Police Bias, Use of Deadly Force, Public Outcry
In their article, "A Bird's-Eye View of Civilians Killed by Police in 2015: Further Evidenceof Implicit Bias," Justin Nix, Bradley Campbell, Edward Byers, and Geoffrey Alpert (2017,this issue) analyzed 990 police fatal shootings, which were compiled by The Washington Postin 2015, to a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Criminology & public policy 2017-02, Vol.16 (1), p.305-308 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 308 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 305 |
container_title | Criminology & public policy |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Lim, Hyeyoung |
description | In their article, "A Bird's-Eye View of Civilians Killed by Police in 2015: Further Evidenceof Implicit Bias," Justin Nix, Bradley Campbell, Edward Byers, and Geoffrey Alpert (2017,this issue) analyzed 990 police fatal shootings, which were compiled by The Washington Postin 2015, to answer the following three research questions: (1) What are the individual-, city-, and agency-level characteristics of all civilians fatally shot by police in 2015? (2) Among those fatally shot, were minority civilians more likely than White civilians to have not beenattacking the police or other civilians? (3) Among those fatally shot, were minority civiliansmore likely than White civilians to have been unarmed? To examine police implicit bias,Nix et al. measured threat perception failure by the following two indicators: (1) whether thecivilian was not attacking the officer(s) or other civilians just before being fatally shot and (2) whether the civilian was unarmed when fatally shot. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1745-9133.12293 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1915237545</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1915237545</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1493-18585ee2e0b8eb137712056d1bb737629cc68fb0b929a05d90c65b828f4fc0d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbPXhe8Nu3ObmY_jjVaFQrNwZ6X7GYDKdHUbIPk35u24tG5zMvLwww8hNwDm8M4C1ApJgaEmAPnRlyQyV9zOWYUOpGpEtfkJsYdY4AIOCGLvG1qH-hjXcQZ3cZA24o-haJsBrpqOx9mNO_diNBNf_DdcEuuqqKJ4e53T8l29fyevSbrzctbtlwnHlIjEtCoMQQemNPBgVAKOENZgnNKKMmN91JXjjnDTcGwNMxLdJrrKq08K1MxJQ_nu_uu_epDPNhd23ef40sLBpALhSn-S2nFtOBGspGSZ-q7bsJg9139UXSDBWaP4uxRkz1qsidxNlvm-SmJH5wsXb4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1870832960</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Police Bias, Use of Deadly Force, Public Outcry</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Lim, Hyeyoung</creator><creatorcontrib>Lim, Hyeyoung</creatorcontrib><description>In their article, "A Bird's-Eye View of Civilians Killed by Police in 2015: Further Evidenceof Implicit Bias," Justin Nix, Bradley Campbell, Edward Byers, and Geoffrey Alpert (2017,this issue) analyzed 990 police fatal shootings, which were compiled by The Washington Postin 2015, to answer the following three research questions: (1) What are the individual-, city-, and agency-level characteristics of all civilians fatally shot by police in 2015? (2) Among those fatally shot, were minority civilians more likely than White civilians to have not beenattacking the police or other civilians? (3) Among those fatally shot, were minority civiliansmore likely than White civilians to have been unarmed? To examine police implicit bias,Nix et al. measured threat perception failure by the following two indicators: (1) whether thecivilian was not attacking the officer(s) or other civilians just before being fatally shot and (2) whether the civilian was unarmed when fatally shot.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1538-6473</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-9133</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1745-9133.12293</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: American Society of Criminology</publisher><subject>African Americans ; Bias ; Civilians ; Criminology ; Crowdsourcing ; Deadly force ; Fatalities ; Law enforcement ; Police ; Racial inequality ; Racial profiling ; Shootings</subject><ispartof>Criminology & public policy, 2017-02, Vol.16 (1), p.305-308</ispartof><rights>2017 American Society of Criminology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 of The American Society of Criminology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1493-18585ee2e0b8eb137712056d1bb737629cc68fb0b929a05d90c65b828f4fc0d43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1745-9133.12293$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1745-9133.12293$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27866,27924,27925,33774,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lim, Hyeyoung</creatorcontrib><title>Police Bias, Use of Deadly Force, Public Outcry</title><title>Criminology & public policy</title><description>In their article, "A Bird's-Eye View of Civilians Killed by Police in 2015: Further Evidenceof Implicit Bias," Justin Nix, Bradley Campbell, Edward Byers, and Geoffrey Alpert (2017,this issue) analyzed 990 police fatal shootings, which were compiled by The Washington Postin 2015, to answer the following three research questions: (1) What are the individual-, city-, and agency-level characteristics of all civilians fatally shot by police in 2015? (2) Among those fatally shot, were minority civilians more likely than White civilians to have not beenattacking the police or other civilians? (3) Among those fatally shot, were minority civiliansmore likely than White civilians to have been unarmed? To examine police implicit bias,Nix et al. measured threat perception failure by the following two indicators: (1) whether thecivilian was not attacking the officer(s) or other civilians just before being fatally shot and (2) whether the civilian was unarmed when fatally shot.</description><subject>African Americans</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Civilians</subject><subject>Criminology</subject><subject>Crowdsourcing</subject><subject>Deadly force</subject><subject>Fatalities</subject><subject>Law enforcement</subject><subject>Police</subject><subject>Racial inequality</subject><subject>Racial profiling</subject><subject>Shootings</subject><issn>1538-6473</issn><issn>1745-9133</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbPXhe8Nu3ObmY_jjVaFQrNwZ6X7GYDKdHUbIPk35u24tG5zMvLwww8hNwDm8M4C1ApJgaEmAPnRlyQyV9zOWYUOpGpEtfkJsYdY4AIOCGLvG1qH-hjXcQZ3cZA24o-haJsBrpqOx9mNO_diNBNf_DdcEuuqqKJ4e53T8l29fyevSbrzctbtlwnHlIjEtCoMQQemNPBgVAKOENZgnNKKMmN91JXjjnDTcGwNMxLdJrrKq08K1MxJQ_nu_uu_epDPNhd23ef40sLBpALhSn-S2nFtOBGspGSZ-q7bsJg9139UXSDBWaP4uxRkz1qsidxNlvm-SmJH5wsXb4</recordid><startdate>201702</startdate><enddate>201702</enddate><creator>Lim, Hyeyoung</creator><general>American Society of Criminology</general><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201702</creationdate><title>Police Bias, Use of Deadly Force, Public Outcry</title><author>Lim, Hyeyoung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1493-18585ee2e0b8eb137712056d1bb737629cc68fb0b929a05d90c65b828f4fc0d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>African Americans</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Civilians</topic><topic>Criminology</topic><topic>Crowdsourcing</topic><topic>Deadly force</topic><topic>Fatalities</topic><topic>Law enforcement</topic><topic>Police</topic><topic>Racial inequality</topic><topic>Racial profiling</topic><topic>Shootings</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lim, Hyeyoung</creatorcontrib><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Criminology & public policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lim, Hyeyoung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Police Bias, Use of Deadly Force, Public Outcry</atitle><jtitle>Criminology & public policy</jtitle><date>2017-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>305</spage><epage>308</epage><pages>305-308</pages><issn>1538-6473</issn><eissn>1745-9133</eissn><abstract>In their article, "A Bird's-Eye View of Civilians Killed by Police in 2015: Further Evidenceof Implicit Bias," Justin Nix, Bradley Campbell, Edward Byers, and Geoffrey Alpert (2017,this issue) analyzed 990 police fatal shootings, which were compiled by The Washington Postin 2015, to answer the following three research questions: (1) What are the individual-, city-, and agency-level characteristics of all civilians fatally shot by police in 2015? (2) Among those fatally shot, were minority civilians more likely than White civilians to have not beenattacking the police or other civilians? (3) Among those fatally shot, were minority civiliansmore likely than White civilians to have been unarmed? To examine police implicit bias,Nix et al. measured threat perception failure by the following two indicators: (1) whether thecivilian was not attacking the officer(s) or other civilians just before being fatally shot and (2) whether the civilian was unarmed when fatally shot.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>American Society of Criminology</pub><doi>10.1111/1745-9133.12293</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1538-6473 |
ispartof | Criminology & public policy, 2017-02, Vol.16 (1), p.305-308 |
issn | 1538-6473 1745-9133 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1915237545 |
source | PAIS Index; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | African Americans Bias Civilians Criminology Crowdsourcing Deadly force Fatalities Law enforcement Police Racial inequality Racial profiling Shootings |
title | Police Bias, Use of Deadly Force, Public Outcry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T20%3A17%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Police%20Bias,%20Use%20of%20Deadly%20Force,%20Public%20Outcry&rft.jtitle=Criminology%20&%20public%20policy&rft.au=Lim,%20Hyeyoung&rft.date=2017-02&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=305&rft.epage=308&rft.pages=305-308&rft.issn=1538-6473&rft.eissn=1745-9133&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1745-9133.12293&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E1915237545%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1870832960&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |