The extravagant progressive: an experimental corpus study on the history of emphatic [ be V ing ]

This article combines methodologies from corpus linguistics with an experimental-like setup more affiliated to psycholinguistic research. The resulting methodology allows us to gain more insight into cognitive motivations of language use in speakers from the past, and consequently to better assess t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:English language and linguistics 2017-07, Vol.21 (2), p.227-250
1. Verfasser: PETRÉ, PETER
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 250
container_issue 2
container_start_page 227
container_title English language and linguistics
container_volume 21
creator PETRÉ, PETER
description This article combines methodologies from corpus linguistics with an experimental-like setup more affiliated to psycholinguistic research. The resulting methodology allows us to gain more insight into cognitive motivations of language use in speakers from the past, and consequently to better assess their similarity to present-day speakers (the Uniformitarian Principle). One such cognitive motivation thought to be relevant in the early stages of grammatical constructionalization (grammaticalization) is covered by the evasive concept of ‘extravagance’ (i.e. the desire to talk in such a way that one is noticed). The methodology is tested on the Early Modern English extension of the [ be V ing ]-construction to progressive uses in present-tense main clauses. It is argued, on the basis of recurrent contextual clues, that [ be V ing ] in this novel use is motivated by extravagance. Interestingly, a comparison of two speaker/writer generations that are among the earliest to use this innovation with some frequency suggests that the encoding of extravagance shifted between them. At first, extravagance was signalled by coercion of the still stative semantics of [ be V ing ] into a progressive reading. In the second generation it had become an entrenched characteristic of the construction itself.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1360674317000107
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1916640024</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1916640024</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-5090a8be2cb58261b78e88c2f02ef3ec87e90e574c021c5337899c683e79cf273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAewssQ6M7cQPdqjiJVViQWGDUOSYSZqqTYLtVPTvcVV2rGZG98yM7iXkksE1A6ZuXpmQIFUumAIABuqITFguTZYLZY5Tn-Rsr5-SsxBWCRGg5ITYxRIp_kRvt7axXaSD7xuPIbRbvKW2S9qAvt1gF-2aut4PY6Ahjl872nc0puVlG2Lv01hT3AxLG1tHP2iF9J22XUM_z8lJbdcBL_7qlLw93C9mT9n85fF5djfPnGAyZgUYsLpC7qpCc8kqpVFrx2vgWAt0WqEBLFTugDNXCKG0MU5qgcq4misxJVeHu8nB94ghlqt-9F16WTLDpMwBeJ4odqCc70PwWJdDcmf9rmRQ7pMs_yUpfgF7N2VX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1916640024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The extravagant progressive: an experimental corpus study on the history of emphatic [ be V ing ]</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>PETRÉ, PETER</creator><creatorcontrib>PETRÉ, PETER</creatorcontrib><description>This article combines methodologies from corpus linguistics with an experimental-like setup more affiliated to psycholinguistic research. The resulting methodology allows us to gain more insight into cognitive motivations of language use in speakers from the past, and consequently to better assess their similarity to present-day speakers (the Uniformitarian Principle). One such cognitive motivation thought to be relevant in the early stages of grammatical constructionalization (grammaticalization) is covered by the evasive concept of ‘extravagance’ (i.e. the desire to talk in such a way that one is noticed). The methodology is tested on the Early Modern English extension of the [ be V ing ]-construction to progressive uses in present-tense main clauses. It is argued, on the basis of recurrent contextual clues, that [ be V ing ] in this novel use is motivated by extravagance. Interestingly, a comparison of two speaker/writer generations that are among the earliest to use this innovation with some frequency suggests that the encoding of extravagance shifted between them. At first, extravagance was signalled by coercion of the still stative semantics of [ be V ing ] into a progressive reading. In the second generation it had become an entrenched characteristic of the construction itself.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1360-6743</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-4379</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1360674317000107</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>17th century ; Allegory ; Ambiguity ; Authorial voice ; Authorship ; Construction ; Corpus linguistics ; Early Modern English ; Encoding (Cognitive process) ; Exegesis &amp; hermeneutics ; Grammar ; Grammaticalization ; Hypotheses ; Innovations ; Language ; Linguistics ; Literary characters ; Literary devices ; Narrative techniques ; Psycholinguistics ; Semantics ; Studies ; Syntactic structures ; Tense ; Writers</subject><ispartof>English language and linguistics, 2017-07, Vol.21 (2), p.227-250</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-5090a8be2cb58261b78e88c2f02ef3ec87e90e574c021c5337899c683e79cf273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-5090a8be2cb58261b78e88c2f02ef3ec87e90e574c021c5337899c683e79cf273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>PETRÉ, PETER</creatorcontrib><title>The extravagant progressive: an experimental corpus study on the history of emphatic [ be V ing ]</title><title>English language and linguistics</title><description>This article combines methodologies from corpus linguistics with an experimental-like setup more affiliated to psycholinguistic research. The resulting methodology allows us to gain more insight into cognitive motivations of language use in speakers from the past, and consequently to better assess their similarity to present-day speakers (the Uniformitarian Principle). One such cognitive motivation thought to be relevant in the early stages of grammatical constructionalization (grammaticalization) is covered by the evasive concept of ‘extravagance’ (i.e. the desire to talk in such a way that one is noticed). The methodology is tested on the Early Modern English extension of the [ be V ing ]-construction to progressive uses in present-tense main clauses. It is argued, on the basis of recurrent contextual clues, that [ be V ing ] in this novel use is motivated by extravagance. Interestingly, a comparison of two speaker/writer generations that are among the earliest to use this innovation with some frequency suggests that the encoding of extravagance shifted between them. At first, extravagance was signalled by coercion of the still stative semantics of [ be V ing ] into a progressive reading. In the second generation it had become an entrenched characteristic of the construction itself.</description><subject>17th century</subject><subject>Allegory</subject><subject>Ambiguity</subject><subject>Authorial voice</subject><subject>Authorship</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Corpus linguistics</subject><subject>Early Modern English</subject><subject>Encoding (Cognitive process)</subject><subject>Exegesis &amp; hermeneutics</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Grammaticalization</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Literary characters</subject><subject>Literary devices</subject><subject>Narrative techniques</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Syntactic structures</subject><subject>Tense</subject><subject>Writers</subject><issn>1360-6743</issn><issn>1469-4379</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PAF</sourceid><sourceid>PQLNA</sourceid><sourceid>PROLI</sourceid><recordid>eNplkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAewssQ6M7cQPdqjiJVViQWGDUOSYSZqqTYLtVPTvcVV2rGZG98yM7iXkksE1A6ZuXpmQIFUumAIABuqITFguTZYLZY5Tn-Rsr5-SsxBWCRGg5ITYxRIp_kRvt7axXaSD7xuPIbRbvKW2S9qAvt1gF-2aut4PY6Ahjl872nc0puVlG2Lv01hT3AxLG1tHP2iF9J22XUM_z8lJbdcBL_7qlLw93C9mT9n85fF5djfPnGAyZgUYsLpC7qpCc8kqpVFrx2vgWAt0WqEBLFTugDNXCKG0MU5qgcq4misxJVeHu8nB94ghlqt-9F16WTLDpMwBeJ4odqCc70PwWJdDcmf9rmRQ7pMs_yUpfgF7N2VX</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>PETRÉ, PETER</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLO</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PAF</scope><scope>PPXUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQLNA</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PROLI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>The extravagant progressive: an experimental corpus study on the history of emphatic [ be V ing ]</title><author>PETRÉ, PETER</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-5090a8be2cb58261b78e88c2f02ef3ec87e90e574c021c5337899c683e79cf273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>17th century</topic><topic>Allegory</topic><topic>Ambiguity</topic><topic>Authorial voice</topic><topic>Authorship</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Corpus linguistics</topic><topic>Early Modern English</topic><topic>Encoding (Cognitive process)</topic><topic>Exegesis &amp; hermeneutics</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Grammaticalization</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Literary characters</topic><topic>Literary devices</topic><topic>Narrative techniques</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Syntactic structures</topic><topic>Tense</topic><topic>Writers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PETRÉ, PETER</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Literature Online Core (LION Core) (legacy)</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest Learning: Literature</collection><collection>Literature Online Premium (LION Premium) (legacy)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION) - US Customers Only</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>English language and linguistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PETRÉ, PETER</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The extravagant progressive: an experimental corpus study on the history of emphatic [ be V ing ]</atitle><jtitle>English language and linguistics</jtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>227</spage><epage>250</epage><pages>227-250</pages><issn>1360-6743</issn><eissn>1469-4379</eissn><abstract>This article combines methodologies from corpus linguistics with an experimental-like setup more affiliated to psycholinguistic research. The resulting methodology allows us to gain more insight into cognitive motivations of language use in speakers from the past, and consequently to better assess their similarity to present-day speakers (the Uniformitarian Principle). One such cognitive motivation thought to be relevant in the early stages of grammatical constructionalization (grammaticalization) is covered by the evasive concept of ‘extravagance’ (i.e. the desire to talk in such a way that one is noticed). The methodology is tested on the Early Modern English extension of the [ be V ing ]-construction to progressive uses in present-tense main clauses. It is argued, on the basis of recurrent contextual clues, that [ be V ing ] in this novel use is motivated by extravagance. Interestingly, a comparison of two speaker/writer generations that are among the earliest to use this innovation with some frequency suggests that the encoding of extravagance shifted between them. At first, extravagance was signalled by coercion of the still stative semantics of [ be V ing ] into a progressive reading. In the second generation it had become an entrenched characteristic of the construction itself.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1360674317000107</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1360-6743
ispartof English language and linguistics, 2017-07, Vol.21 (2), p.227-250
issn 1360-6743
1469-4379
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1916640024
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects 17th century
Allegory
Ambiguity
Authorial voice
Authorship
Construction
Corpus linguistics
Early Modern English
Encoding (Cognitive process)
Exegesis & hermeneutics
Grammar
Grammaticalization
Hypotheses
Innovations
Language
Linguistics
Literary characters
Literary devices
Narrative techniques
Psycholinguistics
Semantics
Studies
Syntactic structures
Tense
Writers
title The extravagant progressive: an experimental corpus study on the history of emphatic [ be V ing ]
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T12%3A27%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20extravagant%20progressive:%20an%20experimental%20corpus%20study%20on%20the%20history%20of%20emphatic%20%5B%20be%20V%20ing%20%5D&rft.jtitle=English%20language%20and%20linguistics&rft.au=PETR%C3%89,%20PETER&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=227&rft.epage=250&rft.pages=227-250&rft.issn=1360-6743&rft.eissn=1469-4379&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1360674317000107&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1916640024%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1916640024&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true