“Lock-in” effect of emission standard and its impact on the choice of market based instruments
A country's existing emission standard policy will lead to a “lock in” effect. When the country plans to adopt new market-based instruments to control greenhouse gas emissions, it must consider this effect as it chooses among instruments to avoid larger efficiency loss. In this paper, we find t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy economics 2017-03, Vol.63, p.41-50 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 50 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 41 |
container_title | Energy economics |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Haoqi, Qian Libo, Wu Weiqi, Tang |
description | A country's existing emission standard policy will lead to a “lock in” effect. When the country plans to adopt new market-based instruments to control greenhouse gas emissions, it must consider this effect as it chooses among instruments to avoid larger efficiency loss. In this paper, we find that the “lock in” effect will cause a kink point to occur on the marginal abatement cost (MAC) curve. This change of shape for the MAC curve reminds us to be cautious in choosing market-based instruments when applying Weitzman's rule. We also introduce this concept into a dynamic multi-regional computable general equilibrium (CGE) model for China and simulate MAC curves for all regions. After applying Weitzman's rule, we propose a timeline for introducing price instruments under different marginal benefit (MB) curve scenarios.
•China's existing carbon intensity policy has a “lock-in” effect and leads to a “kink point” on MAC.•A dynamic inter-regional CGE model is developed to simulate the regional kinked MAC curves in China.•A timeline of introducing new market based instrument is proposed by combining different MB scenarios. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.01.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1917690124</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140988317300142</els_id><sourcerecordid>1917690124</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-b6a8b0e4f7726980bcd2a0b8f3bda4c4bd44b3ea48fbd7a39b8e8b0a8ce0fea33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLtOwzAUQC0EEqXwBSyWmBPsxE2cgQFVvKRKLDBbtnOtOqV2sV0ktn4I_Fy_BIcyM93lHPveg9AlJSUltLkeSnCgfVkR2paEloTMjtCE8rYuGsrpMZoQykjRcV6forMYB5KJZsYnSO13XwuvV4V1-903BmNAJ-wNhrWN0XqHY5Kul6HHeWCbIrbrjRwZh9MSsF56q2E01jKsIGElI2TQxRS2a3ApnqMTI98iXPzNKXq9v3uZPxaL54en-e2i0IzRVKhGckWAmbatmo4TpftKEsVNrXrJNFM9Y6oGybhRfSvrTnHIguQaiAFZ11N0dXh3E_z7FmISg98Gl78UtKNt0xFasUzVB0oHH2MAIzbB5tU_BSVijCkG8RtTjDEFoSKnytbNwYJ8wIeFIKK24DT0NuRgovf2X_8HdXiB6A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1917690124</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“Lock-in” effect of emission standard and its impact on the choice of market based instruments</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Haoqi, Qian ; Libo, Wu ; Weiqi, Tang</creator><creatorcontrib>Haoqi, Qian ; Libo, Wu ; Weiqi, Tang</creatorcontrib><description>A country's existing emission standard policy will lead to a “lock in” effect. When the country plans to adopt new market-based instruments to control greenhouse gas emissions, it must consider this effect as it chooses among instruments to avoid larger efficiency loss. In this paper, we find that the “lock in” effect will cause a kink point to occur on the marginal abatement cost (MAC) curve. This change of shape for the MAC curve reminds us to be cautious in choosing market-based instruments when applying Weitzman's rule. We also introduce this concept into a dynamic multi-regional computable general equilibrium (CGE) model for China and simulate MAC curves for all regions. After applying Weitzman's rule, we propose a timeline for introducing price instruments under different marginal benefit (MB) curve scenarios.
•China's existing carbon intensity policy has a “lock-in” effect and leads to a “kink point” on MAC.•A dynamic inter-regional CGE model is developed to simulate the regional kinked MAC curves in China.•A timeline of introducing new market based instrument is proposed by combining different MB scenarios.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-9883</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6181</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.01.005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Abatement ; Air pollution ; Cap and trade of carbon emissions rights ; Carbon tax ; Computer simulation ; Control equipment ; Emission standards ; Emissions ; Emissions trading ; Energy economics ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Lock-in effect ; Marginal abatement cost curve ; Marketing ; Markets ; Prices</subject><ispartof>Energy economics, 2017-03, Vol.63, p.41-50</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Mar 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-b6a8b0e4f7726980bcd2a0b8f3bda4c4bd44b3ea48fbd7a39b8e8b0a8ce0fea33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-b6a8b0e4f7726980bcd2a0b8f3bda4c4bd44b3ea48fbd7a39b8e8b0a8ce0fea33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988317300142$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27843,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haoqi, Qian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Libo, Wu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiqi, Tang</creatorcontrib><title>“Lock-in” effect of emission standard and its impact on the choice of market based instruments</title><title>Energy economics</title><description>A country's existing emission standard policy will lead to a “lock in” effect. When the country plans to adopt new market-based instruments to control greenhouse gas emissions, it must consider this effect as it chooses among instruments to avoid larger efficiency loss. In this paper, we find that the “lock in” effect will cause a kink point to occur on the marginal abatement cost (MAC) curve. This change of shape for the MAC curve reminds us to be cautious in choosing market-based instruments when applying Weitzman's rule. We also introduce this concept into a dynamic multi-regional computable general equilibrium (CGE) model for China and simulate MAC curves for all regions. After applying Weitzman's rule, we propose a timeline for introducing price instruments under different marginal benefit (MB) curve scenarios.
•China's existing carbon intensity policy has a “lock-in” effect and leads to a “kink point” on MAC.•A dynamic inter-regional CGE model is developed to simulate the regional kinked MAC curves in China.•A timeline of introducing new market based instrument is proposed by combining different MB scenarios.</description><subject>Abatement</subject><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Cap and trade of carbon emissions rights</subject><subject>Carbon tax</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Control equipment</subject><subject>Emission standards</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Emissions trading</subject><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Lock-in effect</subject><subject>Marginal abatement cost curve</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Prices</subject><issn>0140-9883</issn><issn>1873-6181</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kLtOwzAUQC0EEqXwBSyWmBPsxE2cgQFVvKRKLDBbtnOtOqV2sV0ktn4I_Fy_BIcyM93lHPveg9AlJSUltLkeSnCgfVkR2paEloTMjtCE8rYuGsrpMZoQykjRcV6forMYB5KJZsYnSO13XwuvV4V1-903BmNAJ-wNhrWN0XqHY5Kul6HHeWCbIrbrjRwZh9MSsF56q2E01jKsIGElI2TQxRS2a3ApnqMTI98iXPzNKXq9v3uZPxaL54en-e2i0IzRVKhGckWAmbatmo4TpftKEsVNrXrJNFM9Y6oGybhRfSvrTnHIguQaiAFZ11N0dXh3E_z7FmISg98Gl78UtKNt0xFasUzVB0oHH2MAIzbB5tU_BSVijCkG8RtTjDEFoSKnytbNwYJ8wIeFIKK24DT0NuRgovf2X_8HdXiB6A</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Haoqi, Qian</creator><creator>Libo, Wu</creator><creator>Weiqi, Tang</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>“Lock-in” effect of emission standard and its impact on the choice of market based instruments</title><author>Haoqi, Qian ; Libo, Wu ; Weiqi, Tang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-b6a8b0e4f7726980bcd2a0b8f3bda4c4bd44b3ea48fbd7a39b8e8b0a8ce0fea33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Abatement</topic><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Cap and trade of carbon emissions rights</topic><topic>Carbon tax</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Control equipment</topic><topic>Emission standards</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Emissions trading</topic><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Lock-in effect</topic><topic>Marginal abatement cost curve</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Prices</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haoqi, Qian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Libo, Wu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiqi, Tang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haoqi, Qian</au><au>Libo, Wu</au><au>Weiqi, Tang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“Lock-in” effect of emission standard and its impact on the choice of market based instruments</atitle><jtitle>Energy economics</jtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>63</volume><spage>41</spage><epage>50</epage><pages>41-50</pages><issn>0140-9883</issn><eissn>1873-6181</eissn><abstract>A country's existing emission standard policy will lead to a “lock in” effect. When the country plans to adopt new market-based instruments to control greenhouse gas emissions, it must consider this effect as it chooses among instruments to avoid larger efficiency loss. In this paper, we find that the “lock in” effect will cause a kink point to occur on the marginal abatement cost (MAC) curve. This change of shape for the MAC curve reminds us to be cautious in choosing market-based instruments when applying Weitzman's rule. We also introduce this concept into a dynamic multi-regional computable general equilibrium (CGE) model for China and simulate MAC curves for all regions. After applying Weitzman's rule, we propose a timeline for introducing price instruments under different marginal benefit (MB) curve scenarios.
•China's existing carbon intensity policy has a “lock-in” effect and leads to a “kink point” on MAC.•A dynamic inter-regional CGE model is developed to simulate the regional kinked MAC curves in China.•A timeline of introducing new market based instrument is proposed by combining different MB scenarios.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.eneco.2017.01.005</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0140-9883 |
ispartof | Energy economics, 2017-03, Vol.63, p.41-50 |
issn | 0140-9883 1873-6181 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1917690124 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; PAIS Index |
subjects | Abatement Air pollution Cap and trade of carbon emissions rights Carbon tax Computer simulation Control equipment Emission standards Emissions Emissions trading Energy economics Greenhouse effect Greenhouse gases Lock-in effect Marginal abatement cost curve Marketing Markets Prices |
title | “Lock-in” effect of emission standard and its impact on the choice of market based instruments |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T09%3A01%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CLock-in%E2%80%9D%20effect%20of%20emission%20standard%20and%20its%20impact%20on%20the%20choice%20of%20market%20based%20instruments&rft.jtitle=Energy%20economics&rft.au=Haoqi,%20Qian&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=63&rft.spage=41&rft.epage=50&rft.pages=41-50&rft.issn=0140-9883&rft.eissn=1873-6181&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.01.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1917690124%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1917690124&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0140988317300142&rfr_iscdi=true |