The Economic and Energy Effects of Carbon Dioxide Emissions Trading in the International Market: New Challenge Conventional Measurement
Starting from the planned linkage of the European Union’s Emissions Trading System with a new system in Australia in 2015, this paper simulates the impacts of expanding this international emissions market to include China and the USA, which are respectively the largest and second largest carbon diox...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the knowledge economy 2017-06, Vol.8 (2), p.565-584 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 584 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 565 |
container_title | Journal of the knowledge economy |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Younsi, Moheddine Hassine, Amine Ben Hadj Ncir, Mustapha |
description | Starting from the planned linkage of the European Union’s Emissions Trading System with a new system in Australia in 2015, this paper simulates the impacts of expanding this international emissions market to include China and the USA, which are respectively the largest and second largest carbon dioxide emitters in the world. The findings suggest that including China and the USA significantly impacts the price and the quantity of permits traded worldwide. When China joins the EU-Australia-New Zealand (EU-ANZ)-linked market, we find that the prevailing global carbon market price falls significantly, from $35/tCO
2
to $11.4/tCO
2
. In contrast, adding the USA to the EU-ANZ market increases the price to $48/tCO
2
. If both China and the USA join the linked market, the market price of an emissions permit is $18.1/tCO
2
and 610 million metric tons are traded, compared to 95 million metric tons in the EU-ANZ scenario. When permit trading between all countries is considered, relative to when all carbon markets operate in isolation, renewable energy in China expands by more than 22 % and shrinks by 50 and 95 % in the USA and ANZ, respectively. In all scenarios, global emissions are reduced by around 5 % relative to a case without climate policies. Such results may attract the attention of the policy makers as well as the stakeholders for future investment in energy and environmental technology. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13132-015-0264-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1912908884</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1912908884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-3bebf8cccbb1f49e0f768bc440620e820018837d2c8873c82db002fef268cd943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAURCMEEhX0A9hZYh3wIw-HHQoBKhXYlLXlONdtSmIXOwX6Bfw2rgKIDd7Yuj4zujNRdEbwBcE4v_SEEUZjTNIY0yyJ04NoQnjG45zn7PD3naXH0dT7NQ6HFYyQZBJ9LlaAKmWN7VuFpGlQZcAtd6jSGtTgkdWolK62Bt209qNtAt233rfWeLRwsmnNErUGDcFmZgZwRg7hT3boQboXGK7QI7yjciW7DswSUGnNG5gfBKTfOujD4DQ60rLzMP2-T6Ln22pR3sfzp7tZeT2PFUuKIWY11Jorpeqa6KQArPOM1ypJcEYxcIox4ZzlDVU8RFecNjXGVIOmGVdNkbCT6Hz03Tj7ugU_iLXdhqU7L0hBaIE553uKjJRy1nsHWmxc20u3EwSLfeVirFyEysW-cpEGDR01PrAhqvvj_K_oCxw5hNI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1912908884</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Economic and Energy Effects of Carbon Dioxide Emissions Trading in the International Market: New Challenge Conventional Measurement</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Younsi, Moheddine ; Hassine, Amine Ben Hadj ; Ncir, Mustapha</creator><creatorcontrib>Younsi, Moheddine ; Hassine, Amine Ben Hadj ; Ncir, Mustapha</creatorcontrib><description>Starting from the planned linkage of the European Union’s Emissions Trading System with a new system in Australia in 2015, this paper simulates the impacts of expanding this international emissions market to include China and the USA, which are respectively the largest and second largest carbon dioxide emitters in the world. The findings suggest that including China and the USA significantly impacts the price and the quantity of permits traded worldwide. When China joins the EU-Australia-New Zealand (EU-ANZ)-linked market, we find that the prevailing global carbon market price falls significantly, from $35/tCO
2
to $11.4/tCO
2
. In contrast, adding the USA to the EU-ANZ market increases the price to $48/tCO
2
. If both China and the USA join the linked market, the market price of an emissions permit is $18.1/tCO
2
and 610 million metric tons are traded, compared to 95 million metric tons in the EU-ANZ scenario. When permit trading between all countries is considered, relative to when all carbon markets operate in isolation, renewable energy in China expands by more than 22 % and shrinks by 50 and 95 % in the USA and ANZ, respectively. In all scenarios, global emissions are reduced by around 5 % relative to a case without climate policies. Such results may attract the attention of the policy makers as well as the stakeholders for future investment in energy and environmental technology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1868-7865</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1868-7873</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13132-015-0264-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Carbon ; Chemical industry ; Economic Policy ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Emissions trading ; Entrepreneurship ; Environmental policy ; Market prices ; R & D/Technology Policy</subject><ispartof>Journal of the knowledge economy, 2017-06, Vol.8 (2), p.565-584</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</rights><rights>Journal of the Knowledge Economy is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-3bebf8cccbb1f49e0f768bc440620e820018837d2c8873c82db002fef268cd943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-3bebf8cccbb1f49e0f768bc440620e820018837d2c8873c82db002fef268cd943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13132-015-0264-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13132-015-0264-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Younsi, Moheddine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassine, Amine Ben Hadj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ncir, Mustapha</creatorcontrib><title>The Economic and Energy Effects of Carbon Dioxide Emissions Trading in the International Market: New Challenge Conventional Measurement</title><title>Journal of the knowledge economy</title><addtitle>J Knowl Econ</addtitle><description>Starting from the planned linkage of the European Union’s Emissions Trading System with a new system in Australia in 2015, this paper simulates the impacts of expanding this international emissions market to include China and the USA, which are respectively the largest and second largest carbon dioxide emitters in the world. The findings suggest that including China and the USA significantly impacts the price and the quantity of permits traded worldwide. When China joins the EU-Australia-New Zealand (EU-ANZ)-linked market, we find that the prevailing global carbon market price falls significantly, from $35/tCO
2
to $11.4/tCO
2
. In contrast, adding the USA to the EU-ANZ market increases the price to $48/tCO
2
. If both China and the USA join the linked market, the market price of an emissions permit is $18.1/tCO
2
and 610 million metric tons are traded, compared to 95 million metric tons in the EU-ANZ scenario. When permit trading between all countries is considered, relative to when all carbon markets operate in isolation, renewable energy in China expands by more than 22 % and shrinks by 50 and 95 % in the USA and ANZ, respectively. In all scenarios, global emissions are reduced by around 5 % relative to a case without climate policies. Such results may attract the attention of the policy makers as well as the stakeholders for future investment in energy and environmental technology.</description><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Chemical industry</subject><subject>Economic Policy</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Emissions trading</subject><subject>Entrepreneurship</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Market prices</subject><subject>R & D/Technology Policy</subject><issn>1868-7865</issn><issn>1868-7873</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAURCMEEhX0A9hZYh3wIw-HHQoBKhXYlLXlONdtSmIXOwX6Bfw2rgKIDd7Yuj4zujNRdEbwBcE4v_SEEUZjTNIY0yyJ04NoQnjG45zn7PD3naXH0dT7NQ6HFYyQZBJ9LlaAKmWN7VuFpGlQZcAtd6jSGtTgkdWolK62Bt209qNtAt233rfWeLRwsmnNErUGDcFmZgZwRg7hT3boQboXGK7QI7yjciW7DswSUGnNG5gfBKTfOujD4DQ60rLzMP2-T6Ln22pR3sfzp7tZeT2PFUuKIWY11Jorpeqa6KQArPOM1ypJcEYxcIox4ZzlDVU8RFecNjXGVIOmGVdNkbCT6Hz03Tj7ugU_iLXdhqU7L0hBaIE553uKjJRy1nsHWmxc20u3EwSLfeVirFyEysW-cpEGDR01PrAhqvvj_K_oCxw5hNI</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Younsi, Moheddine</creator><creator>Hassine, Amine Ben Hadj</creator><creator>Ncir, Mustapha</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>The Economic and Energy Effects of Carbon Dioxide Emissions Trading in the International Market: New Challenge Conventional Measurement</title><author>Younsi, Moheddine ; Hassine, Amine Ben Hadj ; Ncir, Mustapha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-3bebf8cccbb1f49e0f768bc440620e820018837d2c8873c82db002fef268cd943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Chemical industry</topic><topic>Economic Policy</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Emissions trading</topic><topic>Entrepreneurship</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Market prices</topic><topic>R & D/Technology Policy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Younsi, Moheddine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassine, Amine Ben Hadj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ncir, Mustapha</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the knowledge economy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Younsi, Moheddine</au><au>Hassine, Amine Ben Hadj</au><au>Ncir, Mustapha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Economic and Energy Effects of Carbon Dioxide Emissions Trading in the International Market: New Challenge Conventional Measurement</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the knowledge economy</jtitle><stitle>J Knowl Econ</stitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>565</spage><epage>584</epage><pages>565-584</pages><issn>1868-7865</issn><eissn>1868-7873</eissn><abstract>Starting from the planned linkage of the European Union’s Emissions Trading System with a new system in Australia in 2015, this paper simulates the impacts of expanding this international emissions market to include China and the USA, which are respectively the largest and second largest carbon dioxide emitters in the world. The findings suggest that including China and the USA significantly impacts the price and the quantity of permits traded worldwide. When China joins the EU-Australia-New Zealand (EU-ANZ)-linked market, we find that the prevailing global carbon market price falls significantly, from $35/tCO
2
to $11.4/tCO
2
. In contrast, adding the USA to the EU-ANZ market increases the price to $48/tCO
2
. If both China and the USA join the linked market, the market price of an emissions permit is $18.1/tCO
2
and 610 million metric tons are traded, compared to 95 million metric tons in the EU-ANZ scenario. When permit trading between all countries is considered, relative to when all carbon markets operate in isolation, renewable energy in China expands by more than 22 % and shrinks by 50 and 95 % in the USA and ANZ, respectively. In all scenarios, global emissions are reduced by around 5 % relative to a case without climate policies. Such results may attract the attention of the policy makers as well as the stakeholders for future investment in energy and environmental technology.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s13132-015-0264-5</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1868-7865 |
ispartof | Journal of the knowledge economy, 2017-06, Vol.8 (2), p.565-584 |
issn | 1868-7865 1868-7873 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1912908884 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Carbon Chemical industry Economic Policy Economics Economics and Finance Emissions trading Entrepreneurship Environmental policy Market prices R & D/Technology Policy |
title | The Economic and Energy Effects of Carbon Dioxide Emissions Trading in the International Market: New Challenge Conventional Measurement |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T09%3A07%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Economic%20and%20Energy%20Effects%20of%20Carbon%20Dioxide%20Emissions%20Trading%20in%20the%20International%20Market:%20New%20Challenge%20Conventional%20Measurement&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20knowledge%20economy&rft.au=Younsi,%20Moheddine&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=565&rft.epage=584&rft.pages=565-584&rft.issn=1868-7865&rft.eissn=1868-7873&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13132-015-0264-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1912908884%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1912908884&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |