Sustainable Financial Inclusion to the Marginalized through an Analysis of Marketed Surplus and Price Spread of Cauliflower in S. Chotanagpur
The study was undertaken to analyze marketed surplus and price spread for Cauliflower in S. Chotanagpur of Jharkhand. Cluster sampling techniques was used to select the sample villages and respondents. Primary data were collected by personal interview of respondents. Simple statistical tools were em...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Economic affairs (Calcutta) 2017-03, Vol.62 (1), p.163 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 163 |
container_title | Economic affairs (Calcutta) |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Shankar, Tara Dwivedi, Sudhakar |
description | The study was undertaken to analyze marketed surplus and price spread for Cauliflower in S. Chotanagpur of Jharkhand. Cluster sampling techniques was used to select the sample villages and respondents. Primary data were collected by personal interview of respondents. Simple statistical tools were employed to accomplish different objectives of the study. The marketed surplus of the medium category of farms have slightly higher surplus than marginal, large and small categories of farms. Their relative proportion was 94.84 per cent, 94.51 per cent, 94.49 per cent and 94.48 per cent respectively of the total production. The share of producer in consumer rupee is high in channel were there are less number of intermediaries. The marketing cost incurred by wholesaler in different channels were estimated 5.01 per cent, 6.39 per cent and 7.88 per cent of the consumer price respectively and their corresponding net margins were 9.68 per cent, 9.61 per cent and 10.23 per cent of the price paid by the consumer. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5958/2230-7311.2017.00052.6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1917670321</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1917670321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_19176703213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjdtKxDAURYMoOF5-QQ743JhLm9hHKQ7OgyDU9yG2aZsxJDUXRP_BfzYDfoBP-7DX2hyEbijBTdvc3zHGSSU5pZgRKjEhpGFYnKANaaWoaiHEablrVlesofwcXcR4IKSsRL1BP32OSRmn3qyGbUk3GGVh5wabo_EOkoe0aHhWYS7Umm89liL4PC-gHDyU7iuaCH46Ou86Fd7nsJZ54SO8BDNo6Neg1XiUOpWtmaz_1AGMgx5Dt_iknJrXHK7Q2aRs1Nd_eYlut4-v3VO1Bv-RdUz7g8-hvIx72lIpJOGM8v9Zv7LxXGQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1917670321</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sustainable Financial Inclusion to the Marginalized through an Analysis of Marketed Surplus and Price Spread of Cauliflower in S. Chotanagpur</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Shankar, Tara ; Dwivedi, Sudhakar</creator><creatorcontrib>Shankar, Tara ; Dwivedi, Sudhakar</creatorcontrib><description>The study was undertaken to analyze marketed surplus and price spread for Cauliflower in S. Chotanagpur of Jharkhand. Cluster sampling techniques was used to select the sample villages and respondents. Primary data were collected by personal interview of respondents. Simple statistical tools were employed to accomplish different objectives of the study. The marketed surplus of the medium category of farms have slightly higher surplus than marginal, large and small categories of farms. Their relative proportion was 94.84 per cent, 94.51 per cent, 94.49 per cent and 94.48 per cent respectively of the total production. The share of producer in consumer rupee is high in channel were there are less number of intermediaries. The marketing cost incurred by wholesaler in different channels were estimated 5.01 per cent, 6.39 per cent and 7.88 per cent of the consumer price respectively and their corresponding net margins were 9.68 per cent, 9.61 per cent and 10.23 per cent of the price paid by the consumer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0424-2513</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0976-4666</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5958/2230-7311.2017.00052.6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Delhi: New Delhi Publishers</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; Agriculture ; Consumers ; Consumption ; Crops ; Farms ; Financial inclusion ; Marketing ; Retail stores ; Sales ; Sampling techniques ; Towns ; Vegetables ; Wholesalers</subject><ispartof>Economic affairs (Calcutta), 2017-03, Vol.62 (1), p.163</ispartof><rights>Copyright New Delhi Publishers Mar 2017</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shankar, Tara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwivedi, Sudhakar</creatorcontrib><title>Sustainable Financial Inclusion to the Marginalized through an Analysis of Marketed Surplus and Price Spread of Cauliflower in S. Chotanagpur</title><title>Economic affairs (Calcutta)</title><description>The study was undertaken to analyze marketed surplus and price spread for Cauliflower in S. Chotanagpur of Jharkhand. Cluster sampling techniques was used to select the sample villages and respondents. Primary data were collected by personal interview of respondents. Simple statistical tools were employed to accomplish different objectives of the study. The marketed surplus of the medium category of farms have slightly higher surplus than marginal, large and small categories of farms. Their relative proportion was 94.84 per cent, 94.51 per cent, 94.49 per cent and 94.48 per cent respectively of the total production. The share of producer in consumer rupee is high in channel were there are less number of intermediaries. The marketing cost incurred by wholesaler in different channels were estimated 5.01 per cent, 6.39 per cent and 7.88 per cent of the consumer price respectively and their corresponding net margins were 9.68 per cent, 9.61 per cent and 10.23 per cent of the price paid by the consumer.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Financial inclusion</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Retail stores</subject><subject>Sales</subject><subject>Sampling techniques</subject><subject>Towns</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><subject>Wholesalers</subject><issn>0424-2513</issn><issn>0976-4666</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjdtKxDAURYMoOF5-QQ743JhLm9hHKQ7OgyDU9yG2aZsxJDUXRP_BfzYDfoBP-7DX2hyEbijBTdvc3zHGSSU5pZgRKjEhpGFYnKANaaWoaiHEablrVlesofwcXcR4IKSsRL1BP32OSRmn3qyGbUk3GGVh5wabo_EOkoe0aHhWYS7Umm89liL4PC-gHDyU7iuaCH46Ou86Fd7nsJZ54SO8BDNo6Neg1XiUOpWtmaz_1AGMgx5Dt_iknJrXHK7Q2aRs1Nd_eYlut4-v3VO1Bv-RdUz7g8-hvIx72lIpJOGM8v9Zv7LxXGQ</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Shankar, Tara</creator><creator>Dwivedi, Sudhakar</creator><general>New Delhi Publishers</general><scope>04Q</scope><scope>04S</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>Sustainable Financial Inclusion to the Marginalized through an Analysis of Marketed Surplus and Price Spread of Cauliflower in S. Chotanagpur</title><author>Shankar, Tara ; Dwivedi, Sudhakar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_19176703213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Financial inclusion</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Retail stores</topic><topic>Sales</topic><topic>Sampling techniques</topic><topic>Towns</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><topic>Wholesalers</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shankar, Tara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwivedi, Sudhakar</creatorcontrib><collection>India Database</collection><collection>India Database: Business</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Economic affairs (Calcutta)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shankar, Tara</au><au>Dwivedi, Sudhakar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sustainable Financial Inclusion to the Marginalized through an Analysis of Marketed Surplus and Price Spread of Cauliflower in S. Chotanagpur</atitle><jtitle>Economic affairs (Calcutta)</jtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>163</spage><pages>163-</pages><issn>0424-2513</issn><eissn>0976-4666</eissn><abstract>The study was undertaken to analyze marketed surplus and price spread for Cauliflower in S. Chotanagpur of Jharkhand. Cluster sampling techniques was used to select the sample villages and respondents. Primary data were collected by personal interview of respondents. Simple statistical tools were employed to accomplish different objectives of the study. The marketed surplus of the medium category of farms have slightly higher surplus than marginal, large and small categories of farms. Their relative proportion was 94.84 per cent, 94.51 per cent, 94.49 per cent and 94.48 per cent respectively of the total production. The share of producer in consumer rupee is high in channel were there are less number of intermediaries. The marketing cost incurred by wholesaler in different channels were estimated 5.01 per cent, 6.39 per cent and 7.88 per cent of the consumer price respectively and their corresponding net margins were 9.68 per cent, 9.61 per cent and 10.23 per cent of the price paid by the consumer.</abstract><cop>New Delhi</cop><pub>New Delhi Publishers</pub><doi>10.5958/2230-7311.2017.00052.6</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0424-2513 |
ispartof | Economic affairs (Calcutta), 2017-03, Vol.62 (1), p.163 |
issn | 0424-2513 0976-4666 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1917670321 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Agricultural economics Agriculture Consumers Consumption Crops Farms Financial inclusion Marketing Retail stores Sales Sampling techniques Towns Vegetables Wholesalers |
title | Sustainable Financial Inclusion to the Marginalized through an Analysis of Marketed Surplus and Price Spread of Cauliflower in S. Chotanagpur |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T12%3A09%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sustainable%20Financial%20Inclusion%20to%20the%20Marginalized%20through%20an%20Analysis%20of%20Marketed%20Surplus%20and%20Price%20Spread%20of%20Cauliflower%20in%20S.%20Chotanagpur&rft.jtitle=Economic%20affairs%20(Calcutta)&rft.au=Shankar,%20Tara&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=163&rft.pages=163-&rft.issn=0424-2513&rft.eissn=0976-4666&rft_id=info:doi/10.5958/2230-7311.2017.00052.6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1917670321%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1917670321&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |