dehydrogenase activity obtained compared to soil co-contaminated with Cd
2+
.
Conclusions
Results from this study indicate that treatment additives can be used to reduce bioavailable fractions of risk elements in the soil matrices, thereby limiting the toxicity of these risk elements to 1,2-DCA degrading microorganisms. Thus, this approach can be applied to enhance organic compound degradation in co-contaminated soil environments.</description><subject>Additives</subject><subject>Arsenic</subject><subject>Assaying</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bioavailability</subject><subject>Biodegradation</subject><subject>Bioremediation</subject><subject>Cadmium</subject><subject>Calcium</subject><subject>Calcium carbonate</subject><subject>Calcium carbonates</subject><subject>Capping</subject><subject>Carbonates</subject><subject>Cobalt</subject><subject>Components</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Dehydrogenase</subject><subject>Dichloroethane</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Physics</subject><subject>Enzymatic activity</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Gypsum</subject><subject>Heavy metals</subject><subject>Matrices (mathematics)</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Microcosms</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Organic compounds</subject><subject>Phosphates</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Remediation</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Sec 1 • Soil Organic Matter Dynamics and Nutrient Cycling • Research Article</subject><subject>Serum</subject><subject>Sodium chloride</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil contamination</subject><subject>Soil environment</subject><subject>Soil microorganisms</subject><subject>Soil pollution</subject><subject>Soil remediation</subject><subject>Soil Science & Conservation</subject><subject>Soil treatment</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Urease</subject><issn>1439-0108</issn><issn>1614-7480</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUFr3TAQhE1pIWmaH5CboNeq0Vq2ZR9LaNNCoJf0LNbSOtlgS6mkF3j9Q_2b0cvroZecJJhvZlimaS5AfQalzGUG0MMoFRgJw6iledOcwgCdNN2o3tZ_p6eqqvGkeZ_zg1LaVPm0-XubCMtGoQj0ngs_URaJ_M6RF5gyBXYCgxcO_ca7Tcwc8Ql5xZlXLvsXjYOrKbk64FMrPbv7NaZI5R4DHQye7hJ6LBzDC7-xS3FmXAWFP_uNBLpaXMtrNwfhonQxFNw4YKmhOfL6oXm34Jrp_N971vz69vX26ru8-Xn94-rLjXQahiJ70-I0-m4ADXPbDaPrzdQuzvjeGO1cP6l5Xrz3CrVXfbfMVIFFk-uU127WZ83HY-5jir93lIt9iLsUaqWFCcZ2Mv0IlYIjVe_IOdFiHxNvmPYWlD3sYY972LqHPexhTfW0R0-ubLij9F_yq6ZnbQiSHw</recordid><startdate>20170801</startdate><enddate>20170801</enddate><creator>Olaniran, Ademola O.</creator><creator>Balgobind, Adhika</creator><creator>Kumar, Ajit</creator><creator>Pillay, Balakrishna</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170801</creationdate><title>Treatment additives reduced arsenic and cadmium bioavailability and increased 1,2-dichloroethane biodegradation and microbial enzyme activities in co-contaminated soil</title><author>Olaniran, Ademola O. ; Balgobind, Adhika ; Kumar, Ajit ; Pillay, Balakrishna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-572a98d46131b2468c5792fc7d5773cc590bbfddd0a3d054fbe579f3ec40d3cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Additives</topic><topic>Arsenic</topic><topic>Assaying</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bioavailability</topic><topic>Biodegradation</topic><topic>Bioremediation</topic><topic>Cadmium</topic><topic>Calcium</topic><topic>Calcium carbonate</topic><topic>Calcium carbonates</topic><topic>Capping</topic><topic>Carbonates</topic><topic>Cobalt</topic><topic>Components</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Dehydrogenase</topic><topic>Dichloroethane</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Physics</topic><topic>Enzymatic activity</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Gypsum</topic><topic>Heavy metals</topic><topic>Matrices (mathematics)</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Microcosms</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Organic compounds</topic><topic>Phosphates</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Remediation</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Sec 1 • Soil Organic Matter Dynamics and Nutrient Cycling • Research Article</topic><topic>Serum</topic><topic>Sodium chloride</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil contamination</topic><topic>Soil environment</topic><topic>Soil microorganisms</topic><topic>Soil pollution</topic><topic>Soil remediation</topic><topic>Soil Science & Conservation</topic><topic>Soil treatment</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Urease</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olaniran, Ademola O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balgobind, Adhika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Ajit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pillay, Balakrishna</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of soils and sediments</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olaniran, Ademola O.</au><au>Balgobind, Adhika</au><au>Kumar, Ajit</au><au>Pillay, Balakrishna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treatment additives reduced arsenic and cadmium bioavailability and increased 1,2-dichloroethane biodegradation and microbial enzyme activities in co-contaminated soil</atitle><jtitle>Journal of soils and sediments</jtitle><stitle>J Soils Sediments</stitle><date>2017-08-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2019</spage><epage>2029</epage><pages>2019-2029</pages><issn>1439-0108</issn><eissn>1614-7480</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Bioremediation of co-contaminated environments is difficult because of the mixed nature of the contaminants and the fact that the two components often must be treated differently. This study investigated the use of inorganic treatment additives, namely calcium carbonate (CaCO
3
), gypsum (CaSO
4
·2H
2
O), and disodium phosphate (Na
2
HPO
4
) to improve remediation of soil co-contaminated with 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) and arsenic or cadmium.
Materials and methods
The soil samples were collected from a specific site in the Westville area in Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Microcosms were set up by artificially co-contaminating the soil sample (100 g mixed with 75 ml of synthetic groundwater in sterile screw-capped 250-ml serum bottles) with 1,2-DCA + risk elements; As
3+
(150 mg/kg); or Cd
2+
(170 mg/kg). Thereafter, each microcosm was amended with either 5 g CaCO
3
, 2 g CaSO
4
·2H
2
O, or 1.12 g Na
2
HPO
4
+ 0.046 g NaCl, separately. The samples were analyzed for the degradation of 1,2-DCA using GC–MS, while total 1,2-DCA degrading bacterial populations were determined at different sampling times using a standard spread plate technique. Soil dehydrogenase and urease activities were also monitored during the experimental period using standard enzyme assays.
Results and discussion
Addition of CaCO
3
resulted in an approximately 2-fold increase in 1,2-DCA degradation in both the As
3+
and the Cd
2+
co-contaminated soil as compared to the co-contaminated soil without CaCO
3
. All the treatment additives were more effective in the As
3+
co-contaminated soil resulting in 11.19, 9.25, and 5.63% increase in 1,2-DCA degradation in the presence of CaCO
3
, Na
2
HPO
4
+ NaCl, and CaSO
4
·2H
2
O, respectively, compared to the Cd
2+
co-contaminated soil. The total 1,2-DCA degrading bacterial population increased in treated soils over time. Overall, soil dehydrogenase and urease activities were lower in the heavy metal co-contaminated samples compared to the treated soil. The inhibitory effect of heavy metal was less in As
3+
co-contaminated soil for both CaCO
3
- and Na
2
HPO
4
+ NaCl-treated soil, with up to 7.92% increase in dehydrogenase activity obtained compared to soil co-contaminated with Cd
2+
.
Conclusions
Results from this study indicate that treatment additives can be used to reduce bioavailable fractions of risk elements in the soil matrices, thereby limiting the toxicity of these risk elements to 1,2-DCA degrading microorganisms. Thus, this approach can be applied to enhance organic compound degradation in co-contaminated soil environments.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s11368-017-1683-7</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1439-0108 |
ispartof | Journal of soils and sediments, 2017-08, Vol.17 (8), p.2019-2029 |
issn | 1439-0108 1614-7480 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1918297581 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Additives Arsenic Assaying Bacteria Bioavailability Biodegradation Bioremediation Cadmium Calcium Calcium carbonate Calcium carbonates Capping Carbonates Cobalt Components Contaminants Dehydrogenase Dichloroethane Earth and Environmental Science Environment Environmental Physics Enzymatic activity Enzymes Groundwater Gypsum Heavy metals Matrices (mathematics) Methods Microcosms Microorganisms Organic compounds Phosphates Populations Remediation Risk Sec 1 • Soil Organic Matter Dynamics and Nutrient Cycling • Research Article Serum Sodium chloride Soil Soil contamination Soil environment Soil microorganisms Soil pollution Soil remediation Soil Science & Conservation Soil treatment Soils Toxicity Urease |
title | Treatment additives reduced arsenic and cadmium bioavailability and increased 1,2-dichloroethane biodegradation and microbial enzyme activities in co-contaminated soil |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T10%3A46%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treatment%20additives%20reduced%20arsenic%20and%20cadmium%20bioavailability%20and%20increased%201,2-dichloroethane%20biodegradation%20and%20microbial%20enzyme%20activities%20in%20co-contaminated%20soil&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20soils%20and%20sediments&rft.au=Olaniran,%20Ademola%20O.&rft.date=2017-08-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2019&rft.epage=2029&rft.pages=2019-2029&rft.issn=1439-0108&rft.eissn=1614-7480&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11368-017-1683-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1918297581%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1918297581&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |