Multi-criteria decision analysis of energy system transformation pathways: A case study for Switzerland

Two recent political decisions are expected to frame the development of the Swiss energy system in the coming decades: the nuclear phase-out and the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction target. To accomplish both of them, low-carbon technologies based on renewable energy and Carbon Capture and St...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy policy 2017-07, Vol.106, p.155-168
Hauptverfasser: Volkart, Kathrin, Weidmann, Nicolas, Bauer, Christian, Hirschberg, Stefan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 168
container_issue
container_start_page 155
container_title Energy policy
container_volume 106
creator Volkart, Kathrin
Weidmann, Nicolas
Bauer, Christian
Hirschberg, Stefan
description Two recent political decisions are expected to frame the development of the Swiss energy system in the coming decades: the nuclear phase-out and the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction target. To accomplish both of them, low-carbon technologies based on renewable energy and Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) are expected to gain importance. The objective of the present work is to support prospective Swiss energy policy-making by providing a detailed sustainability analysis of possible energy system transformation pathways. For this purpose, the results of the scenario quantification with an energy system model are coupled with multi-criteria sustainability analysis. Two climate protection and one reference scenario are addressed, and the trade-offs between the scenarios are analysed based on a set of 12 interdisciplinary indicators. Implementing a stringent climate policy in Switzerland is associated with co-benefits such as less fossil resource use, less fatalities in severe accidents in the energy sector, less societal conflicts and higher resource autonomy. The availability and implementation of CCS allows for achieving the GHG emission reduction target at lower costs, but at the expense of a more fossil fuel-based energy system. •Three energy system transformation pathways for Switzerland are analysed.•A set of policy-relevant sustainability indicators are quantified for each pathway.•Implementing a stringent climate policy in Switzerland is associated with co-benefits.•In the CCS scenario fossil fuel use increases, but the total system costs are lower.•Fossil-fuelled transport substantially contributes to most of the addressed criteria.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.026
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1917690040</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421517301702</els_id><sourcerecordid>1917690040</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-df1161fb8a2c804c74b31c5f670ad47b77c4670c62cf88d17a9f6e38e8e73653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwC1gsMSfYcWqnSAxVxZdUxEB3y3XOxVGaBJ9DFX49KWVmuhue93TvQ8g1ZylnXN5WKTRdW6cZ4yplImWZPCETXiiRSKXUKZkwwXiSZ3x2Ti4QK8ZYXszzCdm-9nX0iQ0-QvCGlmA9-rahpjH1gB5p6yg0ELYDxQEj7GgMpkHXhp2JB7Az8WNvBryjC2oNAsXYlwMdAfq-9_EbQm2a8pKcOVMjXP3NKVk_PqyXz8nq7elluVglNs-ymJSOc8ndpjCZLVhuVb4R3M6cVMyUudooZfNxtzKzrihKrszcSRAFFKCEnIkpuTme7UL72QNGXbV9GKug5nOu5HzszUZKHCkbWsQATnfB70wYNGf6IFRX-leoPgjVTOhR6Ji6P6Zg_P_LQ9BoPTQWSh_ARl22_t_8DySZgaA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1917690040</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multi-criteria decision analysis of energy system transformation pathways: A case study for Switzerland</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Volkart, Kathrin ; Weidmann, Nicolas ; Bauer, Christian ; Hirschberg, Stefan</creator><creatorcontrib>Volkart, Kathrin ; Weidmann, Nicolas ; Bauer, Christian ; Hirschberg, Stefan</creatorcontrib><description>Two recent political decisions are expected to frame the development of the Swiss energy system in the coming decades: the nuclear phase-out and the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction target. To accomplish both of them, low-carbon technologies based on renewable energy and Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) are expected to gain importance. The objective of the present work is to support prospective Swiss energy policy-making by providing a detailed sustainability analysis of possible energy system transformation pathways. For this purpose, the results of the scenario quantification with an energy system model are coupled with multi-criteria sustainability analysis. Two climate protection and one reference scenario are addressed, and the trade-offs between the scenarios are analysed based on a set of 12 interdisciplinary indicators. Implementing a stringent climate policy in Switzerland is associated with co-benefits such as less fossil resource use, less fatalities in severe accidents in the energy sector, less societal conflicts and higher resource autonomy. The availability and implementation of CCS allows for achieving the GHG emission reduction target at lower costs, but at the expense of a more fossil fuel-based energy system. •Three energy system transformation pathways for Switzerland are analysed.•A set of policy-relevant sustainability indicators are quantified for each pathway.•Implementing a stringent climate policy in Switzerland is associated with co-benefits.•In the CCS scenario fossil fuel use increases, but the total system costs are lower.•Fossil-fuelled transport substantially contributes to most of the addressed criteria.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.026</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accidents ; Air pollution ; Autonomy ; Carbon sequestration ; Case studies ; Clean technology ; Climate ; Climate policy ; Criteria ; Decision analysis ; Decision making ; Electric power ; Electricity generation ; Emissions ; Emissions control ; Energy consumption ; Energy development ; Energy industry ; Energy policy ; Energy policy making ; Energy storage ; Environmental policy ; Fossil fuels ; Greenhouse gases ; Implementation ; Indicators ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Life cycle assessment ; Measurement ; Multi criteria decision analysis ; Nuclear energy ; Nuclear fuels ; Policy making ; Politics ; Renewable energy ; Scenario modelling ; Storage ; Sustainability ; Sustainability assessment ; Trade-off analysis ; Transformation</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2017-07, Vol.106, p.155-168</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jul 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-df1161fb8a2c804c74b31c5f670ad47b77c4670c62cf88d17a9f6e38e8e73653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-df1161fb8a2c804c74b31c5f670ad47b77c4670c62cf88d17a9f6e38e8e73653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.026$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27865,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Volkart, Kathrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weidmann, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirschberg, Stefan</creatorcontrib><title>Multi-criteria decision analysis of energy system transformation pathways: A case study for Switzerland</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>Two recent political decisions are expected to frame the development of the Swiss energy system in the coming decades: the nuclear phase-out and the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction target. To accomplish both of them, low-carbon technologies based on renewable energy and Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) are expected to gain importance. The objective of the present work is to support prospective Swiss energy policy-making by providing a detailed sustainability analysis of possible energy system transformation pathways. For this purpose, the results of the scenario quantification with an energy system model are coupled with multi-criteria sustainability analysis. Two climate protection and one reference scenario are addressed, and the trade-offs between the scenarios are analysed based on a set of 12 interdisciplinary indicators. Implementing a stringent climate policy in Switzerland is associated with co-benefits such as less fossil resource use, less fatalities in severe accidents in the energy sector, less societal conflicts and higher resource autonomy. The availability and implementation of CCS allows for achieving the GHG emission reduction target at lower costs, but at the expense of a more fossil fuel-based energy system. •Three energy system transformation pathways for Switzerland are analysed.•A set of policy-relevant sustainability indicators are quantified for each pathway.•Implementing a stringent climate policy in Switzerland is associated with co-benefits.•In the CCS scenario fossil fuel use increases, but the total system costs are lower.•Fossil-fuelled transport substantially contributes to most of the addressed criteria.</description><subject>Accidents</subject><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Clean technology</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate policy</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Decision analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Electric power</subject><subject>Electricity generation</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy development</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Energy policy making</subject><subject>Energy storage</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Multi criteria decision analysis</subject><subject>Nuclear energy</subject><subject>Nuclear fuels</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><subject>Scenario modelling</subject><subject>Storage</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainability assessment</subject><subject>Trade-off analysis</subject><subject>Transformation</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwC1gsMSfYcWqnSAxVxZdUxEB3y3XOxVGaBJ9DFX49KWVmuhue93TvQ8g1ZylnXN5WKTRdW6cZ4yplImWZPCETXiiRSKXUKZkwwXiSZ3x2Ti4QK8ZYXszzCdm-9nX0iQ0-QvCGlmA9-rahpjH1gB5p6yg0ELYDxQEj7GgMpkHXhp2JB7Az8WNvBryjC2oNAsXYlwMdAfq-9_EbQm2a8pKcOVMjXP3NKVk_PqyXz8nq7elluVglNs-ymJSOc8ndpjCZLVhuVb4R3M6cVMyUudooZfNxtzKzrihKrszcSRAFFKCEnIkpuTme7UL72QNGXbV9GKug5nOu5HzszUZKHCkbWsQATnfB70wYNGf6IFRX-leoPgjVTOhR6Ji6P6Zg_P_LQ9BoPTQWSh_ARl22_t_8DySZgaA</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Volkart, Kathrin</creator><creator>Weidmann, Nicolas</creator><creator>Bauer, Christian</creator><creator>Hirschberg, Stefan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>Multi-criteria decision analysis of energy system transformation pathways: A case study for Switzerland</title><author>Volkart, Kathrin ; Weidmann, Nicolas ; Bauer, Christian ; Hirschberg, Stefan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-df1161fb8a2c804c74b31c5f670ad47b77c4670c62cf88d17a9f6e38e8e73653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accidents</topic><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Clean technology</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate policy</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Decision analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Electric power</topic><topic>Electricity generation</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy development</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Energy policy making</topic><topic>Energy storage</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Multi criteria decision analysis</topic><topic>Nuclear energy</topic><topic>Nuclear fuels</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><topic>Scenario modelling</topic><topic>Storage</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainability assessment</topic><topic>Trade-off analysis</topic><topic>Transformation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Volkart, Kathrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weidmann, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirschberg, Stefan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Volkart, Kathrin</au><au>Weidmann, Nicolas</au><au>Bauer, Christian</au><au>Hirschberg, Stefan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multi-criteria decision analysis of energy system transformation pathways: A case study for Switzerland</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>106</volume><spage>155</spage><epage>168</epage><pages>155-168</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><abstract>Two recent political decisions are expected to frame the development of the Swiss energy system in the coming decades: the nuclear phase-out and the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction target. To accomplish both of them, low-carbon technologies based on renewable energy and Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) are expected to gain importance. The objective of the present work is to support prospective Swiss energy policy-making by providing a detailed sustainability analysis of possible energy system transformation pathways. For this purpose, the results of the scenario quantification with an energy system model are coupled with multi-criteria sustainability analysis. Two climate protection and one reference scenario are addressed, and the trade-offs between the scenarios are analysed based on a set of 12 interdisciplinary indicators. Implementing a stringent climate policy in Switzerland is associated with co-benefits such as less fossil resource use, less fatalities in severe accidents in the energy sector, less societal conflicts and higher resource autonomy. The availability and implementation of CCS allows for achieving the GHG emission reduction target at lower costs, but at the expense of a more fossil fuel-based energy system. •Three energy system transformation pathways for Switzerland are analysed.•A set of policy-relevant sustainability indicators are quantified for each pathway.•Implementing a stringent climate policy in Switzerland is associated with co-benefits.•In the CCS scenario fossil fuel use increases, but the total system costs are lower.•Fossil-fuelled transport substantially contributes to most of the addressed criteria.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.026</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4215
ispartof Energy policy, 2017-07, Vol.106, p.155-168
issn 0301-4215
1873-6777
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1917690040
source PAIS Index; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Accidents
Air pollution
Autonomy
Carbon sequestration
Case studies
Clean technology
Climate
Climate policy
Criteria
Decision analysis
Decision making
Electric power
Electricity generation
Emissions
Emissions control
Energy consumption
Energy development
Energy industry
Energy policy
Energy policy making
Energy storage
Environmental policy
Fossil fuels
Greenhouse gases
Implementation
Indicators
Interdisciplinary aspects
Life cycle assessment
Measurement
Multi criteria decision analysis
Nuclear energy
Nuclear fuels
Policy making
Politics
Renewable energy
Scenario modelling
Storage
Sustainability
Sustainability assessment
Trade-off analysis
Transformation
title Multi-criteria decision analysis of energy system transformation pathways: A case study for Switzerland
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T00%3A37%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi-criteria%20decision%20analysis%20of%20energy%20system%20transformation%20pathways:%20A%20case%20study%20for%20Switzerland&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Volkart,%20Kathrin&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=106&rft.spage=155&rft.epage=168&rft.pages=155-168&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1917690040%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1917690040&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301421517301702&rfr_iscdi=true